Debt Rattle January 12 2021

[Huskynut]

@Booglaoo

So… if we abrogate personal responsibility, and allow our governments to make drastic interventions without either full information or cost/benefit analysis, then we can as societies all derive the benefits?
I can’t see any problems with that.. can you?

Re: Ivermectin, I totally agree. It’s an effective prophylactic and treatment that we could distribute at minimal cost *without any recourse to masks, lockdowns or semi-totalitarian compulsion.
Even better, those that didn’t want the proposed benefits of a long-standing treatment with known side-effects could opt out and take the consequences as they landed.
As opposed to compelling people to take action for benefit of others (not for themselves) off the back of minimally documented or tested science. Ie compel people to act prior to any scientifically-significant evidence.
So sure, your beliefs and mine don’t coincide. Be as antisocial as you wish, and I will feel free to refute as I see fit.

[WES]

Boogaloo:

I would hardly call you antisocial!

Commenting is being very social indeed!

[zerosum]

Lots of comments. Something is changing. I don’t know what or why.
By the way, I still only see one common factor for the covid 19 to be doing so much damage to the elderly, around the world yearly, repeat dose of “flue vaccines”.

[Author]

Posts