Debt Rattle April 11 2024

 

Home Forums The Automatic Earth Forum Debt Rattle April 11 2024

Viewing 2 posts - 41 through 42 (of 42 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #156638
    zerosum
    Participant

    Yes …. Your computer is watching what you are doing/seeing/online activities
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/welcome-to-the-msn-home-page-40ea6a77-a9cd-a729-18ad-58227e97f631
    Welcome to the MSN home page
    We use optional cookies to improve your experience on our websites, such as through social media connections, and to display personalized advertising based on your online activity. If you reject optional cookies, only cookies necessary to provide you the services will be used. You may change your selection by clicking “Manage Cookies” at the bottom of the page. Privacy Statement Third-Party Cookies

    #156652
    TAE Summary
    Participant

    “The conveyor belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels, moving in the opposite direction”

    Wheels on an airplane are passive components. If the airplane moves forward even an inch the conveyor would try to move at an infinite speed to keep up. The backward force of the belt would only be meaningful if there was significant friction on the bearings of the wheels. That is the gist of Maxwell Quest’s response. The belt would have to go fast enough to destroy the bearings so that they could generate enough friction to produce the force to keep the plane from moving and this would need to happen very quickly. The acceleration on the belt is unimaginable. Conveyor belts like this can only be designed by spherical chickens.

Viewing 2 posts - 41 through 42 (of 42 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.