Debt Rattle March 1 2016

[Raúl Ilargi Meijer]

NPC “.. the hearty cereal beverage with flavor and tang, Altemus-Hibble truck” 1920 • China Faces $15 Trillion Bombshell As Shadow Banking Sector Coll
[See the full post at: Debt Rattle March 1 2016]

[Nassim]

I know that Kosovo is no longer in the news. However, the disastrous intervention of NATO in the ex-Yugoslavia is now giving fruit – Kosovars are leaving in droves towards Germany. Kosovo is run by gangsters – with the full connivance of NATO.

“The Migrant Crisis and its Impact on Europe”

https://www.fort-russ.com/2016/03/the-migrant-crisis-and-its-impact-on.html

[Nassim]

An article explaining how Russia is now playing the game of capitalism as well as the West – in Ukraine.

“Ukrainian Banking Sector Is Becoming Russian”

https://www.fort-russ.com/2016/03/ukrainian-banking-sector-is-becoming.html

[Nassim]

It seems the ISIL is busy devouring its own children. I do wish they would publish this more widely. Perhaps then, the idiots in the UK, Netherlands and so on would stop moving to the Middle East.

“ISIL Executes Own Dutch Militants in Raqqa”

https://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13941211001278

“ISIS executed eight of their Dutch members in east of Raqqa”

https://www.raqqa-sl.co/en/?p=1691

BTW, it seems these people were of Moroccan lineage. Not a great idea to let Moroccans into places like the Netherlands and Norway IMHO. In Norway, according to my son, they have destroyed the disco/nightclub culture. Gays cannot walk the streets of a large part of Oslo. Brave fake liberals.

[Babble]

Everyone seems to think it is Europe’s responsibility to take in hundreds of thousands of refugees. The first problem is that these people have kids like rabbits, producing overpopulation in unstable societies. The second is that all these people will need billions of Euros to support and they won’t stop coming. Russia is a major cause of these refugees. Assad has been supported militarily by Russia and has been bombing civilians without much discrimination (Just like their proxy, Assad). There are no articles about sending the refugees to Russia, NONE! This is utter hypocrisy. Europe should tell all the refugees, from this point on, that they will be given transport to the Ukraine – Russian border for entry to Russia. This will thwart both the flow of refugees and make Russia responsible for what they have caused. Wake up Europe and the west.

[Dr. Diablo]

That’s interesting, that Russia in theory could use the population and it would take the edge off the crisis, but there’s a gap in your presentation: There is only one country in Syria that was invited by the legitimate and elected government: Russia. That means every other nation there has invaded, which is by definition a war crime. “The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg…called the waging of aggressive war “the supreme international crime…as it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” (Wikipedia)

I don’t have to cite fringe media to report that there are something like 13 nations fielding armies in Syria. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_involvement_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War
That means something like 10 foreign invaders, unauthorized by the U.N. or any other body, who have invaded a sovereign nation who has attacked no one and has no declaration of war. WWII did not even start so large or so baldly.

It may be harder to stomach, but the United States, Britain and France are openly among those invading armies, and are supporting Al-Queda, as reported by the Christian Science Monitor and MSNBC. It’s easy to find pictures of the original meetings between John McCain and ISIS-head Al-Baghdadi back in 2013. It wasn’t exactly a secret, as the staged protests, then rebellion were fully backed by the U.S. from top to bottom with the “Assad must go” slogan openly promoted by Sec Clinton. It’s child’s play to find the original funding, its broad Congressional support, and training of Al-Quaedan Syrian rebels in Jordan.

Let me ask you, what gives Clinton the legal right to decide who will be the leader of another nation? How would you feel about China funding and training Texans in Mexico to start a civil war in Oklahoma and secede from the nation by shelling Washington? Feeling that might be illegal and unsavory, against international law? That’s what happened in Syria, funded by the U.S. and allies such as Saudi Arabia in a gambit to run a pipeline from U.A.E. and Qatar through Syria to cut off Russian gas sales in Europe.

Later support of the U.S. and allies to ISIS is much less clear, but it’s on record that the U.S. left billions in weaponry to be captured–a court-martial offense–Saudi Arabia is openly fielding an invading army, and Turkey is both buying oil (funding) and trafficking arms. Since this has led to no reproach by anyone in the West, and the U.S. took over an airbase in Syria, France is sending a warship, and U.K. is openly bombing (again, all illegally) you have to believe they approve strongly enough to violate the Hague, the Nuremberg precedent, and International Law.

That Russia was the only nation that chose to uphold international law against sovereign invasion is a sign of how lawless the world has become. That Russia is in the legal right, and the U.S. in the legal wrong contradicts what you’re arguing. Syria has been invaded, not least by a few nations in Europe. Russia, now Iran, and possibly China, are the only nations preventing this 4-year old illegal invasion that has killed 500,000 and displaced 2.5 million, women and children—every one of them illegally.

Moving on, how (or why) has Russia been bombing civilians? Russia and Syria have been working together closely to regain control of the country for the legitimate central government. When you’re trying to re-take your house from bandits, do you generally shoot your family and burn the house? No. You want to own it again, in as unharmed a state as possible. And so with the Syrians–be they good or bad, whether we like them or not: they want the country intact and the people willing to be under their control. In addition, the U.S. has refused every effort to provide legal evidence of Russia’s crimes, relying on innuendo.

Now, just because Europe was semi-complicit in this war crime also doesn’t mean they have a responsibility to accept the entire Middle Eastern population. –Even so, they are being further pressured to accept the entire North African, African, Afghan and Pakistani populations. At the same time, any logical, practical person would be content to simply end the invasion, end the illegal bombing of an unaggressive sovereign nation, and pay some paltry restitution, so that the Syrians could leave Europe, go home, and rebuild their nation in peace. …But then, the U.S. would lose its bid to control Europe and take over the world, and have to live within her means like a normal country. This is expressly against U.S. policy, as stated in the Wolfowitz Doctrine.

[Author]

Posts