Debt Rattle March 15 2026
- This topic has 54 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 3 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
wow, from the declaration of “all men are created equal” to ““We may hit it a few more times just for fun,” said the US leader.
wow…
acoustic detection systems,
– Ukraine’s “Sky Fortress” system uses 14,000 acoustic sensors to detect Shahed drones by their “lawnmower” sound.
– Zvook acoustic network covers 5% of Ukraine and provides early warning.
– Czech JALUD Sound Event Detector identifies drones by sound and alerts security forces.
– Academic systems combine sound + cameras for precise localization.———–
Russia is now fielding at least four distinct acoustic detection systems, ranging from large reconnaissance arrays to smartphone‑based FPV detectors. All are designed to counter Ukraine’s long‑range drones and FPV swarms, and several are direct copies of Ukrainian innovations.
– BUH2 “Sova” (2nd‑generation acoustic reconnaissance system)
– Malik (wearable/mobile acoustic drone detector)
– A new smartphone‑linked acoustic FPV‑drone detector
– A tower‑mounted acoustic network copying Ukraine’s “Zvook” system
These are all confirmed by Russian state media (TASS) and independent defense reporting.Once located acoustically, other systems take over:
Interception methods
– Electronic warfare (jamming)
– RF takeover
– Kinetic interceptors (guns, missiles, anti‑drone drones)
– Laser systems
– Net guns / net drones
Acoustic detection is just the first step in the kill chain.Iraq: a US base in the Middle East was attacked by a fiber-optic drone–US has no defense: “Footage is circulating on the network, which allegedly captures the first use of an FPV drone with a fiber-optic communication channel against the American military base Victoria in Iraq. According to sources, the attack could have been carried out by the pro-Iranian Shiite group Kataib Hezbollah.
Fiber-optic FPV drones in the Middle East conflict zone are a serious concern to the US military. Such devices are extremely difficult to suppress by means of electronic warfare, since they do not use a radio channel. Moreover, for many standard air defense systems, such drones are a very difficult target due to their small size and low speed. -Tsargrad
https://x.com/amborin/status/2033198900484653155
Posted by: Allen | Mar 15 2026 16:40 utc | 709
Tel Avi Satellite Photos:
Yesterday, I saw a link provided by a ZH commentor to the Iranians providing a satellite close up of Tel Avi showing some of the damage done by Iranian missiles.
Israeli Government Bonds:
Not too long ago, I read how some US counties (in Florida?) were moving their cash into safe Israeli government bonds.
I expect this move will turn out very badly for these counties, in that these bonds are not liquid or require a big hair cut to sell.
Of course, no one will be fired over this!Michael:
I think Trump knowing that the RINOs planned to lose both the house and senate, played a major role in Trump decision in attacking Iran/London.
barnes isn’t shocking, it’s obvious.
flip that burger* now and convict these lunatics. make america finally great by reading your own constitution, for the love of moo.
it is the only way the empire can retreat.
if the bull is in the china shop, you don’t wait until november to get him out.
*shucks, put some of that ‘yummy’ american cheez** on it.
** protip: the transparent wrapper isn’t actually part of the cheez. don’t melt that on the grill
Don’t expect any of our Satanic adversaries to change much about what they’re doing. What else could one reasonably expect? Should we sagely and thoughtfully expect the perps to fall on their knees and beg for forgiveness? Or would it be more realistically expectant that they would double-down on the only things that they know how to do to stay alive? [that is, lie, cheat. steal and kill, etc.]
Psycho:
Somettimes … I read a comment … and go WOW … what a psycho … then I press post …
The Odessa File – ZH
Lying with the explicit intention of causing culpable harm to another person or persons is not protected free speech, because the parts of it which were explicitly directed toward the intended felony were not speech. THOSE parts of it were the actual felonious crime itself. Every other part of the communication in question (the freely spoken parts) get a free pass. But the CRIMINAL FELONIOUS ACT does not, because it wasn’t actually “speech” in the first place at all. It was crime.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.