Debt Rattle November 1 2018
- This topic has 12 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Francisco Goya Witches’ Sabbath 1797-98 • US Wages And Salaries Jump By 3.1%, Highest Level In A Decade (CNBC) • Chinese Yuan Tumbles To New Cy
[See the full post at: Debt Rattle November 1 2018]Earths remaining wilderness; mostly in Russia.
How about that?
It should explain the U.S. insistence to destroy Russia and take its vast untapped resources.
It’s that simple!
And if you don’t believe it; you’re delusional and under the control of the machine that is the U.S. hegemon.
It is also why Russia will never, ever, under any circumstance, bend the knee to the US!
Russia will protect and utilize its vast resources in a responsible manner.
GMO’s are not allowed; organic is the thrust of Russian agriculture; and it’s working.
Oh, and yes, I’m an unabashed Russophile…Hard to be scared of a guy without opposable thumbs.
I drew a different conclusion from the seas: Once again, science admits they didn’t know what they were talking about and had to issue a correction. They were wrong by a 60% factor. This is in addition to how they don’t know, or are also arguing about, the actual level of CO2 emissions, and especially about how much consequence those estimated emissions have on heat in comparison to arctic methane, water vapor, and my favorite, solar intensity and sunspots. So in this article they are (wrongly) assuming any of that is known and settled, so they can measure very precisely how wrong they were and dramatically move on to making the case about how they didn’t realize the seas are really large. Funny, because the rest of us knew that. Large heat sinks, mostly because they are deep, unlike the land mass; and large, unimaginably massive sink for CO2, as it interacts with water, but also will change the pH. How much, nobody knows that level either.
Science: always wrong, never in doubt.
You know, it used to be to not be considered a grade-school moron and be drummed out of science in ignominy and disgrace, you had run experiments that got you under a 10% error rate — like 2-3%, to be considered credible in any possible fashion. Now? Meh, wrong by 60%, wrong on 100% of your climate models for 20 years in a row, it’s all good. Being wrong every year on every study just proves how expert you are. …Because all the other IYI experts are totally wrong in their fields: economics, sociology, heck, even physics hasn’t come up with a working theory since the 70s. Hawking tossed out the theory that made him famous on black holes, and the next day, they’re real again, used to calculate “dark matter” where science doesn’t know what 60% of the universe is made of. When are they going to call it in and start looking for a new approach? Open up to ideas that were considered taboo, all other avenues having been exhausted? Not in my lifetime, apparently.
“Sounds terrifying — until you actually look at what happened to global temperature after Gore’s film was released. Global temperatures showed little to no warming trend after Gore released his film. In fact, surface temperature data showed no significant global warming for a period of about 15 years, starting in the early 2000s…Satellite-derived temperature data showed, until the recent El Niño, no statistically significant warming trend for more than 21 years.”
And that’s with horrific and biased data throughout:
Honest errors like reading 82°c in Columbia (hot enough for tea?) and -46°c in Romania…in September. An average temperature of 0°c in the Caribbean, and altered sea temperatures…altered by their being taking aboard ships 100km inland. You know, little errors like that. Science! This is the root data set they’re using for historical temperatures. Just as we saw with erasing the Medieval Warming Period, the Dust Bowl, and record-cold in Australia. Their answer: “No we didn’t.” even though you can go to any newspaper archive or almanac and prove it did. The earth may actually be warming. It may even be because of CO2. But you won’t know it from these models and data sets because they’d be drummed out of a grade-school science fair with a baking soda volcano.
What can I say? No matter how many times we show the data sets, they suddenly “lose” the satellite data, then the whole satellite, then the ice cores, then the ice cores show the opposite of their theory, then they are exposed in emails as having rigged the data intentionally to frame their arguments, then they refuse to give the black-box climate model one researcher showed would make temperatures rise regardless of the input data, they’re still considered fully credible. This issue is fact-and-evidence free, a “science-free zone”, if you will. No one is embarrassed, no one is drummed out, no one fixes the data, no one reveals their methods. That is to say: it is literally not science, which requires open data, repeatable experiments, and predictions that are substantiated by time. …Not to mention consequences for being caught openly lying and fabricating for profit. Day after day, decade after decade. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
So…anybody follow the most recent word-soup papers happily published by “science”?
https://www.timesofisrael.com/duped-academic-journal-publishes-rewrite-of-mein-kampf-as-feminist-manifesto/
They had literally no trouble publishing more multiple papers of stark raving nonsense, computer-generated word soup. One journal even asked them to help with science peer review. BBC checked their story no further than those hoax journals did, then hand it to us for belief and consumption. Yes, BBC, the oceans are large. Science admits they can’t calculate what that means, so we have no idea if that’s warming absorbed, or if it isn’t; and therefore whether warming exists, or doesn’t, because they’re predicating an assumption they can’t prove on a model they can’t prove. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning #notscience.Ugh! Science is important! Why are they determined to make it look bad?
The goat is old Nick. Beelzebub. Mephistopheles. Dare I say, Say-tan?
He looks a bit less formidable when he can’t even sit comfortably.
Hey Arnold,
Well, they’re witches aren’t they? Admittedly they’re wearing rather a lot of clothes for witches, but the goat is the hornèd one, Pan, Herne, Cernunnos, it’s where they get their power from. Did you never wonder where the expression “feeling horny” came from?
Here is what got me thinking, this morning.
“Economists define a zombie firm as one which is at least 10 years old but is unable to cover its costs with its profits.”
What do you call a gov. that is unable to cover its costs with taxes?
What do you call a person that is unable to cover its cost with their income?
Hehehehe !
(The last one is easy)
For small changes in sea water temperature, oxygen solubility doesn’t change all that much.
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/docs/documents/841/oxygen_solubility_fresh_sea_water.pdf
If survival of sea life is a concern, perhaps more attention should be paid to overfishing, plastic trash, pesticides and SSRI’s washing off the continents, etc. But of course, those don’t support the AGW deception. I don’t see see people living in mountainous regions dying off due to thin air. Why wouldn’t ocean species be at least as robust considering the much wider swings in ocean temperatures throughout evolutionary time?
Off topic, but I’ve just gotta say that this interview was a real breath of fresh air. A poignant exposure of the PC madness emanating from universities. Global warming hype is merely a different flavor of the same dynamic.
On a potentially more optimistic note:
Life (probably) adapts to quantum conditions. Are we (entangled) on that spectrum?
Coles and company sequestered several hundred photosynthetic green sulfur bacteria between two mirrors, progressively shrinking the gap between the mirrors down to a few hundred nanometers—less than the width of a human hair. By bouncing white light between the mirrors, the researchers hoped to cause the photosynthetic molecules within the bacteria to couple—or interact—with the cavity, essentially meaning the bacteria would continuously absorb, emit and reabsorb the bouncing photons. The experiment was successful; up to six bacteria did appear to couple in this manner… In essence, it appears certain photons were simultaneously hitting and missing photosynthetic molecules within the bacteria—a hallmark of entanglement. “Our models show that this phenomenon being recorded is a signature of entanglement between light and certain degrees of freedom inside the bacteria” …“It certainly is key to demonstrating that we are some way toward the idea of a ‘Schrödinger’s bacterium,’ if you will,” he says. And it hints at another potential instance of naturally emerging quantum biology: Green sulfur bacteria reside in the deep ocean where the scarcity of life-giving light might even spur quantum-mechanical evolutionary adaptations to boost photosynthesis...
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/schroedingers-bacterium-could-be-a-quantum-biology-milestone/Francisco Goya Witches’ Sabbath 1797-98
“Goya’s depictions of such scenes mocked what he saw as medieval fears exploited by the established order for political and capital gain.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witches%27_Sabbath_(Goya,_1798)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.