Debt Rattle October 24 2024

 

Home Forums The Automatic Earth Forum Debt Rattle October 24 2024

Viewing 22 posts - 41 through 62 (of 62 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #172398
    Oroboros
    Participant

    Pedo Diddy Pizzagate Hookup

    It involves any one who anyone in the Entertainment Propaganda Industrial Complex®

    The West Coast equivalent of Epstein’s East Coast Pedo-ganda Empire

    Smile you fuckers!

    .

    #172399
    Oroboros
    Participant

    .

    #172405
    aspnaz
    Participant

    jb-hb said

    Let’s see if I got it right – jet black hair, unappealing bangs, nearly-black lipstick, the exact glasses you are picturing in your head right now, tatoos including around and under the chin as well as occult-looking ones on the palms.

    Reading the same yesterday …

    https://www.unz.com/article/like-venomous-reptiles-they-warn-us/

    cult of the ugly

    I particularly liked this video where the woman works sort of out why men are not attracted to her … answer, men can see the ugly beneath the facade.

    https://www.youtube .com/watch?v=JK-JvmaImzc

    #172406
    oxymoron
    Participant

    jb-hb in case you missed it. Why Academia is Woman’s Work.
    https://substack.com/@barsoom/p-150318209

    #172407
    oxymoron
    Participant

    Michael Reid – Great content and links – thank you.

    #172408
    jb-hb
    Participant

    interesting Oxymoron – still reading through it.

    His assumptions about male/female differences in “energy investment” in reproduction and related behavior are total nonsense and very old fashioned.

    Humans do not hatch from eggs and go off to survive alone like lizards.

    Humans take around 15-20 years to mature and in that time, historically fathers participate in raising these children.

    DARWIN is the ultimate arbiter here. Continuation of your genes.

    What is Concealed Ovulation? What sort of behavior is it associated with? Male or female behavior?

    Who is in doubt as to whether the energy of TWENTY YEARS is being spent on one’s progeny or someone else’s progeny?

    Who is never ever in doubt as to whether THEIR twenty years are being spent on their own progeny or someone else’s?

    Who can and who cannot be deceived into devoting their entire life towards, essentially, non reproduction – under the impression that they HAVE reproduced?

    Females ALWAYS know that, from a darwinian standpoint, which is the only one that counts from a biological-scientific perspective, whether they are investing their life’s energy in their own genetic line.

    The whole “females have to invest all the energy. Men are only/mostly motivated to Spread Their Seed” is white-knighting. Epic simping.

    Human beings take a couple decades to mature. Simps want to make out that fathers do not matter in the survival and eventual reproductive success of their own offspring – or some comparatively negligible amount. (lol presumably to get laid?) This is super misandrist. And in total defiance of nature, science, reality, and common sense.

    #172409
    zerosum
    Participant

    Hate speech It’s more than “name calling”
    In one word … Trump is …
    Fascist
    Hitler
    Dictator
    Dangerous
    etc.
    (If you were in Canada, Trudeau would put you in jail.

    #172410
    oxymoron
    Participant

    Jb-hb said – “Simps want to make out that fathers do not matter in the survival and eventual reproductive success of their own offspring – or some comparatively negligible amount. (lol presumably to get laid?) This is super misandrist. And in total defiance of nature, science, reality, and common sense.”

    To which I reply as only an anecdote – I didn’t have one. But in reality there was daddy government and then for a while a step-father. So some help I guess.
    I think the article stands but yes poke holes in it please – I was less rigorous and appreciate the arguments.

    #172411
    poppie
    Participant

    jb-hb. that was a top notch rant

    #172412
    Oroboros
    Participant

    A New Job Description

    Wow: Facebook has special pro-Jewish Diaspora director to amplify positive content

    Facebook has a person who is solely in charge of amplifying pro Jewish content and censoring antisemitic content.

    “It is not allowed to say ‘Jews run the world’ on our platform”

    — Facebook’s “Jewish Diaspora” chief Jordana Cutler

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/H7RwRnP8pzTU

    #172413
    Oroboros
    Participant

    .

    #172414
    Oroboros
    Participant

    .

    #172415
    Oroboros
    Participant

    .

    #172416
    aspnaz
    Participant

    oxymoron said

    I think the article stands but yes poke holes in it please – I was less rigorous and appreciate the arguments.

    Watch child rearing among natives in Africa and you will see that it is the female community that brings up the boys until they reach manhood – 11 to 13 – then they join leave the female communityand join the men as a provider, learning their provider skills from the older men.

    Thanks for the article, very interesting and gives you some hope that woke has not driven the man out of the latest generations.

    #172417
    aspnaz
    Participant

    Oroboros said

    Facebook has a person who is solely in charge of amplifying pro Jewish content and censoring antisemitic content.

    How is being pro-Jewish any less racist than being anti-Jewish.

    #172418
    WES
    Participant

    jb – hb:

    Your observations about women remind me of my travails with women.

    Being a bit shy, very logical, and financially conservative. I had very little dating experience with women, from a teenager and through out my twenties. It ,was only in my early thirties, after losing my mining job, and returning home to Toronto, that I tried to start dating women.

    Needless to say I wasn’t very successful at dating. I can count all my dates on my fingers and still have a few fingers to spare. By the way I don’t drink, smoke, or do drugs. Whatever women want in a man, I clearly didn’t have what they all seemed to want.

    I wanted to start a family. That eliminated most women right there! I valued close family relations. I came from a stable family background. I am comfortable being an intellectual or working with my hands as a jack of all trades. I can even cook!

    Through hard work, I was now in a position, where I could afford and support a wife. I wanted a stay at home wife, to raise the children. I liked to spend time at the family island cottage. Nothing fancy. Just a boring stay at home with my woman, man.

    None of these things much interested most women. They didn’t seem to want a stable established man without previous baggage of an ex and kids.

    To be honest, except for my wife who I married when I was 40, I still have no clue to this day what it is women want from a man! I will never solve this problem.

    I read/heard all the time about women leaving their previous relationship and wondered why these women didn’t want anything to do with a man who would value them? Another unsolved problem.

    Maybe only the women can answer these questions?
    Maybe it is a secret that women hide from men?

    #172419
    WES
    Participant

    A funny antidote:

    When my younger sister met her husband, she was shocked that he had no idea how use tools, build things, or fix anything that broke around the house/car.

    She grew up with a father and 2 older brothers who had tools and could build or fix anything that broke around the house/car.

    She just assumed every man was born naturally knowing all of this stuff!
    I9time, her husband redeemed himself!

    #172420
    aspnaz
    Participant

    @oxymoron The article you posted contained a link to an article by a more feminist author … https://celestemdavis.substack.com/p/why-boys-dont-go-to-college/comments#comment-71626545.

    Although a very interesting article, the comments are a nightmare with anyone supporting men being ridiculed and insulted … reminds me why I never considered marrying a white woman, the westernnwoman is mostly horrible.

    #172426
    oxymoron
    Participant

    DoD can now assassinate you on your own soil for wrongthink. Didn’t this all escalate rather quickly.

    https://open.substack.com/pub/radicalamerican/p/the-spooks-new-license-to-kill?r=nv8me&utm_medium=ios

    #172427
    Dr D Rich
    Participant

    @aspnaz

    That’s not just rhetorical flourish. It’s also the foundational grift at the dark heart of the matter.
    They’re caught in the web of their own cognitive construction when your question is asked the apologists. I’m sure it’s soothed over by money, land and title. You know, the standard fair of money addicts

    “How is being pro-Jewish any less racist than being anti-Jewish?’

    #172438
    aspnaz
    Participant
    #172473
    John Day
    Participant

    @jb-hb: Something like BRICS membership might help?


    @oxymoron
    : My wife knows I would die for her because I put my life on the line for a married lady I just met, in Galveston Bay in 1986, and we did both live, but we could have died…


    @Michael
    Reid: Yes, not a machine, unless you believe you are a machine. Can’t really convince a machine person that they are not, and that everybody else is not, or a sociopath that all people are feeling-humans. Vonnegut dealt with it in Breakfast Of Champions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakfast_of_Champions

Viewing 22 posts - 41 through 62 (of 62 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.