
Odilon Redon The boat 1900


Prayer
The Prayer is a robotic mouth by artist Diemut Strebe that chants algorithmically generated prayers.pic.twitter.com/B2w0B7zH0u
— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) May 30, 2025
Ron Paul
DOGE embodied The Original American Spirit.
America's Founders would have jumped for joy.
Both parties squashed it. pic.twitter.com/MRS6AJncNG
— Ron Paul (@RonPaul) May 30, 2025
Yellen
Janet Yellen looks terrible. pic.twitter.com/XTc7EgVx6A
— Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator. (@RudyHavenstein) September 19, 2024
Doge
— Dan Scavino (@Scavino47) May 31, 2025
🚨 President Trump just posted this EPIC video honoring @ElonMusk and his service to our country
EVERY SECOND of this is worth watching.
It’s been an incredible ride.
THANK YOU, ELON! 🚀🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/3yTn8UpMKG
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) May 30, 2025


The year was 2014…
• Angela Merkel Started The EU Migrant Crisis, And She Wants It To Continue (RT)
The former chancellor is back in the news, lecturing her fellow citizens to allow more asylum seekers into their country even as Germany is plagued by rampant crime and dismal economic factors.If it is true that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results, then we can say with some degree of certainty that Angela Merkel is suffering severely on the mental front. The four-term leader of the Christian Democratic Union (2005-2021) has gone down in the history books as the person most responsible for the greatest upheaval of German society in modern times, and she shows no sign of letting up.
Without ever asking the German electorate what they wanted, Merkel in 2015 opened her country’s borders to over one million illegal immigrants, while holding out cash incentives and other handsome benefits for those who made the difficult journey. Merkel was of the opinion that Germany had the economic strength to handle the influx of migrants and reiterated that there was no legal maximum limit on the number of migrants the country could take. Unfortunately, she was seriously mistaken. And her views on the matter – despite serious cultural, societal and political repercussions – have not changed.
During this week’s presentation of her memoir, ‘Freedom,’ Merkel, 70, spoke out on migration, warning that without it “we could see Europe destroyed.” “I do not believe we can decisively combat illegal migration at the German-Austrian or German-Polish border… I have always advocated European solutions,” Merkel said when asked about the latest measures adopted by Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who faces an uphill battle in the Bundestag, the federal parliament, to incorporate more anti-immigration policies. As for Merkel the diehard globalist, who once lamented the failure of multiculturalism, she fails to understand that the German people are desperately holding out hope for a real change of political course. The fact is Germany is no longer a safe place to do simple everyday things, like take a casual stroll down the street or to raise a family, without an unhealthy degree of fear and apprehension.
That is because an entirely new phenomenon of knife attacks is now plaguing the streets of every German city as the migration crisis has spiraled into a crime crisis. Statistics show that such heinous criminal acts, overwhelmingly committed by individuals of foreign origin, are getting worse, with a shocking 79 knife attacks per day on average now recorded, according to some German media. Last year, there were 29,014 cases involving a crime where a knife was used, of which, 15,741 were knife attacks. Physical harm involving a knife surged by 10.8 percent in 2024 compared to 2023.
Here is just a glimpse of the recent violence that has plagued Germany. In January, a two-year-old boy and a 41-year-old man were killed in a stabbing in a park in Aschaffenburg, with several others wounded. One month later, a Spanish tourist was stabbed at Berlin’s Holocaust Memorial. This month, a 35-year-old Syrian asylum seeker stabbed five youths in an unprovoked knife attack outside a popular student bar in Bielefeld, Germany. Not all of the migrant violence was the result of a knife attack. Last December, six people were killed and hundreds were injured after a car plowed into a crowd at a Christmas market in the eastern city of Magdeburg. Such indiscriminate attacks must be taking a heavy toll on the German psyche.

TEXT
• On the Trump Front — A Change In The Agenda? (Paul Craig Roberts)
Trump’s original plan was to quickly get rid of foreign wars in order to focus on his presidential campaign’s domestic agenda to Make America Great Again. Trump has discovered that Democrat “judges” and some RINO ones can block and distract him from removing illegal aliens who have no right to remain in the US, and from exercising his legitimate powers as president to reform the corrupt and ideological US civil service. The civil service is responsible to the executive branch, not to the judiciary, but the judiciary, always seeking to expand its power, is seeking to establish control over the Office of the President. On the domestic front the frustrations and delays of an over-reaching judicial system have shifted Trump’s focus abroad as an alternative way of Making America Great Again.
In a recent press conference with Genocide King Netanyahu, President Trump declared America’s possession of Gaza. Questioned by media, Netanyahu seemed to agree, at least for the sake of avoiding conflict with Israel’s American sponsor.Trump has begun to describe a new Middle East. It is no longer one that Washington was creating for Greater Israel. Israel had Washington destroy opposing Arab countries–Iraq, Libya, and Syria–disguised as a “war on terror.” The New Middle East is to be Washington’s colonial empire, in which Washington achieves control over oil flows in a new way.
¿Unlike the old colonialism in which the British and French exploited the region, sending the profits home, Trump is offering Saudi Arabia, the last standing Arab country, a junior partnership. The junior partnership is also being offered to the Iranians. The Saudias and Iranians are tempted to accept junior partnerships as it saves them from US/Israeli attacks. Gaza, Trump suggests, will be the highly developed anchor for making all of the Middle East rich. The new American colonialism, unlike the old, is a profit-sharing empire. And it puts an end to Israeli/Arab wars.It is difficult not to see this as a brilliant settlement. But the world never expected anything of this sort. Perhaps the American Ruling Establishment sat down with Trump and explained the situation to him.
In place of the American neoconservative unipolar world of American hegemony there will be the division of the world between the three powers–Washington, Russia, and China. Will the Zionist neoconservative American policymakers accept this or will they continue their pursuit of hegemony? The path ahead is not clear. President Putin is not interested in merely a negotiated end of the conflict in Ukraine. Putin wants a Great Power Agreement that ends the West’s conflict with Russia. Putin’s agenda goes far beyond merely ending the conflict with Ukraine. Can Trump and Putin renew the effort of Reagan and Gorbachev and end the revival of the Cold War that the neoconservatives launched? If not, war will be upon us.

“The modern politics of division have become a banally hectoring faux morality play put on by the theater kids for the other theater kids.” —El Gato Malo on X
• Trump’s Parlous Gambit (James Howard Kunstler)
While Jake Tapper leads the Mea Culpa Chorus singing Kumbaya in a minor key, absolutely nobody is fooled that the grotesque psychotic deformities of US politics can be reduced to a few White House factotums lying to the news media about “Joe Biden’s” cognitive abilities. For one thing, the news media was not lied to. The news media (including Jake) lied to the nation, consistently, flagrantly, mendaciously, for years, and most of all they lied about the gigantic racketeering operation that government had become in the age of Anything Goes and Nothing Matters.Cases-in-point, as reported by Alex Krainer, the $93-billion barfed out of the Department of Energy between the November election and January 20 to scores of hastily-formed NGO gangs with no business model or record of competency. . . and the staggering $375 billion spread around similarly out of the EPA from a slush fund run by John Podesta (as Senior Adviser to the President for International Climate Policy and Clean Energy Innovation).
That was pure grift, you understand, and it was how the Democratic Party kept its activist troops of the so-called “marginalized” paid and happy. As it happened, the “marginalized” who dwell on the edge of society — and also just beyond the set of agreements that define reality — are out-numbered by the rest of us, who voted against the tyranny of the margin and their hallucinations. And so now, the country goes through a convulsion attempting to readjust to reality — for instance, the unhappy fact that all that money was unreal, mere bookkeeping entries by dishonest accountants.
One reality we struggle with is the doleful fact that there is no work-around for the nation’s monumental debt. Since it can’t possibly be paid off, there are two stark paths for it: default and ruinous deflation (that is, money vanishes and the nation goes broke); or a futile attempt to inflate it away with more fake money creation (you’ll have money, but it’s increasingly worthless, so you’re effectively broke). Either way, you’re broke. In the meantime, the remorseless interest that has to be paid on $36.2-trillion squeezes out everything else we’re supposed to care for as relates to the common good.
Every broke-ass family or individual person knows how debilitating money-worries can be. And since unpayable debt is the common denominator across all of Western Civ, this perhaps explains the gross, suicidal mental disorder displayed lately by leadership all across Europe, North America and Anglo-Oceania. Europe, especially, exhibits behavior that is completely cuckoo — inciting war with Russia, inviting in murderous hostiles from foreign lands, and sadistically policing their own citizens.
The exception is Mr. Trump, a businessman-outsider to government trying to pull off an escape from the deadly debt quandary. It’s probably impossible, but he is trying nonetheless. It has three main features: 1) to readjust trade relations that, in theory, would restore industrial production across the land — a bootstrapping operation to kick off “growth.” 2) to engineer a severe re-set of the money system that would effectively amount to defaulting on debt but somehow without the feature of disappearing money. At best, this would induce some kind of fall in living standards, but mostly among the small sector of financial buccaneers who thrive on swindles and the Boomers living on investment accounts (figment wealth), who are now dying off anyway — which is to say, Great Depression Lite. And 3) the least understood feature of Trumpism: to decouple the USA from the resource scarcity in the rest of the world, and the consequent strife it’s inducing, and withdraw into a sort of Fortress North America that can somehow carry-on self-sufficiently while everybody else collapses.
As big pictures go, this is a pretty wild one, stupendously ambitious, risky, and perhaps improbable. But what do Mr. Trump’s domestic opponents have to offer? To go back to their asset-stripping operation with its insane sideshow of race-and-sexual hoaxes and hustles? Let’s face it, the Democratic Party has utterly shot its wad. If it tries to start another civil war, it will have its ass handed to it. Despite all the desperate, rear-guard lawfare underway now, the party is already withdrawing into the political thickets to hide while it considers some drastic reorganization of its purpose and personnel. It may skulk there for many years, just as it did between James Buchanan (1857) and Grover Cleveland (1885).
And despite his daunting agenda, Mr. Trump at least presents a sense of confident determination to get the country righted in some fashion, to recover a sense of purpose and enterprise after years of feckless, dissipative drift into the hallucinatory madness of the Left. You must give him a chance. There is no one else right now with no other way.

TEXT
• Kellogg Calls Russia’s NATO Concerns ‘Fair’ – Warns Ukraine It Better Show Up In Istanbul
US presidential envoy Keith Kellogg told ABC News in a Thursday interview that Russia’s concerns over NATO expansion are “fair”. Moscow this week demanded of the West a written commitment to stop further enlargement, especially when it comes to the potential for Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia one day entering the NATO alliance. “It’s a fair concern and we’ve said that repeatedly… that to us Ukraine coming into NATO is not on the table,” Kellogg said. “And they’re not just talking Ukraine – they’re talking the country of Georgia, they’re talking Moldova, they’re talking, obviously, Ukraine,” the top Trump envoy stated.“We’re saying: okay, comprehensively we can stop the expansion of NATO coming close to your border,” Kellogg added, noting that such a move would ultimately require a presidential-level decision.This appears a clear affirmation that Washington is ready to do this as part of ongoing negotiations – but the big question will be whether other powerful members of the alliance are ready to sign off. After all, there is currently a ‘coalition of the willing’ led by the UK, France, and Germany which has somewhat broken with the US on these matters. This week, the written guarantees and other conditions Moscow has requested have been spelled out in English-language Russian state media as follows:
Ukraine’s permanent neutrality
Partial sanctions relief for Russia
Return of frozen Russian assets
Protections for Ukraine’s Russian-speaking peopleAnd then an or else was offered as part of an ultimatum. While not officially issued by the Kremlin, this appears some very intentional signaling by Putin officials. It was conveyed via a Wednesday Reuters report:The first source said that, if Putin realizes he is unable to reach a peace deal on his own terms, he will seek to show the Ukrainians and the Europeans through military strength that “peace tomorrow will be even more painful.”
The next, or second, round of direct Russia-Ukraine talks are set to happen Monday in Istanbul. Both sides are expected to exchange their versions of draft ceasefire plans. However, Kiev has complained it has not received an advanced draft, which puts the whole meeting into question. Kellogg had some words for the Ukrainian side in the ABC interview, as he said, “I always caution [Kiev’s chief negotiator Rustem Umerov]: don’t say things like that.” He pointed out, “Part of life is showing up, and you need to show you’re serious.” As for Kellogg calling Russia’s demand of no more NATO expansion fair, this is consistent with President Trump’s own stance articulated from the beginning of his presidency:
Ukraine can forget about NATO, says Trump pic.twitter.com/Os4qLWsl2j
— Ragıp Soylu (@ragipsoylu) February 26, 2025
And of course, history fully supports the notion that the tragic war is rooted in constant NATO expansion right up to Russia’s doorstep, which Putin himself had loudly warned against going back to the mid-2000s.In September of last year, then NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg had a very candid moment wherein he laid out the recent history, admitting at one point that Putin invaded Ukraine to prevent more NATO” expansion.
https://twiyye.com/declassifiedUK/status/1701195071922815058?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1701195071922815058%7Ctwgr%5E2958be4971cb04f198f6f0f41424a4787bb725fa%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fgeopolitical%2Fkellogg-calls-russias-nato-concerns-fair-warns-ukraine-it-better-show-istanbul
But that ‘smoking gun’ public admission didn’t gain much traction in American media, where it was downplayed and even ignored. The majority of Americans still likely don’t even know this was openly said by the head of NATO, or that the clip exists.

“..we would suggest that you broaden your curriculum, you give both points of view, and just try to hire more conservatives to balance out. And if you don’t want to do that, don’t worry about it. We’ll just give the money to trade school.” This is as simple as that.
I think there’s no question that there is a climate of antisemitism throughout Harvard. Recently, two Harvard students who assaulted a Jewish student—one of whom was kind of rewarded with a $65,000 honorarium through the auspices of the law school, another one was given an honorific title at a graduation at the Divinity School of marshal. That sent the wrong message. What I’m getting at is there was a lot of cause for Donald Trump to suggest, “I don’t need this, the country doesn’t need this.” But in his bill of complaints that were contingent on Harvard making compromises, he also got into elements of instruction, curriculum, and hiring.
He said, “Why are you hiring people from only one point of view?” Which I think is indisputable. Very few conservatives. Or one particular take on the American history, i.e., negative. That prompted the Council on Higher Education and other venues that have published it to solicit letters from people who would be called center-right—some of my colleagues at Hoover. And they objected to what Donald Trump’s add-ons were. And I think that’s reflected in The Wall Street Journal column by Jason Riley. Essentially, they’re saying: We understand when Harvard’s clearly violating laws or charging too much for individual research grants—60% overhead. But now you’re entering the inner domain of the Harvard complex and you’re trying to micromanage and that’s wrong. I’m not a constitutional lawyer, but I don’t know whether my colleagues and friends on the right have characterized it the way in which the argument is coming from the Trump administration.
They are saying, “This is analogous to immigration. When somebody is a guest and applies to come here in a visa, that’s an invitation. And we don’t have to give reasons why we don’t want a particular person to come to the United States. What the federal government does with its money vis-a-vis private education is kind of like an invitation. They invite us to give them money. And sometimes we don’t wanna do it. Maybe we say, ‘We don’t like Harvard. We like Fresno State.’ And we don’t have to give you a reason at all because it’s not a requirement. It’s a privilege. Some colleges like Hillsdale don’t take any money. They don’t want us to give them money.”And so, I think the argument from the administration that maybe our right-wing friends are missing is not that the Trump administration doesn’t have a right to go in and micromanage. They’re just saying, “I don’t really wanna give Harvard any money. They’ve got $53 billion. They’re private. They’re not public institutions. But you know, if they ask us and they want money, then we have to look at why we would give it to them.”
And it’s kind of like Mr. Smith coming from Korea or Mr. Jones coming from Sweden. We look at them and we don’t really think they add to the Americans. So, we don’t have an invitation. It’s kind of like foreign aid. Maybe Denmark wants foreign aid. Maybe Ghana wants foreign aid. And we look at it and then, we’re under no—we can say, “Well, Denmark, you have to give us Greenland—if we want—before we give you foreign aid.” We’re under no requirement to explain every decision we make for an optional gift. So we would apply that logic. I think that’s what the Trump administration is doing: “Harvard, here’s some money. We don’t really care if you want it or not. But if you do want it, we would suggest that you broaden your curriculum, you give both points of view, and just try to hire more conservatives to balance out. And if you don’t want to do that, don’t worry about it. We’ll just give the money to trade school.” This is as simple as that.

Who’s buyinfsD./p>
President Donald Trump has announced the US will double its current tariff rate on steel and aluminium imports from 25% to 50%, starting on Wednesday. Speaking at a rally in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Trump said the move would help boost the local steel industry and national supply, while reducing reliance on China. Trump also said that $14bn would be invested in the area’s steel production through a partnership between US Steel and Japan’s Nippon Steel, though he later told reporters he had yet to see or approve the final deal. The announcement is the latest turn in Trump’s rollercoaster approach to tariffs since re-entering office in January. “There will be no layoffs and no outsourcing whatsoever, and every US steelworker will soon receive a well deserved $5,000 bonus,” Trump told the crowd, filled with steelworkers, to raucous applause.
One of the major concerns from steelworkers about the US-Japan trade deal was how Japan would honour the workers’ union contract which regulates pay and hiring. Trump began his remarks by saying he had “saved” US Steel, America’s biggest steel manufacturer, located in Pittsburgh, with the 25% tariffs he implemented during his first term as president in 2018. He touted the increase to 50% as a way to ensure US Steel’s survival. “At 50%, they can no longer get over the fence,” he said. “We are once again going to put Pennsylvania steel into the backbone of America, like never before.” US steel manufacturing has been declining in recent years, and China, India and Japan have pulled away as the world’s top producers. Roughly a quarter of all steel used in the US is imported, and the country’s reliance on Mexican and Canadian steel has angered Trump.
The announcement comes amid a court battle over the legality of some of Trump’s global tariffs, which an appeals court has allowed to continue after the Court of International Trade ordered the administration to halt the taxes. His tariffs on steel and aluminium were untouched by the lawsuit. “It is a good day for steelworkers,” JoJo Burgess, a member of the local United Steelworkers union who was at Trump’s rally, told the BBC. Mr Burgess, who is also the city mayor of nearby Washington, Pennsylvania, expressed optimism over the reported details of the partnership with Nippon Steel, saying he hoped it would help breed a new generation of steel workers in the area. He recalled “making a lot of money” in the years after Trump instituted steel tariffs in his first term.
Although Burgess would not label himself a Trump supporter, and says he has only voted for Democratic nominees for president in the last two decades, he said: “I’m never going to disagree with something that’s going to level the playing field for American manufacturing.” But so far the impacts of Trump’s tariffs have largely led to global economic chaos. Global trade and markets have been upended and cracks have formed – or widened – in relations between the US and other countries, including some of its closest partners. The levies have strained relations between China and the US, the world’s two biggest global economies, and launched the countries into a tit-for-tat trade battle. On Friday, without providing details, Trump accused China of violating a truce they had reached over tariffs earlier this month over talks in Geneva.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer later clarified that China had not been removing non-tariff barriers as agreed under the deal. China then shot back with its own accusations of US wrongdoing. Beijing’s response on Friday did not address the US claims directly but urged the US to “cease discriminatory restrictions against China”. China is the world’s largest manufacturer of steel, responsible for more than half of global steel production, according to World Steel Association statistics from 2022. “If you don’t have steel, you don’t have a country. You don’t have a country, you can’t make a military. What are we going to do? Say, ‘Let’s go to China to get our steel from the army tanks,'” Trump quipped at the Pittsburgh rally on Friday.
Trump’s roughly hour-long, wide-ranging rally speech hinted at the deal he said he had made with Japan’s Nippon Steel but he did not offer any new details. Both companies have not confirmed any deal was completed. While campaigning for president, Trump had said he would block foreign acquisition of US Steel, the storied 124-year-old American steel company. It is unclear how the reported partnership would operate and who would own the company. White House officials said Trump had convinced Japan’s Nippon Steel to boost its investment in the US and give the government key say over the operations of the US factories. According to US media, Japan plans to invest $14bn over 14 months.
Other reported details include that the companies had said they would maintain ownership of US steel in the US, with US citizens on the board and in leadership positions; pledged not to cut production for 10 years; and agreed to give the government the right to veto potential production cuts after that period.

“It is absolutely clear that Ukraine isn’t interested in negotiations. They’re simply playing games. For them, it’s not a serious or meaningful negotiation.”
• Zelensky ‘Playing Games’ Instead Of Negotiating – Russian Diplomat (RT)
Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky doesn’t want meaningful negotiations and only seeks to prolong the conflict, Russian first deputy envoy to the UN Dmitry Polyansky has told RT. Russia proposed holding a second round of direct talks in Istanbul on June 2, but Ukraine has yet to formally commit to attending the event.“They are making every effort to convince [US President Donald Trump] that Russia isn’t interested in peace,” Polyansky said in an interview on Friday. “It is absolutely clear that Ukraine isn’t interested in negotiations. They’re simply playing games. For them, it’s not a serious or meaningful negotiation.”
“Everything Kiev now does and says should be analyzed through [the lens] of Ukraine wanting to prolong the war,” the diplomat added. He suggested that Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky is motivated by a desire to stay in power and avoid accountability. Zelensky’s five-year presidential term formally expired in May 2024, but he has refused to call new elections, citing martial law. “It is not in the interest of the Ukrainian president to engage in any meaningful peaceful efforts because they would lead to elections – something he fears the most,” Polyansky said. “He would also be held accountable for the embezzlement of the state budget and Western aid… That’s why he wants to avert this scenario any way he can.”
“““
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he no longer considers Zelensky a legitimate leader and argued that his status could potentially undermine the peace process. Trump previously branded Zelensky “a dictator without elections,” but has since toned down his criticism. Russia and Ukraine held their first direct talks in three years in Istanbul on May 16, agreeing to carry out a large prisoner exchange and each present ceasefire terms. The Kremlin has denied accusations of stalling negotiations and said on Wednesday that it was finalizing a memorandum outlining its vision of peace.

Stunning physical strength and balancepic.twitter.com/TIfC3PJxDL
— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) May 31, 2025

Home › Forums › Debt Rattle May 31 2025