Topcat

 
   Posted by at  No Responses »

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 3,081 through 3,091 (of 3,091 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Debt Rattle January 11 2021 #68135
    Topcat
    Participant

    Thanks Raul

    I’m fascinated by weaponizing medicine for political gain.

    Not that it hasn’t always been like that, but it seems we’re shift gears into new territory.

    At least I know the PCR test is as good as the Scientology one!

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 11 2021 #68131
    Topcat
    Participant

    So the Manchurian Candidate, Old White Joe, is going to lower the cycle threshold (ct) of the PCR tests gradually over time and the number of ‘positives’ will drop like magic, PROVING that the vaccine rollout is a fabulous success.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 11 2021 #68130
    Topcat
    Participant

    PCR tests can be done by ‘sensitivity’ using ‘cycle threshold (ct)’

    From The Trouble With PCR Tests

    “….A PCR test is amplifying samples through repetitive cycles. The lower the virus concentration in the sample, the more cycles are needed to achieve a positive result. Many US labs work with 35 to 45 cycles, while many European labs work with 30 to 40 cycles.

    The research group of French professor Didier Raoult has recently shown that at a cycle threshold (ct) of 25, about 70% of samples remained positive in cell culture (i.e. were infectious); at a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive; at a ct of 35, 3% of samples remained positive; and at a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in cell culture (see diagram).

    This means that if a person gets a “positive” PCR test result at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is less than 3%. The chance that the person received a “false positive” result is 97% or higher.

    (Note that the exact figures depend on the test and lab in question, and that if a sample was already positive at a lower cycle threshold (e.g. 20), chances of infectiousness are much higher.)

    Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside, explained to the New York Times: “Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive. I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive. A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35.” According to the New York Times, up to 90% of positive tests at a cycle threshold of 40 would be negative at a ct of 30…..”

    So some US states are using a cycle threshold (ct) of 45

    Let’s repeat:

    …up to 90% of positive tests at a cycle threshold of 40 would be negative at a ct of 30..

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 11 2021 #68129
    Topcat
    Participant

    The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

    Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?

    Kary Mullis

    This is the guy who invented the PCR test technique, Kary B. Mullis

    He won a Nobel Prize for his efforts.

    The PCR test has been distorted and weaponized by TPTB

    “…Dr. Kary Mullis wrote [about PCR], on May 7, 2013:

    “PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. “

    If things were done right, “infection” would be a far cry from a positive PCR test.

    “You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it,” Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics told me.

    “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs.

    I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true.

    It’s a great scientific research tool.

    It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine.

    30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”

    [Dr. David Rasnick]……

    “The PCR test for Corona is as good as…”

    “It’s as good as that Scientology test that detects your personality and then tells you need to give all your money to Scientology. “

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 10 2021 #68109
    Topcat
    Participant

    By Roman standards, the ‘American Empire’ is a joke, a satire of a Real Empire.

    Say what you will about Rome and it’s ultimate demise, the noise you heard with Rome approaching in it’s prime was the sound of it’s big brass balls dragging across the landscape like thunder in the distance.

    The US sounds like a yappy little dog, nipping at the heels of it’s newly minted Mandarin overlords.

    A puny clownish shell of a country, in debt up to it’s eyeballs, prancing around the globe with a carrier fleet from a bygone century that could be completely sunk in less than an hour by a couple of dozen hypersonic surface to ship missiles.

    It’s finances run like a game of Three-card Monte, a confidence trick that was already in use by the turn of the 15th century. So creative, so innovative.

    It’s judicial, healthcare and education systems run like Rico Rackets, for sale to the highest bidder.

    It’s mainstream media tarted up like $20 hookers, serving opinions rather than actual news. The MSM now collapsing into it’s own gravitational field funk of incestuous Chinese whispering games, spread with a thick layer of Ed Bernays mayonnaise and washed down with a goblet of Goebbels.

    The Chinese, and the rest of the globe, are Schadenfreuding at the Capitol Clown Show the other day.

    Schadenfreuding

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 8 2021 #67957
    Topcat
    Participant

    I think the Covid moment was the official transfer of power to China 2020.

    Rome being eclipsed by Constantinople is an apt comparision.

    The Left-Carthyism witch hunt unfolding now is the beginning of a Chinese adapted ‘Social Credit Score” system in the US.

    You support (or supported in the past) or even dreamt of supporting Trump (Pre-Crime) at any point in the time /space continuum, No Social Media for You!

    Next will be you can’t use any kind of public transportation, as a present, former or future Trump supporter.

    Next no socially responsible employer will hire you as a Trump supporter.

    Next you’ll have to shop for food at restricted hours and only on certain days as a Trump supporter.

    And of course, they’ll be an arm band Trump supporters will have to wear in public.

    A five pointed red, white and blue Star of Donald.

    Star of the Donald

    in reply to: Debt Rattle Christmas Day 2020 #67290
    Topcat
    Participant

    From 2011

    Peak Potassium: The Next Resource War

    “..a potassium shortage will be much more serious than an oil shortage. We can develop substitute strategies for energy, but potassium is a part of our bodies, and part of the plant tissues that feed our bodies. The next time some moron tells you that we needn’t worry about running out of our natural resources because we humans are infinitely clever and can find a substitute for anything, ask him how he will maintain the electrolytic balance in the tissues of his body (essentially, the sodium/potassium balance) without potassium. Without this mineral, we die.”

    in reply to: Debt Rattle Christmas Day 2020 #67289
    Topcat
    Participant

    From Forbes on running out of resources:
    “… The world will never run out of phosphorus or potassium; there’s huge amounts out there in the oceans, and in fact that’s where the runoff from our phosphate rock and potash-based fertilizers go.

    But when those supplies run out, the process of recovering phosphate from agricultural waste, runoff, and sewage will be so expensive that many forms of agriculture that depend on cheap NPK fertilizers will suffer.

    Let’s not even get started on the step change in cost that mining it from the ocean would entail.”

    in reply to: Debt Rattle Christmas Day 2020 #67288
    Topcat
    Participant

    The second member of the Big Three (P)

    Peak phosphorus (P)

    It is scheduled to arrive at 2030

    Manure is the best small scale solution to recycle the Big (P)

    Recycling (P) in sewage is not cost effective yet on industrial scales.

    No more cheap phosphorus for you!

    It all ends up inaccessible in the oceans in large scale farming.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle Christmas Day 2020 #67287
    Topcat
    Participant

    The Haber-Bosch process also helped mock Malthus.

    The Big Three nutrients NPK

    Haber allowed the production of agricultural nitrogen (N) from fossil fuels

    Haber also helped develop chemical warfare agents for the WWI German trench nightmare.

    In the 1920’s, he was instrumental in developing Zyklon B

    So he burned the candle at both ends.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle Christmas Day 2020 #67286
    Topcat
    Participant

    The Bones of Waterloo

    https://medium.com/study-of-history/the-bones-of-waterloo-a3beb35254a3

    Digging up battlefield bones for their phosphorus

    Sweet

Viewing 11 posts - 3,081 through 3,091 (of 3,091 total)