migrant children Archives - The Automatic Earth

Explosive New CIA Report Details Russiagate Fraud

Trump administration investigation affirms earlier reports by Racket and Public about use of "cooked" intelligence to launch the Russiagate frenzyhttps://t.co/HPwAlqOd4D pic.twitter.com/uRnnLHjKHg

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) July 3, 2025

90%

OMG. State Dept Spokeswoman Tammy Bruce says 90% of foreign aid never actually made it to its intended destination.

The amount of fraud is mind-boggling. This is why Democrats fought DOGE so hard.

We need more arrests. pic.twitter.com/V24D8ibtoQ

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 2, 2025

“It is the responsibility of every single Jewish person in this moment to say absolutely No to Z10NISM. The entire ideology is built on racism, fascism, and anti-Semitism, and it must be dismantled….”

—Rachael Shapiro (ANTI-Z10NIST JEWISH ACTIVIST ) pic.twitter.com/ts1jLwGcGi

— The Resonance (@Partisan_12) July 3, 2025

Megyn Kelly
Diddy was guilty as sin. The jury let him off. pic.twitter.com/2pB3qlcysu

— Big Fish (@BigFish3000) July 2, 2025

Happy 4th ‘Murica!

• House Republicans Pass Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ (ZH)

Update (1430ET): The republican response to Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries’ record-breaking address was brief and to the point, as Rep Jason Smith retorted: “I come from the Show-Me State, and what we just heard can be defined in one word. A bunch of hogwash is what we’ve heard for eight hours on that side of the building.” House Speaker Mike Johnson spoke next, noting that “we have a big job to finish.” “With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before.” And then came the vote… and (218-214) Republican House members passed the bill with all Democrats voting ‘nay’… The bill will now go President Trump’s desk for to signed tomorrow [5 pm].

Happy 4th ‘Murica!

* * *
Overnight, most of the Republican holdouts on the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ relented, flipping their support to advance the legislation to a final vote on the House floor after several deals were cut with President Trump. Earlier in the morning, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) kept the procedural vote open for almost six hours – which once passed would kick off debate before final passage. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), however, decided to throw a massive tantrum that’s been going on for more than five hours in what’s known as the “magic minute,” a privilege for party leaders in the chamber that allows them to speak for as long as they want. According to Fox News, Jeffries was seen arriving with multiple binders – one of which he read from for around three hours. If the rest of the binders also contain portions of his speech, we could be waiting for a while.

[..] Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) was a one-man rollercoaster for the GOP leadership. Massie railed against the bill all week. He initially voted for the rule. But then at 11:30 p.m., Massie entered a mostly empty House chamber and switched his vote from yes to no.

However, Massie – who Trump has personally targeted for defeat in 2026 – switched again back to yes when all the hardliners flipped. The GOP leadership hopes that Massie will vote for final passage later this morning. And he has made clear that he would like Trump to stop attacking him. -Punchbowl “He did a masterful job of laying out how we could improve it, how he could use his chief executive office, use things to make the bill better,” Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina told CNBC. This comes after multiple Republicans were seen in the West Wing on Wednesday to cut deals as Trump pressed them into voting yes on the bill. Norman said he would be a ‘nay’ on the Senate-passed version of the bill, only to flip and support it after his meeting with Trump – who promised to use his office to stringently enforce energy tax credit phase-outs.

[..] In response to the GOP’s advancing the bill, Trump said on Truth Social that it was a “great night.” “What a great night it was. One of the most consequential Bills ever,” he wrote, adding “The USA is the ‘HOTTEST’ Country in the World, by far!!!” The core of the BBB permanently extends and expands the 2017 Trump tax cuts, introducing new deductions for tip income and overtime pay, while providing significant tax relief for Social Security recipients. It reinstates full and immediate expensing for business equipment and R&D, delivers new construction write-offs for manufacturers, and boosts incentives for domestic semiconductor production. High-income Americans and owners of pass-through entities also stand to benefit from expanded deductions, and the bill raises the state and local tax deduction cap for upper-middle-class households. But these tax changes are offset by historic spending cuts—chiefly, nearly $1 trillion in reductions to Medicaid and SNAP.

The legislation also scales back Affordable Care Act subsidies and imposes stricter eligibility checks, drawing ire from hospitals and health advocates. Meanwhile, clean energy and EV sectors face deep setbacks as tax credits are repealed and renewable subsidies curtailed.

“No money for Ukraine was included in the “big beautiful” budget bill promoted by President Donald Trump, the article pointed out..”

• US Halts All Military Shipments To Ukraine – The Economist (RT)

The US has suspended all military equipment and ammunition deliveries to Ukraine, including all types of shells and spare parts, The Economist has reported, citing Ukrainian officials. Washington had earlier confirmed a decision to halt certain key arms shipments, citing low stocks.The decision reportedly followed an internal review of American weapons reserves ordered by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to Politico and NBC News. The initial reports suggeste d that the decision would stop the supply of Patriot missile interceptors, Stinger and AIM air-to-air missiles, hundreds of Hellfire and GMLRS systems, and thousands of 155mm artillery shells. According to The Economist, the suspension of military aid was actually total. “Ukrainian officials say that, in fact, all shipments of American weapons, including shells and spare parts, have been halted,” the outlet said on Wednesday, adding that the US officials have denied that.

Washington’s envoy to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, told Fox News on Wednesday that the decision to halt certain aid was made as part of the “America first” policy, aimed at ensuring Washington’s own “strategic defense capabilities.” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said that “we can’t give weapons to everybody all around the world. We have to look out for America and defending our homeland and our troops around the world.” Neither official provided details about exactly which shipments were suspended. The move could be part of a bigger plan to end US support for Kiev altogether, The Economist suggested. No money for Ukraine was included in the “big beautiful” budget bill promoted by President Donald Trump, the article pointed out. Funding allocated to support Kiev within the regular Pentagon budget “would be cut further under the budget request for fiscal year 2026,” the outlet said, citing officials.

US support for Ukraine has come mostly in two forms: Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA), which allowed Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden, to send weapons to the country out of the Pentagon’s stocks, and the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), under which Washington ordered arms from manufacturers. Trump has made no use of PDA since coming to office in January. The weapons orders made by the previous administration under the USAI would continue US shipments to Ukraine until late 2028, according to The Economist. The magazine asserts that these supplies could now be “interrupted.”

Trump and Putin had a phone call yesterday with “no result”.

• US Still ‘Giving Weapons’ To Kiev – Trump (RT)

President Donald Trump has denied media speculation that the United States has suspended all military equipment and ammunition deliveries to Kiev, insisting that lethal aid is still being sent while Washington ensures it retains enough stockpiles to defend itself and its allies. Several reports earlier this week indicated that the US had paused deliveries of various critical munitions to Ukraine, including Patriot and Hellfire missiles, GMLRS rockets, and thousands of 155mm artillery shells. The Economist even suggested that Washington could be gradually winding down its military support for Kiev altogether. Trump rejected claims of a complete halt of military aid to Kiev, echoing previous statements by the Pentagon and the White House that a decision had been made to prioritize US national interests.

“We’re giving weapons, but we’ve given so many weapons,” Trump told reporters before boarding Air Force One on Thursday. “You know, Biden emptied out our whole country giving them weapons. And we have to make sure that we have enough for ourselves.” “But we are giving weapons, and we’re working with them and trying to help them,” Trump added, without providing specifics about the exact weapons withheld and still being supplied. Trump has been critical of providing aid to Ukraine without reciprocal benefits, and his administration has not approved any new assistance packages since he took office. According to Germany’s Kiel Institute, the US has sent nearly $115 billion in military and financial aid to Kiev since the conflict escalated in 2022, although Trump has claimed the actual total runs into “hundreds of billions.”

Washington recently signed an agreement granting the US priority access to Ukraine’s mineral resources – an effort the White House said would help recoup some of the taxpayer money spent under Biden. News of the aid suspension drew sharp reactions in Kiev, with Ukrainian officials summoning US Chargé d’Affaires John Ginkel to lecture him about “the critical importance of continuing the deliveries of previously allocated defense packages.” Ukrainian MP Mariana Bezuglaya even declared that “the US is no longer our ally,” even though the two countries never signed any deals to that effect. Russia has repeatedly condemned Western arms shipments to Ukraine, arguing they prolong the conflict and risk broader escalation.

Kremlin officials have also accused Western backers of encouraging their proxies in Kiev to fight to the last Ukrainian in the empty hope of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia. “The fewer the missiles that arrive in Ukraine from abroad, the closer the end of the special military operation,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday. He noted, however, that the freeze may be temporary and caused by too many US weapons being redirected to support Israel in the stand-off with Iran. President Vladimir Putin reiterated that Moscow remains open to peace talks during a phone call with Trump on Thursday, but stated that Russia will not back down until the “well-known root causes” of the Ukraine conflict are eliminated, according to presidential aide Yuri Ushakov.

And they will.

• Ukraine Wants EU Backers To Purchase US Weapons On Its Behalf – Politico (RT)

Ukraine wants its EU backers to purchase American-made weapons on its behalf in order to offset the suspension of key US arms deliveries to Kiev, Politico reported on Wednesday. US media outlets reported earlier this week that supplies of Patriot missile interceptors – touted as important in repelling Russian strikes – as well as GMLRS rockets, Hellfire missiles, and thousands of 155mm artillery shells have been put on hold. NBC noted that some US cargo had already reached Europe but was being withheld from transfer to Ukrainian forces. nUS officials later confirmed the development, portraying it as part of the “America first” policy and stating that the country must maintain its weapons stockpiles to ensure “our own success on the battlefield.”

The freeze “blindsided top Ukrainian officials” and has prompted Kiev to ask Washington “to let Europe purchase US weapons for Ukraine,” several Politico sources claimed. “We don’t have a choice,” an unnamed Ukrainian official added. Several European countries are reportedly reviewing potential purchases. However, the weapons transfers would still require US approval, one person told Politico, indicating that Ukraine’s attempts to keep weapons flowing could become mired in additional negotiations. Part of the push involves overcoming export restrictions that Washington typically imposes on foreign use of its arms.

Under the administration of former US President Joe Biden, even British deliveries of Storm Shadow missiles to Ukraine were initially delayed because the systems contained American components, Politico noted. A Ukrainian official told the outlet that similar hurdles could be addressed during the talks, although it remains unclear whether the US would sign off on deliveries. The administration of US President Donald Trump appears to be warming up to the idea of direct military sales to Kiev, according to the magazine. Politico in particular cited a recent meeting between Trump and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky on the sidelines of the NATO summit in the Netherlands, with one person briefed on the talks claiming that Trump seemed “compassionate” and “understanding,” although no specific commitments were detailed.

The US weapons freeze has caused frustration in Kiev, with Ukrainian MP Mariana Bezuglaya proclaiming that the country “is no longer our ally.” The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry also summoned US chargé d’affaires John Ginkel to underscore “the critical importance” of deliveries and warn against any “delay or procrastination.” Russia has consistently denounced Western arms deliveries to Ukraine, insisting they will only drag out the conflict without changing its eventual outcome.

”Trump must “act urgently, top priority, to apply massive diplomatic, trade, aid and security muscle, every tool in the hardball diplomacy toolkit – up to and including our participation in NATO..”

• Trump Should ‘Knock The F**K Out’ of EU Disinfo Law – Mike Benz (RT)

US President Donald Trump must urgently threaten to “knock… the f out” of a new EU law on disinformation that requires online platforms and search engines to restrict content deemed ‘fake news’ by the bloc, former State Department official Mike Benz has said. The formerly voluntary Code of Conduct on Disinformation, which was integrated into the Digital Services Act (DSA) by Brussels earlier this year, became mandatory as of July 1. Under the law, major online platforms and search engines, mostly owned by US tech firms, are obliged to follow EU content rules or face penalties.

Benz, who worked on cybersecurity and internet policy at the State Department during Trump’s first term, took to X on Wednesday to warn that the likes of YouTube, X, Facebook, and Google would “now get whipped by huge EU fines.” The Code of Conduct on Disinformation, which he described as a “Global Censorship Law,” had been the “secret weapon” of Brussels for a long time, but is now “fully unleashed,” the head of the self-described pro-free speech website Foundation For Freedom Online said.

Trump must “act urgently, top priority, to apply massive diplomatic, trade, aid and security muscle, every tool in the hardball diplomacy toolkit – up to and including our participation in NATO – to knock this law the f out,” he insisted. The disinformation code came into effect amid trade talks between Washington and Brussels, with Trump threatening to impose 50% tariffs on all imports from the EU if no deal is reached by the July 9 deadline. The European Commission’s tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, said on Monday that content moderation and digital competition are “not part of trade negotiations from our side” because they are “based on our European values.”

Paul Craig Roberts: “By the time Russia, China, and Iran face up to the situation, it will be too late for anything but nukes.”

• Washington Builds Its Color Revolution Arsenal Against Putin (PCR)

In Serbia large street protests are underway demanding the end of President Vucic’s government. Rightly or wrongly, I cannot say, Vucic is regarded as a friend of Russia. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, “we cannot rule out the possibility that well-known tactics employed for carrying out color revolutions are now being used in Serbia.” Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov said, with his characteristic weakness, “We hope Western countries, which often exploit domestic affairs in other states to advance their interests, will refrain from color revolutions this time.”Washington is at work causing friction between the Russian Federation and former Central Asian provinces of the Soviet Union. In Azerbaijan. Ten or more Russian journalists have been arrested on false charges, and Azerbaijan has refused Russia’s consular access to its jailed citizens. This has all the hallmarks of an orchestrated confrontation.

I forecast this, but, of course, Putin-the-Unready was unready, as always. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said: “We have requested that employees of the embassy’s consular department be allowed to visit the Russian citizens. But access has so far not been granted.” She demanded that “those who want to spoil bilateral relations cease attempts to further escalate the situation.These steps cause serious damage to interstate relations.” This is how the Kremlin closes its eyes to the new aggression that Washington is unleashing against Russia. Having failed to demonstrate resolution and military prowess, Russia now faces two more color revolutions while Russia is still mired down in Ukraine.

Putin’s humanity in turning a blind eye to provocations speaks well of him. The downside is that he makes the Kremlin seem irresolute and unwilling to confront the fact that the Zionist American doctrine of US hegemony is a dagger aimed at Russia’s heart. It is simply unbelievable that at this stage Putin will do anything, accept any humiliation, to avoid winning the conflict in Ukraine. Putin is at the point of begging for negotiations that end the conflict, so fearful he is of settling the conflict by winning it. It is Russian, Chinese, Iranian weakness when confronted with US and Israel aggression that is committing the world to destruction in nuclear war. Sooner or later Russia, China, and Iran will no longer be able to deny the reality that faces them. By the time Russia, China, and Iran face up to the situation, it will be too late for anything but nukes.

Insulting the world’s no.1 diplomat is not a sign of strength.

• Moscow Responds To NATO Chief’s ‘Jesus’ Comment About Lavrov (RT)

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte mentioning Jesus Christ when talking about Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov means that Moscow’s top diplomat is doing good job, ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said. She was referring to a brief interview Rutte gave Fox News on Wednesday. The NATO chief sought to diminish the role of the Russian foreign minister by claiming that he “has been foreign minister of Russia … since the birth of Jesus Christ. And since then, nothing… useful came out of his month.” “Not for nothing has Sergey Lavrov been working for so many years since he has made the NATO Secretary General remember Jesus Christ,” Zakharova quipped in response in a Telegram statement.

A veteran diplomat, Lavrov has headed the Russian Foreign Ministry for more than 20 years, since 2004. Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, has been in the NATO top job for less than a year, but already found himself at the center of controversy at the bloc’s summit last week. Some European officials were unhappy with the level of flattery he used to win over US President Donald Trump during the meeting, according to Politico. “People are so embarrassed,” one official told the outlet, adding that “the sucking up was pretty over the top.” Rutte called Trump “daddy” during the summit and sent him a gushing message praising the US attack on Iran’s nuclear sites ahead of the summit. The US president was quick to post the NATO chief’s message online. The White House also shared a clip on social media showing Trump’s participation in the summit and accompanied by Usher’s song ‘Daddy’s home’.

See it to believe it.

• Hamas Says Ready For ‘Complete End To The War’ – AP (RT)

The Palestinian militant group Hamas has expressed readiness for a deal with Israel to end the war in Gaza, the Associated Press (AP) reported on Wednesday. Hamas official Taher al-Nunu was quoted as saying the group was “ready to accept any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war.” However, it reportedly stopped short of endorsing a 60-day ceasefire plan proposed by Washington. The statement came after US President Donald Trump warned Hamas that rejecting the American-backed proposal would worsen its position. Trump said on his Truth Social platform on Tuesday that Israel “has agreed” to the terms needed to finalize the 60-day truce, during which all sides would work to bring the war to an end.

An Israeli official told AP the plan includes a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, a surge in humanitarian aid, and mediated talks aimed at ending the conflict. However, Israel is not formally committing to a full cessation of hostilities as part of the current proposal, the official said. Hamas, in a brief statement on Wednesday, reportedly confirmed it had received the proposal from mediators and was working to “bridge gaps” in order to return to the negotiating table. A Hamas delegation is expected to meet with Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo, a source told the outlet. The militant group has said it is willing to release the remaining 50 hostages – fewer than half of whom are believed to be alive – in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal and a permanent end to the war. Israel has rejected those terms.

“There will be no Hamas,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a speech on Wednesday. He has insisted the group must surrender, disarm, and leave Gaza, conditions Hamas refuses to accept. The war, now in its 22nd month, has devastated Gaza. According to the Hamas-run health ministry, the death toll in the enclave surpassed 57,000 by Wednesday, as Israeli strikes intensified amid ceasefire talks. The conflict began with a Hamas-led assault on southern Israel that killed around 1,200 people and took 250 hostage.

“We’ve seen the evidence. We know who was responsible. It’s time for real consequences.”

• Bombshell CIA Report Exposes How Obama’s Team Framed Trump (Margolis)

The new CIA assessment released this week is nothing short of a bombshell—a long-overdue confirmation of what conservative media has been saying for years: The Obama administration, with the eager help of its top intelligence brass, orchestrated an unprecedented operation to cripple Donald Trump’s presidency before it even began. This isn’t some fevered speculation or partisan rumor. The CIA’s own review lays out, in damning detail, how former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, and former FBI Director James Comey took “unusual” and direct control over the infamous Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that became the cornerstone of the Russia collusion hoax. Let’s be clear about what this means. These men didn’t just oversee the process—they commandeered it, sidelining career intelligence professionals and shutting out 13 of the 17 intelligence agencies from the assessment.

Brennan handpicked the analysts, ensuring only the most compliant voices had a say. The National Intelligence Council, the body normally responsible for such crucial reports, was shoved aside. Why? Because the outcome was predetermined: manufacture a narrative that Trump was a Russian asset, no matter how flimsy the evidence. The review identified “multiple procedural anomalies” that undermined the credibility of the ICA, including “a highly compressed production timeline, stringent compartmentation, and excessive involvement of agency heads.” It also questioned the exclusion of key intelligence agencies and said media leaks may have influenced analysts to conform to a false narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. “The rushed timeline to publish both classified and unclassified versions before the presidential transition raised questions about a potential political motive behind the White House tasking and timeline.”

The review found that Brennan directed the compilation of the ICA, and that his, Comey’s and Clapper’s “direct engagement in the ICA’s development was highly unusual in both scope and intensity” and ”risked stifling analytic debate.” According to the story, John Brennan handpicked a small group of CIA analysts to produce the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian interference, deliberately excluding 13 of the 17 intelligence agencies at the time. He bypassed the National Intelligence Council and insisted on including the discredited Steele dossier, despite objections from its authors and top CIA Russia experts, to promote the false narrative that Russia helped Trump win the 2016 election. John Ratcliffe, the former Director of National Intelligence, put it bluntly: “This was Obama, Comey, Clapper and Brennan deciding ‘We’re going to screw Trump.’” They manufactured the collusion narrative, stamped it with the authority of the intelligence community, and then classified the details to keep the public in the dark. It was, in essence, a soft coup—a direct assault on the will of the American people, carried out by those sworn to uphold the Constitution.

The consequences were disastrous. Trump’s presidency was hobbled from day one, forced to operate under a cloud of suspicion that was deliberately manufactured by his political opponents. To this day, the lie that Trump colluded with Russia lingers on, poisoning our politics and giving Democrats a convenient excuse for their 2016 defeat. And why? Because Barack Obama ordered his lackeys to come up with a bogus pretense to undermine Trump. Republicans, and indeed every American who cares about the rule of law, shouldn’t settle for bureaucratic hand-wringing and empty promises of reform. We’ve seen the evidence. We know who was responsible. It’s time for real consequences. The American people deserve nothing less.

.@POTUS has trusted me with helping to end weaponization of US intelligence. Today's report underscores that the 2016 IC Assessment was conducted through an atypical & corrupt process under the politically charged environments of former Dir. Brennan & former FBI Dir. Comey. https://t.co/VXBp3oy6EM

— John Ratcliffe (@DCIARatcliffe) July 2, 2025

“We’re like a solar system with no sun … We don’t act as a team, and when we don’t work as a team, we turn our guns on each other..”

• Democrat Civil War Intensifies As Obamaworld Opposes Mamdani (ZH)

The Democrat Party is grappling with internal divisions following Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York City’s Democrat mayoral primary election this week. Mamdani, a 33-year-old New York State Assembly member, decisively defeated disgraced former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo with 56% to 44% in the final ranked-choice voting results. Two prominent Obama-era officials, former Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and former Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag, have publicly opposed Mamdani’s candidacy, warning that his progressive economic policies could harm New York City. In a CNBC interview on Wednesday, Lew expressed deep concern about Mamdani’s platform. “The policies that he outlines are not policies that would be good for New York,” Lew said. “I worry deeply, having spent most of my life in New York, about a city I call home.”

He further cautioned against populist-driven policies from both political extremes, stating, “I see a similarity between policies solutions to the left and the right that satisfy populist sentiment, don’t always go through the filter of ‘do they work? I don’t think they work. I think that’s a problem,” Lew added. Orszag, now Chairman and CEO of Lazard, shared similar apprehensions in a separate CNBC interview last week, describing Mamdani’s victory as indicative of troubling trends within the Democratic Party. “Let me step back and just say that I am saddened to say that I think the Democratic Party is becoming increasingly antisemitic and anti-capitalism,” Orszag said. “And the thing about it is turning … towards socialism and turning away from your moral principles through antisemitism never works. So there is a fundamental concern that I have and I think many people have about the direction of the Democratic Party along those two dimensions.”

Orszag pointed to specific examples, noting, “The Democratic candidate for mayor has embraced the ‘global intifada’ idea.” He also criticized the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for distributing fundraising emails from a senior operative who suggested Jewish donors are primarily motivated by tax cuts. “I am hopeful that the Democratic Party will change course and, again, history shows that neither being anti-capitalism nor being antisemitic is the pathway to any sort of good outcome,” Orszag added. Mamdani’s win is just one example of growing tensions within the Democrat Party. Similar concerns about the party’s direction have surfaced elsewhere. In June, David Hogg, the 25-year-old Parkland shooting survivor and gun control activist, resigned as vice chair of the Democrat National Committee (DNC) amid internal turmoil.

Hogg faced backlash for his controversial plan to intervene in primary races against incumbent Democrats, which many viewed as divisive and a breach of DNC neutrality. After the DNC called for a new election for his position citing procedural issues, Hogg chose not to run again. In his departure, he sharply criticized the party, calling its leadership a “government of old people” fixated on “attention and reputation” rather than addressing critical issues like the economy. Meanwhile, Randi Weingarten – longtime head of the 1.8 million-member American Federation of Teachers have also quit the DNC. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) has also voiced frustration with the party’s lack of cohesion during a speech at the Center for American Progress on Thursday. “We’re like a solar system with no sun … We don’t act as a team, and when we don’t work as a team, we turn our guns on each other, and it’s so, so, so, fruitless,” she said.

On day 1.

• Ukrainian Membership Of EU Would Destroy Bloc’s Economy – Orban (RT)

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has warned that Ukrainian membership of the EU would destroy both the bloc’s and his country’s economy. Ukraine was granted EU candidate status in 2022, but Orban has argued that allowing the country to join the bloc would draw all members into a direct conflict with Russia. The stance has increasingly put Kiev at odds with Budapest. “Ukrainians are increasingly attacking Hungary because we stopped Ukraine’s EU accession in Brussels,” Orban wrote in a Facebook post on Thursday. Hungary could not support Ukraine’s bid for “fundamental and strategic reasons,” he explained. “We do not want war and we do not want the European [EU], including the Hungarian, economy to be destroyed,” he said.

Last week, Orban said he vetoed an EU Foreign Affairs Council statement on Ukraine, effectively blocking Kiev’s accession talks, arguing that the decision was backed by popular sentiment in Hungary. More than two million Hungarians, or an overwhelming 95% of voters in an unofficial Voks 2025 referendum, voiced opposition to Ukraine’s EU bid. The vote has worsened already elevated tensions with Kiev, the Magyar Nemzet newspaper wrote on Wednesday. Hungarian-Ukrainian relations have been on the downturn in recent months, rocked by Kiev’s decision to block the transit of Russian gas into Hungary, as well as a spy scandal. An EU and NATO member, Hungary has long opposed both bloc’s policies on supplying Kiev with weapons, and called for a diplomatic solution to the hostilities.

Ukrainian accession into NATO “would mean war with Russia, and World War 3 the very next day,” Orban said last week.Moscow has strongly opposed Ukraine’s ambition to join NATO, but had taken a more neutral stance on Ukraine’s EU bid. However, recently Russia has pointed out that militarization efforts are turning the EU into more of a military than an economic bloc. According to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, the EU has undergone a “radical transformation” and become an “aggressive military-political bloc.” In its current state, the EU is effectively “an appendage of NATO,” the top diplomat said last week.

“The British have long shown a greater “willingness” than others to engage in “escalatory and incendiary actions..”

• MI6 Fueled Ukraine Proxy War And Fabricated Intel On Iran – Klarenberg (RT)

The UK Secret Intelligence Service, commonly known as MI6, has played a central role in spreading false intelligence and engaging in provocative actions aimed at escalating global conflicts, British whistleblower and investigative journalist for The Grayzone, Kit Klarenberg, has told RT. Speaking to host Rick Sanchez on Thursday, Klarenberg said MI6 was at the forefront of efforts to push the West deeper into the Ukraine conflict. “I have since the very start of the Ukraine proxy war been reporting on how Britain is leading this effort,” he said, adding that many see MI6 as merely a tool of the CIA, but “no, they go into business for themselves all the time.”

Klarenberg pointed to the 2022 bombing of the Kerch Bridge, which connects Crimea with mainland Russia, claiming it was orchestrated by British operative and NATO adviser Chris Donnelly as part of an effort to pull Washington further into the conflict. ”We have leads… conversations with senior British military officials in which he’s talking about how the [former US President Joe] Biden administration’s reluctance to get fully involved in the proxy war needs to be countered at all costs,” Klarenberg said.

“As a vassal of the US – who is completely dependent on Washington’s wealth and muscle to maintain their international relevance – well, what wouldn’t you do to keep them invested in conflicts you yourself have fomented?” Asked about recent sabotage acts on Russian soil, such as railroads and airbases, and whether MI6 could be “capable of doing that kind of thing,” Klarenberg replied, “Absolutely.” He said “The British were quite clearly behind” Ukraine’s drone attacks on Russia’s strategic bombers last month, with the purpose “to escalate [the conflict] even further.” Turning to Iran, Klarenberg said MI6 also produced fabricated claims about Tehran’s nuclear program. He cited the CV of longtime operative Nicholas Langman, who allegedly infiltrated the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to help coordinate Western sanctions between 2010 and 2020.

“His purpose very much seems to have been to generate false intelligence in the manner of Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction capability,” he said. Langman also reportedly worked to align US and Middle Eastern intelligence agencies behind claims that Tehran was developing nuclear weapons. Asked why Israel’s Mossad could not be behind the campaign, Klarenberg said MI6 is known “for going a lot further than other intelligence agencies are willing to…” and stated that it operates with virtually “no oversight.” The British have long shown a greater “willingness” than others to engage in “escalatory and incendiary actions,” he said, noting that MI6 had been described by Cold War operatives as “the meanest.”

“Iran’s long memory, its 3,000-year-old identity, and deep-rooted patriotism have created a kind of collective immunity to outside pressure.”

• The West Never Understood Iran – Now It’s Too Late (Ibragimov)

The “twelve-day war” between Iran and Israel marked a turning point – not just for Iran, but for the entire region. America’s involvement in the conflict shattered any remaining hopes for de-escalation through diplomacy. For Tehran, foreign policy is now split into a “before” and “after.” And in this new “after,” there’s no trust left – especially in Donald Trump. Before the war, some Iranian politicians and analysts still held out hope for a gradual thaw with the West. That hope evaporated when Washington showed it could swing between gestures of peace and military threats within days. Even the more moderate voices in Tehran now see Trump as unreliable, though they haven’t ruled out talks with the West altogether in the long run.

Trump’s recent statements about easing sanctions in exchange for “peaceful dialogue” are widely seen in Iran as hollow. In late June, the mixed signals from Washington only deepened mistrust. On June 26, Fox News reported that the US was backing a $30 billion aid plan for Iran’s civilian nuclear program – excluding uranium enrichment. But the next day, Trump dismissed the report as a “myth” and hinted at more strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Then, on June 29, he reversed course again, saying sanctions might be lifted if Iran displayed “peaceful behavior.” This pattern is familiar. On June 12, Trump urged Israel not to attack Iran. Days later, he backed Israeli strikes.

Tehran sees these shifts not as diplomacy, but as manipulation. In response, Iran’s leadership is trying to present a united front. But deep divisions remain – especially around the nuclear issue. Still, the focus now is on strengthening internal resilience: shoring up the economy, modernizing the military, and preparing for what many believe is an inevitable next round of confrontation. Crucially, the Iranian public has not panicked. Western analysts misjudged the national mood. Iran’s long memory, its 3,000-year-old identity, and deep-rooted patriotism have created a kind of collective immunity to outside pressure. The Islamic Republic isn’t just a regime – it’s seen by many as a vessel for preserving national sovereignty.

What truly shocked Iran’s leadership during the recent war was the open threat against Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. For Tehran, that wasn’t just rhetoric – it was a real warning. Many believe a future attempt on his life is only a matter of time. That threat has accelerated Tehran’s push to mobilize. Iran now sees a short window to build up defenses, invest in the economy, and prepare for tougher times. Washington keeps urging Tehran to abandon its nuclear ambitions, but US officials know full well: Iran has the resources, infrastructure, and scientific expertise to revive its program quickly – and likely will. The conflict with Israel left scars too deep for quick reconciliation. The US joining the military phase of the war made matters worse. Any Western claims that Iran might still make concessions now sound out of touch with the mood in Tehran.

And now you lose all oversight..

• Iran Suspends Cooperation With UN Nuclear Watchdog (RT)

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has formally ordered the suspension of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), acting on a parliamentary decision passed in the aftermath of Israeli and US attacks on nuclear facilities. The legislation, passed by lawmakers and approved by Iran’s Guardian Council on June 25, instructs all government institutions to cut ties with the UN nuclear watchdog. Pezeshkian’s office said on Wednesday that he had issued directives to the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, the Foreign Ministry, and the Supreme National Security Council to carry out the mandate. Israel claimed its actions were a necessary preemptive measure to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon – a goal Tehran has consistently denied.

The US assisted in defending Israel from retaliatory strikes and later joined the offensive, with President Donald Trump declaring that the Iranian nuclear program had been “obliterated” by US military action. On the eve of Israeli strikes, the IAEA’s board of governors declared Iran non-compliant with a key safeguard agreement. The decision was based on a report in late May by IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, who cited remarks by former Iranian officials claiming the country had the capacity to build nuclear weapons. The same report also noted there were “no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear program.” The Iranian Foreign Ministry accused Grossi of “obscuring the truth in [an] absolutely biased report that was instrumentalized” by Western nations to justify the resolution condemning Tehran.

Israel has claimed for decades that Iran is on a path toward acquiring nuclear arms, although the Islamic Republic maintains that such weapons violate Islamic principles. The IAEA is responsible for verifying the peaceful use of nuclear technology among states under the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which Iran has signed. Israel, which has never signed the NPT and does not officially acknowledge its nuclear arsenal, is estimated by experts to possess around 80 nuclear warheads. Under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Iran agreed to strict limitations on its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The deal effectively collapsed after the US unilaterally withdrew in 2018 during Trump’s first presidency. Trump opted instead for a “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran. Russia, which voted against the IAEA resolution, condemned the US and Israeli strikes, saying they had undermined the NPT and damaged the credibility of the IAEA.

They have no-one else or better. Time for Farage?!

• British PM Starmer Could Be On Way Out – Sky News (RT)

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer could be ousted by next May if his Labour Party continues to perform poorly, Sky News has reported. Labour lost ground to Reform UK in local elections in May, after the ruling party experienced a plunge in public support. The prime minister could lose his position if Labour performs badly in the next vote across Wales, Scotland and London, Sky News reported on Thursday, citing two senior Labour MPs. “I am hearing from ministers in government that Starmer might have to go in months,” the outlet’s deputy political editor Sam Coates said, describing “unhappiness and despair” in the Labour Party.

A day earlier, a controversial welfare bill proposed by the government passed in a watered-down form, after a number of Labour MPs rebelled against proposed cuts to social benefits. This latest U-turn undermined the prime minister’s authority after a series of similar flip-flops in June, the BBC wrote on Wednesday. Last month, Starmer bowed to pressure and ordered a national inquiry into the police handling of the massive Pakistani grooming gangs sex abuse scandal. Just months before, his administration had insisted the prior seven-year investigation into decades of systematic rape of young, vulnerable girls in the UK had been sufficient.

Labour had been under mounting public pressure to backtrack on the issue, after the simmering scandal was thrust back into the spotlight early this year by tech mogul Elon Musk. Starmer’s public approval has taken a nose dive, with 73% of UK adults unsatisfied with his performance, the Independent wrote on Thursday, citing an Ipsos survey concluded in June. Less than a fifth of respondents were satisfied with his tenure, the poll suggests. According to Ipsos, this is the lowest score ever recorded by the polling company for a prime minister’s first year performance.

“After dismantling the Trump-era safeguards — rigorous sponsor screening, biometric checks, and actual accountability — the Biden team prioritized getting kids out of government custody as fast as possible, no matter who was waiting on the other side..”

• The Biden Administration Basically Trafficked Migrant Children (Margolis)

If you want to understand the full scope of the Biden administration’s border catastrophe, look no further than the horrifying reality that unfolded for thousands of migrant children. Under Joe Biden, the federal government didn’t just lose track of unaccompanied minors; it actively handed them over to criminals, abusers, and traffickers, putting these kids directly in harm’s way. Under Biden, the Department of Homeland Security placed unaccompanied migrant children with so-called “sponsors” who were barely vetted, if at all. These weren’t just distant relatives or family friends. In many cases, these sponsors had rap sheets a mile long — charges ranging from aggravated assault and drug trafficking to prostitution and even attempted murder.

Agents found numerous instances where sponsors had previously been charged with serious crimes such as “hit-and-run, aggravated assault, larceny, counterfeiting, drug trafficking, prostitution and even attempted murder,” according to the release. In some of the most extreme cases, girls were found to be “pregnant with children fathered by their alleged sponsors,” with some minor being forced into labor, the release stated. Some sponsors also had images of child sex abuse material. “In February 2025, the Department of Homeland Security and its federal and state partners launched a national child welfare initiative to locate and verify these at-risk kids’ safety,” ICE explained in a statement.

This wasn’t an isolated bureaucratic blunder. It was a systemic failure, fueled by an administration obsessed with speed over safety. After dismantling the Trump-era safeguards — rigorous sponsor screening, biometric checks, and actual accountability — the Biden team prioritized getting kids out of government custody as fast as possible, no matter who was waiting on the other side. The numbers are staggering: during Biden’s term, Customs and Border Protection encountered nearly half a million unaccompanied minors at the border. Many of these children were released into the country with little more than a cursory background check for their so-called sponsors, if that. In short, the Biden administration was practically sex trafficking migrant children as a matter of policy. Maybe they didn’t know they were, but they purposely put them in dangerous situations.

“Children’s safety and security is nonnegotiable. The previous administration’s failure to implement meaningful safeguards has allowed vulnerable kids to fall into the hands of criminals,” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) spokesperson Laszlo Baksay said in a prepared statement. “Our special agents are working tirelessly to locate these alien children, ensure their protection, and hold accountable those who have abused the system.” Now, with President Donald Trump back in office, we’re seeing a return to sanity: border encounters are at historic lows, and there’s a renewed focus on protecting children, not exploiting them. It’s a stark reminder of what happens when leadership fails and ideology trumps responsibility. The Biden administration’s legacy on this issue is not just a scandal; it’s a national disgrace.

What the Biden administration allowed to happen to these children is unforgivable. Joe Biden and his handlers chose chaos over control, optics over outcomes, and abandoned their duty to protect the most vulnerable to justify their open borders agenda. The result? Thousands of kids were thrown into the arms of predators, traffickers, and abusers, with the federal government playing matchmaker. President Trump is cleaning up a disaster he didn’t create. Again. We shouldn’t forget how we got here — and we damn sure shouldn’t let the people responsible off the hook. Biden’s border policies didn’t just fail; they victimized children. And for that, we should hold every single official who pushed this agenda accountable.

Dollar, BTC, gold. Take your pick.

• The Last Time Gold Moved Like This Was 1929 (Reagan)

Speaking on the Money Sense podcast, Alasdair Macleod chimed in on why he believes we are in an environment similar to 1929, or the start of the Great Depression. In recent times, we have seen things compared often to infamous economic downturns, like the inflation and recession of the 1970s. We have also seen invocations of the Great Depression when the lockdowns happened, and gold accordingly leapt in massive bounds back then. But these days, the price of gold is nearly doubled since the start of the lockdowns, so there might very well be something to MacLeod’s idea. Rather than buying into the narrative that reopenings prevented a 1929-style economic environment, Macleod thinks we are merely in the opening acts of a new global economic depression.

Macleod calls it the U.S. debt trap, mentioning how gold might have already overtaken U.S. dollars in terms of central bank reserves. As I’ve mentioned frequently since 2022, appetite for long-term U.S. government debt is hitting historical lows. Very few entities are willing to wager that the U.S. dollar, in 20-30 years, will still be a desirable asset. The economy isn’t growing anymore (and there are questions of whether it can), and an annual budget deficit of 6%+ means stagnation is a serious concern. Somewhat touching upon our own idea of a disassociation between gold and armed conflict, Macleod says that U.S. dollar and debt are actually the preferred safe haven during such times. This, in turn, makes the U.S. economy even more vulnerable if or when the threat of that military conflict subsides, as investors then start moving out of U.S. assets.

Looking back on it now, Macleod believes that the narrative of China dedollarizing to boost the yuan was just a way of making the dollar look better in comparison. We are seeing that unfold month after month, as a recent report detailed how 32% of central banks are expected to buy gold just in the short-term. As both the report and Macleod note, the situation is so bad that central banks are even taking on other currencies as reserves, so long as it means less exposure to the dollar. Besides being under-owned, Macleod’s analysis of COMEX open interest suggests that gold might still be underbought, making the climb to $3,500 all the more remarkable. This is the first time since 1977 that U.S. assets have all broadly fallen in conjunction while gold has gone up, but, as said, 1929 might be a closer comparison.

Central banks are buying gold because they have a vision of the future, and this vision doesn’t appear to involve the currencies they print having any real money. Macleod is also one of the many analysts convinced that China’s gold heap exceeds 30,000 tons, and he also says that silver is not to be overlooked here. He says that informed accusations of silver price suppression go back more than two decades, with JPMorgan being consistently listed as a key culprit. The idea, he notes, is to artificially deflate silver’s spot price to sell massive amounts of the physical variety. But to whom? China is again pointed to, with Macleod saying that China’s silver reserves might be even more stupefying than their gold stockpile.

He reminds us that the Shanghai Gold Exchange is wholly owned by the PBoC and appears to exist primarily as an instrument for the state to acquire more bullion while suppressing reports of purchases. Although he says gold might be starting its summer doldrums, it’s interesting to note that it’s double the price of its summer doldrums from two years back. Not much has changed in terms of fundamentals since then, so we have to ask what investors can expect over the next two years. And, if we are indeed in a not-so-hidden 1929-style environment, what can gold investors in turn expect over the coming decade?

Per diem
https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1940476393231352192

Purple

Purple is purely a mental construct of the human brain.

We invented the color because of a lack of a sensor signal.pic.twitter.com/IbzN2ogxui

— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) July 3, 2025

Trees

pic.twitter.com/GhZp5O3LiS

— Science girl (@gunsnrosesgirl3) July 3, 2025

Nanchang

I keep sharing these type of photos since they keep blowing my humble little mind. Nanchang, China. pic.twitter.com/HXdAwCjNoF

— Simon Kuestenmacher (@simongerman600) July 3, 2025

Fennec

A family of fennec foxes

pic.twitter.com/m1zO3myRSQ

— Science girl (@gunsnrosesgirl3) July 3, 2025

97%

Tajikistan, a 97% Muslim-majority nation that had already banned burqas and hijabs, is now turning mosques into dance halls to fight radicalization.

Do you like this idea? pic.twitter.com/qPek9T2kji

— Dr. Maalouf ‏ (@realMaalouf) July 2, 2025

https://twitter.com/buitengebieden/status/1940639927596921136

Support the Automatic Earth in wartime with Paypal, Bitcoin and Patreon.

Debt Rattle June 18 2024

Jun 182024

June 18, 2024 Posted by Raúl Ilargi Meijer at 8:54 am Finance Tagged with: bump stocks, Euroclear, FSD, migrant children, Neuralink, Putin, Tories, Trump, war cabinet 55 Responses »

Pablo Picasso The blue room 1901

• Next Stage – The General Staff’s Targets After Putin’s Feint (Helmer)

• NYT Docs: Putin Was Willing To Compromise To End War in 2022 (Antiwar)

• US Must Be Saved From WWIII – Trump (RT)

• If Putin Ukraine Peace Offer Rejected, Next To Be Tougher – Intel Chief (TASS)

• NATO In Talks To Put More Nuclear Weapons On Standby – Stoltenberg (RT)

• Kremlin Views NATO’s Rhetoric On Putting Nukes On Alert As Escalation (TASS)

• Netanyahu Disbands War Cabinet (RT)

• The Unites States of Go Figure (Kunstler)

• Schumer Plans Vote on Bill to Ban Bump Stocks After Supreme Court Ruling (ET)

• British Conservatives Annihilated In Pre-Election Polls (RT)

• Elon Musk Slams “Extinctionist Movement” Who See Humans As A “Plague” (MN)

• Brain Chips To Replace Cell Phones In Future – Musk (RT)

• Tesla Begins Testing Full Self-Driving On Chinese Roadways Ahead Of Rollout (ZH)

• Horrors Of Biden’s Lost 85,000 Migrant Children In America (ZH)

Jim Rickards @JamesGRickards My latest interview with Steve Bannon on The War Room covers the G7 theft of Russian assets and how Russia will retaliate by putting a lien on $40 trillion at the Euroclear custodian. U.S. can’t think one move ahead. Financial chaos will result.

Black voters

Corporate media has spent 8 years, in consensus, branding Trump a racist and White Nationalist.

Meanwhile, actual Black voters are migrating away from Dems/Biden to Trump in what even CNN is describing as a historic shift (following Latino voters):pic.twitter.com/QmBi29WRmp

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) June 17, 2024

Tucker Alex

Tucker Carlson: "They're trying to put the front runner in the presidential race in prison for the rest of his life for things that are not crimes…I do think the formality of these elections is really irksome to them. They hate the whole idea that people they despise would have… pic.twitter.com/slWZT4B6Hb

— Camus (@newstart_2024) June 16, 2024

Watters

Democrat hoaxes used to be convincing, but now they’re unbelievable and uninspiring, which has many on the left hoping for a last-minute switcheroo for @KamalaHarris or even @HillaryClinton. But first, they have to drag @JoeBiden over the finish line, and it's an… pic.twitter.com/APSSOAsLZh

— Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) June 18, 2024

“To think anyone on the other side is trustworthy, or capable of agreement, after all Putin recounted of US aggression, lying, double-dealing, and Ukrainian Nazism, is impossible.”

• Next Stage – The General Staff’s Targets After Putin’s Feint (Helmer)

“[Putin’s terms] will obviously not be accepted by the West and their Ukrainian puppets,” wrote Rozhin. “Against the background of the ‘world summit’ [the Burgenstock, Switzerland, meeting on June 15-16] this will indicate that in fact the West is prolonging the war, so these statements [of Putin] are another torpedo in the summit. Russia is thus showing the countries of the Global South that it has offered a world that will be rejected by those who are broadcasting about ‘peaceful summits’…The war will continue. The goals of the SVO [Special Military Operation] will be achieved by military means.” The distinction in the last line is between Kremlin political strategy and General Staff military strategy – this is a distinction which published Russian analyses of the president’s speech and the state propaganda organs avoid identifying. The semi-official Vzglyad quoted Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, as characterizing the reaction from the West as “of an unconstructive nature”. No Russian official will say as little as this for the record.

Instead, Vzglyad has mobilized its official sources to patch over the differences between Kremlin strategy and General Staff strategy by emphasizing that Putin is following the latter. “According to [Putin], the West has received a specific condition – either Ukraine will be outside the NATO bloc, or there will be a bold and sharp onslaught that will leave no chance for the enemies. Putin is confident of victory not only over Ukraine, but also over the entire collective West. The proposal was made in order to recall this initiative after the defeat of Ukraine. But Western leaders did not understand Putin, and then they themselves will say that they want peace… But there will be no mercy, tougher conditions will be put forward.” In a second report from academics on the Kremlin-financed Valdai Club roster, Vzglyad claims “the essence of the Russian president’s speech is that the European security system no longer exists and will not be based on the same principles.”

“In addition, the Russian president managed to change the agenda of the Swiss summit…the president’s initiative is capable of transforming the security structures not only of Eurasia, but also in the perspective of the entire planet. In addition, Russia already has really working international institutions in this space: the CIS, SCO, EAEU, CSTO, BRICS, the Union State of Russia and Belarus. All these tools have proven their reliability and suitability in modern conditions.” The Kremlin’s American camp followers have repeated the semi-official line by scratching the difference between tactics and strategy, between feint and purpose. “Notice he’s [Putin] not making a demand about Odessa,” said one. “So Odessa is still off the table…So this is a prelude to the next ramp-up in Russian military operations.”

Russian skeptics, as well as non-Russian military analysts, point out that Putin has repeatedly refused to follow the General Staff’s advice, restricting their proposed military operations to an extent that there is open questioning about his reasons. One source says Putin’s June 14 exposition is “only half-right in blaming the Western ‘globalist liberal elites’ [Putin’s speech] for the current ‘extremely dangerous state of affairs’ [Putin’s speech]. Ultimately, the ideology of liberalism, inferiority complex, and corruption which dominate the oligarch-backed elite in Moscow has played a major role.” This is a reference to the role Putin invited the oil and minerals oligarch Roman Abramovich to play in the negotiations of March-April 2022 in Istanbul; in the negotiations with the Ukrainian delegation, Abramovich was Putin’s personal delegate and he outranked the official Russian negotiators.

There was strong domestic military and political opposition to this at the time in Moscow; there remains suspicion of an attempt to repeat by Putin’s Kremlin staff, represented by Peskov, even now. “He [Putin] cannot be so influenced still as to think the war against Russia via the Kiev regime will stop under the conditions he laid out, nor can he think there are any terms which the US and NATO can be trusted by the Russians to sign. That’s why the Russian Foreign Ministry tabled the terms of a non-aggression and security in Europe requiring the roll-back of NATO’s borders to 1997. That was in December 2021. To think anyone on the other side is trustworthy, or capable of agreement, after all Putin recounted of US aggression, lying, double-dealing, and Ukrainian Nazism, is impossible.”

Much better deal than available now, and 500,000 Ukrainians still alive.

• NYT Docs: Putin Was Willing To Compromise To End War in 2022 (Antiwar)

In April 2022, Ukraine and Russia were on the brink of signing a deal to end the war just weeks after it began. The New York Times published documents showing President Vladimir Putin was willing to make concessions to get an agreement signed. According to the documents, Putin initially sought to have Kiev recognize Moscow’s 2014 annexation of Crimea. However, a draft agreement from April 15, 2022, suggests both parties were prepared to set aside the issue to end the conflict. “Paragraph 1 of Article 2 and Articles 4, 5, and 11 of this Treaty shall not apply to Crimea and Sevastopol,” the document says. In December, Ukrainian negotiator Oleksandr Chalyi explained that an agreement was reached in the spring of 2022, stating the two sides “managed to find a very real compromise. We were very close in the middle of April, in the end of April, to finalize our war with some peaceful settlement.”

Kiev was also willing to accept neutrality with regards to NATO, according to the NYT. Ukraine’s negotiation team proposed a peace deal that would say the country “does not join any military alliances” and “does not deploy foreign military bases and contingents.” The draft deal would have allowed Kiev to sign bilateral agreements with NATO states, as well as become a member of the European Union, but would have required Ukraine’s security partners to lift sanctions on Russia. The Kremlin also sought to protect the rights of millions of Russian speakers living in Ukraine by forcing Kiev to repeal restrictions on the Russian language, and to bar the state from erecting monuments glorifying neo-Nazis and WWII-era Nazi collaborators. As the talks were ongoing, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was pushed by his Western backers to forgo diplomacy and attempt to forcibly expel Russian troops from his country.

Then-UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson made an infamous trip to Kiev to pressure Zelensky to abandon any peace negotiations, while Washington repeatedly vowed to supply unlimited military aid. The NYT report added details about US pressure on Ukraine to ditch the talks. According to a senior American official familiar with the negotiations, Washington “quietly said, ‘You understand this is unilateral disarmament, right?’” Additionally, the NYT noted that Polish leaders believed the French and German governments might have endorsed the peace agreement and pushed Ukraine to accept it. During a meeting in late March 2022, Poland’s President Andrzej Duda pressured other NATO leaders not to allow Ukraine to sign the Russian proposal.

Some US officials cautioned Ukraine not to trust Russia and warned the talks were merely a military ploy. However, two out of three Ukrainian negotiators who spoke with the NYT believed the Russian proposal was genuine, and one explained Putin had “reduced his demands” over the course of the discussions. Ultimately, decision-makers in Kiev listened to their supporters in Warsaw, London, and Washington and elected to break off the negotiations. More than two years later, the conflict drags on, with Russian forces steadily advancing on major Ukrainian cities despite renewed Western military aid. On Friday, the Russian president extended a public peace offer to Ukraine that is similar to the one nearly agreed to in 2022. However, along with Kiev agreeing never to join NATO and the West lifting sanctions on Russia, the Kremlin is now demanding that Ukraine recognize Moscow’s sovereignty over Crimea and four other Ukrainian oblasts that have been annexed by Russia throughout the two-and-a-half-year-long war.

“..he has done more damage to the country than the ten worst presidents in US history combined..”

• US Must Be Saved From WWIII – Trump (RT)

Former US President Donald Trump has warned of the possibility of a third world war breaking out under the current leadership in Washington, saying that if elected he would reverse course. Speaking at a Turning Point USA campaign event in Detroit, Trump emphasized that he had not started any new conflict during his 2017-2021 presidency, and vowed to work towards restoring peace, particularly in Ukraine, if he wins a second term. Trump claimed that Joe Biden’s “weakness and failure” were putting the US in “grave danger” and “dragging us towards World War III,” suggesting that he has done more damage to the country than the ten worst presidents in US history combined. “We have a lot of problems in this country, on top of that, we could end up in World War III because we have an incompetent leader that should never have been there,” he stressed.

Earlier this month, the Republican also warned that the world could be plunged into a devastating nuclear war due to Biden’s alleged mental decline. Speaking to Fox News host Sean Hannity, Trump suggested that unlike the leaders of Russia, China, and North Korea, Biden is “not at the top of his game” and had never been “the brightest bulb” among US politicians. Trump warned that a nuclear exchange could lead to “world obliteration” and emphasized that the US currently has a leader that is “incapable of even discussing” the issue. During his speech in Detroit, the presidential candidate also criticized the Biden administration for “wasting money at levels never seen before,” particularly when it comes to continued financial support for Ukraine, and called Vladimir Zelensky “the greatest salesman that has ever lived.”

“Every time he comes to our country, he walks away with $60 billion dollars,” Trump said, adding that every time Zelensky receives money, he immediately asks for more. “It never ends,” he stressed, and vowed to have the issue “settled” before he takes office again as president. Previously, Trump has stated that the Ukraine conflict “never would have happened” if he had been president at the time and has said that he would be able to end it “in 24 hours” if he gets another term in November. He has not, however, offered any details as to how he would accomplish that goal.

Obviously.

• If Putin Ukraine Peace Offer Rejected, Next To Be Tougher – Intel Chief (TASS)

The conditions of the next peace proposal for Ukraine if the current one is rejected will be more complex and harsh, Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) Director Sergey Naryshkin said in an interview with TASS. “The conditions on which peace can be achieved and some sort of a peace agreement may be signed will become more complex and tough for Ukraine,” he said, replying to a question as to what will happen if Ukraine refuses Russian President Vladimir Putin’s peace proposal. Earlier, Putin presented new peace proposals on settling the Ukraine conflict, providing for the recognition of Crimea, the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics and the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions as parts of Russia, the establishment of Ukraine’s non-aligned and non-nuclear status as well as its demilitarization and denazification and the lifting of anti-Russian sanctions. The Kiev regime has rejected this initiative.

“..the only scenario in which they might resort to a nuclear option is if Russia’s very existence is at stake..”

• NATO In Talks To Put More Nuclear Weapons On Standby – Stoltenberg (RT)

NATO members are debating putting more of their nuclear weapons on standby mode amid tensions with Russia and China, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has said. In an interview with the Daily Telegraph on Sunday, Stoltenberg stated that NATO is in talks about taking nuclear assets out of storage and making them ready to use, since the US-led military bloc must clearly convey to the outside world that it has a strong deterrent potential. ”I won’t go into operational details about how many nuclear warheads should be operational and which should be stored, but we need to consult on these issues,” he said, adding that deliberations are already underway. The NATO chief stressed that while the bloc’s ultimate goal is a world without nukes, “as long as nuclear weapons exist, we will remain a nuclear alliance, because a world where Russia, China and North Korea have nuclear weapons, and NATO does not, is a more dangerous world.”

He voiced particular concern about what he called China’s growing nuclear capabilities, adding that NATO could soon face “something that it has never faced before, and that is two nuclear-powered potential adversaries” – Beijing and Moscow. According to Stoltenberg, the US is also modernizing its nuclear gravity bombs deployed in Europe, and its allies on the continent are also upgrading the aircraft that carry them. This came after Pranay Vaddi, Special Assistant to the US President and Senior Director for Arms Control, said earlier this month that “absent a change in the trajectory of adversary arsenals,” the US would soon reach a point where it would have to increase the number of deployed nuclear weapons.

Western media and officials have repeatedly accused Russia of nuclear saber-rattling amid the Ukraine conflict. However, officials in Moscow have repeatedly said that they have no plans to use nukes against the neighboring country, stressing that the only scenario in which they might resort to a nuclear option is if Russia’s very existence is at stake. At the same time, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov warned last week that Moscow could potentially alter its nuclear doctrine in view of a growing threat caused by “unacceptable and escalatory actions of the US and its NATO allies.”

“..the Russian president never talks nukes “at his own initiative as he takes the issue seriously..”

• Kremlin Views NATO’s Rhetoric On Putting Nukes On Alert As Escalation (TASS)

The recent remark by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg that the bloc’s allied members are discussing putting their nuclear arsenals on alert is another bout of tensions, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. “This is nothing else but an escalation,” Peskov said. Unlike Western officials, the Russian president never talks nukes “at his own initiative as he takes the issue seriously,” the Kremlin spokesman said. “Whenever President [Vladimir] Putin comments on the issue of nuclear arms, he does so, taking someone’s questions or questions from reporters, including foreign ones,” he explained.

Also, the NATO chief’s statement runs counter to the declaration issued following last weekend’s conference on Ukraine in Switzerland, Peskov added. The communique, he said, ruled out such rhetoric as inadmissible. Stoltenberg told The Daily Telegraph in an interview that NATO allies had started consultations on the need to put nuclear weapons on alert, including against the background of China’s plans to increase the number of its nuclear warheads.

Nothing changes.

• Netanyahu Disbands War Cabinet (RT)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dissolved the war cabinet overseeing the conflict in Gaza after a key member, retired general Benny Gantz, resigned from the emergency government, according to media reports. The prime minister reportedly announced the move to ministers at a meeting of the cabinet on Sunday. Gantz, a former defense minister without portfolio who entered the war cabinet shortly after the beginning of the conflict with the Palestinian militant group Hamas last October, announced his resignation earlier this month, citing disagreement with Netanyahu’s policies. ”The cabinet was in the coalition agreement with [National Unity MK Benny] Gantz at his request. As soon as Gantz left – there is no need for a cabinet anymore,” Netanyahu said, as cited by local media.

The prime minister is now expected to hold consultations on the Gaza conflict with a small group of ministers, including Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, who had been in the war cabinet. Shortly after Gantz’s resignation, another minister without portfolio, former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, also resigned from the cabinet, where he served as one of three observers. Another observer, Knesset member Yechiel Tropper, made the same announcement. Both Gantz and Eisenkot said they resigned due to Netanyahu’s failure to form a strategy for the war in Gaza.

During the government meeting on Sunday, Netanyahu reportedly said, “in order to reach the goal of eliminating the capabilities of Hamas, [I] made decisions that were not always acceptable to the military echelon,” adding, “we have a country with an army and not an army with a country.” The war cabinet was established on October 11, just days after the Israeli-Hamas war broke out following the Palestinian militant group’s surprise attack on southern Israel, in which over 1,000 people were killed and around 250 were taken hostage. The cabinet was chaired by Netanyahu, and included Gantz and Gallant, along with three observers – Dermer, Eisenkot, and Shas party leader Aryeh Deri.

“Pretend is what actors actually do, you see. They’re really good at it, and your job is to play along, suspend your disbelief. That’s the essence of showbiz.”

• The Unites States of Go Figure (Kunstler)

You realize, don’t you, that everything going on around the Ukraine fiasco on the NATO side is completely insane? The folks running the US government — Barack Obama and his witches’ coven — started the whole thing over there in concert with a gang of corporate players (BlackRock, sundry oil-and-gas companies, Haliburton types, arms-makers, bunch of big banks), plus the dastardly WEF for “guidance” (ha!), looking to grab the mineral wealth of Ukraine and, ultimately, of Russia itself. Nice try. Didn’t work out. Tons of money pounded down a rat hole. Now, the chatter is that we (NATO) “can’t afford to lose.” Yeah? But we’re losing. Russia will hold the eastern Ukraine provinces and what’s left in the rest of Ukraine will be a failed state drained of men under sixty able to work at anything, bankrupt, broken. It will take a century, if ever, for Ukraine to recover from all that and the West will have gained nothing.

Anyway, that’s the true prospect. And so, the West’s “solution” to that humiliating quandary appears to be: start a bigger war, right up to and including nukes. That’s good thinking there, Butch, said Sundance. Why the European members of NATO wanted to go along with this nickel-plated clusterfuck is an abiding puzzle of history now, like who exactly bumped off JFK in 1963. Germany, the Euro club’s biggest economy, stood by listlessly while America blew up its supply of affordable natgas (the Nord Stream pipelines), which was an act of war by us against Germany. Apparently, Olaf Scholz went to our CIA station in Berlin for a haircut one day and came out with a lobotomy, staring blankly through the whole affair like a Hinterwälder steer on the killing floor. Meanwhile, goodbye industrial economy! Nice knowing you. Looks like it’s back to the fourteenth century, living on rough black bread, sleeping with the cattle under your house for heat in winter, fighting jihadis inside your town walls. . . .

What is the purpose, you ask yourself, of this new world war we’re itching to start? And why now, exactly? The stupid answers may be the correct ones. To furnish an emergency pretext allowing “Joe Biden” (Barack Obama & Co.) to “postpone” the election? If so, I guess they want a hot civil war even more than WWIII, because that’s what they’ll get. Or is it just to complete the destruction of the USA, turning us into a failed state run by a tranny Mamluk-ocracy? Or is it, as Ed Dowd has averred, to cover up the imminent implosion of the US / Euroland debt debacle? To provide cover for all that, the West held a fake peace conference at a five-star resort in Switzerland last week — flutes of Louis Roederer Cristal Brut with langoustine mousse in puff pastry boats . . . to die for! (and you just might) — and you know how serious the USA was because we sent our ace problem-solver Veep Kamala Harris, who cackled and hee-hawed her way through a session or two and then. . . just. . . split the scene, mysteriously. Russia, was conspicuously not invited, by the way. Whose idea was that?

Mr. Putin marked the occasion by issuing a sane proposal to commence peace negotiations so plain, simple, and straightforward that even “Joe Biden” might have gotten the drift: 1) withdraw Ukrainian troops from Donbas territory that has joined the Russian Federation, and 2) agree that Ukraine not join NATO. The US and NATO instantly rejected it, on grounds unspecified. According to The New York Times own search engine this very morning (June 17), the newspaper hasn’t published a news story on the Ukraine War for the past five days. Go figure . . . . While Veep Kamala Harris was yukking it up over the peace hilarity in Switzerland, “Joe Biden” went to the far more important celebrity fundraiser out in Hollywood, headlined by the likes of actors George Clooney, Julia Roberts, and late-nite snarkist Jimmy Kimmel, that is, certified experts on geopolitical conflict, united in the cause of “saving our democracy” from “the dictator Trump.”

“Joe Biden” declared that Donald Trump was bent on “retribution. . . he’s gonna get back at the people.” Roger that. But I think he meant that Mr. Trump might open some inquiries into how come the Democratic Party and its Intel blob ran one debilitating lawless hoax after another on our country for the past eight years while bankrupting it and destroying the medical system, the legal system, the currency, higher education, and the US military, not to mention jailing thousands on fake criminal charges and letting ten billion alien mutts into the country, many of them jihadis with dubious intentions.But never mind all that. $30-million got raised in Hollywood to continue the game of pretend that “JB” is running for reelection. Pretend is what actors actually do, you see. They’re really good at it, and your job is to play along, suspend your disbelief. That’s the essence of showbiz.

“.. the high court found that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) exceeded its authority..”

How is that a “disgraceful decision”?

• Schumer Plans Vote on Bill to Ban Bump Stocks After Supreme Court Ruling (ET)

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he will bring a vote this week on legislation to outlaw bump stocks after the Supreme Court on June 14 struck down a Trump-era ban on the gun accessory. Mr. Schumer, at a June 16 news conference shared by CBS News, said he would bring the bill up for unanimous consent, meaning that only one senator has the power to block the measure. It is almost certain that a Republican senator would move to block the measure. “We’ll see just what Republican MAGAs do: Will they allow it to go forward, or will they cower to MAGA and hurt the American people?” Mr. Schumer said. A 6–3 opinion by the high court found that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) exceeded its authority when it interpreted a federal firearms statute to outlaw the use of bump stocks.

Bump stocks are attached to the butt end of a rifle, to take advantage of a semiautomatic gun’s recoil to fire more rapidly. “As I warned the Trump administration at the time, the only way to permanently close this loophole is through legislation. Senate Democrats are ready to pass legislation to ban bump stocks, but we will need votes from Senate Republicans,” Mr. Schumer said in a statement on June 14 after the ruling. The ATF in 2018, with the support of President Donald Trump, reversed its earlier position and declared bump stocks illegal in response to the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas, in which a gunman used firearms equipped with bump stocks to fire multiple guns more rapidly, killing 60 and leaving hundreds wounded.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito filed a concurrence on June 14 that emphasized Congress’s role. “There is a simple remedy for the disparate treatment of bump stocks and machineguns,” he said. “Congress can amend the law—and perhaps would have done so already if ATF had stuck with its earlier interpretation. Now that the situation is clear, Congress can act.” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, called the Supreme Court decision “deeply disappointing.” “Today’s ruling renews a call for Congress to enact further gun safety legislation,” he wrote on social media platform X. Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-Fla.) echoed that, writing on X that the ruling was a “disgraceful decision” that “will result in the death of more Americans, especially children.” Some Republicans saw the ruling as a victory for Second Amendment rights. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said on June 16 that any legislation to ban bump stocks might violate the Second Amendment.

“Winning just 72 seats would be the party’s worst result in its 200-year history..”

• British Conservatives Annihilated In Pre-Election Polls (RT)

The UK’s ruling Conservative Party is heading for “electoral extinction,” according to multiple polls published in British media over the weekend. Amid Sunak’s record unpopularity, two polls showed Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party surging to third place. According to an Opinium poll published in The Observer on Saturday, 40% of likely voters said they would choose the Labour Party when they cast their votes on July 4. Another 23% said they would vote Conservative, while 14% said they would back Reform UK candidates, a better result for the anti-immigration party than for the Greens (7%) and Liberal Democrats (12%). A Telegraph poll published the same day showed even more dismal results for Sunak’s party, with 46% of likely voters choosing Labour, 21% Conservative, and 13% opting for Reform UK.

It marks the poorest showing for the Conservatives in a Telegraph poll in five years, while Labour’s 25-point lead is the party’s largest since October 2022, when Conservative Prime MInister Liz Truss stepped down after unveiling a widely-reviled mini-budget. Reform’s share in both polls is its largest since the party’s creation in 2021. A more detailed poll carried out by Survation for the Times showed Labour winning 456 out of 650 parliamentary seats, and the Conservatives hanging on to only 72. By contrast, the Conservatives won 365 seats in 2019, a majority of 80 and at the time their best result since 1987. Winning just 72 seats would be the party’s worst result in its 200-year history. The Conservatives’ previous low point came in 1906, when under the leadership of Arthur Balfour it won 156 seats to the Liberal party’s 397.

Sunak called the election last month, before the publication of economic data showing that inflation was unlikely to fall to his government’s target. Like Truss and Boris Johnson before him, Sunak has presided over an historic decline in British living standards and a rise in energy costs and inflation, both of which soared after the UK cut itself off from Russian fossil fuels in 2022. With three weeks to go until the election, some Conservatives have accused Reform UK and its leader, Nigel Farage, of splitting the right-wing vote. “The only wasted vote is a Conservative vote,” Farage shot back last week, after a separate poll showed Reform as the country’s second-largest party. “We’re heading north and the Tories are heading south,” he continued, declaring that “the people’s revolt is just gathering momentum.”

“..If humans go extinct or civilisation collapses, whatever policies we may have are irrelevant..”

• Elon Musk Slams “Extinctionist Movement” Who See Humans As A “Plague” (MN)

In a recent interview, Elon Musk warned that those who wish to see humanity thrive are in a fight against those with an “extinctionist” philosophy, environmental extremists who see humans as a “plague on the Earth.” Musk was speaking to the Cato Institute about the “implosion of the birth rate,” noting that we should be “very concerned” because it is “accelerating in most countries.” “If there are no humans, there’s no humanity,” Musk simplified, adding “we need to make them somehow.” The Space X owner continued, “In the sort of extreme form of the environmentalist movement, people start to view humans as a plague on the surface of the earth, as a fundamentally bad thing, and with the implication that if all humans disappeared, somehow earth would be better off.”

Musk labeled it “The Extinctionist Movement,” urging that “I think at a fundamental level, you can think of things as a fight between expansionist and extinctionist philosophies.” “That’s what really matters. If humans go extinct or civilisation collapses, whatever policies we may have are irrelevant,” he further asserted. Musk further stressed that civilisation and consciousness will end and everything will be left to robots unless we “have an expansionist philosophy.” “We must seek to go beyond what we’ve done in the past to increase the number of humans,” Musk declared, adding “one way or another, this must happen.” His final message to the world was “Go forth and multiply.” It is a warning Musk has been repeating for some time now.

He mentions so much, and the author picks out the cell phone? How about “revolutionary treatments for people suffering from various physical disabilities such as paralysis and blindness, as well as illnesses like obesity, autism, depression, and schizophrenia..”?

• Brain Chips To Replace Cell Phones In Future – Musk (RT)

Cell phones will become obsolete in the future, being replaced by chips that are implanted directly in the human brain, billionaire tech entrepreneur Elon Musk has predicted. His Neuralink biotech company implanted a brain chip for the first time in 30-year-old quadriplegic Noland Arbaugh back in January. The surgical procedure involved placing the computer chip – which is about the size of a coin – in the region of the brain which controls the intention to move. The chip is then used to “record and transmit brain signals wirelessly to an app that decodes movement intention.” Musk shared his latest prediction in response to a post published on X (formerly Twitter) by a parody account named Not Elon Musk on Sunday. The original message read: “Would you install a Neuralink interface on your brain to allow you to control your new X phone by thinking?”

Musk replied by claiming that “in the future, there will be no phones, just Neuralinks.” In its press release last year, Neuralink said its Precise Robotically Implanted Brain-Computer Interface (PRIME) program aims at developing a “fully implantable, wireless brain-computer interface” that would at first grant people the ability to control a computer cursor or keyboard using their thoughts. It would later pave the way for revolutionary treatments for people suffering from various physical disabilities such as paralysis and blindness, as well as illnesses like obesity, autism, depression, and schizophrenia. In an interview with Joe Rogan in 2018, Musk suggested that Neuralink could also one day allow humans to communicate without using words, and possibly also achieve a state of “symbiosis” with artificial intelligence.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval for the first chip implantation trial last May. Several weeks after the procedure in late January, Musk reported that the man had made a “full recovery with no ill effects that we are aware of,” and was capable of moving a computer mouse around the screen “by just thinking.” However, in May, Neuralink acknowledged that it had encountered certain issues after tiny wires implanted in the brain were dislodged out of position. Nevertheless, the FDA gave the green light for a second human trial, the Wall Street Journal reported last month. The next experiment, which is reportedly slated for June, will feature a modified procedure, whereby a chip will be implanted deeper into the brain to prevent it from retracting. According to the media outlet, another eight people are expected to take part in further trials by the end of the year.

Wow. That’s fast.

• Tesla Begins Testing Full Self-Driving On Chinese Roadways Ahead Of Rollout (ZH)

Beijing recently ‘greenlighted’ Tesla the ability to roll out its driver-assistance system, known as “Full Self-Driving,” or FSD. A new report suggests Tesla is testing vehicles equipped with FSD on city streets and highways in the world’s largest car market. Reuters cited a report from the government-backed Shanghai Observer that said ten Tesla vehicles with FSD are being tested ahead of what could be a much larger planned rollout later this year. Elon Musk has been strategically paving the way for an FSD rollout in China in recent months. His surprise visit to China on April 28, where he met with top Chinese officials, including Premier Li Qiang, clearly indicated Tesla’s deepening ties with China.

One day later, on April 29, news broke in US corporate media that Tesla would partner with Chinese tech giant Baidu for mapping and navigation software to support FSD, including satisfying regulators about data security and privacy requirements. Other reports said top Chinese officials gave Musk the greenlight to roll out FSD in some limited capacity. In May, Reuters reported that Tesla was preparing to register FSD with Chinese authorities for a planned rollout later this year. Chinese state media also stated that Tesla had begun building a Megapack factory in Shanghai. The larger rollout of FSD in China will be a golden opportunity for Tesla to expand revenue streams amid the worldwide slump in EV sales. Also, this allows them to better compete with local rivals in China.

“If this happened under former President Trump, CBS, ABC, NBC, and other media outlets would be running 24/7 specials about the horrific situation..”

• Horrors Of Biden’s Lost 85,000 Migrant Children In America (ZH)

One of Muckraker.com’s journalists has taken to X, revealing an upcoming report set to expose the shocking reality behind some of the 85,000 migrant children who vanished under the Biden administration’s first term. Muckraker wrote on X that one government insider has supplied them with a “list of addresses where some of the 85,000 missing alien children have been delivered under the Biden administration.” In the video, a Muckraker journalist stood outside an abandoned Amityville, New York house. He said this is one of the thousands of addresses the government insider has provided them, adding this home with boarded-up windows allegedly had two migrant children delivered to a sponsor living at the house. “Our upcoming report will expose the horrors of the Biden administration’s unaccompanied children program,” Muckraker wrote on X.

Leftist corporate media outlets have barely covered that the Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement has lost more than 85,000 migrant children in Biden’s first term. If this happened under former President Trump, CBS, ABC, NBC, and other media outlets would be running 24/7 specials about the horrific situation. All the American people hear are crickets from leftist corporate media outlets, more focused on rainbow June month than actually caring about missing children. It is disappointing and another reason why distrust in leftist corporate media is soaring as ratings implode. In recent weeks, “Fox and Friends Weekend” co-host Rachel Campos-Duffy asked Trump in an interview about the missing migrant children situation and what he would do if reelected.

President Trump commits to finding the 85,000 plus missing migrant children — most who have been sex trafficked — that Trafficker-in-Chief Joe Biden has lost.

“Many of them are dead,” Trump sadly revealed.

The sad reality is that most sex trafficking victims do not survive… pic.twitter.com/HIxRRCK09k

— LIZ CROKIN (@LizCrokin) June 2, 2024

“So in just this year, fiscal year 2024, there’s been 74,000 unaccompanied children that have come across the border. In 2023, get this number, 137,275. You know, you’ve seen the images of these children … and the Joe Biden administration has lost 80,000 of them. No one can track, no one knows where they’re at … Will you commit, will the Trump administration commit to finding these children, to finding them and returning them to their families? To their countries? Because many of them have been lost into sex trafficking. It’s heartbreaking. Will you commit to that?” Campos-Duffy asked the former president.

Trump responded: “Yeah, I would do that. Sure, adding, “I haven’t been asked that question, but the answer is yes. It’s a simple answer. Many of them are dead. They have done such a bad job.” Trump also spoke with Dr. Phil about the situation, in which he said, “Can you imagine if that were Trump that had 88,000 missing children…” What Trump is referring to is corporate leftist media would be railing against him if he were president right now for the missing children. Muckraker did not provide a release date on the report: “Stay tuned, you do not want to miss what’s next.” If the climate cultists and woke zombies across the West redirected their wasted energy from rainbow parades to actually addressing human trafficking, perhaps real progress in tackling this crisis could be made.

Kansas AG Pfizer

BREAKING: Kansas Attorney General sues Pfizer for "misleading Kansans on COVID vaccine."

The announcement alleges Pfizer mislead Kansans on vaccine risks, such as with pregnant women and myocarditis, and that Pfizer claimed the vaccines protected against COVID variants when data… pic.twitter.com/RjNDTGrwg5

— Jason Blair (@JasonBlairNTD) June 17, 2024

Turandot
https://twitter.com/i/status/1802646620015579338

Whenever I see Optimus, I just keep thinking: Joe Biden moves very energy efficient.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1802678186611777681

Horse

I think about this horse dancing to Fleetwood Mac at least 5 times a day pic.twitter.com/nF9EB3zyzy

— Nature is Amazing ☘️ (@AMAZlNGNATURE) June 17, 2024

Baby turtle

Baby turtle reacts to a wash pic.twitter.com/z20gIc3Kzm

— Nature is Amazing ☘️ (@AMAZlNGNATURE) June 17, 2024

Baby rhino

What a sight!

Interspecies, interactive behaviour is always fascinating to observe. The mother rhino took good care of her calf with 3 curious Ladies understanding to keep their distance!

Video credit Zulu Nyala pic.twitter.com/wljho6a9n5

— Christina (@CWitvrouwen) June 17, 2024

Elephants