Nov 032021
 November 3, 2021  Posted by at 9:55 am Finance Tagged with: , , , ,

Pablo Picasso Harlequin and woman with necklace 1917


80% Of Women Vaxxed In 1st 20 Weeks Of Pregnancy Has Spontaneous Abortion (IP)
Italy Health Department Revises Covid Deaths Down From 130,000+ To 3783 (IT)
CDC Recommends Vaccines for 5 to 11-year-olds, Jabs Start Tomorrow (CTH)
CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is “Problematic” (Techno Fog)
Researcher Fingers Data Integrity Issues In Pfizer’s Vaccine Trial (BMJ)
Dr. Paul Offit Is Lying To Us About Myocarditis Rates (Steve Kirsch)
German Companies Creating Segregated Canteens For Vaxxed and Unvaxxed (SN)
The Disaster That Never Came (Anderberg)



“Name one other disease for which: governments & medical boards prohibit doctors from prescribing prophylactic & early treatment meds to patients & threaten them with jail sentences, fines, disciplinary proceedings & termination of their medical license.”





I spent a long time thinking about this, the physical stress, the emotional pain, all just a for an experiment. This concerns millions of women just in America alone. And yes, the “natural” spontaneous abortion rate may be high, maybe 20% or so, so a doctor can just say: it’s not abnormal…. try again!

Get the jab! It’s safe and effective! Don’t risk endangering your child!

80% Of Women Vaxxed In 1st 20 Weeks Of Pregnancy Has Spontaneous Abortion (IP)

An important peer-reviewed study looked at the CDC’s data on pregnancy losses following the mRNA injections, and found that more than 80% of those who got the injections during the first 5 months of pregnancy ended up with a spontaneous abortion (which is 7- to 8-times higher than the expected baseline of around 11%)

The study indicates that at least 81.9% (≥104/127) experienced spontaneous abortion following mRNA exposure before 20 weeks, and 92.3% (96/104) of spontaneous abortions occurred before 13 weeks’ gestation (Table 4, footnotes).[4] This is a very high proportion of pregnancy loss observed in those exposed to the mRNA vaccination before 20 weeks’ gestation, ranging from 81.9–91.2% (n = 114–127), which is significantly different to baseline estimates from other studies (11.3%, n = 79,978 [6]; p < 0.001), being 7- to 8-fold higher than expected (p < 0.001).

Read more …

Google translate.

Everyone copy the methodology, and apply locally.

Italy Health Department Revises Covid Deaths Down From 130,000+ To 3783 (IT)

According to the new report (which had not been updated since July) from the Higher Institute of Health on mortality from Covid, the virus that brought the world to its knees would have killed far less than a common flu. It seems a bizarre and no vax statement, but according to the statistical sample of medical records collected by the institute, only 2.9% of the deaths registered since the end of February 2020 would be due to Covid 19. So of the 130,468 deaths registered by official statistics at the time of preparation of the new report only 3,783 would be due to the power of the virus itself. Because all the other Italians who lost their lives had from one to five diseases which, according to the ISS, therefore already left them little hope. Even 67.7% would have had more than three contemporary diseases together, and 18% at least two together.

Now I personally know many people, but none who have the misfortune of having five serious illnesses at the same time. I would like to trust our scientists, then I go to read the ailments listed which would be no secondary reason for the loss of so many Italians and I begin to feed some profane doubts. According to the ISS, 65.8% of Italians who are no longer there after being infected with Covid were ill with arterial hypertension, that is, they had high blood pressure. 23.5% were also demented, 29.3% added a little diabetes to their ailments, 24.8% also atrial fibrillation. And that’s not all: 17.4% already had sick lungs, 16.3% had had cancer in the last 5 years; 15.7% suffered from heart failure, 28% had ischemic heart disease, 24.8% suffered from atrial fibrillation, more than one in ten were also obese,

Read more …

They should put signs at the airports: “Welcome To Guinea Pig Nation”.

CDC Recommends Vaccines for 5 to 11-year-olds, Jabs Start Tomorrow (CTH)

Center for Disease Control (CDC) Director Rochelle P. Walensky has given the authorization for vaccinations to begin in 5 to 11-year-olds starting tomorrow. You can review the CDC press release HERE. According to the CDC announcement, Walensky states: “We know millions of parents are eager to get their children vaccinated and with this decision, we now have recommended that about 28 million children receive a COVID-19 vaccine.” Unfortunately, the CDC authorization now gives cover to various blue state democrats who will likely mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for public school children. However, despite the CDC position, it is worth noting the recent survey by NBC showing only 27% of parents would vaccinate their kids under 12:

… 64% of people with children under age 11 say they would not vaccinate their kids or would wait to see more data on long term consequences. Only 27% of respondents said they would immediately vaccinate their children with the untested COVID vaccine. (more) It is very reasonable for parents to question the FDA approval and the political intents of the CDC in authorizing this vaccination for children 3 to 11. The risk to children from the virus itself is virtually nonexistent. However, despite the low risk the government is recommending, perhaps soon to be mandating, a little tested vaccine for a population that is not at any significant level of health risk. If the Virginia election result teaches the Biden administration that protecting kids is important to parents on the issue of education…. they haven’t seen anything yet, when it comes to the response from parents to vaccinating kids with an untested vaccine. Madness.

Read more …

So we change the definition. If anyone asks, it’s because of The Science. Any more questions, ask Fauci.

CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is “Problematic” (Techno Fog)

The CDC caused an uproar in early September 2021, after it changed its definitions of “vaccination” and “vaccine.” For years, the CDC had set definitions for vaccination/vaccine that discussed immunity. This all changed on September 1, 2021. The prior CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination (August 26, 2021): • Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose. • Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.

The CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination since September 1, 2021: • Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose. • Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease. People noticed. Representative Thomas Massie was among the first to discuss the change, noting the definition went from “immunity” to “protection”.

To many observers, it appeared the CDC changed the definitions because of the waning effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. For example, the effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine falls over time, with an Israeli study reported in August 2021 as showing the vaccine being “only 16% effective against symptomatic infection for those individuals who had two doses of the shot back in January.” The CDC recognizes the waning effectiveness, thus explaining their promotion of booster shots.

Of course, the usual suspects defended the CDC. The Washington Post, for example, cast doubt that the CDC changed the definition because of issues with the COVID-19 vaccines. The CDC tried to downplay the change, stating “slight changes in wording over time … haven’t impacted the overall definition.”

CDC emails we obtained via the Freedom of Information Act reveal CDC worries with how the performance of the COVID-19 vaccines didn’t match the CDC’s own definition of “vaccine”/“vaccination”. The CDC’s Ministry of Truth went hard at work in the face of legitimate public questions on this issue.

In one August 2021 e-mail, a CDC employee cited to complaints that “Right-wing covid-19 deniers are using your ‘vaccine’ definition to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines…”

After taking some suggestions, the CDC’s Lead Health Communication Specialist went up the food chain to propose changes to the definitions: “I need to update this page Immunization Basics | CDC since these definitions are outdated and being used by some to say COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines per CDC’s own definition.”

Getting no response, there was a follow-up e-mail a week later: “The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition.”

The change of the “vaccination” definition was eventually approved on August 31. The next day, on September 1, they approved the change to the “vaccine” definition from discussing immunity to protection (seen below).

There you have it. Affirmative action for the multinational corporations. Why have them improve their vaccines when you can just change the definition of vaccine to fit their ineffective vaccines?

Read more …

From the British Medical Journal.

Researcher Fingers Data Integrity Issues In Pfizer’s Vaccine Trial (BMJ)

In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States. But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial.

Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. On its website Ventavia calls itself the largest privately owned clinical research company in Texas and lists many awards it has won for its contract work. But Jackson has told The BMJ that, during the two weeks she was employed at Ventavia in September 2020, she repeatedly informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, patient safety concerns, and data integrity issues.

Jackson was a trained clinical trial auditor who previously held a director of operations position and came to Ventavia with more than 15 years’ experience in clinical research coordination and management. Exasperated that Ventavia was not dealing with the problems, Jackson documented several matters late one night, taking photos on her mobile phone. One photo, provided to The BMJ, showed needles discarded in a plastic biohazard bag instead of a sharps container box. Another showed vaccine packaging materials with trial participants’ identification numbers written on them left out in the open, potentially unblinding participants. Ventavia executives later questioned Jackson for taking the photos. Early and inadvertent unblinding may have occurred on a far wider scale.

According to the trial’s design, unblinded staff were responsible for preparing and administering the study drug (Pfizer’s vaccine or a placebo). This was to be done to preserve the blinding of trial participants and all other site staff, including the principal investigator. However, at Ventavia, Jackson told The BMJ that drug assignment confirmation printouts were being left in participants’ charts, accessible to blinded personnel. As a corrective action taken in September, two months into trial recruitment and with around 1000 participants already enrolled, quality assurance checklists were updated with instructions for staff to remove drug assignments from charts. In a recording of a meeting in late September2020 between Jackson and two directors a Ventavia executive can be heard explaining that the company wasn’t able to quantify the types and number of errors they were finding when examining the trial paperwork for quality control. “In my mind, it’s something new every day,” a Ventavia executive says. “We know that it’s significant.”

Read more …

Just wait till the 5-11 numbers come in.

Dr. Paul Offit Is Lying To Us About Myocarditis Rates (Steve Kirsch)

The New York Times recently reported that Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and member of the FDA outside advisory committee for vaccines, said that COVID-19 is much more likely to cause myocarditis than the vaccine. He’s lying. It’s the exact opposite. The FDA and CDC committee members are all misinformed and clueless just like our friend Paul. We know that because hospitals are filling up with kids who are vaccine injured. That never happened before we had vaccine rollouts for kids. But you don’t have to believe me because now the proof is in plain sight thanks to one slide Pfizer mistakenly showed at the last FDA meeting. All my data sources for this proof are the CDC and The NY Times and that one Pfizer slide.

[..] Let’s look at 16 year old boys so we can compute some concrete numbers using trusted data sources to see if Offit’s myocarditis claim is true or false. We use a COVID catch rate of 37 cases per 100,000 per week. We use a myocarditis incident rate of 2.3%. Both numbers are from the NY Times. So multiplying that out for 6 months (which is 24 weeks) we get 37*24*.023=20.4 cases per 100,000 in 6 months or 204 case per million over 6 months. Easy peasy. Here are the screen shots from the two NY Times articles to save you some time:

For the Pfizer vaccine, we have 76.7 cases per million vaccinated male teens from John Su’s chart (see slide 13). This is caused by the vaccine and the vaccines last 6 months so it’s a total amount over 6 months. Just 77 cases per million over 6 months. This is a very conservative estimate since it is based only on reports in the first 7 days and we know these myocarditis cases can show up much later than the first 7 days.

Here’s the slide from the Pfizer presentation at the October 26, 2021 VRBPAC meeting. This slide shows, without a doubt, that VAERS is underreporting myocarditis cases by at least a factor of 5. Now as we’ve said before, VAERS is underreported by more than 41, but that would require you believe me. For this one, you do not have to believe me at all. You just look at Pfizer’s slide and compare 22 with 106:

So now instead of 204>77, we have to multiply the right side by at least 5 since we now have a reference that shows definitively that VAERS is at least 5X under reported. 77*5 is 385. And 385 > 204. Which means that you are worse off taking the vaccine, which is exactly the opposite of what Dr. Offit claimed. So there you have it.

Read more …

Jim Crow.

German Companies Creating Segregated Canteens For Vaxxed and Unvaxxed (SN)

Major companies in Germany are segregating their employees by creating canteens for vaccinated people and separate areas for the unvaccinated, who will be forced to continue to follow social distancing and mask mandates. Pharmaceuticals giant Bayer, energy company Eon, and travel company Alltours are all set to impose the new rules, which will see the unvaccinated treated like second class citizens. “In the ‘2G’ areas for vaccinated and recovered people, employees would be allowed to eat together under completely normal conditions, while those who are not vaccinated or do not provide information about their vaccination status would have to continue to live with rules on social distancing, mask wearing and partitions during meals,” reports the Local.

Bayer also announced that its employees have also started forming work groups that “exclude unvaccinated staff.” People visiting Christmas markets in Berlin who haven’t been vaccinated will also be denied entry. As we previously highlighted, despite facing brazen discrimination, 90 per cent of Germans who haven’t had the vaccine say they have no plans to get it in the near future. As we highlighted back in January, German authorities announced that COVID lockdown rulebreakers would be arrested and detained in refugee camps located across the country. Earlier this summer it was also confirmed that the unvaccinated would be deprived of basic lifestyle activities like visiting cinemas and restaurants.

The editor-in-chief of Germany’s top newspaper Bild shocked some people by apologizing for the news outlet’s fear-driven coverage of COVID, specifically to children who were told “that they were going to murder their grandma.” During a meeting with other world leaders in Rome, Angela Merkel engaged in COVID security theater by briefly wearing a mask when she exited her vehicle, only to remove it as soon as she entered the building.

Read more …

Google translate.

The Disaster That Never Came (Anderberg)

It’s almost hard to remember it now, but for most of 2020, the word ‘experiment’ had a negative connotation. It was one that we Swedes were exposed to, when we – compared to the rest of the world – maintained some form of normality. This experiment was condemned by the outside world early on as “a disaster” (Time Magazine), a “moral history” (New York Times), “deadly folly” (The Guardian) and so on. The more influential a newspaper was, the stronger the invective seemed to become. In Germany, Focus called it all “laxity”, Italian La Repubblica said that “the Nordic model country” made a dangerous mistake. That’s what it looked like. The description of the Swedish line as an experiment was not really wrong. In both theory and practice, Swedes lived very differently compared to, above all, Americans and other Europeans.

One could object that it was Italy, France, Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom and the other countries that were conducting an experiment, that they were testing completely new ways to prevent the spread of a virus. But the word choice is less important. It is clear that Sweden chose one path, the rest of Europe another. One could see it as if the outside world formulated a hypothesis. It was that freedom in Sweden would be costly. The absence of restrictions, the open schools, the reliance on recommendations in violation of laws and police interventions, would result in higher death rates than in other countries. And – consequently – that the freedom that the citizens of the other countries experienced would save lives.Many Swedes agreed with that hypothesis.

“Shut down Sweden to protect Sweden,” wrote Dagens Nyheter’s Peter Wolodarski, who in his double power of both opinion leaders and head of Sweden’s most influential newsroom, must be described as the country’s most powerful journalist. He was far from alone in demanding a tougher grip. Renowned infection control experts, microbiologists, epidemiologists – from all over the country were warned of the consequences. Researchers from Uppsala University, Karolinska Institutet and the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm connected supercomputers and calculated that 96,000 Swedes would die before the summer of 2020. At this time , it was not an unreasonable theory that Swedish freedom was expensive. In the US, with its powerful shutdowns, the death toll – measured per capita – was significantly lower than in Sweden throughout the spring of 2020. And on the sites where the ravages of the pandemic could be followed in real time [..] it was clear that Sweden had higher death rates than most other countries.

But the experiment continued. During the year that followed, the virus ravaged the world and several of the shut down countries now passed Sweden’s death toll – one by one. Great Britain, USA, France, Poland, Portugal, Czech Republic, Hungary, Spain, Argentina, Belgium – countries that blocked playgrounds, forced their children to wear mouth guards, closed schools, fined citizens for hanging on the beach, guarded parks with drones – all have they been hit worse than Sweden. At the time of writing, over 50 countries have a higher proportion of deaths in covid. If you measure excess mortality for the whole of 2020, Sweden, according to Eurostat, will end up in 21st place out of 31 European countries.

Read more …














Support the Automatic Earth in virustime; donate with Paypal, Bitcoin and Patreon.


Home Forums Debt Rattle November 3 2021

Viewing 24 posts - 41 through 64 (of 64 total)
  • Author
  • #91507

    The Guardian has an article up that reads, in its third paragraph, “Over the last month, 4,409 people over 50 were admitted to English hospitals after testing positive for Covid – despite having two doses of a vaccine. And 2,148 men and women in that age group lost their lives.” It goes on to this, “The best way to protect the elderly and vulnerable this winter is, say government scientists, a booster programme. The third vaccine dose will eventually be offered to 30 million people over 50, medical staff, and younger adults with some health conditions.[…]”

    Yes, they are saying that about half the people over the age of 50 who were “fully vaccinated”, but who then got sick enough to enter the hospital died anyway. And by the way, if anyone over 50 is now considered “elderly”, I can only assume someone has re-defined the word “elderly” the same way someone re-defined the word “vaccine”.

    The Guardian is using this statistic to tell everyone that this is why you ought to get another booster pronto. Looks like most of the commenters are very worried about why they can’t find a closer place to get said booster or why they couldn’t get on the booster list for a quicker appointment. I would have read more of the comments, but my head hurt from banging it on the desk so many times, so I quit reading the comment section after a dozen or so.

    Full article here:


    Those vaccines for children – shit. There are NO studies and the FDA let Pfizer/BioNTech defer any studies until later.

    I found this from the FDA to BioTech Manufacturing, dated Aug. 23, 2021, regarding their Biologics License Application (BLA) for the use of the vaccine in children and pregnant women. The application to broaden the use of their vaccine was received by the FDA on May 18, 2021.

    The FDA found that they were applying for approval to administer vaccines (the COMIRNATY vaccine) to groups not yet approved for its use: to wit; children under 16 and pregnant women. In order to approve it, the FDA has to have studies that prove it is safe and effective, unless the FDA decides to “defer” the studies until a later date. So that is what they did. Absent any current studies, they outline the deferred dates that BioNTech/Pfizer has to abide by in their studies for pediatric and pregnancy use. In other words, there are no studies that show either safety or efficacy for this vaccine, but the FDA just approved them for kids anyway and told Pfizer to do the studies later. The reasoning for this is circular – we already approved it for those over 16 and you didn’t do studies on anyone under 16, so we’ll approve it now and you do the studies, y’know, when you get around to it.

    The study dates are pretty far out on the horizon. I am copying a few of them in between the rows of stars (for some reason, I still don’t have any formatting options here, so I can not indent quotes.)

    Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) (21 U.S.C. 355c), all applications for new active ingredients, new indications, new dosage forms, new dosing regimens, or new routes of administration are required to contain an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the product for the claimed indication in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived, deferred, or inapplicable. 
    We are deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16 years for this application because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, and the pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.

    Deferred pediatric Study C4591001 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of COMIRNATY in children 12 years through 15 years of age.
    Study Completion: May 31, 2023
    Final Report Submission: October 31, 2023

    Deferred pediatric Study C4591007t to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of COMIRNATY in infants and children 6 months to <12 years of age.
    Study Completion: November 30, 2023
    Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

    Deferred pediatric Study C4591023 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of COMIRNATY in infants <6 months of age.
    Study Completion: July 31, 2024
    Final Report Submission: October 31, 2024
    The FDA goes on to admit that myocarditis and pericarditis are actual risks, so they are requiring BioNTech/Pfizer to do the following studies (note the end dates of the studies):

    We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis. 

    Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks. 

    Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are required to conduct the following studies: 

    Study C4591009,entitled “ANon-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
    Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021 
    Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022
    Interim Report Submission: October 31,2023
    Study Completion: June 30, 2025 
    Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025

    Study C4591036, a prospective cohort study with at least 5 years of
    follow-up for potential long-term sequelae of myocarditis after vaccination
    (in collaboration with Pediatric Heart Network). 
    We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which
    states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
    Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021 
    Study Completion: December 31, 2026 
    Final Report Submission: May 31, 2027 

    Study C4591007 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis following administration of the second dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of participants 5 through 15 years of age.
    We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this assessment according to the following schedule:
    Final Protocol Submission: September 30, 2021
    Study Completion: November 30, 2023
    Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024 

    Regarding the use of their vaccine in pregnant women, the required safety study on vaccine exposure during pregnancy will not be completed until June 30, 2025, with the final report due Dec. 31, 2025.
    The entire letter with its set of protocols and study requirements may be read here:

    TAE Summary

    * The Benefits of Hesitancy: He who hesitates is sometimes saved

    * The Danger of Occam’s Razor: It can shave your face or slit your throat

    * The Reason: Molnupiravir does not interfere with vaccine EUA’s because molnupiravir itself only has EUA

    * The Long Term Consequences: The younger you are the more they matter

    * The New Definition: Vaccine, noun: An expensive treatment claimed by the manufacturer to be safe and effective for any measurable prevention of a specific disease

    * The Final Segregation: Cemeteries create separate sections for the vaxxed and unvaxxed

    * The New Insanity: Stop doing what has always worked yet expecting the previous results

    * The Gates Future: You will own everything and hate it

    * The New Logic: Post vaxx ergo propter the unvaxxed

    To action alone you have a right and never to its fruits. Let not your motive be the fruits of action; nor let there be in you any attachment to inaction.
    Fixed in yoga, O winner of wealth, do your work, renouncing attachment and remaining even-minded in both success and failure.
    Pitiful are those who work for results.

    Bhagavad Gita

    Mr. House

    Yep, i had those exact same symptoms when i had it. Maybe she has mental health problems?

    Mr. House

    I’ve been reading Jessescafeamericain since 2008 and am disappointed in his latest

    “The irrational mask and vaccine antipathy are sign of hysteria, and the mass persuasion of the not so hidden persuaders of the oligarchs, who are operating on longer term agendas of their own.”

    I see, so believing that Russians were running .gov and trump was getting golden showers and putting all your faith in a sparsely tested jab with no safety history and was developed in a few months is not hysteria. I think he’s got this one wrong, which is sad because of everyone i’ve been reading since 2008 he’s generally been level headed.


    > * The Danger of Occam’s Razor: It can shave your face or slit your throat <

    Who’s your daddy

    High-paying jobs in disinfo just now


    > I think he’s got this one wrong, which is sad because of everyone i’ve been reading since 2008 he’s generally been level headed. <

    How did so many like him get it so wrong- and all at the same time!- while still staying obtusely, utterly, immune to evidence?

    What explanation best and most simply fits the facts ?


    Like I said – “Dies Suddenly” is the new “Rare” :

    I wonder just how many of these “sudden” deaths of young people it will take to wake people up.

    Today was the first day they began injecting 5-11 year olds in the USA.
    Go USA!!



    A lot of “died suddenly”:


    > Like I said – “Dies Suddenly” is the new “Rare” <

    I said a few months back it’s a subtle form on terrorism on the “vaxxed” citizenry, among other things. That still seems like a good fit to me: why make it big NYT-ish news, otherwise?




    LOLOL !!!
    What a hoot!!

    Fully-vaxxed LA Mayor Eric Garcetti tests positive for COVID at COP262


    Yeah – sure!

    “Germany is experiencing a ‘massive’ pandemic of the unvaccinated, says health minister”

    John Day

    @Germ: I hope your friend just has acid reflux and esophageal spasm.

    @Mr.House: Tidy little package, my great-reset-conspiracy-theory, innit?

    : I think Mark Carney got promoted for massive wealth transfer to the most wealthy, as you said.

    @Those Darned Kids: Dutton looks nice, kind of like Yoakum. Give up F-35s. Yes.

    : Warm shower. Yes.

    : I’m a vegetarian. No Soylent Green, please.

    John Day

    @Germ: That wench is spiTTing “HeSSS NoTTT VACCCInaTTeD!” at the poor guy in the passenger seat.

    Stewardess and Pilot were most cool and collected… Commendable poise they showed.
    Thanks as always for finding the gems…


    Soft mandate option ready. This will give reprieve for those with a cloud of termination hanging over their head. So is imminently this week or Dec. 7th?

    Stick to your guns and don’t take the shot. We have networked with some employees that got the shot but oppose the mandate. They are holding off uploading vax papers and applying for exemptions making the resistance look larger.

    OSHA’s COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard Set to Issue Imminently

    Additionally, a Department of Labor spokesman shared this statement this morning:

    “On November 1, the Office of Management and Budget completed its regulatory review of the emergency temporary standard. The Federal Register will publish the emergency temporary standard in the coming days. [OSHA] has been working expeditiously to develop an emergency temporary standard that covers employers with 100 or more employees, firm- or company-wide, and provides options for compliance…. Covered employers must develop, implement, and enforce a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, unless they adopt a policy requiring employees to choose either to get vaccinated or to undergo regular COVID-19 testing and wear a face covering at work. The ETS also requires employers to provide paid time to workers to get vaccinated and paid sick leave to recover from any side effects.”

    OSHA’s COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard Set to Issue Imminently


    Trying to post a jpg file with this.

    Doc Robinson

    Published in Newsweek:

    How Fauci Fooled America
    by Martin Kulldorff and Jay Bhattacharya

    …Unfortunately, Dr. Fauci got major epidemiology and public health questions wrong. Reality and scientific studies have now caught up with him

    By pushing vaccine mandates, Dr. Fauci ignores naturally acquired immunity among the COVID-recovered, of which there are more than 45 million in the United States… Under Fauci’s mandates, hospitals are firing heroic nurses who recovered from COVID they contracted while caring for patients. With their superior immunity, they can safely care for the oldest and frailest patients with even lower transmission risk than the vaccinated…

    After more than 700,000 reported COVID deaths in America, we now know that lockdowns failed to protect high-risk older people. When confronted with the idea of focused protection of the vulnerable, Dr. Fauci admitted he had no idea how to accomplish it, arguing that it would be impossible. That may be understandable for a lab scientist, but public health scientists have presented many concrete suggestions that would have helped, had Fauci and other officials not ignored them

    Considering the devastating effects of school closures on children, Dr. Fauci’s advocacy for school closures may be the single biggest mistake of his career…

    A fundamental public health principle is that health is multidimensional; the control of a single infectious disease is not synonymous with health. As an immunologist, Dr. Fauci failed to properly consider and weigh the disastrous effects lockdowns would have on cancer detection and treatment, cardiovascular disease outcomes, diabetes care, childhood vaccination rates, mental health and opioid overdoses, to name a few. Americans will live with—and die from—this collateral damage for many years to come

    Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., is an epidemiologist, biostatistician, and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.
    Jay Bhattacharya, MD, Ph.D., is a Professor of Health Policy at Stanford University School of Medicine.

    TAE Summary

    A Summary in Limericks

    There once was a girl from Racine
    Got Covid and acted obscene
    Delirious and nude …
    In a world-peace mood …
    For Pete’s sake! She needs the vaccine!

    Get vaxxed with no lame hesitation
    With friends and then join in elation
    If after the shot
    You die from a clot
    It’s kismet, there is no relation

    Italians have changed their statistic
    Rejecting the logic simplistic
    “With cancer you died;
    One virus inside;
    Your death is by Covid”: Sophistic

    When caught in a damning position
    And silence is tacit admission
    Announce without shame
    You’re free from all blame
    Your crime has a changed definition

    When flying to some new location
    Insist that all have vaccination
    Seatmate’s got no jab?
    You’re soon dead on a slab.
    Demand. And accept no cunctation.


    @ Oxy your post 91524: Have to have a Fbook acct to see it.
    I have no act,
    Fbook is the enemy


    Just a quick perusal of “custom range- dies suddenly” indicates how sickening “dies suddenly” is now.
    Pretty soon it will be seven year olds.
    Parents are sleepwalking their children into possible death. Two years ago they wouldn’t have let them outside without a helmet.


    Just in: the Ontario government will not be mandating vaccines for health care workers. I guess they are seeing the writing on the wall. In Nova Scotia, a high school graduate with a 94% average could not get into nursing because, get this, nursing training requires some period of supervised work, and nurses who are working are so busy that they don’t have time to train new nurses.

    Dr. D

    A Flock of Seagulls?

    Definitely a straight-swap from AGW Carbon-credits to the Covid. Strange how no matter what happens, it always has the same solution: more money and power for me!

    I have often thought the Green Plan was to get us into a failing corner (just like “helping” health care Federally so it collapses in order to replace it) and then saying “Oops! Guess our only possible answer now is nuclear. It’s non-carbon!” That overcomes the nuclear reservations, in fact, I already heard top Greenies demanding it. Embarrassing. They so stupid and led by the nose. How is that at all green, or even economical? You need to decentralize and use LESS, silly, but that would move power and money back to the people.

    “Green Bubble” is right, these social-ESG Funds (which are the opposite of all green, investing in power-and-road hungry Apple, Amazon, etc) is the way to get Al Gore’s trillion dollar Greenie-payout that got waylaid. But with Powell’s money, ain’t it grand idiot sons never have to take a loss? A Wooster always helps out a Pal.

    As the dumbest guys in the room, murdering any dissenters according to “free will” and “natural law”, they actually think they’re so special they can live without the working class. Like a king with no subjects, or, as today, the 20 dead-end managers with no employee reports every company is saddled with. Okay bud, who’s going to fix your private jet parts, pave the runway, and fix the plumbing at St. James? And they’ll still make pipes, asphalt for that? No they won’t you retards: the present level of luxury comes directly from the economies-of-scale that require 500,000-1M normal people below you.

    Here’s a thought exercise: why don’t you tell me how you’re going to live in luxury on Mars? Where there are no people, no workers, no infrastructure in your techno-fantasy you never tested. Oh, we don’t have #10 phillips machine screws with a left-handed spankler on them? Oops, sorry, plumbing and electric stop because you don’t have this 10c part. This is happening all over now, and is working its way up to Bentley parts.

    I wouldn’t mind they’re so dumb as to kill themselves with narcissistic grandeur, it would serve Yale right, but they want to take the rest of us with them.

    As I say about a thousand times: there is no CO2 increase from methane. The methane released is equal to the carbon sequestered in the grass an hour ago.

    Yes, I’ve posted the math that if you just drove half as far to work there’d be a non-stop oil surplus. That just involves local choices. Instead, they want both hypothecated carbon-trading for Sachs and new nuclear reactors. Green!

    Hate to say it, but when we’re done this will destroy the FDA, which is fine with me.

    “I wonder just how many of these “sudden” deaths of young people it will take to wake people up.”

    Infinity, I think. Like Einstein said.

Viewing 24 posts - 41 through 64 (of 64 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.