Feb 032023
 February 3, 2023  Posted by at 3:26 pm Finance Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,

Johannes Vermeer The glass of wine c 1658-1660



Andrew Korybko approached me a few days ago asking if we could share some of his work. I don’t view the Automatic Earth as a publishing platform, and given all the censorship of the past 2-3 years (it’s expensive!), I will be very cautious about letting anyone in. But I like Andrew’s writing, so I said: let’s give it a go.

Then I had to transfer his Word file to the simple text editor I have been using for many years, but that only took half an hour … I don’t like Word. Or Bill Gates. Here’s Andrew:



Andrew Korybko: The “official narrative” surrounding the Ukrainian Conflict has flipped in recent weeks from prematurely celebrating Kiev’s supposedly “inevitable” victory to nowadays seriously warning about its likely loss. It was therefore expected in hindsight that other dimensions of the information warfare campaign waged by the US-led West’s Golden Billion against Russia would also change. As proof of precisely that, the New York Times (NYT) just admitted that the West’s anti-Russian sanctions are a failure.

In Ana Swanson’s article about how “Russia Sidesteps Western Punishments, With Help From Friends”, she cites Western experts who concluded that “Russia’s imports may have already recovered to prewar levels, or will soon do so, depending on their models.” Even more compelling, she references the IMF’s latest assessment from Monday, which “now expected the Russian economy to grow 0.3 percent this year, a sharp improvement from its previous estimate of a 2.3 percent contraction.”

Neither the NYT, the Western experts that Swanson cites, nor the IMF can credibly be accused of being “Russian-friendly”, let alone so-called “Russian propagandists” or even “Russian agents”, which thus confirms the observation that this dimension of the Golden Billion’s infowar has also decisively shifted. The fact of the matter is that the West’s anti-Russian sanctions failed to catalyze the collapse of that targeted multipolar Great Power’s economy, which continues to remain impressively resilient.

The timing at which this narrative changed is also important because it extends credence to the more widely known new narrative that’s nowadays seriously warning about Kiev’s likely loss in NATO’s proxy war on Russia. After all, if the sanctions achieved the goal that they were supposed to and which the US-led West’s Mainstream Media (MSM) hitherto lied that they supposedly had, then it naturally follows that Kiev would “inevitably” win exactly as they claimed would happen up until mid-January.

With this in mind, the most effective way to “reprogram” the average Westerner after brainwashing them over the past 11 months into expecting Kiev’s supposedly “inevitable” victory is to also decisively change the supplementary narratives that artificially manufactured that aforesaid false conclusion. To that end, the order was given to begin raising the public’s awareness about the failure of the Golden Billion’s anti-Russian sanctions, ergo the NYT’s latest piece and the specific timing thereof.

What’s left unsaid in that article is the “politically incorrect” but nevertheless heavily implied observation that the jointly BRICS– & SCO-led Global South of which Russia is a part has defied the Golden Billion’s demands to “isolate” that multipolar Great Power. No MSM outlet will ever admit it, at least not yet, but their de facto New Cold War bloc has limited sway outside the US’ recently restored “sphere of influence” in Europe, whose countries are the only ones suffering from these sanctions.

The NYT’s latest piece might inadvertently make many members of their public conscious of that, however, and they might therefore increasingly object to their governments scaling up their commitment to NATO’s proxy war on Russia under American pressure. Croatian President Zoran Milanovic recently joined Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban in condemning this campaign and raising wider awareness of just how counterproductive it’s been for Europe’s objective interests.

As Europeans come to realize that they’re the only ones suffering from the anti-Russian sanctions that their American overlord coerced them into imposing and that their sacrifices haven’t adversely affected that targeted multipolar Great Power’s special operation, massive unrest might follow. It’s unlikely to influence their US-controlled leaders into reversing course, remembering that the German Foreign Minister vowed late last year never to do so, but could instead catalyze a violent police crackdown.

The reason behind this pessimistic prediction is that a reversal or at the very least lessening of the presently rigid anti-Russian sanctions regime would represent an unprecedentedly independent move by whichever European state(s) does/do so. Seeing as how that didn’t even happen in the eight years prior to the US’ successful reassertion of its unipolar hegemony all across 2022, the likelihood of that happening nowadays under those much more difficult conditions is practically nil.

The US’ “Lead From Behind” subordinate for “managing” European affairs as part of its new so-called “burden-sharing” strategy, Germany, has more than enough levers of economic, institutional, and political influence to several punish any of those lower-tier American vassals who get out of place. It’s therefore unrealistic to expect any single EU member to unilaterally defy the bloc’s anti-Russian sanctions that their own government previously agreed to.

Considering this reality, those leaders who want to remain in power or at least not risk the US’ German-driven Hybrid War wrath against their economies are loath restore a semblance of their largely lost sovereignty in such a dramatic manner. Instead, their most pragmatic course of action is to not participate in the military aspect of this proxy war by refusing to dispatch arms to Kiev exactly as the emerging Central European pragmatic bloc of Austria, Croatia, and Hungary have done.

The population of those countries are thus unlikely to protest against the sanctions even after being made aware of the facts contained in the NYT’s latest piece and naturally coming to the conclusion that the anti-Russian sanctions have only harmed their own economies and not that targeted Great Power’s. Folks in France, Germany, and Italy, however, could very well react differently, especially considering their tradition of organizing massive protests.

In such a scenario, their governments are expected to order a violent police crackdown under whatever pretext they concoct, whether it’s falsely accusing the protesters of employing violence first or accusing them all of being so-called “Russian agents”. Regardless of how it happens, the outcome will be the same whereby Western European countries will slide deeper into liberal-totalitarian dictatorship, which will in turn contribute to further radicalizing their population towards uncertain ends.

Returning back to the NYT’s piece, it represents a remarkable reversal of the “official narrative” by frankly admitting that the West’s anti-Russian sanctions are a failure. This coincides with the decisive shift of the larger narrative driven by American and Polish leaders over the past month whereby they’re nowadays seriously warning about Kiev’s likely loss in NATO’s proxy war on Russia. It remains to be seen what other narratives will change as well, but it’s predicted that more such ones will inevitably do so.




We try to run the Automatic Earth on donations. Since ad revenue has collapsed, you are now not just a reader, but an integral part of the process that builds this site. Thank you for your support.



Support the Automatic Earth in virustime. Click at the top of the sidebars to donate with Paypal and Patreon.


Home Forums The New York Times Just Admitted That The West’s Anti-Russian Sanctions Are A Failure

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
  • #128100

    Johannes Vermeer The glass of wine c 1658-1660     Andrew Korybko approached me a few days ago asking if we could share some of his work. I
    [See the full post at: The New York Times Just Admitted That The West’s Anti-Russian Sanctions Are A Failure]


    Are you expecting “justice”?
    Millions of people have taken to the street in demonstration.
    Yet, the gov. still do not budge.
    The governments still continue to send money and to disarm themselves for the biggest scam ever done.

    D Benton Smith

    The Western Empire and its vassal (mostly European) states are living in a “shrinking bubble” (of their own making within which they can still exercise some degree of enforceable influence , and from which they belligerently refuse to be rescued.

    So be it.

    It will be interesting to see what sort of new nations discover themselves and coalesce into true nationhood within those geographical regions. The general populations of those places will stay put and continue to be very much as they are now (genetically, linguistically and culturally, albeit with some migrational smudginess) but I expect a flurry of names and labels to ensue while they sort things out and give themselves new borders.


    Today’s latest from the NYT is that Russia has suffered a massive 200,000 killed and wounded in the Ukraine operation, obviously a vast exaggeration over anything reliable sources are reporting. I guess this is supposed to be a sop to those objecting to the failure of the proxy war, allowing it to be claimed that it hurt the Russians badly after all. We don’t yet have any think tank or IMF white papers on this topic, so it is still possible for claims like this to go unrebutted.


    It will be interesting to see which leaders will dangle on the coattails of our loathesome leaders here in Canada ( Trudeau and Freeland ) who declared a national emergency on horn honking truckers. Let’s bring in the muscle and at the same time steal directly from their bank accounts.

    Oh, and if you supported the truckers or their cause of Covid response over-reach, let’s steal those funds too — and publish their names and financial information for further punishment.

    Freedom, democracy and all that the “ West” offers!

    Yup, could be interesting.

    John Day

    @Andrew Korybko. It’s nice to see your work on TAE. I look for your stuff on Global Research, and used to see it some on Tony Hall’s American Herald Tribune, before it got taken down by AI internet assassins, the best I can tell. I know you publish on other sites also. I’m glad you like it here. This is one of the main places I e-Socialize.

    Let me toss another scenario at you. Let’s consider the center of the western-empire to be the financial “center” of London-Wall-street-Associated-tax-havens. BIS is part of this, as is BlackRock.

    This western empire has trouble with the rapidity of the growth of money, which has outlandishly outdistanced the growth of real-economy in the world. It has been parasitizing real-economy to extract-value, to make those financial wealth-schemes “come-true” in at least some fraction.
    It’s a Ponzi scheme, as we know. It’s gonna’ collapse. It’s not going to get to eat Russia to make payouts.

    The inability of the current imperial courtiers to make major direction changes will cause the (real) owners to take losses soon. The owners will need more intelligent/competent courtiers, a management team change.
    The current inertia is actually as bad as it looks to us. The owners are not stupid, even if they are insulated from “reality”.
    The collective west does not have any executive or management team which is competent and able to make quick decisions. Times of rapid economic restructuring call for that. There appears to be infighting between owners. The current courtiers have been in place a long time, but are “negatively efficacious” like those novel “vaccine” products.
    The courtiers will be replaced. Sooner is better. A lot of control-narratives are breaking. The COVID-pandemic narrative is now demanding support, rather than creating support. The Ukraine war control-narrative is very expensive, and will collapse badly when it stops being fed men, tanks, howitzers, rockets, etc. Those things are literally running out.

    Time is short to replace the control narratives before being completely discredited by reality.
    Either case is fine with me, but I think the owners have a different team to put in place in the US, which will not have so much inertia in the wrong direction, and will be more nimble and better at meeting the actual physical-economy needs of other team-participants. (I do like that the core of the Austro-Hungarian Empire is not participating in the supplying of the war-effort. I can find that Slovenia sent 28 old Soviet tanks in September, but I can’t see that they are sending anything now. Slovenia is a natural member of the same core as Austria, Hungary and Croatia.

    If the management team in DC can be swapped out before this fall, a lot of sensible things could be done, and with less overall damage to all parties.


    NYT is raising the white flag on the economic war, but this means nothing other than it may be signalling that the US may change tactics. I am sure that the US is not raising the white flag.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.