Without the broken poker, which is
put up or shut up for you, but not for me, and
not simply because of empty creditors
(Henry Hu / Univ. of Texas,)
or even just because of shorting your own
original hand, but potentially even packing
your own hand as a loser, getting others to
buy into it, and then shorting it (I’m not alleging
any particular entity has done that,)
then (where it’s NOT broken poker) the other
people in the game would by implication have
real oversight in the maintenance of fair rules.
The purpose of that would be rightful goals.
If we analogize the above to sectors and nations,
we wouldn’t have heads I win, tails you lose
policy-making, and the nations’ goals would
be strong currencies and
high wages, the two reflecting the high
worth of their citizens.