Debt Rattle August 16 2025
- This topic has 47 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 5 months, 3 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Zerosum:
Yes, and a warm wife/girl friend helped get you through those long cold winter nights too!
This likely had something to do with the higher birth rates back then too!
-
Bombast IS an infectious disease spread by Those Bombastards Afflicted by Narcissistic Personality Disorder!
Here’s some Fine Wordsmithing by two most hirsute of the wordsmiths.
Word!!-
“Existential-Secret versus Remarkably-Altruistic-Intention”
Where do altruisms and existentials fit into WitkopfistiCapitalism?
Steamrolled: Vladimir Putin Shares an Existential Secret with Trump and You Just Saw the Result
Versus
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/seasonality-of-births
Seasonality of Births
In a comprehensive analysis of Canadian birth records from 1881 to 1989, it was discovered that there had been a shift in the seasonal distribution of births. The earlier pattern (1881) is characterized by a trough of births during the spring, with most births occurring in the months of January to March.
For the most part, the “early” pattern of seasonality likely reflects natural fertility conditions in the absence of conscious use of contraception by couples. In other words, this pattern reflects conditions that would prevail in a predominantly agrarian rural society.Zerosum:
Oh, well!
There goes my winter theory all shot to hell!So women were “hot -hot” in the spring, eh!
Like after their spring beauty bath?
Maybe less layers of women’s clothing to unlayer?
Warmer weather better reveals a women’s natural charms?Maybe during the winter months, the women had too many layers of clothing on for a guy to successfully unlayer, before he lost the desire or forgot what his original intentions were or he was just too cold and tired to try?
Or maybe it was just the smell factor?John Day said
Brandon Smith throws this cricket to the chickens: The Butker Principle: Is America Better Off Without Women In The Workforce?
Which argues that feminism and the other isms are basically founded in population control. That is one perspective, but here is another from https://revisesociology.com/2014/02/10/marxist-perspective-family/
This document states
Marxists argue that the nuclear family performs ideological functions for Capitalism – the family acts as a unit of consumption and teaches passive acceptance of hierarchy. It is also the institution through which the wealthy pass down their private property to their children, thus reproducing class inequality.
The obvious attempts at destroying family values in the west, are these attempts due to eugenics and population control or, as jb-hb would attest, is it part of the Marxist takeover of the west? I don’t know, I suspect it is a mixture of both, but this is another significant change that has happened to the west.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.