Marc Gauvin
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 8, 2014 at 1:06 pm in reply to: The Bank of England Lights A Fuse Under the Field of Economics #12205Marc GauvinParticipant
Agreed!
Logically it is only possible to “owe” the value of real goods and services, money at best is a record of that value never a substitute of it. That is the essence of our thesis too.
Love to talk about it if you like send me a mail to [email protected].
Great work!
Marc
March 22, 2014 at 12:31 pm in reply to: The Bank of England Lights A Fuse Under the Field of Economics #11919Marc GauvinParticipantif money is property then it can be lent, borrowed, sold and rented. The question then is if money “IS” an object of property/value subject to “supply”. It turns out that such a notion is “THE” underlying double think. Interest on money is justified by that false notion and even if prohibited, as long as people believe money IS an object of value, interest will be charged whether legally or not.
March 22, 2014 at 10:37 am in reply to: The Bank of England Lights A Fuse Under the Field of Economics #11914Marc GauvinParticipantHI Oscar,
My apologies I didn’t mean to imply an argument. I am just hoping that after so much effort on the part of those of us that have gone counter the status quo’s assumed beliefs, we can start to have confidence in numbers to put an end to the money mind trap. Because of its importance as a sort of mass cult religion that has managed to subdue humanity so profoundly, we must on mass but on purely rational and objective grounds, completely debunk the current paradigm. The rational approach is in our favour in terms of making both present and future better and healthier.
Thanks for your comments and this blog,
Marc
March 21, 2014 at 10:22 pm in reply to: The Bank of England Lights A Fuse Under the Field of Economics #11910Marc GauvinParticipantCome on, we don’t need anyone to tell it to us, it is basic logic. My book “The Money PSYOP” shows that it can’t be any other way, money can only be created as a measure of value it cannot be the value it measures.
https://bibocurrency.com/index.php/money-psyop-2
Graham Towers former Governor of The Bank of Canada said it in 1939
https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/98/98vw36.htmThe multiplier is impossible without money being created and that has been taught for years. But that is neither here nor there, as my article posted above in my previous post says, the real point is that money is not value it is only a record of value. So money contracts cannot be valid if conceived with a definition that confuses value with the record of value. If I owe a kilo of flour do I owe a kilo or do I owe flour? See:
March 21, 2014 at 6:43 pm in reply to: The Bank of England Lights A Fuse Under the Field of Economics #11904Marc GauvinParticipantYet they still get it 100% wrong. We all knew this decades ago, no one listened then, will they now?
-
AuthorPosts