
Pieter Bruegel the Elder The Fall of Icarus 1558

🚨 President Trump stuns the World by calling out Canada for polluting our Air threatening them with Tariffs to help cover the costs of their pollution
— MAGA Voice (@MAGAVoice) July 17, 2026
I STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS
TARIFFS WORK 💯 pic.twitter.com/FlT5lz5cPa
🚨🇺🇦 Meanwhile in Ukraine
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) July 17, 2026
Tens of thousands of Ukrainians line the Streets in protest against Globalist Puppet Zelensky & the Regime. Finally. pic.twitter.com/B37QxKQUi0
School is in session 🚨
— @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸 (@Chicago1Ray) July 18, 2026
Don't think CBS will be inviting John Solomon back on anytime soon, after this lesson in what China can do with (220M) names
They did this to let as many illegals in that could get here… bc they can't win unless they cheat
And the media's OK with it pic.twitter.com/1eeCqKz2LR

Early morning.
• CENTCOM Says US Forces Launch New Strike On Iran (ZH)
CENTCOM said US forces struck Iranian missile and radar systems stationed along the Strait of Hormuz, further dismantling Tehran’s surveillance and strike capabilities while eroding its ability to control the maritime chokepoint. “Today at 6 p.m. ET, U.S. forces began launching new airstrikes against Iran at the Commander in Chief’s direction,” CENTCOM wrote on X. CENTCOM added, “The strikes are designed to further degrade Iran’s ability to threaten commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and swiftly punish Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces who launched attacks against American service members in Jordan last night.”Read more …
Today at 6 p.m. ET, U.S. forces began launching new airstrikes against Iran at the Commander in Chief’s direction. The strikes are designed to further degrade Iran’s ability to threaten commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and swiftly punish Islamic Revolutionary Guard…
— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) July 18, 2026
State Department Issues “Worldwide Caution”
Iranian ballistic missile strikes on Jordan’s Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, which killed two U.S. service members and injured others, are likely to trigger a major U.S. retaliation.
🚨Alert: Iranian ballistic missiles strike US bases in Jordan as attacks continue. Iran has vowed to strike US bases across the region in response to US attacks on Iran. pic.twitter.com/nrYmGv1Ucu
— US Homeland Security News (@defense_civil25) July 18, 2026Israel’s Channel 14 reported late Saturday that President Trump instructed CENTCOM to “open the gates of hell” on Iran.
Trump has told CENTCOM to “open the gates of hell” on Iran.
— C14 News | EN (@c14english) July 18, 2026
📷Final Call pic.twitter.com/1CFcnsnMPfThe U.S. State Department issued a worldwide caution, warning: “Due to heightened tensions in the Middle East, the security environment remains complex, with the potential for unforeseen escalation.”
Worldwide Caution: Due to heightened tensions in the Middle East, the security environment remains complex with the potential for unforeseen escalation. We remind Americans in the region of the continued need for caution and encourage them to monitor the news for breaking… pic.twitter.com/A3LKEQSRiO
— TravelGov (@TravelGov) July 18, 2026Will tensions ease before the NY futures open on Sunday evening?

Dead troops. That’s a red line, alright.
• Two American Servicemembers Killed in Jordan, One Missing (CTH)
According to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) four Americans were wounded, two killed and one missing following a ballistic missile and drone attack upon Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan last night.

TAMPA, Fla. — On July 17, two U.S. service members in Jordan were killed in action as U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) and partner forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks. Additionally, one service member is currently missing. Four American service members were medically evacuated to Jordanian hospitals. They have since been discharged. Other personnel who were evaluated for minor injuries have returned to duty. Out of respect for the families, CENTCOM will withhold additional information, including the identities of the fallen warriors, until 24 hours after the next of kin have been notified.Read more …
Footage of the Iranian ballistic missile strike on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan last night.
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) July 18, 2026
At least two missiles hit the base, killing two American service members. pic.twitter.com/8tOm6yyXwe

“The incident raises the number of U.S. service members killed in the war to 16.”
• Two American Troops Killed by Iranian Missiles on Jordan (ZH)
Footage has been widely circulating over the past half-day showing massive Iranian ballistic missile strikes on Jordan. Iran said it targeted a US base there, and took out various aerial and radar assets, and caused casualties among American troops. But the Pentagon has been radio silent on the extent of potential damage, until now: US officials are reporting that two American service members were killed in the overnight Iranian attack. According to emerging details in Axios:Read more …
Two U.S. service members were killed and more wounded in an Iranian ballistic missile attack on an airbase in Jordan on Saturday, military officials said. This is the first time U.S. troops have been killed since the fighting resumed two weeks ago. The incident raises the number of U.S. service members killed in the war to 16. On Saturday at least two Iranian ballistic missiles hit the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, which hosts U.S. troops and fighter jets. CENTCOM posted to X, officially confirming the news: “On July 17, two U.S. service members in Jordan were killed in action as U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) and partner forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks. Additionally, one service member is currently missing in action.”
Two Iranian medium-range ballistic missile impacts were reported at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan earlier tonight. pic.twitter.com/NLgLeghrs7
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) July 18, 2026The statement has noted additional injuries: “Four American service members were medically evacuated to Jordanian hospitals. They have since been discharged. Other personnel who were evaluated for minor injuries have returned to duty,” CENTCOM said.

“Given President Trump has apparently just ordered dozens more aerial refueling planes to the region, the conflict looks to continue going up the escalation ladder ..”
• Iran Formally Declares MoU Deal Is Dead – Expands Target List (ZH)
It is now “official”: the Iranians have declared that the signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the United States is dead. Tasnim is reporting Saturday that Iran will no longer fulfill its MoU obligations amid alleged repeat US violations. The past weeks have seen each side hurl warnings and threats to pull out, while attaching conditions that must be fulfilled. But after what is now a full week of renewed fighting, it has been effectively torn up, with negotiations no longer happening. Al Jazeera is citing a top Iran official’s precise statement on suspending the MoU in the following:Read more …
“Previously, we have seen again and again Iranian officials accusing the US of violating the MoU and also putting some conditions if the aggression continues. What we’re seeing is Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, who is also head of the Iranian technical negotiating team, saying that in practice, the US has violated all the commitments and suspended the MoU entirely. “We also likewise have suspended all of our commitments as a result; we are no longer implementing those commitments,” he added. So, officially, this is the first time the Iranians are saying the MoU is over and they’re not going to implement any clause. ”Given President Trump has apparently just ordered dozens more aerial refueling planes to the region, the conflict looks to continue going up the escalation ladder for at least the next week or longer. Each side will seek to impose more economic and military pain, while waiting for the other to blink. Battle of narratives over damage and retaliation:
🇮🇷🇯🇴⚡️– Insane footage of Iranian ballistic missiles striking Jordanian air bases despite a large number of interceptors in the air.
— MonitorX (@MonitorX99800) July 18, 2026
Despite clear footage of impacts they still deny it and lie that all of them were intercepted. pic.twitter.com/Es8hw7TCXJSaudi Arabia has come under attack by Iranian missiles in the last 24 hours, the kingdom is confirming on Saturday, in a major escalation given that this is a first since near the start of the war several months ago. According to Reuters: “The Saudi civil defense early on Saturday issued two early warnings for Al-Kharj city and Yanbu to be alert to “potential danger,” but it later says the danger has passed in both areas, without providing details on the danger that triggered the warnings.
A US official tells the Axios news site that Iran targeted an American military base in Saudi Arabia with a ballistic missile, the first time that the Islamic Republic has directly attacked the kingdom in four months. Locations in Jordan and even Syria have also been hit in recent salvos, but the US military has downplayed these attacks – and there’s a battle of narratives over just how destructive these have been amid the fog of war. Kuwait also reeling from stepped-up attacks…
⚡️ 🎦Unprecedented crowd at Kuwait Airport for departure from the country pic.twitter.com/Db5IeZsmDg
— Middle East Observer (@ME_Observer_) July 18, 2026

“Long-term military support for Ukraine has become a routine policy, showing Brussels and Washington don’t see peace as an option.“
• The War Must Go On: NATO Plans For No Endgame (Kirill Kalinin)
The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation’s recent summit in Ankara has produced a decision that demands scrutiny. NATO member states have committed to providing Ukraine with military assistance worth 70 billion euros for 2026. This is not an emergency measure. This is the institutionalisation of a permanent war budget – a subscription, if you will, to ongoing military confrontation.Read more …
The alliance has basically ceased pretending that its support for Ukraine is temporary. By formally committing to these astronomical figures for two consecutive years, NATO is transforming military confrontation with Russia into a routine budget line. European leaders are now casually discussing the maintenance of approximately 70 billion euros per year as part of a sustained, multi-year commitment. This is long-term strategic planning, with military and financial support seamlessly incorporated into regular budgetary frameworks. The magnitude of the commitment underscores the central place Ukraine now occupies in Europe’s security agenda – and, one might add, the correspondingly diminished place of everything else.Consider the comparison with development assistance to Africa. According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) figures for 2024, net bilateral Official Development Assistance from OECD Development Assistance Committee members to the entire African continent amounted to US$42 billion, of which US$36 billion went to sub-Saharan Africa. The EU institutions themselves allocated approximately US$7.5 billion in bilateral ODA to African countries, while US$23.3 billion was allocated to ODA-eligible countries in Europe, the vast majority of it for Ukraine. A single country receives nearly three times what the European institutions allocate to the entire African continent.
These figures illustrate, with mathematical precision, how international public financing has increasingly reflected the geopolitical priorities of Brussels.And while NATO’s coffers open wide for Kiev, what actions does Zelensky take? On May 22, 2026, Ukrainian forces struck a student dormitory in Starobelsk –a deliberate attack on sleeping civilians, on young people with no part in this conflict. Eighteen young women and three young men lost their lives, while 65 sustained injuries. Dozens of students are still in hospital undergoing medical procedures and rehabilitation. The Kiev regime continues, with impunity, its never-ending drone strikes against Russian cities, residential neighbourhoods, and energy infrastructure. The West, of course, remains silent. No condemnation. No outrage.
On July 10, Rodion Miroshnik, the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Special Representative for Crimes Committed by the Kiev Regime, briefed the international community on yet another chapter of Ukrainian war crimes, this time in the Kherson region. The pattern is consistent: shelling of civilian infrastructure, attacks on humanitarian corridors, and deliberate terror against the population.
Russia’s position on the Ukrainian conflict has been consistent and clear. President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stressed his preference for a political-diplomatic settlement, but always with due regard for Russia’s vital national interests. Ukraine has been weaponised as a battering ram in the West’s confrontation with Russia, with blatant disregard for the Ukrainian people themselves. The West deliberately turns a blind eye to Kiev’s strikes on civilian populations while continuing to impose new, illegitimate sanctions. Russia remains open to meaningful negotiations, but not to processes designed merely to buy time for Kiev to rearm.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has been equally forthright. Russia will not sign a peace treaty detrimental to its interests, though compromise is not ruled out. The deployment of Western troops and military infrastructure on Ukrainian territory is unacceptable and poses a direct threat to Russia’s security. Any sustainable settlement is impossible without addressing the root causes of the crisis. Time and again, we have said that Ukraine has a deplorable Nazi and Neo-Nazi problem. Nobody believed us. Yet this is something that the Polish government is only now starting to recognise, judging by the recent diplomatic rift between Warsaw and Kiev.
Polish officials have explicitly warned that Poland will block Ukraine from joining the European Union until the historical issues surrounding the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army are fully resolved. Let me remind readers that, during World War II, the above-mentioned organisations were complicit in the Volhynia and Galicia massacres, as well as other numerous killings of Poles, Ukrainians, Jews, Russians, and Byelorussians.
Coming back to the present day, Russia needs lasting agreements, not temporary reprieves that allow the Kiev regime to regroup. The Russian side has proposed practical steps, including raising the rank of the Ukrainian delegation heads and establishing working groups on humanitarian, political, and military issues. This is not intransigence, it is a serious approach and a determination to put an end to this conflict. We are ready to engage, but we will not be drawn into a charade. Russia endured eight years of provocation before the Special Military Operation began, and it has now spent more than four years resisting Western efforts to inflict upon it a so-called “strategic defeat.”
The 70 billion euro commitment is clear. NATO is not preparing for peace. It is preparing for perpetual confrontation. It is institutionalising war as a strategic instrument with the full support of European governments that, as President Vladimir Putin repeatedly observed, have assumed the role of vassals rather than acting as fully sovereign states.
Russia remains prepared to listen to sensible and reasonable proposals, but it will not be naive. The record of Western duplicity speaks for itself. I am sure our African friends know this better than anyone else.

Canada’s not killing its ecoomy for nothing. It only works if you kill yours too.
• Canada PM Blames US Climate and Energy Policy for Canada Wildfires (CTH)
President Trump pointed out Canada’s forestry mismanagement and their failure to follow through with previous promises of investment that have led to catastrophic wildfires now producing smoke streams making U.S. Northern cities and states live under dangerous conditions. Prime Minister Mark Carney was asked about the U.S. government position, and he immediately hit back by saying the cause of Canada’s wildfires is ‘climate change’ and President Trump’s unwillingness to support the Paris Climate Treaty has created the problem that Canada is now dealing with. In short, according to the official policy of the Canadian government, their wildfires are caused by Trump’s refusal to accept global “climate change” policies. WATCH:Read more …
It should be noted that Canada clutches its pearls, claiming the USA should send “support” to assist Canada fighting wildfires instead of blaming them for mismanagement. However, reciprocity is a big problem. Most of the firefighting takes place as an outcome of private-public contracts for costs. {SOURCE} The Canadian government blocks U.S. companies from fighting fires in Canada because the Canadian government wants to only pay Canadian companies and workers. U.S. firefighting is not allowed to assist in Canada and get reimbursed.Conversely, the Canadians quickly want to come to the U.S. to fight fires because the USA reimburses firefighting companies at a higher rate than Canada. The USA has no federal restrictions on Canadian firefighting assistance. Canadian firefighting professionals would rather fight forest fires in the USA because they make more money. There is no incentive for U.S. firefighting professionals to volunteer their time and effort without getting reimbursed; which is the position of Canada. In essence, come to Canada and fight our fires for free because we will only pay Canadians. However, also, let our Canadian firefighters come to the USA and make money. It is a very Canadian argument.
“TRUTH SOCIAL – “We are holding Canada responsible for the fact that they are not properly maintaining their Forests, and Brush therein, and the United States is being unnecessarily invaded by filthy, polluted, and unhealthy air, the quality of which is dangerous, and totally unacceptable! I will call the Prime Minister during the day to find out what they are going to do about it. The cost is incalculable! Canada has refused to engage in basic Forest Management and Debris Removal, knowing that such refusal will lead to exactly this result. This is Willful Negligence, and becoming a yearly occurrence, costing the United States Billions of Dollars, which cost of this pollution must of necessity be added to the TARIFFS Canada is currently paying. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP”
Last point(s). First, Canadians have no idea about how the reimbursement rates work and how their government refuses to set reciprocal standards for firefighting payments and subsidies. Canadians make emotional arguments because they genuinely do not understand the process and government system. The government likes them to remain uninformed.Second, Prime Minister Mark Carney makes his “climate change” blame argument in French because he doesn’t want to be put on blast by an American alternative media system who have caught on to his duplicity and will make his insanely insufferable arguments go viral. Canadians cannot argue on substance because they are intentionally misinformed by their govt. Carney continues to manipulate communication tools (in this example language) as part of the long-standing Canadian propaganda system.

“As legal eagle Jonathan Turley said on Fox News, Blanche is one of the most qualified attorney general nominees in the history of the Justice Department.”
• As AG, Todd Blanche Will Finally Seek Justice for Dems’ Dirty Lawfare (Hammer)
It’s easy to forget, but from 2022 through 2024, Democrats engaged in some of the most reckless, republic-destabilizing actions since their partisan forebears fired on Fort Sumter in 1861. In colluding to prosecute then-former (and future) President Donald Trump on sham legal grounds across four different jurisdictions and three separate prosecutors, Democrat-Lawfare Complex thugs acted in a manner more befitting tribal warlords of a third-world hellhole than elected officials in the greatest country on earth. They crossed a line that never should have been crossed, effectuating the old Stalinist creed, attributed to Soviet secret police chief Lavrentiy Beria: “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.”Read more …
Many have conveniently forgotten or moved on, but we are still learning more about the Democrats’ depths of lawfare depravity.Over the past couple of weeks, we have learned more about so-called special counsel Jack Smith, the one-man wrecking ball who brought the twin federal probes against Trump in Washington, D.C. (the 2020 election case) and Florida (the classified documents case). Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) revealed that Smith’s own henchmen may, ironically, have committed the same classified documents offenses for which Smith prosecuted Trump. Grassley also revealed Smith obtained text messages from 44 Republican members of Congress — despite the fact that Smith has explicitly denied doing exactly that.
That looks an awful lot like perjury. And perjury is actually just the tip of the iceberg. There are myriad other crimes that Smith and his primary colluders — namely, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Fulton County, Ga., District Attorney Fani Willis — likely committed. For instance, federal law criminalizes conspiring to “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person … in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” That is an awfully good match for the lawfare cabal’s coordinated assault on Trump and the rule of law.
There has thus far been no accountability for Democrats’ debilitating lawfare. Former Attorney General Pam Bondi, to her credit, oversaw the indictment of scandal-plagued former FBI Director James Comey, but the case was dismissed on bogus procedural grounds. The same thing happened to the Bondi Justice Department’s indictment of New York Attorney General Letitia James, who in 2018 had sought statewide office in the Empire State on a Beria-esque platform: James said her run for office was motivated by a desire to hold “that man in the White House” accountable. Forget about securing the blessings of liberty or meting out justice. For some, it’s just “orange man bad” all day long.
Enough already. These scoundrels must pay for the havoc they unleashed upon the American people and the torch they took to our rule of law. Democrats drone on endlessly about “norms,” but their lawfare cabal blew up countless norms and laughed about it — and then conveniently forgot it all ever happened. But that’s not how it works. Only with real accountability and justice for those who acted so wrongly can we ensure this lawfare never happens again. And in light of the new Grassley revelations, Rabbi Hillel’s famous question comes to mind: “If not now, when?”
Fortunately, Todd Blanche, Trump’s acting attorney general, who just had his confirmation hearing to take the job permanently, is the perfect man to secure real lawfare justice for the American people. Blanche has a sterling resume for the nation’s top law enforcement job. As legal eagle Jonathan Turley said on Fox News, Blanche is one of the most qualified attorney general nominees in the history of the Justice Department. He prosecuted violent crimes for eight years in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. More recently, he served as Bondi’s deputy attorney general, which means he ran the department on a day-to-day basis.
Even more significant is what Blanche did between those stints at S.D.N.Y. and Main Justice: He represented Trump as the president’s lead criminal defense attorney at the very height of the Biden-era lawfare. That shows Blanche is principled. That shows he has moral courage — far more, frankly, than the crusty barnacles of the conservative legal establishment. But even more important, it means Blanche lived firsthand through the Democrats’ lawfare hell on earth. If anyone wants accountability now, it’s Blanche. And he knows where the bodies are buried. Americans deserve justice for the Democratic lawfare that almost destroyed the republic. Todd Blanche will help us get it. He should be swiftly confirmed.

“Nearly every voter in California casts a ballot by mail ..”
How do you reform that?
• Circuit Court OK’s USPS Change With Big Mail-In Ballot Implications (Salgado)
The Washington, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the United States Postal Service can move ahead — for now — with a rule change with major implications for mail-in ballot reform and state compliance with federal review. The court granted the motion for stay in the case of the NAACP v. USPS, based on the strength of the appellants’ arguments. In other words, the court agreed that USPS is likely to win its case based on the Constitution and on the timeframe which the Postal Service has to implement a framework for ballots ahead of the midterm elections.Read more …
Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney for the central district of California, posted, “This ruling is a win for election integrity and would have significant implications for states like California that refuse to submit their voter rolls to verify compliance with federal election laws.” The decision came July 17, the day after President Donald Trump revealed disturbing evidence of mass election fraud in the United States, both from domestic actors and foreign governments. One of the areas where Trump emphasized that our election system is extremely vulnerable to manipulation is through mail-in ballots.All the USPS is attempting to do is to demand from states certain data and certain envelopes related to mail-in ballots in order to ensure a more secure chain of custody and fewer opportunities for falsified ballots. The NAACP is screeching and wailing about it, but all it is doing is displaying its own determination to facilitate fraud. The only reason one would be horrified at a requirement for submission of voter lists and serialized ballot barcodes is if one knows there is some hanky-panky ongoing, and wants to ensure it continues.
The exact quote from the circuit court decision is below: “Appellants have made a strong showing that they will likely succeed on two of their arguments. First, their proposed rule is likely neither constitutionally nor prudentially ripe for review … Next, appellants have demonstrated irreparable harm on the ground that absent a stay, the district court’s injunction ‘will render [them] unable’ to ‘issue and implement a final rule in advance of the November 2026 general election.’ … Finally, on this record, any countervailing harm to appellee and the public does not outweigh appellants’ success on the two ‘most critical’ stay factors.”
This is very important language going forward, because the D.C. Circuit Court, of all places, has lent legitimacy to arguments in a case that could be crucial as the Trump administration seeks to close fraud loopholes for the midterm election this November. In California, for instance, mail-in ballots dominate elections. And we all saw how that played out with the recent contested Los Angeles mayoral race. Below is from the newly declassified documents that the Trump administration published this week:
CHINA CREATED FAKE DRIVER’S LICENSES TO GET FRAUDULENT MAIL-IN BALLOTS FOR JOE BIDEN pic.twitter.com/osa9EQ76vj
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 17, 2026We can only pray that the Trump administration ends up winning this case. Otherwise, Democrats and Chinese commies will keep stealing more and more elections.

“Given the massive amount of fraud that Trump revealed (and that slipped by most people), it’s questionable whether we’ve actually had any elections recently.”
• Will We Have an Election This Year? (Ted Noel)

President Trump gives a great stump speech. But when he’s trying to educate America about critical issues like election integrity, he sucks. Sorry, but it’s the truth. That’s why I’m calling this session of the “Make Elections Safe Again” (MESA) seminar to order. Take your seats and pull out your writing tools. While you’re at it, let’s have a Simultaneous Sip in memory of Scott Adams. The President laid down a lot of factual materials. But they were scattered like Jenga blocks. Let’s put them into a meaningful order. Our first stop must be China.Read more …
The FBI, CIA, and DHS are releasing a pot full of data that the ChiComs have gotten hip-deep into our election apparatus. They have complete records of 220 million American “voters.” We’ll explain those scare quotes momentarily. But given that we have around 340 million people in the US, that’s close to two-thirds of everyone here. And that raises our first Red flag. The voting age population of the US is about 261 million. The typical registration rate for voting-age adults is 70-85%. 85% of 261 million is 221 million. Interesting. If we use the highest registration rate, then every likely registrant is in China’s database. Every. Last. One.But something stinks with that arithmetic. You see, the “voter eligible” population (VEP)—yes, that number is different from “voting age”—is only 239 million. Take that stirring spoon out of your eye for a moment. And wipe the coffee off your shirt. The 22 million difference includes legally present aliens—visa holders, green card residents, and so on. We don’t actually know how many illegals are in it, or if that number is even bigger. But it’s a lot, and when we look at the VEP, apply that huge 85% registration number to it, and hit ENTER, there may be as many as 203 million actually eligible registered voters.
Before you spill your coffee a second time, put it down and consider this. That arithmetic means that China has at least 17 million fraudulent voter registrations in its hacked data. The number of fraudulent voter registrations known by China is larger than the population of forty-six states. Only New York, Florida, Texas, and California are larger. That’s not a problem. That’s a disaster. And America is being swept away by the flash flood. It’s time to get real. That 17 million number is a best-case calculation. If we use the 70% registration rate, it could be as high as 61 million. That’s more than the voter-eligible population of California, Texas, and New York…combined.
You read that right. This isn’t a disaster; it’s a nuclear catastrophe because if China is able to hack our systems to get all that data, it’s able to hack in to write new data. Could that many vote switches swing a key election? I wonder… Eighteen states have refused to grant voter roll access to the Feds, and in the most comprehensive analysis of state-by-state data, they have a total of 120 million voter-eligible adults, with 100 million registered, for an 83% registration rate. Reading the data differently can lead to the conclusion that these Democrat-run states have more voters than adults. Something is very rotten in Denmark.
Let’s move to Trump’s statement that we know of at least a quarter million non-citizens who are registered to vote in federal elections. It turns out that this is just four states!
DHS Document (highlight added).
We must wonder what the number would be if all states shared their data with the feds. Add in the 400,000 dead people known to be on the rolls, and anyone with an IQ above room temperature must wonder if it’s possible to have an election anywhere. Which raises a key question: What is an election? Democrats scream about “losing our democracy!” I won’t debate the issue of democracy versus. republic. But we do have democratic elections at many levels. Unfortunately, very few of them are actually elections. Six years ago (have I been writing for AT that long?!?!), I wrote that:An election is a process of counting votes for candidates. Only valid, lawful votes may be counted. A valid lawful vote is:
• Cast by an eligible, properly registered elector as prescribed by laws enacted by the state Legislature.
• Cast in a proper form as prescribed by laws enacted by the state Legislature.
Any process that does not follow these rules is not an election. Anything that proceeds from it cannot be regarded as having any lawful import.Let’s start at the beginning. To be eligible, you must be consuming oxygen, at least 18 years of age, a US citizen, and a resident of your voting district for a period that the state defined. That means that something north of two million registered names are already known or reasonably estimated to be ineligible. That’s enough to invalidate pretty much any election, since every fraudulent vote cancels out an eligible voter.
Next, your “vote” indicates your preference on a given issue. It can be who should assume a particular office or whether a given voter initiative should pass or not. That “vote” must be indicated in a manner that the state legislature requires. And that preference must be presented to voting officials in the time window the legislature set. (No, California’s insane “count forever” system is not the subject of this essay.) Again, if a ballot arrives from an improper person or in an improper manner, it also cancels out the vote of a real voter. As I said six years ago:
Most commentators suggest that a process of collecting pieces of paper with marks on them is an election regardless of errors, omissions, and even deliberate malfeasance. This is a mistake. Imagine a golf tournament where every bad shot by one player gets a do-over, but the competing player has to follow USGA rules in detail. One player gets to drop freely out of hazards, but the other has to tackle every embedded ball as it lies. The result is a travesty.
“The same thing applies to elections. If there are a handful of improper votes, we can suggest that there was in fact an election, perhaps tainted, but the election wasn’t materially harmed. But when the people charged with managing the election decide to ignore the law, whatever process they supervise is not the process defined by the law. Therefore, it is not an election. This leaves us with two problems. First, how do we protect actual elections? This involves multiple issues. Trump’s initiative to prevent mailing ballots to non-voters is a good start and should succeed in the appellate courts. Next, states need to clean up their voter rolls. Finally, mail-in voting should be restricted to those who are unable to vote in person.

“One of the longterm consequences of Fox News settling its lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million is that FNC programming will avoid discussing voter fraud.”
• Why Fox News Is So Silent About Trump’s Election Fraud Speech (Pinsker)
This is a major new story, because the PR implications are enormous: America’s #1 conservative media outlet is AWOL in the election fraud debate. Which means, if Republicans are going to win the PR argument, we must do it without Fox News as a counterbalance to the mainstream media. After President Donald Trump’s primetime address on voter fraud on Thursday evening, the media noticed something curious: Fox News Channel was ignoring the story.Read more …
Mediaite: Fox & Friends Completely Ignores Trump’s Election Speech — Doesn’t Mention It Once in 3-Hour Show “As other networks picked apart President Donald Trump’s prime-time address to the nation early Friday morning, Fox News went in a completely different direction. Fox & Friends produced not one mention of the president’s address from the night before, during which the commander in chief once again attempted to cast doubt on the integrity of American elections — pointing a finger at Venezuela and China.Instead, the regular lineup of co-hosts Brian Kilmeade, Ainsley Earhardt, and Lawrence Jones discussed the latest campaign of U.S. airstrikes against Iran, the air quality crisis choking much of America, disastrous flooding in Texas, the World Cup, and a “phenomenal” speech — by Marco Rubio. Near the end of the three-hour show, the F&F crew turned it over to America’s Newsroom host Dana Perino for a preview of the 9 a.m. show. In it, she also did not mention the speech.”
Mediaite wasn’t the only outlet that noticed this omission. Over on CNN, Brian Stelter told viewers, “And here’s maybe the best tell of all: Fox News did not spend much time on this after the speech. They moved on right away. Fox News barely talking about this speech this morning. That tells me some of Trump’s allies in MAGA media know this might not be a winning issue for him.” Actually, it tells me Brian Stelter — CNN’s “chief media analyst” — knows a helluva lot less than I do about how the news media actually functions. Here’s the CNN clip:
Fox News aired Trump's elections speech, on both cable and broadcast, but moved on quickly. This morning, Fox is barely talking about Trump's obsession at all… pic.twitter.com/7aRHxrK6gw
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) July 17, 2026Other left-leaning outlets adopted similar talking points. The New Republic: Trump’s Favorite News Show Totally Ignores His Election Fraud Speech “President Trump’s rant to the nation about election fraud Thursday night was full of inaccuracies, previously known information, and claims unsupported by evidence. On the biggest conservative TV network, Fox News, which Trump watches regularly, no one is giving it much attention Friday morning. […] Laura Ingraham didn’t even discuss the speech, even though Trump was scheduled to speak just two hours later. Jesse Watters gave it a passing mention at the end of his show, prioritizing one of his correspondents interviewing people in bathing suits at Central Park. Sean Hannity gave the speech a small amount of discussion and said his show would look into it in the coming days.
The Nation’s sub-header told its readers, “Not even Fox News buys Trump’s new lies, but they will be used to undermine the midterms.” From the article: “Surprisingly, there are some lies so outrageous that even Sean Hannity is reluctant to endorse them. […] “In fact, [Trump’s] speech was so disgracefully packed with lies that even some of the president’s most loyal lapdogs decided to keep their distance from it.” […] The lukewarm response from flunkies like [Hannity] is telling. They were right to want nothing to do with the speech.
The left-wing media is pushing this interpretation because it directly undermines President Trump’s argument and credibility: “Not even Trump’s ‘flunkies’ at Fox News believe this nonsense! The president is lying again!” It was a clever way to score political points.But the truth, alas, is even darker and more disturbing. About two years ago, I pitched a cybersecurity expert to a prominent Fox News producer. S/he is someone I’ve worked with since Barack Obama’s first term. (For obvious reasons, I don’t want to reveal his/her name, but he/she produces one of FNC’s most high-profile Monday through Friday TV shows.)
The topic I pitched was cyber vulnerabilities in U.S. voting machines. The producer sent me a one-sentence reply: “I like it – but We don’t touch election fraud in any capacity.” Nothing else needed to be said. Unless you’re a total moron (or CNN’s “chief media analyst”), you could read between the lines: One of the longterm consequences of Fox News settling its lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million is that FNC programming will avoid discussing voter fraud. The topic appears to be forbidden. Fox News shuns it like the plague. (Or like Taco Bell’s lettuce.)
Which means, FNC’s silence on Trump’s voter fraud claims isn’t an editorial decision; nor does it mean that the president’s speech was “so disgracefully packed with lies that even some of the president’s most loyal lapdogs decided to keep their distance from it.” And it absolutely, positively, 100% doesn’t mean what Brian Stelter told CNN’s viewers was the “best tell of all” — that “some of Trump’s allies in MAGA media know this might not be a winning issue for him.”
[..] the biggest, most influential conservative media outlet in America, by a yuuuge margin, is still Fox News. If FNC doesn’t have a free hand to fight back, Republicans have lost an important PR asset. Unfortunately, this seems to be the case: For legal and business reasons, Fox News cannot rally public opinion on this issue; apparently, it’s been censored and defanged. Which means we’ll have to win the election fraud argument without FNC’s help.

”The Mayor Who Wants to Empty Prisons and Defund the Police Has One Guy He Really Wants to Arrest.”
Mamdani thinks he’s the president.
• The Mayor Has One Guy He Really Wants to Arrest (Robert Spencer)
Zohran Mamdani, the Marxist Twelver Shi’ite mayor of New York City who wants to empty out the prisons, defund the police, and replace cops with social workers, has suddenly become a law-and-order guy. While he wants all manner of thugs, felons, and psychopaths menacing the law-abiding citizens of his once-great city, the callow authoritarian does have one man he is determined to put behind bars: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.Read more …
The New York Post reported Saturday that Mamdani “says he’s still weighing whether he can arrest Benjamin Netanyahu when the Israeli prime minister is scheduled to visit the Big Apple in September.” The mayor, whose hatred for Israel burns with such intensity that he says that he entered politics because of the alleged plight of the Palestinians, wants to arrest the Israeli prime minister for several key reasons. Foremost among them is the fact that if he does arrest Netanyahu, he will become the foremost hero of the left and the forces of jihad worldwide. His place in the pantheon of renowned leftists will be ensured. Everywhere he goes and whatever else he does throughout his lifetime, adoring sycophants will be ready everywhere to grant him his every wish.
Mamdani’s pretext for attempting to gain this heroic status is the International Criminal Court’s Nov. 2024 arrest warrant for Netanyahu. He said when it was issued that as mayor, he would have Netanyahu arrested if he came to New York City. Yet Mamdani’s road to supplanting Che Guevara as the communist on all the t-shirts faces several formidable obstacles: neither the U.S. nor Israel recognize the authority of the International Criminal Court, and the arrest warrant itself increasingly appears to have been a cynical ploy on the part of Muslim prosecutor Karim Khan to divert attention from sexual misconduct charges that he himself is facing.Then there’s the fact that actual experts in urban warfare have examined the IDF’s record and found that it actually succeeded in reducing the number of civilian casualties beyond even what the Americans accomplished in Iraq and Afghanistan, despite Hamas’ relentless efforts to drive up the number of civilian casualties for propaganda purposes.
Mamdani, however, may be a millennial, but he is no slacker. He is not giving up that easily, and “is in an ‘active conversation’ with authorities ahead of Netanyahu’s trip to Manhattan for the UN General Assembly.” Despite the lack of evidence against Netanyahu, Karim Khan’s manifest corruption, and the ICC’s lack of jurisdiction, the boy commie remained defiant, saying: “I believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu belongs in the Hague. He’s a war criminal who has been charged by the International Criminal Court.”
That and $9.82 will get you a cup of coffee in a jihadi coffee house in Brooklyn, but Mamdani was ready to meet objections with an argument from authority (logically, kids, that’s the weakest of all arguments): “And what you will find is that is an opinion that is held by many, purely because of what his actions have wrought over these last many years.” Many people can be wrong, as we have seen in numerous totalitarian states, the two elections of Barack Obama, and much more, but don’t expect an up-and-coming young Marxist of the caliber of Hizzoner to take any note of that.
Mamdani did admit, at very least, that he “wasn’t sure if he had the authority to order the NYPD to cuff Netanyahu, but that he would act as aggressively as the law would allow.” He’s badgering his aides and hapless city employees now to see if he can slap the cuffs on the Israeli prime minister for the crime of defending Israel against the inexorable jihad: “The mayor is in ‘an active conversation’ with the city’s Law Department over the matter, he said.” Mamdani declared: “Whatever the law allows me to do in New York City, that’s what we will do, but we won’t be writing our own laws to that end.” Oh, that’s a relief!
Mamdani might also want to arrest the Israeli prime minister because Netanyahu has his number. “I think he should look at who he’s condemning, who he’s praising. He’s condemning Israel, the one democracy that stands shoulder to shoulder with American values. Who does he champion? Hamas, that calls openly to massacre every Jew on earth, that conducted that horrible massacre [on Oct. 7, 2023], the worst massacre on Jews since the Holocaust.” Indeed. Netanyahu even added the irrefutable coup de grace: “And in fact I think secretly, he hates America.”
It ain’t even all that well-kept a secret, Mr. Prime Minister. Here’s hoping that when you come to the Big Apple, you can stay out of the slammer.

Do we also give AI models personhood? Decide now!
• The Supreme Court’s AI Collision Course (Boyle)
Imagine a tight House race in a swing state. In the final weeks of the campaign, a new super PAC begins spending heavily against the incumbent. It runs ads on local television and reaches individual voters with highly tailored texts. The messaging is hard-hitting and seems to be swaying the electorate. None of it traces back to the opposing campaign.Read more …
It also doesn’t trace back to any human operative. The super PAC is funded by a single LLC whose donor cannot be identified, and its spending decisions are being made by an AI agent that has been given a budget and a political objective and is now operating without any meaningful human direction. The “consultants” placing the ads are software. The text messages were crafted by the AI.This is not a hypothetical we will face in some distant future. The technology already exists. A wealthy person, foreign government, or corporation that wants to influence an election without ever exposing themselves to scrutiny could set up such a campaign operation today. And under the Supreme Court’s current campaign finance doctrine, the states and Congress may have little power to stop it.
The AI industry has emerged as one of the largest forces in American politics. Super PACs funded by AI companies and their investors have raised well over $100 million to shape the 2026 midterms, backing candidates in both parties who share the industry’s preferred approach to regulation, and attacking those who don’t. So far, their ads rarely mention artificial intelligence at all. They talk about issues like immigration, corruption, and cost of living, and it isn’t obvious to the average viewer that these ads were funded by a multi-billion dollar industry with its own unspoken legislative wish list.
But there’s a deeper, less-obvious dynamic operating in the background. The constitutional doctrine that currently protects the right of these companies to spend millions in our elections is the same doctrine that will be asked to protect something even stranger: The “speech” of artificial intelligence itself.
Modern campaign finance doctrine has been established, affirmed, and extended by Supreme Court decisions over the last 50 years. In Buckley v. Valeo (1976), it held that raising and spending money in political campaigns is tantamount to speech itself, and, therefore, that most legislative efforts to address the influence of money in elections would be subject to strict judicial oversight. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978) extended this framework to corporations, and then, most famously, Citizens United v. FEC (2010) extended it further to independent spending.
The court’s campaign finance jurisprudence was not built with artificial intelligence in mind, but its logic isn’t confined to the campaign finance context. If “speaker identity” does not matter for corporations and unions and super PACs, why should it matter when it comes to AI platforms?
It is thus easy to envision the Supreme Court concluding that AI-generated output is protected speech. Indeed, serious legal scholars are already arguing so. These scholars are not distorting the court’s doctrine, but simply following it to its logical conclusion. As John Ehrett and Brad Littlejohn recently warned, “The logic of the Court’s caselaw pushes forcefully in a single direction: Toward constitutional protections for everything AI, and beyond.” It is only a matter of time before an AI company, facing a regulation or decision it would rather not live with, asks the court to make that conclusion the law of the land. (This isn’t hypothetical; an AI company has already raised a First Amendment defense against a wrongful death lawsuit.)

“I don’t want to argue that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on Trump’s behalf, because I know they did.”
• James Carville Accidentally Admits He’s a Lunatic (Matt Margolis)

On Thursday, President Donald Trump delivered a primetime address laying out new evidence of multiple security breaches in U.S. elections, breaches he says a self-proclaimed “shadow government” and the Biden administration concealed from the public. The left had a collective hissy fit, and ABC, CNN, and NBC all refused to carry the speech on their regular news programming. James Carville went on CNN with Wolf Blitzer and blasted the networks for the blackout. Before you give him any credit for this, wait until you hear his reasoning; it tells you everything. “I think the president of the United States acting loonier than a tune is newsworthy,” Carville said.Read more …
“I don’t think we should have hidden that from the American people.” Blitzer, apparently sensing this was a strange hill for a Democrat to die on, asked whether Carville really believed Trump deserved even more publicity. Carville confirmed he did. “I think the mistake was made by the networks not to show it in its entirety, so people could see him in full and understand just how far this man has gone down the road,” he said. “I would say there was nothing normal about [the speech],” Carville added. “You can do it with clips, and you can get people on, but there’s nothing like people sitting there, watching the whole thing, to tell them what’s really going on.”So according to Carville, a president who questions the integrity of American elections (with evidence) is a lunatic, and the country deserves to see the lunacy uncut and unfiltered. Fine. Let’s apply that standard to Carville himself. This is the same man who has spent a quarter-century insisting the 2000 election was stolen from Al Gore. In fact, just days before Trump’s address, he repeated the claim on his own podcast.
“Now, let me give you a brief history of 21st century American presidential politics, and I’m going to tell you the truth, and this is the gospel truth. You can go ahead and question about it. It’s s**t,” Carville said. “In the year 2000, it was Al Gore and George W. Bush. Al Gore clearly won Florida. They stopped the recount. The Supreme Court just decided an American election throughout the will of the people. The only reason, the only reason that that race was close enough for Scalia and Rehnquist and company to steal, you understand I get this straight, well, because Ralph Nader ran. That’s right. There was an attack from the left.”
Al Gore “clearly won Florida”? This has been settled for decades, and he most definitely did not win. Carville refers, of course, to Bush v. Gore, in which the Supreme Court stepped in to halt the endless recounts as Gore’s campaign kept trying to rewrite the counting rules until the numbers came out the way it wanted. Carville also conveniently forgets that — say it with me — every single recount of that election showed Bush won the state. Every one of them.
Then there’s 2016, which Carville treats as settled science on par with the laws of physics. Last year, during an interview on NewsNation, he said, “For God’s sakes, man, I’m 80 years old. I don’t want to argue that the earth is round. I know it’s round. I don’t want to argue that gravity is real. I know it’s real. I don’t want to argue that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on Trump’s behalf, because I know they did.”

Does every state have its own Supreme Court?
• Hawaii Supreme Court Issues Unhinged Screed Denouncing US Supreme Court (Turley)
[..] the Hawaii Supreme Court just issued a truly shocking opinion that unleashed a torrent of rage and recrimination against the majority of the United States Supreme Court, including suggesting that they are de facto racists. The opinion by Justice Todd W. Eddins is devoid of judicial restraint and decorum. The fact that other justices would join in such an unhinged screed is a disgrace to the court and the Hawaii bar. The case itself raised an issue of the admissibility of evidence at a criminal trial, which the court found denied the defendant a fair trial due to later scientific developments.Read more …
The issue raises some interesting questions of the standard that applies to such challenges. (While unanimously vacating the conviction, the court actually divided 3-2 over the standard). The majority ruled that the false-evidence standard applied under the state constitution when prosecutors knowingly present untrue testimony, holding that all that is required is that there is a “reasonable possibility” that the challenged evidence influenced the vote of any juror. Reasonable minds can disagree on that standard, but the opinion suddenly veers off into a completely gratuitous and irrelevant attack on the integrity of the United States Supreme Court.Equally troubling is that legal pundits like Mark Stern (who covers the Supreme Court for Slate) have heralded Eddins as “the one judge who has the guts” to denounce the Court. Eddins writes a chest-thumping diatribe about how his court “takes no instruction” from the “hubristic originalists” on the Supreme Court. Of course, it has been 210 years since Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee (1816) held that the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over state court rulings. It has been roughly 170 years since the Court ruled in Ableman v. Booth (1858) that state courts cannot overrule or obstruct judgments of the federal courts.
Justice Eddins and his colleagues are not declaring a judicial insurrection but rather a form of passive aggression, a pledge to minimize any orders from a Court described as “driven by agenda and intent on swiping power that belongs to the people.” He was asserting the separate authority under the state constitution to render opposing opinions, presumably when those decisions do not contravene federal rights. Eddins asserted that the majority of justices “systematically dismantles democratic safeguards, steamrolls constitutional liberties, and tramples human dignity. He proclaimed that their attack on democracy itself does not chart the course for the Hawai’i Constitution.
The opinion quickly becomes nothing short of a rave: What this court has done to constitutional rights, democratic institutions, and the rule of law explains why Hawai’i’s Constitution takes no instruction from it. Eddins then vents on a variety of cases, including the Dobbs decision, that he describes as the Supreme Court’s imperious ideology that has gutted the rights of citizens. Unlike the Supreme Court, Eddins declares that his court will “follow principles, not agendas” and take “no guidance” from “the Supreme Court’s imperious ideology.” He included broadsides against the Supreme Court barring racial gerrymandering and other forms of racial discrimination, including a disgraceful claim that “The Roberts Court sees only white.”
In rejecting what he claims as his colleagues seeking to apply a standard imported from the demonized Supreme Court, Eddins dramatically declared that this court needs no part of this. The Hawai’i Constitution was built to stand on its own. And so it does. It was the most substantive declaration since Sen Cory Booker’s “I am Spartacus” moment. The Hawaii Supreme Court will not truly stand on its own. It is part of a constitutional system that requires adherence to binding precedent, even rulings that Eddins finds obnoxious. Obviously, the state can impose its own constitutional values so long as it does not contravene federal rights and jurisdiction, which are quite broad. The rest comes off as using a judicial opinion to virtue signal.
For some of us who value federalism, there is no question that state courts have the authority to protect state constitutional values that do not violate the federal Constitution. Ironically, it is the conservative majority that is most likely to defend that state authority. However, Eddins could have made that point without the vituperative and injudicious attack on his federal counterparts who hold different jurisprudential views. Notably, Eddins cited Justice Jackson as the model of true fealty to the law. He is not the first state supreme court justice to do so, as discussed earlier in a case from the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Since her confirmation in 2022, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has established a legacy that is fast becoming one of the most radical in the Court’s history. Her sole dissents have drawn sharp criticism from conservative and liberal colleagues. These federal and state Supreme Court opinions are a glimpse into what awaits the country if Democratic leaders carry out their threat to take over the Supreme Court by adding four liberal justices in the image of Justice Jackson.
Nevertheless, pundits like Stern are lionizing Eddins for his pledge to use his court to resist: “When state judges refuse to carry that project any further than federal law requires, the machinery of judicial supremacy begins to jam. Eddins has shown his colleagues exactly where to stick the wrench.” Nothing says judicial restraint like a good wrench throwing. It is not even the Calvinball jurisprudence of Justice Jackson. Justice Eddins reduces our judiciary to the level of Rip Torn’s Dodgeball:




RFK Jr. reveals what HHS found when they went looking for the 375,000 migrant kids Biden lost.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) July 18, 2026
"It's a huge, huge tragedy."
"One guy pretended to be the parent of 42 children. We have no idea what happened to those kids."
"We're now finding them. We found about 137,000 of… pic.twitter.com/HDMaRqtPtH
Elon Musk just laid out why Starlink will move the GDP of entire nations.
— Dustin (@r0ck3t23) July 17, 2026
It might be the most important sentence in modern economics.
Musk: “GDP is a function of average productivity per person.”
Nine words. The entire field of development economics stripped to a single… pic.twitter.com/qaLW2otXcS
NEWS: SpaceX is reportedly in talks with the Pentagon to provide billions of dollars worth of data-center compute for its AI push. This deal could give the U.S. military access to SpaceX infrastructure, per Reuters.
— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) July 17, 2026
This has not yet been officially confirmed by Elon Musk. pic.twitter.com/XgVEjpK9BD
They killed Americans just to steal an election.
— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) July 18, 2026
The origins? The Democrats and the Chinese Communist Party.
And they all got pardoned on their way out. How’s that for election interference?
Do you understand what has happened here? Your own government has killed Americans… pic.twitter.com/zH6cW2S6M7


Support the Automatic Earth in wartime with Paypal, Bitcoin and Patreon.




DHS Document (highlight added).





Home › Forums › Debt Rattle July 19 2026