Debt Rattle October 22 2026

 

Home › Forums › The Automatic Earth Forum › Debt Rattle October 22 2026

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 43 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #253779

    Salvador Dali Madrid. Drunk man 1922 • Elon Musk Will Have His Revenge on Democrats, and I Can’t Wait (Matt Margolis) • EU’s Kallas Lashes Out At US O
    [See the full post at: Debt Rattle October 22 2026]

    #253795

    Should TAE be promoted on Facebook, Instagram et al? We used to have VK in Kenya doing that, but I lost track. And I don’t have active accounts in things like that. Please tell me what you think.

    #253798
    tboc
    Participant

    “.. the Iranian government is dragging its heels in making a deal to end the war deliberately to prevent Donald Trump from getting any political benefit from ending the war and the plummeting oil prices that would surely follow.”
    Minab, school, children, double tap – – – – – annihilate

    “Did Trump and Musk cut the service to Kiev? It would make sense if they did. The US is not at war with Moscow, and shouldn’t help Kiev’s efforts.”

    Click your heels three time and repeat
    “The US is not at war with Moscow,”
    “The US is not at war with Moscow,”
    “The US is not at war with Moscow,”

    Word of the day
    schizophenia

    #253799

    VK,

    If you’re still there, do let me know.

    #253800
    Dr. D
    Participant

    Duran today totally forgets it’s all the United States’ and Donald Trump’s fault. Well, it’s an odd-numbered day. Today Europe exists and has responsibility for themselves. Until Midnight, London GST. Then it’s our fault again. I can post the link (on Europe and riots) but nothing worth it.

    :French Counterterror Police Arrest ‘Ultra-Left’ Activist Over Limoges City Hall Fire

    He’s not Ultra-Left, he’s just average Antifa. But I accept your premise. Let’s re-assert that people who burn government buildings are again “Ultra”. He’s some white guy. College. True believer. Eternal Revolution.

    “ His record was clean until an appeal court convicted him of violence against a police officer at an October 2024 protest in Guéret,”

    Same as Minnesota. Allow dozens of small assaults first, where there are no consequences, and then graduate to burning black neighborhoods and running over policemen with cars.

    Noting that although here in the U.S. they are pointing at 70-year terms for Antifa, those very few shot at police officers, openly, knowing, with great pre-planning, as they opened the police side door facing the woods, iirc. So yes, that’s not Protesting, or even Rioting. But is that the Police’s fault because they refused to arrest and prosecute 100 smaller crimes where they then thought there was no law? Of course not, but you see my point – this could have been avoided.

    That’s why we have Law for 5,000 years, and I refer you to GK Chesterton “Before you remove a fence, you might want to find out why somebody put it there.” That is from the raging murderous bull standing in the next field. Who is predictably going to gore your -ss to death.

    “UK Landlords Offered More Than Double Council Rents To House Channel Migrants
    Landlords offered double rent by UK government to evict brits for channel migrants…

    Remember who they’re fighting for. “Anyone not me.” “Anyone but us.” Anyone that will kill and impoverish my family. So that the English, the French, have no nation to retreat to, and will cease to exist as a people. Genocide, extinction, murder: Sigh. Ah, all the GOOD things in life!

    “Jacques Derrida, the French postmodern theorist,… pointed out in his 1993 book Spectres of Marx….that the glorious proletarian future predicted in Marx’s writings does not exist, has never existed, and will never exist, but that it still exercises a weird power over the imaginations of Marxist true believers, as though it existed in some sense. He described it as an “always-already absent present,” and proposed a new branch of philosophy, “hauntology,” to deal with such unreal realities.” — Archdruid

    Happy Halloween. Because it’s never worked anywhere, over all time, even in small tribes, means it’s going to work perfectly this time. Yes we do need a name for such a mental illness. Show me. No one stopping you. Get 100 acres and your friends and show me as an example. It works great, believe me, I’ll join on.

    Why do they do the above? “[it’s a] stalking horse for certain political and business interests and, more crucially, for the privileges of the waning managerial class.”

    “”Mobilization Will Be Massive”: French Govt Plans To Send Soldiers To The Streets After Admitting Failures

    But Macron just said he approves of their protests, their anger, and their methods! What gives, man?

    https://alt-market.us/the-turd-eaters-france-gives-us-a-lesson-on-the-pillager-class/ Interesting.

    “The pillager class is very similar. You can take them out of the global ghettos, bring them to your home and give them every opportunity imaginable to improve their circumstances, and yet, they will always choose thievery and barbarism instead. The only thing that might change is the complexity of their crimes.” “These people aren’t thankful for the opportunities handed to them. They believe they are entitled.”

    A type of narcissism, ego-inflation.

    Unlike Ayn Rand, the problem isn’t THAT these people exist; it’s what you DO with their existence. Like any family if there are rules, consequences, order, their gradient of lesser-forward thinking, right down to the truly violent or retarded can largely still be channeled to productive ends. Money has worked very well for doing so, as it’s both an immediate cost and reward, and a future one. But obviously, if I need to emphasize it, it’s not stopped if you wear a suit. Gordon Gekko is a Pillager Class, obviously. Millions of the working poor are Productive Class. So you need to contain the top sociopaths as well as the bottom. I’m not sure which we failed, certainly both. That’s not “Them”, their fault: you all abdicated your known duty.

    “ “Pillagers vs Producers: There’s Only Two Ways To Save The Western World”, I look specifically at the alliance between third world cultures and Marxist activism.”

    When seen as The Resentfuls, the Fatal Envy, you can suddenly understand the worldwide Red-Green Alliance, even as Green will immediately expel the Progressives and Socialists and kill every gay, stop all Progress, the second they get the upper hand. — This was seen in Michigan (?) where the Muslim radicals got the upper hand on the City Council and immediately removed the Gay Pride flag and trappings. The Left are so self-absorbed and dumb they said “Why would you do that?” and started a lawsuit. YGBFKM. The Judge referred them to their own case, a year before, where it was established from the Normal Americans that they could remove the AMERICAN flag and hang the Gay Flag, as they had that right. Instantly that “Right” was used against them. And this is true. And in some sense harmless to learn at this point. But demonstrates the process.

    If there were only TWO members left on earth, they would also be Resentful and attack each other. Because: Pillager Mindset. Instead of each creating more, which is Producer Mindset. And I find it stupefying that other Producers can’t understand not everyone is like you. Y’all need to talk to a lot more criminals and low-lifes in your life. I don’t harbor ill-will toward them, but I can’t permit them to roam free either because if permitted they will arson everything they touch, killing everyone. I can jail them for THEIR safety, as well as everyone else’s, even if it’s my safety last (the dutiful are the ones making waves and drawing fire). However, if you do not – as every culture on earth over all time would put a hatchet in their brain – then it’s just “Law of the Jungle” sleeping with your finger on the trigger of a warm gun every night. Why. And I can also say “Every culture on earth over all time” EXCEPT ours. We try to jail them over and over again and avoid it in an excess of Charity and Mercy to them. I argue that makes us the BEST of all time, not the worst, but others may disagree.

    “Elon Musk has confirmed that Ndiaga Diagne, the 53-year-old Senegal-born naturalized citizen who opened fire outside a downtown Austin bar in March and killed three people, was a former Tesla employee at the company’s Gigafactory Texas.
    Diagne was fired after he violently assaulted a female coworker who accidentally stepped on his prayer rug during a company-sanctioned break.
    Months later he carried out the attack while wearing a “Property of Allah” hoodie and an Iranian-flag shirt.”

    Again, shouldn’t he be in jail from the original assault, so not out walking the streets with guns?

    He had a prior criminal record that included a 2022 hit-and-run reduced to a misdemeanor and later dismissed after probation, as well as domestic violence allegations.”

    And again. And again. And again. You want Justice? Or Mercy? “If only we forgive everyone everything and hand over the keys to pure evil” the Pope says. That’ll work.

    “Israel Detains NY Congressional Nominee In West Bank Olive Grove, Sets Free After Learning Who He Is

    Is anyone going to learn something here? Adding the top one here, “there is no law” since the law doesn’t apply according to who you are. That’s lesson 4 of this one-sentence story.

    “Donald Trump Jr. Privately Breaks With His Father On Foreign Policy: Report

    Newsflash: people disagree with Trump! News at 11. It’s so private that everybody knows. Wait: has this ever happened before? I mean except with every official on every issue, where he always hires people who disagree then choose between them like this thing we call “A Boss” and “An Executive”? And he also just did exactly this over the public Firing squad issue. Hegseth wanted it, for Reasons. Other people piped up (probably lawyers) and so he seems to have finalized on not Public. Okay, whatever. That’s what “Deciders” do: Decide. Remember the left, Media criticism of Trump. Both that “He listens to everyone who comes in the room” and ALSO “He doesn’t DO WHAT HE’S TOLD.” Told by whom, ma’am? You? NYT intern reporter, straight from Swiss Private School? Told by John Brennan? Who?

    Bosses have to always choose, because all people disagree, however slightly. Being part of the hive mind, and killing and eating heretics however so small, they don’t get this. This is just normal, average, properly-used power, worldwide, over all time.

    #253801
    Dr. D
    Participant

    Yes, probably, iirc, there are sub-softwares you can buy that automatically cross-post, because doing it by hand is a major timesuck and PITA.

    #253802
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    India-China Ties Headed for a Crisis || PRAVIN SAWHNEY

    #253803
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    India to be Part of Perpetual War in West Asia || PRAVIN SAWHNEY

    #253804
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    US Preparing for More Strikes on Iran: Using “Leave it to Bibi” to Pass

    #253805
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Powerful Explosions SHOOK a NATO country! Russia changed Warfare Tactics and SHOCKED the WEST!
    ******************************************************

    Meanwhile, last night Russia launched another massive missile strike on Ukraine. At the same time, reports indicate that numerous explosions were recorded in almost all parts of Ukraine, including its Western regions

    #253806

    Powerful Explosions SHOOK a NATO country!

    Complete BS. Obviously.

    Russia will not bomb a NATO country. NOTE: Why would they?

    But our ‘allies’ would love it if they do. So much so that…

    #253811
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Dear RIM:

    Explosions near Poland border.

    Advertised to get clicks I guess

    #253812
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    US “Project Meridian” — A Symptom of American Decline, Not a Solution
    Brian Berletic, October 12, 2026
    The creation of “Project Meridian” is not a path to US military superiority but an admission of its own weakness, rooted in a financialized system rather than a technology gap.

    US “Project Meridian”

    US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth recently announced the creation of the 120 day task force, “Project Meridian.”

    On the US Department of Defense’s website it says the project aims, “to secure America’s long-term military superiority by identifying the capabilities required to achieve absolute technological dominance on the next-generation battlefield.”
    At face value, the initiative serves as a further symptom of the US’ terminal decline rather than any sort of path toward “long-term military superiority” or “absolute technological dominance.”

    The necessity of the project itself is an oblique admission of current and growing US military weakness — increasingly on display amid US wars and proxy wars worldwide in which US weapons are both falling behind in capabilities and quantities.

    The stated path the project seeks to take to address this growing military weakness — “leveraging the nation’s premier private-sector innovators, business leaders, and technologists” to “discover and accelerate the fielding of advanced systems” — ignores completely the fundamentals of the US system which is directly responsible for this growing weakness and dysfunction relative to the rising multipolar world and especially China, in the first place.

    This is precisely why the interests in the US today, benefiting from decades of financialization and the monopolies it militarily enforced, are so determined to prevent the success of nations like China and so desperate to leverage unprecedented technology like AI to make sustainable a system that is in reality entirely unsustainable
    The idea that future technologies and “wonder weapons” can somehow restore US military power around the globe in the face of a rising multipolar world order ignores the pressing fundamental questions regarding why the US seeks to project military power worldwide to begin with, whether it is necessary or not, and whether it is sustainable or even possible to do so.

    The Root of the Problem

    The “private-sector” — large corporate-financier monopolies predicated on the perpetual pursuit of profit and power (driven by shareholder primacy) and which have captured and control US foreign and domestic policy toward that end — are what drives the US’ global military presence and the “need” for “long-term military superiority.”

    The multitude of wars, proxy wars, and potential wars the US is instigating at any given time around the globe are aimed at eliminating any obstacle to the power and profit of this “private-sector” and to implement the coercion of and control over nations and regions the US has already successfully subordinated.

    Thus, this military power is not used to uphold the legitimate national security of the people and territory of the United States — but as a means of undermining and overcoming the national security of other people and territories abroad.

    Proponents of US primacy would argue that if the US did not seek global primacy, others would — a false premise based on an interpretation of “realism” hat assumes all people and nations are driven by the same sociobiological need to “dominate” as the special interests and the system they’ve created in the West.

    Back in reality — nations currently exist in parallel to the US with the ability to project military power globally but have deliberately chosen not to — including both Russia and China — and only develop and use military force in reaction to US encirclement, encroachment, and aggression (by proxy or otherwise).

    The systems of governance and economics in nations outside the West are likewise built from the foundation up in a fundamentally different manner — one in which the rational nature of humanity — not an inherent sociobiological desire for dominance — guides nations and their policies for specific people-driven purposes (accessible healthcare and education, modern infrastructure, etc.) rather than solely profit and power.

    By doing so, these nations ensure access to wealth and influence, but in a sustainable manner — the difference between hungry chimpanzees in the jungle stripping bare fruit trees and humans who have learned to grow and farm for food. Both are driven by hunger — one chooses the most direct (and ultimately unsustainable) means of satisfying that hunger — while the other chooses to leverage ingenuity to overcome natural limitations on available food supplies.

    If nations do not seek to threaten the US — or even develop the capabilities to do so — this means the entire premise of “Project Meridian” is based on not only a wholly unnecessary imperative, but one at cross purpose with international law, endangering global peace and stability. There is an added irony to the growing military and economic crisis consuming the West — it is created by this unsustainable and unnecessary pursuit of global primacy — not by some threat the rest of the globe poses to the West or the United States.

    Project Meridian Built on Fantasy, not Facts

    The “advanced systems” the US imagines it will “field” to achieve “long-term military superiority” may consist of technology the US is capable of developing, but not at a rate faster than the emerging multipolar world, and certainly not at the scales nations like Russia and China can deploy them at.

    Project Meridian and all other attempts to address the US’ dwindling military advantages have not only refused to examine the necessity of their imperatives, but refuse to face the insurmountable nature of their objectives.

    The monopoly the US enjoyed over technology post-Cold War and throughout the early 21st century has convinced policymakers of some inherently superior quality within the US system or among “Western” peoples rather than despite it.

    Co–directing the project will be Elon Musk of SpaceX, Palmer Luckey of arms startup Anduril, and career politician Newt Gingrich, along with other academic, policy, and industry “experts.” Both SpaceX and Anduril exemplify the fading advantages the US had enjoyed for decades in terms of technological innovation and military power.

    SpaceX’ Starlink and Star shield satellite constellations have provided useful, but not insurmountable advantages to Washington’s Ukrainian proxies amid war with Russia.

    Anduril — created specifically to reverse the growing disparity in quality and quantity in US military hardware versus Russia and China — has failed to leverage AI (artificial intelligence) and software-defined manufacturing to close the growing gap. This is primarily because both Russia and China are already using both technologies in their vastly larger and more efficient state-owned enterprises to develop and manufacture similar or better weapon systems.

    Anduril’s drones in particular have proven such a failure in Ukraine that Ukrainian troops refuse to use the systems being transferred to them.

    What Anduril has achieved, is the production of weapons at slightly cheaper costs than traditional US arms manufacturing monopolies, with a slightly faster innovation pace — but still falls far short of Russian — let alone Chinese — prices, capabilities, and of course quantities.

    Newt Gingrich — the third “co-director” of “Project Meridian” — is a career-politician and vocal warmonger who has contributed to the very system creating the US’ current decline in the first place and has no discernible intentions to change.

    If the US does not possess an inherently superior ability to innovate — either because of the composition of its population or the manner in which its political and economic system is organized, and no intention of changing that system — no project of any kind organized to “study” and implement a path toward continued domination and superiority will succeed.

    Because the people co-directing “Project Meridian” are examples of the sort of deficient thinking contributing to the US’ decline, failure is only further guaranteed.

    What “Project Meridian” may achieve is the streamlining of an inherently inferior system, putting off but not avoiding its ultimate displacement by more viable alternatives. It may also serve as a means of disrupting the global economy and thus the basis upon which Russia, China, and the growing multipolar world are building more viable alternatives — the equivalent of a criminal planning to burn down a rival business because of their inability to compete head-on with it.

    Even if the US acknowledged the limits of its profit-driven system and made the decision to radically transform it into a purpose-driven alternative — while it might manage to eclipse Russia in terms of innovation and industrial production — it would still face extreme disadvantages vis-à-vis China — possessing a fourth of China’s population, thus a deficit in trained manpower and a vastly smaller industrial base.

    There is also the reality that a purpose-driven US would replace its financialized Ponzi-economy with one tied to actual production — and thus would no longer be required to seek out, confront, and eliminate productive systems abroad — but would instead seek out to cooperate with them.

    The Approaching End Game

    The US cannot compete with nations like Russia and China which exist as functioning, productive nations, prioritizing industry and the national workforces required to maintain it, through gimmicks ultimately subordinated to an unproductive financialized Ponzi-economy.

    Because the very interests benefiting from the financialization of the US have captured and controlled America’s political system, media, education, and all of its essential industries — a discussion about transitioning from financialization to production can’t even take place, let alone take the first step toward making the transition.

    Only with a collapse at home in the US of these interests and the system they created, together with the success abroad of productive alternative systems like China’s, Russia’s and many others will it be possible for Americans to enjoy the same benefits of billions of people abroad — modern infrastructure, affordable healthcare, accessible and relevant education, and thriving industry for employment.

    This is precisely why the interests in the US today, benefiting from decades of financialization and the monopolies it militarily enforced, are so determined to prevent the success of nations like China and so desperate to leverage unprecedented technology like AI to make sustainable a system that is in reality entirely unsustainable.

    Because of how unlikely a breakthrough in AI or in other frontier technologies is to empower the US in a way other superpowers could not immediately replicate or surpass, it is much more likely the US will use its remaining strength to “overturn the game board,” destroying the existing global order multipolarism is building itself on top of, in the hopes of emerging out the other side of deliberate worldwide chaos in a position of advantage.

    The word finds itself at a critical inflection point — where technology, industry, and innovation can either lead us forward away from our worst natural impulses — or turn us into prisoners of them. Only time will tell whether the multipolar world is prepared to ensure the former, or if the special interests driving the US will manage to reimpose upon the world (including upon Americans themselves) the latter.

    Brian Berletic is a Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer

    #253813
    Michael Reid
    Participant
    #253814
    Dr. D
    Participant

    Today:
    “Finally a German politician admits the war in Ukraine is the EU-NATO’s fault:

    So they finally admit what TAE said 2014. A decade ago. Free Speech. And we would have said it far earlier, as it was obvious back to Soviet Times, but nothing brought it to our attention until then.

    “People don’t have enough money to live on, all the services are crumbling in Europe, and they want to cut back on hospitals and schools. There’s no money in Europe to continue funding Ukraine.”

    But he approves of all that. Or am I mistaken and he wants to Drill Baby Drill, open mega refineries, and close every border tighter than a frog’s rear end? Yeah, probably not. He’s MI6 topknot to his toes, and betrays every (irish)man he can find for London. Twue Wuv.

    “For years, Democrats have used the machinery of government as a club against anyone who crosses them.”

    Not entirely, but you have the “Big Government” vs “Small Government” problem. A government small enough to drown in a bathtub can’t march around tyrannizing people. Especially if they’re heavily-armed. Only the Left can.

    “Rep. Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.), who sits on the Natural Resources and Veterans Affairs committees, made no secret of where this is headed. She lumped Musk in with “the well-connected billionaire, trillionaires who have seen government contracts as a way to subsidize their own company’s research, development, and bottom line.”

    Yup, totally. Musk is the most MICMAC of all companies over all time. However, they usually can’t pillage the people and the Treasury ENOUGH to hand out to Government, what gives, ma’am? It’s almost like you don’t have principles. Remember the EXTRA $40B Democrats gave Trump in his term one budget for the Police state? He didn’t ask for or want? Oh yeah: they TOTALLY believe Trump is Hitler. Totally real. That went to Musk as well as he hadn’t flipped at that time. That was Tuesday when everyone HAD to buy a Tesla or be shot, before WEDNESDAY, when IF you bought a Tesla you’d be burned or shot. #Logic.

    “This isn’t oversight. Democrats may call it that, but this is revenge.”

    Submit or Die. You thought I was kidding these 18 years I’ve been saying it. I thought it was some dum guy, but it was a DNC SENATOR, said she promises to track down every child who ever met Trump and fabricate charges against them. Wow. I mean: we know, but thanks for making it clear and quotable for the election. You’ve been attacking children non-stop since Gamergate, 2014.

    “• EU’s Kallas Lashes Out At US Over Ukraine Peace Efforts (RT)

    Like Zelensky, we all know Kallas isn’t a real human being, really doing or running anything. So WHO? Let’s dispense with the finger puppets and talk to the real people, K? This is goofy and beneath us all. It’s like you have Mel Brooks as King, or Charlie McCarthy, Jeff Dunham and we’re supposed to address the puppet as if it’s real and you’re not crazy.

    “That doesn’t mean they’ll bend to Kiev’s wishes even one inch.
    • Russia Willing To Resume Trilateral Talks With Ukraine (ZH)

    Guarantee they won’t. Why should they? They are setting the terms of surrender and the after-state. But it won’t be accepted at this time, just getting them accustomed to the ideas.

    “It seems this is a Kremlin ‘thank you’ to Trump for doing the diesel deal, and for at the last minute waiving the sweeping Graham sanctions package, which outraged hawks and Democrats in Congress.”

    Just a review on the “Graham Package” that Big Gay Lindsay got through. He passed “Bone Crushing” sanctions on Russia that the President could enact. ….BUT ALSO NOT ENACT. Do I need to repeat that? And you all fell for it and wondered why Trump backed Lindsay? Now we have to ask, “Did Lindsay ALSO know what he was signing?” Because sure seems hard to think he didn’t, he’s a JAG lawyer and all that.

    So again, media reports it – you can borrow down every little thing – but the overall picture is the OPPOSITE of what they suggest. This is politics.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOjP_1WpoN8
    “Paddy O’Neil can sleep at night. He probably enjoys the irony. She’s not lrish, she’s English.” Jack Ryan He gave what you SAID, not what you WANTED.
    Lindsay can give Trump the PRO-Russia, while keeping his word and image of being ANTI-Russia. Trump immediately moves on this law. Everyone is busy eating crayons and doesn’t notice.

    “The conflict could freeze along the frontlines if the US coerces the EU and Ukraine into agreeing to the resumption of Russian energy imports through partially US-controlled pipelines while convincing Russia to agree to the deployment of European forces to Ukraine without the US’ Article 5 protection.”

    Yes, but a DMZ/Frozen Conflict is a classic European win. Win win win for them, just like the Berlin wall. They survive, keep it going forever. Sad to say, but hopefully they don’t take it. The year has been filled with these “Offer incredibly generous terms” to Ukraine, Iran, Canada, knowing they can’t and won’t take them. Because 1) it IS the moral thing to do, and as the good guys you have to try, but 2) It reveals who they are. If Putin hadn’t given Ukr everything, 2, 3, 4 times, the mask wouldn’t have come off how violently Europe wants the war and to not help Ukr but DESTROY RUSSIA. That was an easier sell in Russia, but the REST of the world also needed to conclude that.

    “Macron denies the rioters are muslims, foreigners: “They’re French”

    Exactly the problem. I didn’t want to bring up. Sure “Millions must go”, “Millions” (and millions) aren’t even citizens, or false ones, but that leaves the MILLIONS WHO ARE. Their children. Who know nothing of their parent’s homeland.

    Thanks to these Globalist Oligarchs, killing everyone. Even if they WENT home, to a nation they’d never seen, they’d be aliens there too. See “Captain America The Falcon and the Winter Soldier” 2021.

    “Due to the catastrophic damage, this beautiful piece of European architecture is unlikely ever to be restored.”

    Why would you say that? It’s a building, there’s nothing easier than restoring it. Take volunteers. It’ll be identical in a few years. S—t man, you have A WHOLE FRENCH CASTLE being built at Guidelion, with NO money. And it’s not historic nor an icon. Many cathedrals – including the recent one in Barcelona – take HUNDREDS of years. This is the “Can’t-Do” attitude Europe is now famous for.

    Do no work. Give up. Blame others. That’s the Winning Way.

    “• Ilhan Omar Is Begging Supporters for Cash As Deportation Looms (Margolis)

    Like the DNA yesterday there is more to this. WHO does she call? They shut off her bank accounts, and are wiretapping her phone to see who her illegal criminal network is. WHO is she “getting cash” from? We think “The people” okay, that’s fine. The D.A. thinks: “Oh here’s the don of the Somali Mafia, and previously-secret back accounts of the Black CIA.” She called them on the phone, then met them in a parking lot, then their foreign bank accounts moved her legal fund, Bessant says.

    “• Trump Criticizes Ilhan Omar As A ‘Sick, Very Dishonest Person’ (JTN)

    I don’t think that’s slander, that’s apparent. She’s eclipsing the rest of the “Squad” though: Rashid was caught sending hundred-million dollar contracts to her friends? I’m not following; I don’t care. Arrest somebody and tell me after.

    ““.. the Iranian government is dragging its heels in making a deal to end the war deliberately to prevent Donald Trump from getting any political benefit from ending the war and the plummeting oil prices that would surely follow.”

    Of course: but it’s the most predictable thing ever. This is not going to help.

    “Nonsense. There is no link between Trump and Alberta. And everyone knows Alberta was not going to vote to leave.
    • Alberta Decision To Stay In Canada Gives Carney Backing To Take On Trump (BBC)

    I haven’t followed it at all. Was it even legit? The QC one wasn’t: they bussed in Ontario to get it over the line back when. In any case, the first vote almost never works, so it pretty predictable. 80/20 will status quo, which is sensible. They’re awful at strategy though, Canadians must like to be abused: IF you voted “Leave” then ALBERTA HAS LEVERAGE. They don’t HAVE to leave, you dopes! There’s an encyclopedia of special carve-outs, some huuuuuuuuge, that Quebec has over Canada. Alberta could have gotten the equality they wanted and still not leave. The end. Instead “They voted” (remains to be seen) to NOT have any leverage. WTF.

    And you wonder why they’re being beaten like red-headed step children for 40 years. IF YOU CAN’T UNDERSTAND THIS, you get what you get. “To stop being raped would be mean to my rapist” Canada says.

    Uhhhh, yes. It would be. Sooorry.

    “Did Trump and Musk cut the service to Kiev? It would make sense if they did. The US is not at war with Moscow, and shouldn’t help Kiev’s efforts.
    • About Starshield, SpaceX’s Military-Grade Satellite Service (New York Times)

    No, no no no no. I couldn’t grasp this either. Think bigger: YES they had “a problem” with Starlink. StarSHIELD should never be used (although we know the Black CIA is defying orders there).

    They shut off Star Link, IN THIS VERY SPECIFIC WAY. i.e. Speeds of over 100mph or something? Huh. That’s oddly specific. Yes, IT’S NOT UKRAINE. It was POLAND. ESTONIA. St. Petersburg. Ah. Got it now?

    NATO is flying drones 1,000 miles to St. Pete, Kaliningrad, to start WWIII. HOWEVER they are there, whether ‘just launched” from Estonia, or on a mega-carrier drone which then releases the smaller attack drones, whatever it is, IT USES STARLINK. The U.S. knew, and shut it off. Maybe by “Hacking” their own systems, whatever, but that just tells NATO: “We See You”. And tells Russia “We’re still allies”.

    Now what can they say? “Why did you shut off Starlink in Poland and Kaliningrad while we’re bombing them using Elon’s own tech to start a Nuclear WWIII”? F—k no! So they come on camera and complain about the same thing IN UKRAINE, where the complaint makes legal and moral sense. I find it hilarious. You’re screwed, boys. And no False Flag, etc for the 29th time this month.

    “• Why Is Elon Musk Plotting A Mega-Merger of SpaceX and Tesla? (BBC)

    It’s actually dum. He should break up the companies instead. Like Tesla solar wall, etc. I mean, I’m sure he knows what he’s doing but all larger companies lose focus and collapse. Also not Huge for America. Nothing is made or done when you shuffle legal paperwork, you fools.

    Satan Takes a Holiday:

    But those who lack the peace and unity of God can never rest.

    #253815
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Found this interesting

    The machines are starting to replace us

    They will need a good power source

    U.S. up to no good again

    #253816
    Dr. D
    Participant

    New Altas’s Premise:

    The nation that overnight make the world’s largest rocket, also reuseable, by the HUNDRED, and dropping space launch prices by 1,000x OVERNIGHT …. Can’t compete with Russia.

    “Boy, are you HIGH? Or just really stupid?”
    “I assure you. I am not high” — W Bush, from South Park.

    The nation that is ABSOLUTELY first-world if anyone is, as even Canada and Europe Drop below Mississippi, is the LARGEST oil producer, with the most energy to burn, opening new shipyards and steel plants overnight, planning 100 nuclear microreactors, is the top in Tech, Food, R&D, Medicine, everything else.

    …Is BEHIND China. Has no chance. “It’s Inevitable, Mr. Anderson”.

    “Boy, are you HIGH? Or just really stupid?”

    Look, China, Russia: Awesome. Great. Tops. But they’re FROM THEIR LEVEL. China has huge internal problems and is on the mid-term downcycle. Russia is VERY SMALL. I mean, they do amazing with what they have, but how many people in 12 time zones are up to speed being high-tech, high-production, connected manufacturing? Like 2 time zones? 30%?

    We have all that, and every time Honda opens a factory, not GM, and builds something you see how awesome, productive, and even moderately high quality-control we are. He’s insane.

    Or rather, like everyone else, he learned all this in 1990 and never added a fact. He left America in 2001 and maybe rightfully so! However, he knows literally nothing about the US since 2018: he’s talking a book and a strategy and reality that is now a DECADE gone. Is no more. Doesn’t exist. Is dead. Is no longer seen even on long-term charts. WHILE the US market roars, everything turns around overnight.

    HE’S A TRADER. He KNOWS this. And lies, denies it. Okay man. Don’t say I didn’t tell you what a dips–t and loser you are tho.

    #253817
    John Day
    Participant

    Quoth Michael Reid yesterday:
    “I see a great future for Russia, Iran and China. I feel the populations in the West need to break free from war and the money interests and not fear Russia, Iran and China. They may help us break free.
    humanity, decency and morality
    How do we get there from malignant governance before it is ever worst?”

    A: Seek Divine Guidance in life. It tends to feel like compassion, occasionally an epiphany, but don’t hold your breath.
    I have lots of thoughts and feelings that are not from Divine Guidance… I recognize that.
    The advantage is that it transcends the mechanical limitations of physical systems. The coordination of purpose to reduce suffering of sentient beings seems basically “frictionless”.
    It is completely a personal choice, not a church or a political party.
    It seems paradoxical from that perspective.

    #253818
    John Day
    Participant

    Ahem… Pot, you’re also black.
    ” Trump Criticizes Ilhan Omar As A ‘Sick, Very Dishonest Person’”

    #253823
    zerosum
    Participant

    Denial/Truth/Blame Game
    Former British diplomat Alastair Crooke on the protests across Europe:

    “People don’t have enough money to live on, all the services are crumbling in Europe, and they want to cut back on hospitals and schools. There’s no money in Europe to continue funding Ukraine.”
    ————–

    A debt economy is an economic system in which borrowing and debt creation are central to the generation and circulation of money, with most money in circulation originating from loans.

    In a debt-based economy, both governments and individuals rely heavily on borrowing to finance activities, investments, and consumption.
    When money is borrowed, it is effectively created as new currency, meaning that the total debt in the system can exceed the actual physical money in circulation
    This system allows economic growth by enabling spending and investment beyond immediate financial resources.
    It also introduces risks if debt levels become unsustainable.
    ———-
    EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has accused Washington of trying to force Ukraine to surrender to Russia, attacking President Donald Trump’s diplomatic efforts to end the conflict.
    Speaking to the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Tuesday, Kallas credited Europe’s military and financial backing of Kiev with prolonging the conflict and preventing Ukraine from accepting Moscow’s terms.
    ————
    Iranian analyst Saeed Leylaz believes the U.S. should get used to the idea of a near-state of war with Iran even after Trump is out of office. “Reaching a sustainable deal with the US, even after the Trump administration, is no longer possible because of the deepened distrust,” Leylaz said. “Nothing will go back to the pre-war status quo.”

    —————-
    “Without a doubt, a fake poll can affect an election. It can stop a candidate from raising money, boost another candidate, or cause a party to invest in a place it otherwise wouldn’t.”

    • A Pollster Just Admitted Faking Its Numbers, and The Fallout Is Huge! (Matt Margolis)

    —————
    Please tell me what you think. – RIM

    A.I. is not going away
    We got to learn how to use it.
    Since I started to learn,, I found that A.I. is still in its baby phase but we must learn what, how to use it. Old saying, “Garbage is always garbage”
    —————–

    Question.:
    In a short paragraph explain how you can best help my search for info., my inputs and your outputs

    Claude said:
    I can help most when you give me a specific question or goal along with the context that shapes it: what you already know, what you’re trying to decide or produce, and how deep you want me to go.
    The more precisely you frame the target (a claim to verify, a comparison, a timeline, a summary of a field), the better I can aim.
    For anything current or checkable, I’ll run web searches, often several for a broad topic, then read the most relevant sources and give you a synthesized answer in my own words with citations, flagging where sources conflict or where the evidence is thin.
    If you paste in documents, links, or data, I can analyze them directly.
    My outputs can be a short direct answer, a structured comparison, a deeper research-style overview, or a file such as a document or spreadsheet if you want something to keep.
    Tell me your preferred format and level of detail up front, and push back or redirect as we go; follow-up questions usually sharpen results more than a perfect first prompt does.
    ———-

    #253824
    zerosum
    Participant

    Here is a sample Question to Claude using copy, paste – “Project Meridian” A short paragraph on paste info/opinion –

    Berletic’s op-ed argues that Project Meridian is a symptom of US decline rather than a remedy. He says the Pentagon’s turn to private-sector innovators ignores the real problem, a financialized, profit-driven system that he claims pushes the US to project military power worldwide and can’t out-produce state-driven economies like China’s and Russia’s. He calls Anduril and SpaceX evidence of fading US advantages and Gingrich part of the problem. He predicts failure and suggests the US may instead try to “overturn the game board.” That is opinion and advocacy from a multipolarist viewpoint, and its sweeping claims (for example, that Russia and China only use force in reaction to US aggression, or that Anduril’s drones are rejected in Ukraine) are asserted without sourcing.

    The factual core checks out. Hegseth launched the effort in a “State of the Force” address, with Musk, Luckey and Gingrich co-leading under Defense Department CTO Emil Michael. It is a 120-day study that will end in an unclassified public report. Mainstream coverage focuses on a different critique from Berletic’s: critics say Musk and Luckey would be recommending solutions their own companies already sell, and the Defense Department didn’t respond to questions about those potential conflicts of interest. Supporters counter with Hegseth’s argument that the best forecasters of future conflict don’t all sit inside the Pentagon.
    ————–

    #253825
    zerosum
    Participant

    October 22, 2026
    Pentagon Installs New Economic Spying And Sabotage Units

    Pentagon Installs New Economic Spying And Sabotage Units

    … Both of the new initiatives, the clandestine economic warfare agents and the ‘technical support’ sabotage unit, are likely to end up in scandals.

    This will probably be due to botched operations in allied countries, operations that exceed the legal framework the Pentagon is working under, or due to the not so hidden corruption when buying products from companies in which the Pentagon leaders have financial interests.

    It takes a while for scandals come to the fore. Until then the pure existence of these units must be taken as a warning by U.S. allies that their economies and companies are in danger of becoming victims of these new Pentagon activities.
    —————
    Another Hopeless Round of Shuttle Diplomacy Begins as West Grows Frantic to End Ukraine War
    Simplicius
    Oct 20, 2026

    https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/another-hopeless-round-of-shuttle

    —————
    “30 NIGHTS OF NIGHTMARE”😱SOUTHERN BRIDGE HIT + ZERO Missiles Intercepted❌Military Summary 2026.10.22


    ————-

    #253829
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    The idea that future technologies and “wonder weapons” can somehow restore US military power around the globe in the face of a rising multipolar world order ignores the pressing fundamental questions regarding why the US seeks to project military power worldwide to begin with, whether it is necessary or not, and whether it is sustainable or even possible to do so.

    #253830
    zerosum
    Participant

    @Michael Reid
    Here is what Claude said. Does it add anything useful?
    ————
    Here is the paragraph, written as the case restraint-minded critics would make:

    The faith that the next generation of exotic weapons will restore American primacy is a technical answer to a strategic question nobody has bothered to ask. Critics note that for seventy years the Pentagon and its contractors have produced an unbroken string of “wonder weapons” meant to guarantee an edge, yet the same pattern left Vietnam a tactical failure and a technological triumph for the industry. Better hardware cannot tell us why Washington needs to project power in every region, which of those commitments serve the security of Americans rather than inertia and institutional habit, or whether a country with its debts, industrial limits and fraying alliances can afford to keep doing so. Even defense analysts have warned that the assumption of staying a technological generation ahead of adversaries is “baked into US strategy” and may prove false, as espionage and cheap digital tools erode the advantage. A multipolar world is not a problem a better fighter jet can solve. It is the result of other powers growing richer and more capable, and the sober response is to decide what the US actually needs to defend, then pare back commitments to match, instead of searching for a gadget that lets us avoid the choice.

    Defenders of the technology-first approach would answer that these questions are already settled by the stakes: they argue that deterrence in the Indo-Pacific and Europe depends on credible capability, that retrenchment could invite the very conflicts it hopes to avoid, and that some strategists see US power surviving by leading the emerging multipolar system and using new technology to project it. The real dispute is whether primacy is the cheapest way to keep the peace or an expensive habit mistaken for one.

    These are the sources behind the cited claims:
    ( I deactivated by inserting 2 spaces )
    “The Pentagon’s New Wonder Weapons For World Dominion” (History News Network): htt ps://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/166889
    “High Tech Pork: The Pentagon’s New Wonder Weapons for World Dominion” (Naked Capitalism repost of the same piece): htt ps://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/09/high-tech-pork-pentagons-new-wonder-weapons-world-dominion.html
    “A Generation Ahead, Not by 2030” (The CyberWire): https:// thecyberwire.com/stories/e5fbdb6f11ca45588ed4128f56d6ac37/a-generation-ahead-not-by-2030
    “How will the United States manage the new challenge to the old status quo?” (Lowy Institute): htt ps://lowyinstitute.org/publications/how-will-united-states-manage-new-challenge-old-status-quo

    Most of these are older pieces. The first two date from around 2017 and the Lowy piece from the Obama era. They are good illustrations of each side’s argument, but they don’t reflect the latest developments. If you want, I can search for more recent sources, such as 2025-2026 analyses of US force posture and emerging weapons programs, to strengthen the paragraph.

    Here are more recent sources (2025-2026), grouped by the side of the debate they support.

    **Supporting the restraint critique**
    1. **Defense Priorities, “The End of US Global Dominance Presents an Opportunity for America”**: argues the US should adopt a grand strategy of restraint and that overreach has weakened American primacy. htt ps:// http://www.defensepriorities.org/opinion/the-end-of-us-global-dominance-presents-an-opportunity-for-america/
    2. **Marcellus Policy Analysis (Spring 2025), Lane**: examines the restraint community’s critique that an expansive global military footprint leaves the US overstretched. htt ps:// jqas.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Lane-Analysis-3.pdf
    3. **The Pioneer (April 2026), Nani Gopal Mahanta, “From hegemony to contestation”**: notes the Pentagon’s concern about “simultaneity,” the possibility of war on multiple fronts without the capability to handle them. htt ps:// dailypioneer.com/news/slug-lite/from-hegemony-to-contestation-unraveling-of-american-primacy?year=2026

    **Supporting a technology- and primacy-oriented view**
    4. **Breaking Defense, 2026 preview**: covers the planned Golden Dome homeland air defense system and the push to restore dominance in the Western Hemisphere. htt ps://breakingdefense.com/?p=72771
    5. **DKI APCSS, James Minnich, “America’s Future in a Contested World”**: accepts that uncontested primacy has passed but stresses deterrence and execution, while also calling for restraint in pursuing ambitions that exceed sustainable capacity. htt ps://dkiapcss.edu/?p=3246475

    **Mapping the debate itself**
    6. **Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Marc Saxer, “Map: US Grand Strategy for the Multi-polar World”**: lays out the primacist, prioritizer and restrainer factions, and says primacists currently hold the upper hand in Washington. htt ps://asia.fes.de/news/map-us-grand-strategy.html
    7. **Asia News Network (April 2026), “The international system remains uni-multipolar”**: argues the US still dominates in aggregate hard power, and that the durability of its primacy depends on how it exercises that power. htt ps://asianews.network/?p=271417

    A few cautions: most of these are think-tank or commentary pieces with a stated point of view, and several come from regional outlets rather than major wire services or peer-reviewed work. Only the Breaking Defense piece deals directly with new weapons programs. None of them directly evaluates the claim that technology can restore global power, so that link in the paragraph is still my synthesis rather than something a source establishes. If you’d like, I can look for sources on specific programs such as Golden Dome or drone and hypersonic procurement to ground that part better.
    ————-

    • This reply was modified 21 hours, 53 minutes ago by zerosum.
    #253833
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Dear D:

    You are suffering from a life of consuming propaganda that you are great and the best and on and on.

    News alert: while you have been busy bombing people their bridges and financing rockets to space your country is collapsing not from immigrants but from corrupt oligarchs robbing and indebting the country,

    Your so good and excellent that you have not managed to build a bridge.

    Bridge replacement
    Main article: Francis Scott Key Bridge replacement
    Hours after the collapse, President Biden said that the federal government would pay for the entire cost of reconstructing the bridge.[263] In June 2024, the Maryland Department of Transportation accepted bids to design and build a replacement bridge by autumn 2028 at an estimated cost of $1.7 billion to $1.9 billion.

    #253834
    zerosum
    Participant

    The title is distracting from the real discussion.
    What are you? What is our society. It is insightful. Worth the time to read.
    ———–
    The anaesthetised society: distraction, fragmentation and social control
    Ismaele
    3 hours ago

    https://geopolitiq.substack.com/p/the-anaesthetised-society-distraction

    #253836
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #253847
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Dear D:

    Did you miss all this stuff? You are simply no longer dominant and are cruising for a bruising

    #253848
    Dr. D
    Participant

    “Another Hopeless Round of Shuttle Diplomacy Begins as West Grows Frantic to End Ukraine War” — Simplicius

    Simplicius, who can’t be arsed to tell the truth even on accident, NO ONE IS FRANTIC, man. No one. Nada. None. Zip. That’s the horror of it. Russia looks happy to go another 100 years, Trump is merely a broker, Europe is doing all they can. None. AND: I remember saying this exact thing when Trump left 2020. Still here! Not Frantic. Not hopeless either! Just surrender: INSTANT WEALTH. All the oil you could use for 100 years. Riots stop overnight.

    Nope. Not hopeless, no one is frantic, so I guess if you run Simplicius through an AI that REVERSES everything, you’ll be close.

    “The idea that future technologies and “wonder weapons” can somehow restore US military power around the globe in the face of a rising multipolar world order ignores the pressing fundamental questions regarding why the US seeks to project military power worldwide to begin with, whether it is necessary or not, and whether it is sustainable or even possible to do so.” — Reid

    We very clearly CAN. We basically took Venezuela without shot. (Details) We defeated Iran, a nation of 90 Million people larger than Europe in 90 days with 1/10th of our arsenal. Nothing has changed since then, we’ve been flying hot air balloons and Cessnas over them.

    However! Yes: every other part of your paragraph, EXACTLY. Why would we? Why SHOULD we? In fact it is our open and declared national policy – since January 2017 – to NOT do this. To demobilize and come home. Which absolutely necessitates handing off all security to local forces, local SOVEREIGNTY, unless you want a collapse and regional/world war from our power vacuum. Unfortunately, that ALSO means we need to settle or remove major explosive points. Or points that specifically can attack us. We saw this in Trump I with NoKo. Remember all the “Little Rocket Man” stuff the media clutched pearls on and Kim Jong found hilarious? But we already had a worldwide nuclear war over that the media reported. …Wrongly again. Not a peep, all settled, all good! Huh.

    Again, they CLAIM these things. AGAINST ALL PUBLIC DOCUMENTS, every public statement, all public policy, and every Federal and Military action we’ve taken the whole 6 years of this administration. You know what I’m going to say, say it with me, “We. Make. S—t. Up”. Ruthlessly, shamelessly, constantly, tirelessly, stupidly. Every day, in every way, making s–t up more and more.

    Yes, WE the American People don’t want these things: never have. And it took 30 years but finally got an administration that – mostly – is doing what we wanted for 100 years: Ending Empire.

    “You[‘re] so good and excellent that you have not managed to build a bridge.
    Bridge replacement Main article: Francis Scott Key Bridge replacement

    Uhh, yes? And I’m the one who forwards pics and videos of our zombie drug-addled ghettos, Detroit more ruined than Hiroshima, and that we spend every day from 1971 to 2016 liquidating the country? Was that me? Pretty sure it was. Like Tuesday I did that last.

    “Hours after the collapse, President Biden said” Whoops! ‘Nuff said! He said something, so it was a lie. He was wrong.

    We need a STEEL MILL, and then we need NO CORRUPTION. One of which is in Iowa, and the other is arresting dozens in CA and MN. ‘Yes! Until they arrest Biden’s friends and the Left, no bridge! What do you think I tell you every day and above, with the VA Senator? That’s the Bridge’s state, isn’t it?

    I live under a bridge, I know all the drug-addled crooks and homeless here. Tell me all about it. There ain’t no Kool-Aid I’m drinkin’ — I can’t afford it!

    Don’t you worry yourself a bit about me, buddy, when every town of every province for 3,000 miles is worse than mine, guy. You just lost the steel mill that MIGHT have fixed your nation, but now import steel from China in order to have no jobs at all. …And no ships. For one of the world’s foremost, perhaps THE most, sea-faring coast. If Carney gets a dollar worse, Newfies will be swimming to shore, and we already know that not only does PEI have no health care, but the bridge is seldom working there either. …Which they TOLD Canada not a build. Voted and ordered them not to. But how can you have multi-billion corruption without public works to hide it in? So they bankrupted Canada to the Banks to build a bridge no one wanted.

    So just you nevermind about our bridges until yours are fixed, eh? Every day I point to Canada and you ignore your own business and your own sacred duty and attend to mine.

    #253850
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #253851
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Dear D:

    I hope your bridge is not bombed.

    #253853
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    The fall of Europe and its geostrategic implications
    Today in Istanbul, Vladimir Putin’s special envoy said that future cooperation between Russia and the US (and other nations) will be “glorious.”
    Alex Krainer
    1 hour ago

    One of the consequences of political instability in France has that it revealed the fracturing of Western alliances as President Trump and President Macron swapped insults and blame for the riots gripping France. The consensus seems to be that the riots, which have spread to many other European countries, will continue and escalate.

    If only we had any early indications that things have gone off the rails…
    In fact, it seems that the French government is caught in something of a perfect storm surging both from the bottom-up and from the top-down: while the struggling French people are increasingly restless and ready to pour into the streets and protest, global capital markets have been exerting pressure on France’s dismal finances. Just in the past ten months, the interest rate on French government bonds soared by nearly 40%.

    Image

    Incidentally, that chart became obsolete in the space of about one day. By now, interest rate on the 10-year French government bonds rose to 4.935%. But unlike in the United States, French stocks went nowhere and may have entered into a bear market. With both bond prices and stock prices collapsing, the value of collateral in the banking system is melting away in a self-stoking cycle and no end in sight.

    In France, government spending represents nearly 57% of the GDP. One Michael Aarouet put together a handy comparison of French state’s share of the GDP with that of other capitalist liberal democracies:

    The system is drowning in debt…
    At €3.6 trillion, France’s public debt is just short of 120% of the GDP. By now, all these trillions in debt and also the GDP percentages above, mostly just elicit yawns because it’s all become so new normal. But if we calculate public debt on a per capita basis, things look a bit more serious: €3.6 trillion represents about €52,000 per man, woman and child living in France today. With the government running annual fiscal deficits of up to 5.8%, this debt load is 100% certain to continue inflating, suffocating French economy and further stoking social pressures.

    No, it’s not about “socialism.” It’s deeper than that!
    And for anyone about to yell, “socialism” about now, we have to understand that the problem does not originate with profligate “socialist” governments, nor can we solve it by voting in capitalist, conservative, pro-small government officials. The problem is entirely systemic and the system is demonstrably immune to the intended or desired policies of elected officials and even more so to the will of their voters.

    Even if they passionately advocated balancing budgets, paying down debts and reducing government footprint in the economy, once they’re in office, public officials will continue down the same path of deficit spending. I elaborated this in August in the article titled, “Why governments can NEVER give up deficit spending.” There will be no voting our way out of those problems. The article is linked belw:

    I-System TrendCompass
    Why governments can NEVER give up deficit spending
    In yesterday report we looked at the accelerating trend in government deficit spending and the rising overhang of unpayable debts. I suggested that in such a situation, any business person or household would reduce spending and make every effort to pay down their debts, but that for…
    Read more
    2 months ago · 45 likes · 3 comments
    The geostrategic consequences
    There can be little doubt that the festering, escalating financial crisis will have very substantial geostrategic consequences. At some point, the Unity of the combined West, centered on our “shared values” will begin to disintegrate and individual nations will move to mitigate the crisis at home, regardless of how this could impact their allies by shared values.

    In fact, we are well past that point; the perfect example is President Trump’s recent “Diesel Deal” with Russia’s President Putin. That deal is also an example of the United States’ capability to manage the crisis and and engineer a soft(er) landing for itself by managing its fiscal crisis. Other examples include the American leverage over other nations in the Western hemisphere, which are being turned, one by one, into colonial outposts of Wall Street banks.

    Regardless of the ethical ramifications of those arrangements, it is securing new collateral as well as future demand for US dollars for the bankers who issue it. That will mitigate US financial crisis, at least marginally. Manwhile, the Europeans are well and thoroughly stuck. In only a few years, they’ve managed to largely destroy, not only their industrial base and energy production, but also their relationships with Russia, China, Iran, Arab nations, much of the Global South, and the United States.

    The only front where they still have considerable leverage is against their own people where regulation, censorship and repression are growing worse with each passing day, so we get demonstrations and riots. At the same time, they are trying hard to convince the white, Christian part of that population, that doing their “duty” and sacrificing themselves and their children in a war against Russia is right and necessary in order for us to protect our countries and our way of life.

    Desperate for war
    By now, however, a large segment of that same population no longer care to preserve that way of life and, the crisis is only going from bad to worse, which is why most observers expect that things will continue down that same path. Inability and unwillingness to solve very much of anything leaves war as the only pressure-release valve available to the authorities. Even on that front, Europe is finding itself isolated.

    Our designated enemy, Russia, understands the score well enough and is happy to play ball with the United States in order to try to forge a more cooperative, more constructive relationship going forward. Among the American officials, it seems that more and more of them are prepared to kick the Russophobia and get on with business, as we witnessed with the Diesel Deal, as well as last week’s UN Security Council meeting. During the course of UNSC proceedings, the American conciliatory statements vis-a-vis Russia stood in sharp contrast with the rabid, hostile position of European representatives.

    The fate of Russia’s frozen assets
    This brings us back to the fate of Russia’s frozen assets in Western jurisdictions. The amount in question is estimated at $300 to $335 billion. Most of these assets by far are held in Europe: the largest portion is managed by Belgium-based Euroclear central securities depository, which holds around $190 to $208 billion.

    France holds up to $71 billion in Russian Central Bank assets, but the suspicion is that Macron government already helped themselves to much of that money. According to more recent figures, only about $25.6 billion of the Russian money remains in French custody. The UK holds about $37 billion of Russian assets. At the same time, the US portion is estimated at only $5 billion to $8 billion, primarily in debt securities and cash.

    During his recent appearance at the Warsaw Security Forum, Poland’s British Agent Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski stated that those assets would be returned to Russia, “over our dead bodies.” Indeed, Russia is unlikely to see the return of those assets any time soon, but both the Kremlin and their American counterparts might have their own reasons to transfer the totality of those assets to US custody.

    Last August, in the immediate aftermath of the Alaska summit between Presidents Trump and Putin, I wrote as follows:

    I suspect that one of the outcomes of Russia-US cooperation – this we will find out in due course – will resolve the fate of the Russian frozen assets held by Western countries. … Trump will likely be keenly interested to have Russia invest that money in the US. For their part, the Russians have every reason in the world to accommodate Trump and such an investment deal would certainly go a long way to advancing the two powers’ cooperation. …

    For the collateral starved British financial system, this could prove catastrophic. The same is true for Europe: Emmanuel Macron‘s dream of using $260 billion in frozen Russian assets as collateral for reconstruction investments was also meant to underpin a large-scale credit impulse in Europe. The reconstruction [of Ukraine] was meant to be financed by European banks and the contracts awarded to European corporations. Unfortunately, none of that will be possible without strong backing by the United States.”

    If anything about Donald Trump is predictable, it is that he’ll want those assets in the US … For the same low price he’ll get to deliver another humiliating kick to the duplicitous, warmongering Europeans. I simply don’t see him resisting that temptation and one day soon, the news will report that Trump has ordered that the Russian assets held in Europe be transferred to US custody. The Eurotards will have no recourse but to comply.

    Vladimir Putin’s special envoy: it will be glorious!
    Just today, on the first day of the XIX Verona Eurasian Economic Forum in Istanbul, Mr. Kirill Dmitriev, the CEO of Russian Direct Investment Fund and Vladimir Putin’s Special Envoy for investment and economic cooperation spoke about the economic cooperation between Russia and the United States being the foundation of the dialogue and development of the relationship between the two powers.

    He also spoke that this cooperation will exert further pressure on European governments: when they see Russia and the United States engage in a mutually beneficial, constructive cooperation, the Europeans will not want to be left behind. In time, they will have to sober up and come to the negotiating table. The ever optimistic Mr. Dmitriev chose the term, “glorious” to describe the ultimate results of that cooperation. Mr. Dmitriev’s remarks start at the 1:38-min. mark in the video linked below:

    Well, getting the Europeans to sober up will be a different challenge, and removing the punchbowl might require the transfer of Russia’s frozen asset to US custody. If (when) that happens, the EU will sustain a crippling financial blow. People like Mr. Sikorski might have little recourse but to offer “our dead bodies.”

    Mired in political paralysis, facing unsolvable economic crises and squeezed between the Russia it alienated and a hostile United States, Europe will have to make peace with the fact that after many centuries, the world is no longer Euro-centric and that they’ll have to learn to treat other players on the global scene as their equals.

    Hopefully, after experiencing some withdrawal symptoms, a fully sober, constructive and cooperative Europe without a superiority complex, might emerge. The sooner it does, the better it will be for all involved. Who knows, maybe it really will be glorious, if not for Mr. Sikorski, then certainly for most of the rest of us.

    #253854
    zerosum
    Participant

    okay lets run a test on Dr. D many comments on [Debt Rattle October 22 2026 – The Automatic Earth](https://www.theautomaticearth.com/forums/topic/debt-rattle-october-22-2026/#post-253834)

    Good. I didn’t know that you could do that.

    Glad it was useful. The method is simple: I open the page, read the comments, search for outside evidence on the claims that can be checked, and separate what holds up from what’s rhetoric or unsourced.

    It works on most public pages, such as blog posts, forum threads, articles, and op-eds. It doesn’t work behind logins or paywalls, and comment sections that load separately sometimes don’t come through, so pasting the text fixes that. I can also take a claim you’re unsure of from any source and check it, or compare two commenters’ arguments side by side.

    If you’d like to keep testing, send me another commenter or a claim from the thread and I’ll run the same process.
    ————
    NO, I’m not going to post Claude’s response/evaluation/challenge on what Dr. D says.
    It’s revealing, educational, complementary and instructive.
    Try the same Question with your A.I.
    ———–

    #253855
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #253856
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    zerosum:

    Are you were just a tease?

    Many worldviews going to implode.

    The image of the Chinese who were building railway in America and how they were treated comes to mind

    #253857
    zerosum
    Participant

    @ Michael Reid

    You post a lot of Good cut & paste. Check first, with what AI says, about those statements/opinions.

    #253859
    zerosum
    Participant

    @ Michael Reid
    I submitted your post … To Claude for his input.

    The deficit-spending article is on Krainer’s Substack: htt ps://trendcompass.substack.com/p/why-governments-cant-balance-their (also at htt ps://alexkrainer.substack.com/p/why-governments-cant-balance-their). The titles differ slightly from what he wrote, so it may be a retitled version.
    The Dmitriev video link wasn’t in your paste, and I couldn’t find coverage of his Istanbul remarks yet. The forum only began today, so I can’t confirm the “glorious” wording or context.
    The chart images and the Aarouet comparison weren’t included in the paste either.

    Claude’s final words …

    “Overall, the post is strongest as a description of strain (French finances, transatlantic friction, the asset dispute) and weakest wherever it turns that strain into certainty about what happens next.”

    #253860
    zerosum
    Participant

    Advise for me, from Claude.

    Good. A few habits will get you sharper answers:

    Name the claim you want tested. “Is it true that France used the frozen assets?” gets a better answer than “what do you think of this post?”

    Ask me to separate the layers. Facts that can be checked, forecasts, and rhetoric need different treatment, and asking for that split keeps the response honest.

    Ask for the strongest version of each side. That shows you where the real disagreement is.

    Paste the full text and any links. The post only became analyzable once I could see the whole thing.

    Push back when something seems off. Your question about how the money is actually held led to corrections on my side, and the answer was better for it.

    Come back anytime with the next post or claim.

    #253861
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    zerosum:

    AI use would increase my work and I have sufficient REALI to construct my interpretation of reality. I assess content to extract things of value in seeking truth.

    My posts are things I have found that I am planning to assess.

    #253862
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    zerosum:

    For me AI is just another voice to consider

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 43 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.