BTW, anyone seriously interested in learning more, should due way more due diligence than just watching a documentary (which will be skewed in Burzynksi’s favor – doesn’t mean it is true or not, the impartial data should reveal that).
One criticism of his work is that it hasn’t been peer reviewed and published in a medical journal. That sounds reasonable.
Where are the peer reviewed randomized, double blind placebo studies for fluoride or the flu shot?
Oooops! Even though they don’t exist, that’s “establishment” so it doesn’t get criticized.
So many (I couldn’t find any criticising fluoride and flu shots as quackery like they Burzynksi, share a link if you find one – just one!) of these alleged “skeptics” aren’t consistent in their questioning of medicine. They “pick on the little guy.”
In addition, one site I read calls him a quack, but doesn’t provide any kind of detailed data or logic applied to that data to prove the point. No peer reviewed studies in a journal – the guy is a quack.
No, that doesn’t logically follow. It might be true or it might not be true – that has yet to be established.
Think. Question. Always.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qG_ZWs04es
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.