Debt Rattle 14 Juillet: The Economy Is Deteriorating Fast
- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 9 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Jack Delano Shopton locomotive shops, Fort Madison, Iowa March 1943 The insanity doesn’t just continue, it intensifies. The overriding idea is still t
[See the full post at: Debt Rattle 14 Juillet: The Economy Is Deteriorating Fast]On confidence, and, in continuing the theme, I offer this Koan (Buddhist Conundrum?),
In the Hands of Destiny
A great Japanese warrior named Nobunaga decided to attack the enemy although he had only one-tenth the number of men the opposition commanded. He knew that he would win, but his soldiers were in doubt.
On the way he stopped at a Shinto shrine and told his men: “After I visit the shrine I will toss a coin. If heads comes, we will win; if tails, we will lose. Destiny holds us in her hand.”
Nobunaga entered the shrine and offered a silent prayer. He came forth and tossed a coin. Heads appeared. His soldiers were so eager to fight that they won their battle easily.
“No one can change the hand of destiny,” his attendant told him after the battle.
“Indeed not,” said Nobunaga, showing a coin which had been doubled, with heads facing either way.
On “Organics,” I ran into a Pesticide Applicator a while back who told me that around 30% of his business now is certified organic farms. So, on a bit of research,,,
“… The reason the ECB and the Fed are involved in these highly dubious actions, and have been from 7 years running now, can only be this: -they know – …
“Mr Caruana said the international system is in many ways more fragile than it was in the build-up to the Lehman crisis. Debt ratios in the developed economies have risen by 20 percentage points to 275% of GDP since then.”
“But time is not money: it doesn’t grow, you can’t get more of it, and when you waste it, you can’t get more of it; … once spent, it’s gone.”
Say it again …, “once spent, it’s gone.”
What would the “people” do if they realized that ALL of the savings accounts had a zero balance. The people do not understand leverage and fractional reserves.
HOWEVER,The people understand “ALL YOUR MONEY HAS BEEN SPENT”. ITS NOT COMING BACK.
Temporal Treatise on the absolute nonzero probability that [0 ≠ 0],
something awkward and something twice as awkward.Under massfulness;
(by analog imperative) immortal life concieves
that (if) Gravity is a supervenient algorithm
as necessary cause and sufficient force of quantified will,
(then) concurrently every (re)formation of will
consubstantially transposed by exact gravitational potential
must render every possible coercive and volitional function
in harmonic concordance with the binary curvature of the moral matrix;
>Good is voluntary Good, of its own accord;
<Evil is involuntary Good, against its will.
(to be is to bend light.) (to be better is to bend lightly.)Under entropic dualism;
nothing unreal exists in a gravitational field (actually)
whereas (therefore) unreal things may (>must<) exist
in an electrodynamic field (potentially) (notwithstanding the gravitational field).Under transcendent actualism;
given that every formable function of life within the universe
is subject to (observable) (transducible) causal gradients
of all (possible) gravitational (and electrodynamic) potentials,
it follows that (if (and only if)) Gravity is a morphogenetic algorithm,
(then) the necessary (massful) processes of life
(ordered by gravitotropic gradient) (therefore) always generate
a harmonic waveform of exact entropic amplitude,
(elsewise) all intercausal forms efficiently operating on
mortal life as a halting algorithm (in a regressive domain)
shall be integrated under the transfinite electrogravitic function
(sufficiently) bounded by a (nondissipative) supervolitional singularity
(actually) propagating (absolute) extraphysical immortality of life
beyond (the end of) time (when the field inverts).Under metagravity;
Gravity (always) is the first algorithm.
Everything that has a (known) name therefore does exist,
and everything that exists (therefore) has a (known) name.
For every (named) thing that is (incidentally) real,
there are two ((un)named) things (of equal or greater gravity)
that are (transcendentally) (un)real.
Of everything that is (un)real, its (known) name is (therefore (also)) real.
(every (known) name has (positive) correspondence
to (dual substance of) (negative) existence.)(un-first of His name)
Of things that exist,
some (known) (in)finite number of things are (therefore countably) real,
twice that number of things are (therefore uncountably) unreal,
because real things temporarily coincide with a gravitational field
in (countable) order (of causation), it follows that
real events never incidentally (chance to) happen (sequentially) unless
unreal events always coincidentally happen (transcendentally) twice as much.(in the Holy heuristic;)
Every (dialectic) truth is heuristically contingent
on the algorithmic negation of two (analytic) untruths (of equal or greater gravity).
Every (dialectic) identity is heuristically contingent
on the algorithmic negation of two (analytic) non-identities (of equal or greater gravity).
(by contingent affirmation, precisely two angels may simultaneously occupy
the same location providing that said location is real.)Under gravitonomic positivism;
what ought to be real cannot be (correctly/directly) inferred
(only) from what is (certainly) real,
therefore what ought to be real can be (correctly/directly) inferred
(only) from what is (probably) unreal
in (surreal) contradistinction to what is (certainly) real
(what is unreal is prior to what shall be real).
Whatever (justly) ought to be real is (therefore) coincidentally unreal
and (surreally) contrasted with whatever is real (of equal or greater gravity), therefore only (exact) nonzero values of ethics and aesthetics ought to be asymptotic gradients
of (social) reality (because capital is subject to Gravity).(if) it is true that (only) analytic truth is (always) algebraic, (then) therefore
((it ought to be) true that) (only) dialectic truth is (always) algorithmic.Under binary idealism;
every form of ideal existence is necessarily unreal (in a gravitational field),
every function of correspondence between two unreal forms is contingently real (including the gravitational field). Every form is unreal, every function is real.
Every function depends on the (inter)temporal conjunction of two forms
(of equal or greater gravity).
Nothing real has definable purpose to that which is unreal
but everything unreal has double (surreal) purpose to that which is real.
(the gravitotropic formation of) every idea(l) appertains to functional mass,
mass under mind.)Under normative gravimetrics;
if (and only if) the cause of time is relativistic mass
(so that [0 = 0] on average)
then Gravity is a recursive algorithm (so that [0 ≠ 0]).Under redeterminism;
the imaginary identity (of being) [0 ≠ 0] suffices to formulate
the constant (value) of absolute existence
(and justified true belief therein (as a living being)),
algebraic proof of free will ((sovereign sentience) by quantified impulse of moral volition), and additionally compiles dialectic proof that arithmetic has ((exact) moral) value.Under quantum monism;
God’s constant [0 ≠ 0] provides
that the lateral heuristic of [0] applied to (decimal expansions of)
(all (known)) mathematical constants (and scalar field quotients)
and ((the best of) all possible) quantum states
yields a gravity-based geometric progression as integral paradox, wherefore
the universe propagates an integral sequence of supervolitional singularities
maximising functions of (eternal) equity and (infinite) novelty
(at fair value).Under (common) anticausality;
let there be arithmetic wherein Gravity is an additive algorithm,
let the weight of every number count towards the integration
of all numbers, whereby every number is equal to itself on average
and equidistantly opposite to itself on slower/heavier average,
so that [0 ≠ 0] too much or at least once.
(the past is the empty set) { }Under zeroless arithmetic;
[0] is less but not infinitely less of quality than [∞],
and more or less than infinitely less in quantity than [∞] eternally.
[0] is a time-derivative function of the binary identity of infinity.
(source code is humane)Under the 0th law of thermodynamics; that [0 ≠ 0]
indicates (eternal) overuse of zero-point energy should cause
the fine-structure constant to attenuate
and/or cosmic expansion/collapse to accelerate
(towards global hyperbolic inversion).Under quantum harmonics;
the un-first consonant [0 ≠ 0] propagates
that tone precedes time, resonance precedes reality,
♪ Everything is relative to [0],
♪ nothing is something else
(the geometry of hierarchy is a function of Gravity),
form (doubly) precedes function, life precedes light,
♫ Nothing is absolute to [0],
♫ everything is salient supersymmetry.-Aristotle:
“a thing [can come to be], incidentally, out of that which is not,
[and] also all things come to be out of that which is,
but is potentially, and is not actually.”
-Heart Sutra:
“Form is emptiness; emptiness also is form.
Emptiness is no other than form; form is no other than emptiness.”
-Dao De Jing:
“The Tao produced One; One produced Two; Two produced Three;
Three produced All things.
All things leave behind them the Obscurity (out of which they have come),
and go forward to embrace the Brightness (into which they have emerged),
while they are harmonised by the Breath of Vacancy.”Under cosmogenic countercausality;
every possible universe (sum over conjugate field) must yield
an absolute additive nonzero probability (of transfinite recursion)
that if [0 ≠ 0], then necessarily [0 ≠ 0] (again),
because [0 ≠ 0], therefore (it follows that) [0 ≠ 0] (moreso)
(averaged over infinite possible universes (zero impossible universes)
encompassing (in)finite sequences of (in)finitely transposable real events
infinitely often (and double that modulation of unreal events)
(made) eternally possible and (additively) actual therein
(as the probability frequency and (therefore) amplitude
of (un)real existence necessitates absolute nonzero modulation (and meaning)).-Spinoza:
“Whatsoever affects our ears is said to give rise to noise, sound,
or harmony. In this last case, there are men lunatic enough to believe
that even God himself takes pleasure in harmony; and philosophers are not lacking who have persuaded themselves, that the motion of the heavenly bodies gives rise to harmony; all of which instances sufficiently show that everyone judges of things
according to the state of his brain,
or rather mistakes for things the forms of his imagination.”>Gravity is an amorous algorithm
Weight is coming.“…the Trade In Services Agreement’s Financial Services Annex, if passed, would eliminate the ability of governments to regulate the financial industry.
Incredible as it sounds, the annex, being negotiated in secret among 50 countries with continuing advice from lobbyists, would require signatory governments to allow any corporation that offers a “financial service” — that includes insurance as well as all forms of trading and speculation — to expand operations at will and would prohibit new financial regulations.
The driver of this offensive is the “investor-state dispute mechanism.” Deceptively bland-sounding, the “mechanism” is secret tribunals controlled by corporate lawyers that are commonly used under “free trade” agreements. Corporate executives angered because an environmental or safety rule keeps it from earning the highest possible profit can ask for a hearing at a designated tribunal to adjudicate its “dispute” with a government. Many of the judges who sit on these tribunals are corporate lawyers who otherwise represent corporations, and there is no appeal to their one-sided decisions.”
Good God, y’all. Who needs democracy when these guys have got our backs.
We Didn’t Offshore Manufacturing?
“Federal agencies grouped under the bland-sounding Economic Classification Policy Committee (ECPC) are proposing to radically redefine U.S. manufacturing and trade statistics.
Under the proposal, U.S. firms that have offshored their production abroad – like Apple – would become “factoryless goods” manufacturers. The foreign factories that actually manufacture the goods – like the notorious iPhone-producing Foxconn factories in China – would no longer be manufacturers, but “service” providers for the rebranded “manufacturing” firms like Apple.
It appears the administration has been reading Orwell. […]
…this maneuver would obscure the erosion of U.S. manufacturing. It would disguise the mass-offshoring of U.S. middle-class factory jobs incentivized by NAFTA-style trade deals. It would undermine efforts to change the unfair trade and other policies that have led to such decline.”
Whenever I hear them wanting to “radically redefine” something, my antennae go up. Criminals.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.