Debt Rattle April 13 2019

[Raúl Ilargi Meijer]

Pablo Picasso Standing nude 1928   • The Assange Arrest Is a Warning From History (John Pilger) • The 7 Years Of Lies About Assange Won’t Stop No
[See the full post at: Debt Rattle April 13 2019]

[Raúl Ilargi Meijer]

The main US charge against Assange is new: “abetting the “stealing of secrets””

Someone explained it like this: if you have a source who calls you up and says (s)he wants to bring you some documents in the morning, you’re fine. But if you say: better do it in the evening (because fewer people around), you’re guilty of abetting.

[zerosum]

In support of the efforts of our Keymaster. I also bring you some entertainment
plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose French quotation from Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr

the more that changes, the more it’s the same thing : the more things change, the more they stay the same

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppet
A puppet is an object, often resembling a human, animal or mythical figure, that is animated or manipulated by a person called a puppeteer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Matrix
It depicts a dystopian future in which humanity is unknowingly trapped inside a simulated reality called the Matrix,

For your weekend entertainment (Don’t rely on your memory. Read the links. You will learn something new)
http://persweb.wabash.edu/facstaff/royaltyr/AncientCities/web/bradleyj/Project%201/Games.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colosseum

[sinnycool]

Hi Ilargi while it might appear that “abetting” is a new charge it’s more than likely not. Here is a quote from the “Criminal Code Act 1924” in Tasmania which I’m sure would be typical of similar Acts world wide in relation to parties to a crime:

3. Which parties to crimes to be deemed principals in the first degree

(1) Where a crime is committed, each of the following persons is deemed to be a party to, and to be guilty of, the crime, and may be charged with actually committing it:
(a) every person who actually commits the crime;
(b) every person who does any act or makes any omission for the purpose of enabling or aiding another person to commit the crime;
(c) every person who abets another person in committing the crime;
(d) every person who instigates any other person to commit the crime.
(2) Any person who instigates another to do any act or make any omission of such a nature that, if he had himself done the act or made the omission, the act or omission would have constituted a crime on his part, is guilty of the same crime as if he had himself done the act or made the omission; and may be charged with himself committing that crime.

HTH.

BTW seems to me that the UK will try to avoid sending Assange to the US and send him to Sweden instead so as to get around the extradition argument that he’s being extradited for a crime to which capital punishment applies. Let the Swedes do that. After the rape of course.

I wondered what distraction the deep statists in the US would dream up to distract everyone from the failure of Russiagate and help sell more “news”, now we know.

[Dr. D]

Sure is hard to tell what’s going on…

[Author]

Posts