Debt Rattle August 11 2026

 

Home Forums The Automatic Earth Forum Debt Rattle August 11 2026

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #247104

    Rene Magritte Memory 1944 • Trump Finally Responds To Iran’s Demands, Says US Is Owed Compensation (ZH) • The Long View of Iran (Victor Davis Hanson)
    [See the full post at: Debt Rattle August 11 2026]

    #247116
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Their discussion:

    I’m just calling reality out.

    #247117
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    This is the best from yesterday.

    #247118
    Dr. D
    Participant

    Yesterday:
    ““The Democrats’ Ghost Dance
    “Kill them. Murder them. Let the streets soak in their red capitalist blood.” —Hasan Piker

    Well, that’s pretty straightforward. Exact duplicate of Marx himself. Yup. Never more glad for free speech.

    Sooo…we have an equivalent on the Right, yes? Someone who publicly calls for the murder of, essentially everyone? Daily? Hmmm, I think maybe not. I can’t think of one. Murder the employees of the EPA? Let the streets run red with the blood of the Social Security Administration? Uhhh, don’t think so. There isn’t a crazy on the right within 50 miles of that position. …And there ARE crazies. But any man who works then owns his labor? THAT man just die.

    Theft must not be interfered with. Hasan, a multi-millionaire, says YOU can’t own property. Anything you own is his. Or the streets will run red with your blood. That’s his vow and promise. Not Schumer, not Trump; You.

    “In just TWO YEARS, underground pipelines will suck 50-70% of the oil that currently flows through the Strait of Hormuz…”

    How is it those very obvious pipelines were never built before? Says Tom Luongo, who points out that London sits on chokepoints and charges tolls, starting internal wars for 100 years if anyone interferes. Does it seem like there could be any other plausible explanation?

    “Iran’s IRGC is holding the line, reiterating that the Strait of Hormuz will reopen to international shipping only after the United States accepts all of its conditions,”

    Okay, but we don’t care. We don’t need anything from the strait. Did you think of that? Iran is now Somalia and will be permanently. Congratulations.

    “The US hope was that Iran and its economy would just collapse from within, the masses would take to the streets, and the government of the Ayatollah would be overthrown. This has proven delusional time and again.”

    Delusional of reporters and experts. Was this ever the official position? Or did you make it all up?

    “Iranian SNSC: We will never compromise, whether in war or in negotiations.”

    In that case, Iran has invaded and is occupying Oman, and intends to never leave. They are reserving the right to attack every neighbor at will as official policy, forever.

    Note, it may be advantageous TO drive oil to $200/bbl if Europe won’t collapse. We will survive it, they won’t. There may be no other way to stop their deadly colonialism and 2M man ethnic cleansing on the Eastern Front, as well as in their own nations, eg Ireland, which may have ceased to exist. Which is next, Canada or UK? Oddly, I feel France and Sweden far more likely to expel and preserve their cultures.

    “• Media Fawning of Senate Candidate Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed Begins (CTH)

    That means he’s the definite product of billionaire Oligarchs and not resistance at all. They LIKE him. Has he been attempted assassination 15 times yet? I rest my case. Who is his only voting bloc? AWFULs. And other rich white liberals. That’s also not #Resistance. Only White Pepo. That was true of, eg Kamala too.

    “people making less than a million dollars could see their taxes go up. I just want to be very clear.” (M4A)

    Wow! He can’t even LIE correctly. It’s quite possible that M4A would see cost go DOWN, such is the unprecedented fraud Obama engineered into Obamacare. He could argue that. (We’re merely swapping “Profits” for inevitable fraud, where govt fraud will always outpace it by multiples … eventually. As in UK and Canada. However, we have that here already as all our “Private” care is actually dictated by government. The point of Obamacare, now well-proven, was to destroy all medicine, health, independence, cause a Soviet swap-out of the system under Cloward-Pivon. …As said Day One in Hillary, 1993, Right Again!)

    Anyway, he’s too dumb to lie, and doesn’t know the first thing about any of the issues, or he’d deflect using complication. …Like the Medicare Gap coverage argument.

    Actually, no one wants to solve the problem at all, which takes seconds. Have State-Run clinic care for very basic things. That’s legal and possible today. It would cover, say, antibiotics and broken bones, but not cancer. It’s public health but only on the cheap side. People would support this and it would work, buying real or catastrophic insurance for the back end risks. They do not WANT it fixed, therefore. They WANT it broken. If you say you want a Taco, and I put $20 on the table and hand you a phone and you don’t call, you don’t really want one do you? Same here. Fixed in 30 days, any state in the Union can start. Nope.

    “”I’m not here to disavow people’s views,” El-Sayed said at the time”

    This is Alinsky’s “Diversity of Views” tactic. If you have a protest and some hold signs peacefully, while others murder officers, that’s a “Diversity of Tactics”. Yet you’re all Brothers in Socialism, see? Yeah, see, that does NOT work or happen on the Right. If someone riots (J6) or carries a Nazi flag, they are instantly disavowed as “Not us” and even asked to be prosecuted normally, under the law. Sayed is following two parts: One, all ways to destroy the U.S. are equally good, no “Disavow”, and two, LIE about it to everyone, as the End Justifies the Means. There is no such thing as Evil if your intent is good, is Socialist Utopia.

    However, that principle never ends, does it? When Uncle Joe runs the whole place for 20 years, they are STILL using the means of Evil daily, even though there is a Worker’s Paradise. We have just one more little thing to do, comrade, stop resisting.

    No. The ends can never justify the means, which is a CHRISTIAN view. E.g. China doesn’t feel the same in their wars; if you cross me, we kill you, that’s it. We don’t try to have rules and do it nicely. No morality, only “Sending a message”. 1600-1800s, Indians will smash white infant’s heads against the wall as “Nits Make Lice.” Perhaps that’s right. That’s war. Pick the culture you prefer.

    Anyway, the Purpose of “Diversity of Tactics” is to have Hasan be able to say “Murder everyone right now” and deny it, while keeping other idiot Democrats on board. There is no such feature on the Right.

    “He notably accused critics of the sin of “factionalism.” Since the Jacobins of the French Revolution,”

    Same thing. They want Jacobeans chopping wildly, but normal people not objecting, but permitting it. Even by inaction and default. Not acting means they are participating, encouraging the murders.

    “Tucker for President? MAGA Rebels Declare Independence From Israel (Amar)

    Clearly Trump is ahead of them, for two months now. He’s been relentlessly hammering Israel in the Press.

    “Carlson also correctly linked the Iran War – a “strategic disaster” worse than Vietnam”

    Yes, 16 official people = 60,000 people. Wait: WORSE he says. TuckerMath.

    “Third parties are a difficult proposition.” No they’re not. They’re used exclusively to split the vote (and the country). That’s the whole and only point. They are well-paid by billionaires to do this.

    “Why did we allow ourselves to be convinced that Americans should make only a few select things and buy everything else from foreign markets?” “WE” didn’t, you dope. “WE” have been fighting this tooth and nail since 1971. With every move, every law, every election. Welcome to a thing “We” call “Noticing.” “WE” are not guilty of this, not once ever. YOU are. Only idiot reporters and the Overlord class ever believed this, and half of those had to pretend they would end it to get elected. That’s % approaching zero in the United States. So they are ppl from our own culture who are basically traitorous Colonial collaborators and we all know it, but they ain’t “Us”.

    “Fauci helped fund the Wuhan Level 4 Virology Lab, –BECAUSE– knowing full well that the lab was tinkering with bat viruses.” They kept this up with 20 labs, tested on the Slavic population in Ukraine, and had live viruses popping back and forth worldwide on commercial passenger planes for decades.

    “President Donald Trump’s political stature is so poor right now that he has squandered the Republican Party’s advantage on two major issues that almost always favor the GOP: the economy and national security.”

    No he hasn’t, I see no change here. If anything, they’re actually more pissed off and have less tolerance for not arresting everybody than they do Iran. So if you want ratings, do that. Arrest every Democrat (Who has been committing serial felonies for decades). No one cares about Iran, for better or worse. So those numbers are fabulated. Everyone is in the same corners they were in 2024, unchanged. However DEMOCRATS are being cut in half with the DSA problem.

    “Article III of the Constitution allows Congress to establish courts below the Supreme Court, which includes federal District and Circuit Courts. If Congress can establish them, it can abolish them”

    Congress can fix this in 6 hours. They WANT this to happen. They LIKE it. …Same with crime, murder, drugs in D.C. THEY run D.C., 100%. They have infinity resources, as they demonstrate time and again. So there’s no possible conclusion except Nancy Pelosi, etc, like coke-selling D.C. Mayors and what-not. Yes, we in America know. We know this is their morality.

    I don’t know about the Ballroom, it’s all legal details, I feel it’s probably illegal without Congress, etc, but the point is the same and true: the point isn’t funds, which they mis-use hourly for 100 years, but to stop Trump everywhere on everything. No wins at all. Like what was that El-Baghdadi”? A loved father and austere scholar, the media loved him more than …well there’s no comparison, really, and how dare Trump kill ISIS terrorists we were demonizing only a second ago? No wins. Not a minute, not a day, no never!

    Because they are Bizarro-people. It’s a religion. Otherwise, Trump is just sum dum jackass, like he is to me, who can have wins and losses like any other guy. THEY are the ones who give Trump his power. And Trump knows it and uses the Idiot Cat Laser on them daily. Then they call HIM stupid. Wow. Breathtaking.

    “Arrested 4x charged 91 Times…” That’s how you know he’s the Deep State, and works for the infinitely powerful Israeli Lobby. They are in the business of arresting themselves. “Always assassinate your own people” – Sun Tsu.

    #247119
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    U.S. paid Venezuela $400 million for $13000 million worth of oil

    400 / 13000 = 0.03 meaning

    3 percent

    3% of the value of the oil was paid to Venezuela for the product

    39 minutes in
    U.S. has taken $13 billion of Venezuela oil
    U.S. has paid $ 400 million to Venezuela for the oil

    Paid Venezuela $400 million for $13000 million worth of oil

    U.S. is robbing Venezuela paying only 3% for the product

    #247120
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #247121
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #247122
    Dr. D
    Participant

    Today:
    “lift people out of poverty than anything else.” Smartphones are clearly destroying everything and putting all OUR kids INTO poverty, with doordash, etc Elon. Discuss? The internet famously DESTROYS all that. But aside from that, you are installing the worldwide surveillance state. In space, so unescapable. Putting it all online, so that there is Anti-Reality, all records are being doctored in real time. Uhhh, no. Disavow.

    “• Trump Finally Responds To Iran’s Demands, Says US Is Owed Compensation (ZH)

    Similar to “Joe Rogan and Donald Trump Break their Silence”. People? THEY WERE NEVER SILENT. Not for a second. Not one of them has ever shut up. So Trump shut himself up in a tower for a week like the Vatican Council and only now has finally let some smoke out? Uhhhhh…no. “We Just Make S—t Up!!!”

    …And that’s in the FIRST SENTENCE. Imagine all the lies they tell from there!

    Translation: “Both sides are SAYING things.” Wow. Reporters are incapable of telling work from talk, having never done “work” before.

    Below: “A month after National Public Radio’s Nina Totenberg announced that Sam Alito was retiring (a story NPR later had to retract),” We Make S—t Up!!! RussiaRussiaRussia. We Make S—t Up!!! Yellowcake. WMD and ties to Al-Q. We Make S—t Up!!!

    ““Iran’s ultimate fate now rests with the Trump administration, which apparently has not yet decided what, exactly, that fate is.::”

    Not entirely. VDH is saying we can dictate to Iran without a ground invasion and occupation. We can’t at that level. There is a cone of possibilities we have, but we can’t just dictate. So it doesn’t rest with us alone, which is obvious and alright.

    “Together, they are costing the theocracy more than $400 million a day in lost revenue,”

    What is that Revenue? Where is it? In suitcases and saddlebags on a donkey like Juan Valdez? No. Okay, suppose they HAVE money, what can they buy? Nothing, their ports are blown. Well that seems inconvenient. No, that “Money” is in London Banks. THEY are who is getting squeezed. Suppose they HAD the money, yet no ports. Same thing: London. So they keep making missiles with no money, no parts? Not really. The volume gets near zero. In addition, where did that revenue reappear? The same oil is being burned, roughly. A: With the United States. Russia, our ally, also rich.

    “The regime currently has no effective combat aircraft or air defenses—and no allies. In contrast, the Gulf states can field more than 700 combat aircraft”

    They are now approaching equivalents, although Iran is far larger. This is classic balance-of-powers Politik, pre-Hegemon.

    “Iran: The Small Explosion Theory in Practice (Eric Florack)

    I disagree, but it doesn’t really matter. The Mosaic Theory means Iran is now 31 different states. You can’t “Small explode” one point then. So what? They still go around the Gulf, who cares if Iran “Falls” or doesn’t, what does that even mean? If you’re not force-installing the puppet government (It seems clear we never were) than it doesn’t matter, it’s not our problem. We’re so used to doing that, reporters and experts have taken for granted as the only possibility of war. Because they’re morons and evil AF. They can only think evil ends. Their minds are incapable of receiving less bad alternatives.

    “Tehran added new demands over the weekend, saying that the Strait of Hormuz will not reopen”

    Proving Trump right daily. They are not in good faith at all, but merely playing with the clock. Okay then. Most predictable ever.

    “Keep in mind the Washington Post receives all of their exclusives from the CIA leak network. For some insufferable reason, the Washington Post (CIA)

    WaPo is the CIA. The CIA IS THE MAJOR FUNDER. That’s why everyone completely believes the CIA when they say Trump is fighting, we have no missiles, and is about to collapse. I always believe the CIA! When have they ever lied? The CIA are the good guys, doncha know? So say the Left, Liberals, Progressives, and Foreigners! They love the CIA and wake up mouth-kissing them each day.

    ““..what we are doing is the US is using dollars from the Fed to prop up the yen. So, the Japanese do not have to raise interest rates. So, the carry trade does not unwind. So, the markets don’t collapse ..”

    Kind of. Remember, Rickards is essentially CIA. He’s their paid subcontractor. So he tells the truth carefully omitting and diverting certain things because sadly, he’s a smart guy. Yes, Yen carry can end things, but other enormous continental-blocs can make adjustments to that. Like: there are no rules, they can just negate a whole nation’s Bonds, or declare Greece-isn’t-in-default-ackshully. And do. Every time.

    I haven’t dug in and it’s complicated AF, but Luongo says they’re putting the squeeze on Europe and the Eurodollar system. HOW does Europe get “Liquidity”? They as major banks, go to Japan and borrow at 0%. They can then invest in anything real at all and make infinity profit (technically in maths, divide by zero.) Shut off the INPUT and what happens? Here you go. Now the U.S. doesn’t have that problem. Nor does anyone who WORKS. We have actual products to sell. Only financial colonialists and their Empire have that problem. We dry up Europe’s liquidity but not our own – we can borrow our own currency and invest in Main Street, and are. That’s that. We are feverishly creating and capitalizing those small Main St banks.

    ““This is the engine of global economic growth.”

    No, Jim, it is not. WORK is the engine of all growth. BORROWING is a parasite. It’s the Engine of Worldwide Casino SPECULATION, making SPECULATORS and financiers rich. That’s it. They get rich while working people don’t. In comparison, Trump’s 2 years here, lower (black) wages rose 5%. Rich people’s income rose 1%. The income gap is closing. Which is why people hate Trump. They want the opposite as show in their policies. They do not WANT Black People’s wages to rise. Or they would LIKE Trump and his policies, yes?

    They hate the poors and the Proletariat, and hate any minute they get relief. Socialists always have.

    Rickards doesn’t emphasize another thing: COLLATERAL. It’s all about COLLATERAL, which is why at first they could take Syria, but then only Ukraine was big enough, but then only Russia was big enough as COLLATERAL for their debts. But the Yen-Carry unwind is LEVERAGE, it’s COLLATERAL. At 0% you can leverage infinity-to-one. Let’s say it’s 1,000, or even 300:1. So every dollar of Yen you need to post 300 Yen in collateral to unwind now.

    Right? That. Is the actual problem.

    “It you have to sell assets, guess what? The price goes down, and other people have to sell assets.”

    Yes, but not JUST assets, 1:1, which he points out is bad enough. Whoever has more LEVERAGE loses. Whoever has more COLLATERAL wins. That’s ARC: America, Russia, China. That’s people who do WORK. …And also why the administration is feverish for the U.S. to do Work again. We’ve been gutted by the same speculation for 50 years and it’s hard to reverse quickly. We still make A LOT of stuff though. Like Oil and Food are straight-up, we only add limping manufacturing to that. 2/3 are already sold.

    ““Japan is the number one holder of US Treasuries”

    Japan is not. ENGLAND is. For reasons of their own. EUROPE is. They’ve been doing this to dick our interest rates for years, but we out-ran them.

    “• The Fed Is Failing Its Mandate, But It Could Change Soon (Daniel Lacalle)

    The Fed has failed its mandate since 1913. Why now? Famously we’ve said 3% inflation – which they shat out their -ss – cuts your income in half by retirement. That’s not “Stable prices”. Congress never cared and approved.

    What happens if you RECAPTURE the Fed from European banking families though, and used this pirated ship in YOUR Navy instead? Repurpose it to the American Plan? Maybe we’ll find out.

    “US Pays only 3% for Venezuelan Oil”

    That’s AMAZING! You might almost say Un-Credible! HOW is the U.S. doing this? We haven’t got a single man on the ground, yet we’re pillaging an entire well-armed, un-assailable nation of millions by doing…absolutely nothing. Nothing at all.
    Boy, you better hope we don’t try this “Nothing At All” in your country! This “nothing” topples regimes like paper, who then keep their own elected governments intact.

    What. The Literal.

    It’s almost as if THEY’RE JUST LYING and something else is going on. Like we were in a legal spat with them since Chavez STOLE all our oil companies there. And are legally due compensation. (ymmv, but you can understand the concept). Also, they need horrendous investment to get online right now TO THE SAME COMPANIES, having robbed and mined every productive asset for years as Socialists do. So they need billions in investment, and being untrustworthy (see #1) are paying that upfront. So the costs of getting oil flowing is being taken out of the first shipments moved. Like is perfectly NORMAL.

    Just ask. There’s a “Phone”, just ask. How do you THINK a nation of millions, armed to the teeth, is paying only 3% with NO men, no army, not even the threat of one within 500 miles of them? And if that were possible, wouldn’t EVERY nation be doing that, every day? C’mon. Jesus, I thought at least we were at a level of COMMON sense here.

    Nope. The U.S. “Just asks” and then Venezuela said “Okay then, you can have all our oil for free”. Forever. Uhhh, no. That has never happened in world history and isn’t happening now either. Even the Soviets, even German and Japanese occupation didn’t look like that, because – newsflash – it’s impossible.

    But “Experts” believe 10 impossible things before breakfast. And are never discredited. Then we re-post their podcasts again tomorrow.

    Venezuela says “You can have all our oil for free” and how is that OUR fault? Fill in the blanks here. If they’re dumb enough to give it should we stop them? That’s because you know that isn’t happening.

    The U.S. can be painted as evil because they are in cooperation with Ming the Merciless and Emperor Palpatine? I believe it now! It must be true! If it lets me HATE. For the love of God put your brains back in your head.

    #247123
    Dr. D
    Participant

    Fallacy of Appeal to Authority.

    Though why Fox News and the CIA should be considered an “Authority” is a mystery to me.

    #247127
    zerosum
    Participant

    The Long View of Iran


    The Long View of Iran

    … costing the theocracy more than $400 million a day in lost revenue,


    Copilot analysis of US, Israel cost.
    A balanced answer.

    **Short answer:**
    Yes. The combined **U.S.–Israel daily burn rate is roughly \$900 million to \$930 million per day** during active 2026 war operations.
    This figure is grounded in sourced, externally published estimates.

    ## 🇺🇸 **United States — Daily Cost**
    Multiple independent analyses converge on a U.S. daily burn rate near **\$890 million/day** during the early and peak phases of the 2026 war.

    – **CSIS estimate:** \$3.7B in the first 100 hours → **\$891.4M/day**
    – Emergency Digest analysis: daily operational costs “approaching **\$1 billion/day**”

    These numbers are driven by:
    – Massive munitions expenditure (Patriot, Tomahawk, air‑launched PGMs)
    – High‑tempo air operations
    – Carrier strike group deployments
    – Rapid replenishment costs

    ## 🇮🇱 **Israel — Daily Cost**
    Israel’s wartime cost is smaller but still substantial.

    Israel’s total wartime economic shock is estimated at **\$135B to 2030** (Al Habtoor Research Centre). While this is a long‑horizon figure, the near-term wartime burn rate can be approximated using U.S. aid flows and Israel’s own defense mobilization:

    – **Baseline U.S. aid:** \$3.8B/year → **\$10.4M/day**

    Israel’s *own* domestic wartime costs (mobilization, interception economics, reserve call-ups) are not expressed as a daily number in the sources, but the macroeconomic shock is described as “sharp but recoverable.”
    Given the scale of Iron Dome/Tamir interceptors, Arrow-3 launches, and reserve mobilization, a reasonable sourced inference is that Israel’s direct daily burn rate is **tens of millions per day**, consistent with the U.S. supplemental aid flow.

    ## 📌 **Combined U.S.–Israel Daily Burn Rate**
    Putting the sourced numbers together:

    | Component | Daily Cost |
    |———-|————|
    | **U.S. active war operations** | **\$890M/day** (CSIS) |
    | **Israel wartime + U.S. surge support** | **\$30M/day** (aid-based wartime average) |

    **Combined total:**
    ### **≈ \$920 million/day**

    This aligns with Emergency Digest’s independent estimate that total daily operational costs for the conflict are “approaching \$1 billion/day.”

    ## 📌 **Bottom Line**
    **The combined U.S.–Israel daily burn rate during the 2026 Iran war is approximately \$900M–\$930M/day.**
    This is more than **double** the \$400M/day figure you referenced for Iran’s sanction-induced losses.

    #247129
    zerosum
    Participant
    #247130
    zerosum
    Participant
    #247132
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Vampires extract 97% and leave the host with only 3%

    Evil vampire

    #247133
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #247134
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #247135
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #247136
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    D writes: We’ve been gutted by the same speculation for 50 years and it’s hard to reverse quickly. We still make A LOT of stuff though.

    I write: The number one export of the U.S. is lies.

    #247140
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS AT SEA

    #247141
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    NATO and TURKEY dealt an Unexpected BLOW to RUSSIA and demanded the lifting of the Blockade of ODESA

    #247144
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    ALEX:The Mecca Pact Is a Dollar Event,Saudi Arabia Is Buying Protection From Pakistan and Turkey

    5
    6
    7
    8
    9

    ,

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9

    views
    Aug 11, 2026 #MeccaPact #SaudiArabia #Petrodollar
    he Mecca defence pact signed on 7 August 2026 by Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan has been reported everywhere as a NATO-style alliance. Market analyst Alex Krainer argues it is something else entirely: a protection payment. In this episode he sets out why Riyadh — the weakest military partner of the three — is the one with the reason to sign, and why the answer runs through roughly five trillion dollars of Gulf sovereign wealth held inside Western financial institutions.

    The argument begins with Russia. When close to $300 billion in Russian reserves were frozen after 2022, every sovereign reserve manager outside the Western bloc was handed a demonstration of what custody actually means. Krainer traces the line from that moment to the present: depleted US interceptor stocks, air-defence assets relocated out of Saudi Arabia, Iranian-aligned strikes on Saudi territory and shipping, a contested Strait of Hormuz — and a kingdom that concluded the guarantee it had been buying since 1974 no longer functions.

    He then places all of it inside the longer monetary story. On 15 August 1971 Richard Nixon suspended the convertibility of dollars into gold. The petrodollar was the arrangement built to replace that backing: oil priced in dollars, producing structural demand for a currency with nothing behind it. Fifty-five years on, with central banks buying gold at above a thousand tonnes a year and the dollar’s share of global reserves at multi-decade lows, Krainer argues the Mecca signing is best read not as a defence story but as a late chapter in the unwinding of that arrangement.

    Hosted by Zulfiqar Ali, who worked on the construction of the original petrodollar architecture and gives a first-person account of it in this episode.

    Analysis by Alex Krainer, market analyst and former hedge fund manager, speaking from Monaco. Claims regarding Saudi motivation, the aggregate Gulf sovereign wealth figure, and the interpretation of regional force movements are Krainer’s assessment and are presented as such. Reporting on the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, the 2022 asset freeze and current market pricing is drawn from public sources.

    #MeccaPact #SaudiArabia #Petrodollar #DeDollarization #Geopolitics #StraitOfHormuz #Turkey

    #247145
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    WW3? Russia & North Korea’s Missiles HAMMER Kiev, Iran HITS US Ships | Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

    #247148
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #247149
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    #247150
    John Day
    Participant

    Muslim NATO https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/muslim-nato

    ​ “Muslim NATO”​, which is currently Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey in a mutual defense pact, may be a blocking move against Israeli use of nuclear weapons in the region​. Pakistan has nuclear weapons,​ which can be stationed in Saudi Arabia as armed jets at an air base or Pakistani ballistic missiles. ​Wealthy Saudi Arabia needs protection,​ has long helped fund the Pakistani nuclear program and is close to Israel​. ​Pakistan and Saudi Arabia already had a mutual defense pact, but adding Turkey’s large army and military production makes it more formidable towards Israel, and more difficult for Israel to try a first strike attack upon.
    ​ To me it is most natural as a limited nuclear deterrent against Israeli strikes on Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. It provides Pakistan with a very short response time to any Israeli attack, if Pakistan has jets and missiles in Saudi Arabia.
    For Turkey this weakens Israel, which benefits Turkish neo-Ottoman aspirations
    ​ The US has run so low on missile defenses against Iranian ballistic missiles that EUCOM can’t defend Israel, needing to conserve missiles for the “American homeland”.
    ​ “Netanyahu” (or AI projection, if he died in early March) says that Israel is prepared to attack Iran without American help, consultation or approval.
    That takes Trump off the hook​ of Iranian retaliation, doesn’t it? The US won’t be blamed ​if Israel bombs Iran.
    ​ What weapons might Israel use, seeing the failure of America’s arsenal to reduce Iranian strike-capacity?
    Nuclear annihilation is the obvious answer, since the current zionist state of “Israel” is over extended and existentially threatened, with no champion in the world, but the US.
    ​ Israel has the Samson Doctrine (Option), wherein if the State of Israel is existentially threatened it will attack all threatening neighbors with nuclear weapons before it goes down.
    ​ “Threatening” would be seen very broadly, since everybody becomes a threat in this existential scenario​. Neighbors must assume that Israel will attack them. Turkey, Saudi Arabia, ​and Pakistan would ​likely be targeted, not merely Iran.​ Israel’s immediate neighbors currently lack much strategic leeway.
    ​ Having Pakistani nuclear weapons in Saudi Arabia applies a counter threat to Israel, so that Israeli power elites would need to be really certain that they were about to die anyway, before pulling that Samson-Option trigger.
    ​ In “The War Of Atonement”, by Chaim Herzog, the agonized deliberations of Moshe Dyan, Golda Meir and other historic figures during the Yom Kippur war is described. Israeli forces were resurgent, but they sweated bullets for a couple of days. https://www.amazon.com/dp/193514913X
    ​ I don’t know what moves Russia and China might be making to block Israeli nuclear strikes, but I presume that their space-based and electronic intel-collection are tightly focused to detect any Israeli move, and ​track the Israeli nuclear-armed submarines in real time, difficult as that is.

    ​ Alex Krainer, “Muslim NATO” marks the end of US hegemony
    All three signatories of the Mecca Joint Force Agreement have the same enemy and their position can’t be changed with simple bribery. In hindsight, this will prove to have been a watershed event.
    ​ The full text of the agreement has not been made public. Instead, we only have a brief joint statement by the three signatories:
    “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states’ shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future.
    ​ The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states.”
    ​ Furthermore, at least for now, the agreement doesn’t seem to foresee a formal organization, headquarters or any joint command structures. In spite of that, the agreement could prove to be one of the more consequential geopolitical developments to emerge from the current Middle Eastern crisis.
    ​ Given that all three signatories are, at least formally, allied with the United States, many analysts interpreted Friday’s announcement as a creation of a new alliance that would ultimately serve the interests of the United States in the Middle East, and by extension, represent a new bulwark for the defense of Israel. However, I believe that those interpretations will prove mistaken.​
    ​ One thing all three of these nations have in common is that each has been threatened by Israel in the past. The Eretz Israel, or Greater Israel project has very significant territorial ambitions that include a large chunk of Saudi Arabia.​..
    ​..As we can see, Eretz Israel also includes a chunk of Turkey, and most of Syria, which Turkey regards as its own strategic sphere of influence. This has put Turkey in the crosshairs of Israeli officials’ escalating war rhetoric.​.. Defense Minister Israel Katz explicitly warned Turkey against deepening its presence in Syria, and the former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett has called Turkey the “new Iran” and a strategic threat. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that he takes President Erdogan’s anti-Israel statements “very seriously,”​…
    ​..That “regional power balance” also set Pakistan in the Zionists’ crosshairs, and in this sense, Israel has already planned hostile actions against Pakistan in collaboration with its ally, India. Already in 2011, Benjamin Netanyahu made the following statement:​ “… the greatest mission that we have is to prevent a militant Islamic regime from meeting up with nuclear weapons or from nuclear weapons meeting up with a militant Islamic regime. The first is called Iran. The second is called Pakistan. Because if these radical regimes have nuclear weapons, they will not obey the rules that have been obeyed in the last, almost seven decades.”​…
    ​..Indeed, the fear of an Islamic nation possessing a nuclear bomb is not a new thing: it is why Israel attacked Egypt in 1967 and Iraq in 1981.
    In 1981, Israel developed a plan to strike Pakistan’s nuclear program. In this plan, India was supporting Israel by providing air bases where Israeli F16s and F15s could land and refuel before the strikes. The Indians named the plan “Operation Shakti” and Israeli pilots already began training for it.
    ​ However, Pakistan’s intelligence agency ISI found out about this and the country’s then ruler Zia ul-Haq reacted immediately, warning Israel that if they strike Pakistan’s nuclear facilities, Pakistan would strike Dimona. Ul-Haq also issued a warning to India. Facing the prospect of a wider war against Pakistan, India backed off. Without India’s help, there was no way for Israel to carry out the attack, so the plan was shelved.
    ​ A new & improved plan was in the works in 1998. At that time, the Pakistani government received an intelligence report that India and Israel were again planning to carry out a joint attack against the country’s nuclear facilities. Shamshad Ahmad (former Pakistani Foreign Secretary) explained the intelligence report they received:
    ​ “Sir, we have just received intelligence report that at an Indian airport, squadrons of Indian and Israeli air forces are positioned and are preparing for an attack on Pakistan’s nuclear installations in Balochistan. Then I called our Ambassador in New York, Ahmed Kamal.
    ​ I told him, go… on CNN and say that Pakistan has information that India and Israel are about to launch a joint attack on Pakistan. The Ambassador went live on CNN and it resulted in a good impact because if India and Israel had made such a plan, it would be called off by morning.”​…
    ..In view of all this, it would be hard to imagine why Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, or Turkey would come together to defend Israel. More likely, they would come together to protect themselves from Israel and its Western allies, including the US, UK, NATO, and also, in Pakistan’s case from India.​..
    ..Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei called the pact a sign that regional countries are shifting away from relying on the US for security. He stressed Tehran’s perception that the treaty isn’t aimed against Iran, underscoring the deep historical and religious ties with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan.
    ​ I believe that Mr. Baqaei’s statement is correct. He didn’t mention that all three nations and Iran face the common threat and the same enemies. The new “Muslim NATO” signifies the redrawing of the power balance in the region and the emergence of a new security architecture that clearly has no use for either the US, UK, NATO, or Israel.
    ​ This view is corroborated by the conspicuous absence of any official statement regarding the Mecca agreement from the Trump administration, suggesting that they were neither consulted nor involved in forging the new defence pact.​ https://alexkrainer.substack.com/p/muslim-nato-marks-the-end-of-us-hegemony

    ​ H.A. Hellyer, Egypt was invited to join the new Saudi-Turkish-Pakistani defence pact. It declined…
    • Egypt was not excluded…​ Pakistan offered Cairo the opportunity to join, while Turkish FM Hakan Fidan said Erdogan wanted Egypt eventually to become part of the alliance.
    • Cairo appears to see the pact as political as much as military. The concern is that joining would place Egypt inside a Saudi-led alignment, rather than simply expanding its security cooperation.
    • The distinction Egypt makes is between regional security cooperation and a binding commitment to defend Saudi Arabia. Cairo is comfortable with the former; it is much more cautious about the latter.​
    • That helps explain the difference with the Red Sea maritime coalition, where Egypt has direct strategic interests and cooperation is primarily about information-sharing and consultation.
    • The NATO comparison also needs qualification. Fidan has described the pact as analogous to NATO’s Article 5, but Turkish officials quoted by Mada Masr stress that any military response would still require political decision-making. The immediate practical emphasis may be intelligence-sharing, radar integration and deterrence.
    • One of the more striking assessments in the piece is that the pact is, in practice, more about Saudi Arabia’s security than Turkey’s or Pakistan’s. It is difficult to imagine either Ankara or Islamabad becoming the principal military guarantor of Saudi Arabia in a major regional conflict.​ https://xcancel.com/hahellyer/status/2086539762442379600

    ​ Trump Shares Hillary Clinton Op-Ed Backing His Gaza Plan In Face Of Bibi Rejection
    President Trump is currently experiencing a rare moment of his plans for the Mideast region being rejected on multiple fronts – even among allies, apparently. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over weekend rejected a US-backed 15-point peace plan for Gaza, which marks a rare and very glaring public break with Trump.
    ​ Netanyahu was surprisingly up front in acknowledging the complete break in policy vision from the White House. “Contrary to all those who preach to us, we do what must be done for Israel’s security and we can and will stand our ground even against our best friends when necessary,” he stated.
    ​ He said he was confronting a “wave of rumors about Israeli weakness and Israeli withdrawals on all fronts” and made clear that Israel won’t succumb to ongoing US pressure to end wars in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran – unless Israel decides it is in its security interest.​ https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-shares-hillary-clinton-op-ed-backing-his-gaza-plan-face-bibi-rejection

    #247151
    John Day
    Participant

    ​ Moon of Alabama, War On Iran: – ‘New’ Iran Demands Repeat MoU Conditions
    U.S. media claim that Iran has set out new conditions to solve the conflict with the U.S. But the new text it has published is just a repetition of clauses the U.S. had already signed on to.
    On Saturday Iran published ‘new’ demands for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz:
    [Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr] said the US should observe the six following conditions:
    “1. Never, and in no language, threaten Iran or insult the sanctities of this nation.
    2. Permanently end the war and aggression against Iran and Iran’s allies in Lebanon, Palestine, Yemen and Iraq.
    3. Lift the naval blockade and withdraw its military forces (naval and air) from around Iran.
    4. Pay in full, without any reduction, the damages caused to Iran by the two wars of aggression and imposition.
    5. Lift the unjust and illegal sanctions against the Iranian nation.
    6. Unconditionally release the blocked and stolen assets of the Iranian people.”
    These demands seem to have confused U.S. observers…
    ​..There is nothing new in the Iranian demands. They are direct repetitions of clauses laid down in Memorandum of Understanding which the White House had negotiated and President Trump had publicly signed.
    ​ Point 1 of the MoU notes that the parties “undertake .. to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other” which is similar to point 1 of the ‘new’ conditions.
    ​ Point 1 of the MoU also had the parties “declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, …”. This is repeated, and spelled out in more detail, in point 2 of the new conditions.
    ​ Point 3 of the ‘new’ demands, the lifting of the blockade and withdrawal of U.S. forces, is equal to point 4 of the MoU:
    .., the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. … The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.
    ​ Even Point 4 of the ‘new’ version, the demand for reparations, was already included in the MoU:
    The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    ​ Likewise, point 5 and 6 of the ‘new’ demands are shorter repetitions of points 10 and 11 of the Trump signed MoU.
    The differences between Iran’s newly published demands and the MoU are references in the later one to nuclear issues.
    ​ The U.S. had demanded to include those into the MoU and there is simply no point for Iran to include these U.S. conditions into its most recent version.
    The only real difference between the MoU and the new conditions is the timing. The MoU set out to undertake the measures step by step along a defined timeline with each side responding to the others side’s fulfillment of previous clauses.
    ​ It was the U.S. which did not stick to the MoU but immediately breached its promises. As soon as he had signed the MoU Trump was back at threatening Iran thus breaking its point 1 condition. The U.S. then arranged for a separate agreement which extended Israel’s war and occupation of Lebanon instead of ending the war under the MoU’s conditions. It ignored Iran’s privilege under the MoU to “make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels” through the Strait of Hormuz by making separate arrangements with Oman.​..
    ​..That is why Iran is demanding the upfront fulfillment of any promise the U.S. has made. Only when those are fulfilled will Iran move to act on its own commitments.
    ​ Trump can easily solve the conflict around the Strait of Hormuz. He simply has to fulfill the commitments set out in the MoU he had already agreed to. He may not like that he will now have to do that upfront but that is just an obvious consequence of his own mistake of not sticking to it in the first place.
    ​ The only clause where Trump has real limits is the payment of reparations to Iran for the war damage the 20,000 or so U.S. strikes have caused. Trump would need Congressional agreement to pay out that money.
    ​ But the compromise here is obvious and simple. If the U.S. officially agrees that Iran can take tolls from ships crossing the Strait this could be seen as a payment in kind.​ https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/08/war-on-iran-new-iran-demands-repeat-mou-conditions-trump-had-already-signed.html

    Iran’s Military Command Reshuffle Digs In For ‘Hardline’ Confrontation: US Must Meet All Demands For Hormuz Opening​ https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-fires-ship-attempting-break-iran-blockade-amid-several-regional-maritime-attacks

    Trump Finally Responds To Iran’s Demands, Counters US Is Owed “Compensation,” Stops Short Of New Threats​ https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/tehran-doubles-down-hormuz-demands-hardline-irgc-commander-promoted-national-security

    ​ Hegseth Says Congress Should Pay Tribute to Lindsey Graham by Approving $1.5 Trillion Military Budget
    He made the comments at a ceremony renaming Joint Base Charleston to Joint Base Lindsey Graham​ https://news.antiwar.com/2026/08/10/hegseth-says-congress-should-pay-tribute-to-lindsey-graham-by-approving-1-5-trillion-military-budget/

    ​ Gold & Geopolitics, Daily digest: 2026-08-11
    Iran stopped pretending: an advisor to the Parliament Speaker said flatly that Tehran will wait out Trump’s term to January 2029 rather than negotiate, and Trump responded by billing Iran for the war he started.
    ​ Meanwhile the SPR fell below 300 million barrels for the first time since 1983, Nvidia formalised a $500bn off-balance-sheet financing vehicle on the same day the SEC exempted data-center securitizations from post-2008 risk-retention rules, and a 7.4 quake in Colombia killed at least 111 people.
    ​ Iran rules out all talks with this administration until 2029. “Trump will not reach an agreement with us. We will accompany him until his term ends” – Majid Shakeri, advisor to Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf, per HormuzLetter. Demands unchanged: $300bn compensation, $100bn+ frozen assets released, all sanctions lifted, US troop withdrawal from the entire region, end to the naval blockade, transit fees on every ship (HormuzLetter).​..
    ​..SPR: 46 million barrels of policy runway left, and the lease trick is running out​ – 116.3M barrels released since the war began (Nostre_damus).
    ​ The mechanical constraint: barrels already leased-but-not-drawn take the reserve to ~280M, and the last auction failed. Going below requires outright sales, which need congressional approval – meaning the price-suppression tool may already be spent (JustDario).​..
    ​..Russia is importing refined fuel from South Korea – ~30,000 tonnes of diesel and, in one case, jet fuel loaded at Ulsan in late July, bound for the Far East (chigrl). A net petroleum exporter buying product from a US ally is not a small tell.
    ​ Russia’s Starlink equivalent is deploying ahead of schedule – Ukrainian GUR says 16 satellites are up (the tweet’s author puts the real number at 40), with a 292-satellite constellation targeted for 2027 and 924 by 2035 (simpatico771, KonstanVe).​ https://no1sdailydigest.substack.com/p/daily-digest-2026-08-11

    #247152
    John Day
    Participant

    ​ Gold & Geopolitics, Daily digest: 2026-08-10
    Two big deltas: Trump has reportedly dropped the nuclear-deal demand entirely and will settle for Hormuz reopening — at which point Tehran raised its price to $300bn plus troop withdrawal — and another tanker burned overnight inside the US-escorted Omani corridor, which is the corridor whose existence is the counter-argument to Bessent’s claim that Hormuz no longer matters. Elsewhere: Japan’s 2-year yield hit a 30-year high while insurer paper losses set a record, and a Ukrainian drone strike on Nizhnekamsk killed civilians including a child.​..
    ​..Israel rejects Trump’s Gaza plan outright​ – Netanyahu says the new plan is unacceptable; no withdrawal until Hamas is “genuinely disarmed” (Reuters, zerohedge, BRICSinfo, unusual_whales).
    ​ And separately: “As long as I am prime minister, there will be no Palestinian state in Gaza or the West Bank” (DeItaone).​ [Reads differently if he died in March.]
    ​ Kalshi has Gadi Eizenkot at 59% to be Israel’s next PM against Netanyahu’s 33% (spectatorindex).
    ​ US interceptor stocks at zero; defense firms get 21 days — ​Deputy Defense Secretary Feinberg has directed defense firms to submit plans within 21 days to escalate production of weapons “now at zero due to the war,” per WaPo; follows a “very angry” Trump call over munitions shortages after the Camp David clash with Hegseth (HormuzLetter).
    ​ Same reporting: a Lockheed PAC-3 MSE contract worth up to $58.6bn, plus fresh Northrop/Lockheed agreements on PAC-3 and THAAD — the exact missiles described as at zero.​..
    ..Grain: rail shipments to Greater Odesa ports have virtually stopped since August 1, down 84.3%. August 1-6 volumes 312.9k tons vs 784.5k in the same July period — volume -60.1%, revenue -38.4%. Wheat 93.2k vs 294.9k; corn 33.5k vs 293.7k. Road exports +11.3%; overall rail grain traffic -44.1% vs July and -40.8% below last year (KShevchenkoReal).​ https://no1sdailydigest.substack.com/p/daily-digest-2026-08-10

    ​ Thanks Eleni: A global haven for criminals, no questions asked: Israel protects Mexican official wanted for mass kidnap-murder, along with other accused sex criminals and fraudsters https://www.sott.net/article/507842-Israel-protects-Mexican-official-wanted-for-mass-kidnap-murder-along-with-other-accused-sex-criminals-and-fraudsters

    Russian tanks can shoot down drones, missiles and artillery shells: Russian Arena-M Active Protection System Finally Comes of Age on the Battlefield https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/russian-arena-m-active-protection

    Andrew Korybko, There’d Likely Be Another Civil War Before Ukraine Meaningfully Turns Away From The West https://korybko.substack.com/p/thered-likely-be-another-civil-war

    Kennedy was blocked, so Trump EOs it: BREAKING: Trump Signs Executive Order Overhauling America’s Childhood Hypervaccination Schedule
    Executive Order calls for greater parental choice, separate MMR shots, more widely spaced vaccinations, aluminum-adjuvant alternatives, and stronger safety monitoring.​ https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-trump-signs-executive-order-eaf

    #247153
    John Day
    Participant

    ​Meryl Nass MD has the details and implications: Childhood Vaccines: What Pres. Trump just signed and what it means https://merylnass.substack.com/p/childhood-vaccines-what-pres-trump

    It is easy to design studies to not find something. Vaccine Cartel Desperately Clings to New MMR Vaccine–Autism “No Link” Study Riddled With Major Flaws — No truly unvaccinated control group, no clinical autism adjudication, no parent interviews, no independent vaccine-record verification, and a narrow ICD-coded autism definition. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/vaccine-cartel-desperately-clings

    Steve Kirsch (is probably “racist” or something), Can Tylenol increase the risk of a child developing autism? Science says yes.
    But according to r/Autism_Parenting, I am evil for asking such a stupid question. So I guess it depends on who you ask. Here’s what happened to me…​ https://kirschsubstack.com/p/can-tylenol-increase-the-risk-of

    ​ New Study Links Glyphosate to Preterm Births
    A New York University study of 1,450 pregnancies ties glyphosate exposure in mid-pregnancy to a 35% rise in odds of premature birth.​ https://www.themahareport.com/p/new-study-links-glyphosate-to-preterm

    ​ Celia Farber, First Crop Of Fauci Texts Reveal He Knew In ’21 About Many Pregnant Women Having “Significant Cytokine Storms, Fever After The First Dose,” Said It Theoretically Could Be Associated With Miscarriage. https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/first-crop-of-fauci-texts-reveal

    #247154
    John Day
    Participant

    ​ NEWLY RELEASED FAUCI TEXTS REVEAL HE PRIVATELY WARNED COVID SHOT COULD TRIGGER MISCARRIAGE
    Disturbing revelations come as CDC data show safety-signal breaches across all 37 pregnancy/newborn adverse events examined—including miscarriage, stillbirth, fetal malformations, and newborn death.​ https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/newly-released-fauci-texts-reveal

    ​ Walensky Aware of Miscarriage Concern, Still Pushed C-19 Vaccine for Pregnant Women
    Fauci texted the CDC director on 1/25/2021 about cytokine storm and fever after 2nd dose, indicating risk of miscarriage, but Walensky recommended the shot for pregnant women two months la​ter.​ https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/walensky-aware-of-miscarriage-concern

    ​ HHS Takes Aim at GRAS Loophole and Ultra-Processed Food
    With fanfare, HHS moves to close a decades-old food safety loophole and, for the first time, define ultra-processed food.​ https://www.themahareport.com/p/hhs-takes-aim-at-gras-loophole-and

    ​ NEW STUDY: 89% of “Avocado Oil” Foods Use Fake or Adulterated Avocado Oil
    The vast majority of chips, salad dressings, and mayonnaise labeled as containing avocado oil showed fatty-acid and sterol profiles inconsistent with authentic avocado oil.​ https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-89-of-avocado-oil-foods

    #247157
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    PEPE: KHAMENEI PIVOTS-SECRET 6 HOUR MEETING With PEZESHKIAN,PAKISTAN’S MECCA PACT SHAKES EURASIA

    TEHRAN SHAKES THE CHESSBOARD: In this emergency briefing of Transition Protocol, geopolitical analysts Pepe Escobar and Zulfiqar Ali break down exclusive intelligence regarding a secret 6-hour face-to-face summit between Iranian President Pezeshkian and Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. Discover how Tehran is restructuring its national security apparatus under IRGC veteran Mohsen Rezaei, resetting negotiation terms with Washington, and asserting operational oversight over the Strait of Hormuz alongside Oman.

    Simultaneously, we analyze groundbreaking shifts across Eurasia as Pakistan adopts strategic nuclear ambiguity under the Mecca Pact with Saudi Arabia and Turkey—and opens unprecedented dialogue channels with Tehran. As US Strategic Petroleum Reserves reach critical depletion thresholds, how will these interlocking military and diplomatic moves reshape global security?

    #247159
    Michael Reid
    Participant

    Scott Bessent’s Delusional Oil Pipe Dream to Defeat Iran
    By Larry C. Johnson on 10 August 2026

    When U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told an interviewer this weekend that the Strait of Hormuz would “become irrelevant” within two years — with more than half the energy now crossing it rerouted through underground pipelines — he was indulging a pipe dream. Bessent fails to grasp that Iran’s ability to use the Strait of Hormuz as geopolitical leverage is not going to vanish if the Gulf arabs quickly build oil pipelines. It is true that capital hates chokepoints, and Gulf producers are indeed racing to build around one. Saudi Arabia is expanding its East-West Petroline, the UAE has leaned harder on its Fujairah bypass, and Iraq is dusting off long-dormant overland export corridors. Chevron is even studying a revived Haditha–Baniyas line from Iraq to the Syrian Mediterranean.

    Although Bessent ‘s oil pipeline proposal sounded like a nifty way to neuter Iran, he fails to grasp the true economic importance of the Persian Gulf and the leverage that Iran will continue to have for years to come. Bessent’s framing treats Hormuz as an oil problem, and a pipeline network — however ambitious — solves an oil problem. But Hormuz is not merely the world’s most important oil chokepoint. It is the sole maritime exit for a cluster of specialized commodities that cannot be pumped through a pipe, cannot be quickly re-sourced elsewhere, and whose disruption is already inflicting measurable economic damage across food, semiconductors, and heavy industry. Building a crude bypass and declaring the strait “irrelevant” mistakes one throughput for all of them.

    The evidence for that is not hypothetical. It is the record of the past five months.

    The oil bypass math is already the easy part — and it still doesn’t close
    Start with the commodity the pipelines are meant to address. Even here the substitution is incomplete. Roughly 20 million barrels per day of crude, condensate, and products normally transit Hormuz — about a fifth of global petroleum consumption. Existing bypass capacity totals somewhere around 4.7 million barrels per day. Closing that gap requires not one flagship pipeline but an entire redundant network, built through active or recently active conflict zones, over a period of years. Bessent’s own two-year horizon is optimistic against that backdrop, and it is the most favorable case, because crude is the one Hormuz cargo that pipelines are actually designed to carry.

    Everything else produced in the Gulf are not cargo that can be carried by a pipeline, and these are critically important to the global economy.

    LNG: No pipe runs from Ras Laffan to Tokyo
    About a fifth of the world’s liquefied natural gas trade moves through Hormuz, overwhelmingly from Qatar, the second-largest LNG exporter on earth. When Iranian strikes damaged Qatar’s Ras Laffan complex — the single largest LNG export facility in the world — and QatarEnergy declared force majeure in early March, roughly 10 billion cubic feet per day of supply, about 20% of globally traded LNG, went offline. Kpler tanker data showed no laden LNG vessel crossing the strait for nearly two months.

    The consequences landed fast and far from the Gulf. The World Bank’s natural gas price index jumped 24% in a single month. Europe’s benchmark is now projected to climb roughly 25% across 2026, because LNG frequently sets the marginal price there; Asia, which takes the overwhelming majority of Qatari cargoes, was hit hardest as buyers scrambled to replace contracted deliveries on the spot market.

    Here is the part a pipeline cannot fix: LNG has no overland route out of Qatar. Liquefied gas is a seaborne product by definition — you liquefy it precisely because you cannot pipe it across oceans to Japan, South Korea, or India. And the one producer large enough to plug the gap, the United States, cannot. New American liquefaction terminals take years and billions to build; the EIA expected U.S. exports to rise by only a small fraction of the missing Qatari volumes, with meaningful new capacity trickling in through late 2026 at best. A crude bypass does nothing for the LNG buyer in Osaka. There is no bypass to build.

    Urea and ammonia: the fertilizer shock that reaches every farm
    The Gulf is not just an energy hub. It is one of the planet’s great fertilizer factories, and Hormuz is how those fertilizers reach the fields that depend on them. The Middle East supplies close to a quarter of global urea exports; by some measures roughly a third of world seaborne fertilizer trade was put at risk when the strait closed. Iran halted ammonia production; Qatar suspended urea, ammonia, and sulphur output after the Ras Laffan damage.

    The price response was violent. Urea climbed above $850 per metric ton in April — up around 80% from February and the highest level since 2022. World urea prices roughly doubled at the peak. Ammonia jumped nearly 40% in weeks, and about 24% of all global ammonia trade normally passes through Hormuz. Fitch raised its 2026 ammonia and urea forecasts by around a quarter and warned nitrogen fertilizers would be the hardest hit of any product category.

    And unlike a price chart, the downstream damage compounds. India — which sources roughly 80% of its ammonia from the Gulf — saw ammonia-based domestic production stall and lost hundreds of thousands of tons of monthly urea output as industrial gas was rationed. American farmers absorbed the shock at the worst possible moment, entering spring planting with fertilizer costs spiking and diesel above $5 a gallon. Because natural gas is around 80% of the cost of nitrogen fertilizer, the LNG disruption and the fertilizer disruption feed each other — a second-order effect no crude pipeline touches. When fertilizer gets scarce and expensive, the eventual bill is measured in crop yields and food prices, in countries that never bought a barrel of Gulf oil.

    Sulphur and DAP: the quiet input behind the phosphate chain
    Sulphur rarely makes headlines, which is exactly why its disruption is instructive. It is a byproduct of Gulf gas processing and a critical input for phosphate fertilizers and countless industrial processes. With Qatari sulphur output suspended and regional supply choked, prices roughly doubled since the start of the year. That fed straight into diammonium phosphate (DAP): DAP prices rose more than 10% in April on tightening supply and higher sulphur costs, compounded by China moving to restrict its own exports — China relies on the Middle East for roughly half its sulphur imports.

    This is the pattern worth noticing. Hormuz disruption does not produce one clean shortage; it produces a cascade through interlinked chemistry — gas into ammonia, ammonia and sulphur into finished fertilizer, export bans stacked on top of physical shortfalls. A pipeline that moves crude oil intersects none of these chains.

    Helium: the commodity with no substitute and no alternative exit
    Helium is the sharpest illustration of Bessent’s blind spot, because for helium the pipeline argument does not merely fall short — it is categorically inapplicable.

    Qatar supplies roughly a third of the world’s helium, extracted as a byproduct co-located with LNG processing at Ras Laffan. The March strikes and the strait’s closure took an estimated 30% of global helium production offline, with damage assessments suggesting some infrastructure could take years — not weeks — to fully restore. US distributors invoked force majeure, began rationing, prioritized healthcare customers, and layered on surcharges; spot prices spiked.

    Helium cannot be synthesized. It is a finite, non-renewable gas with no substitute in its critical uses: semiconductor fabrication, advanced chip packaging, MRI machines, and the sealed interior of every high-capacity hard drive at a moment when AI-driven data-center demand is surging. Seagate and Western Digital reported full-year allocations and 20–30% price increases; South Korean chipmakers were reported to be running on roughly six months of inventory.

    And every gram of Qatari helium leaves the country the same way: by ship, through Hormuz. There is no pipeline alternative, no overland route, no bypass — helium’s only exit from the world’s second-largest production hub is that one 33-kilometer-wide waterway. A network of crude pipelines could be completed tomorrow and it would not move a single liter of helium to a chip fab in Taiwan.

    Why the framing matters
    None of this means the bypass pipelines are a bad idea. Reducing the world’s dependence on a single crude chokepoint is prudent, and market-driven redundancy is exactly what one would want. Bessent is right that capital routes around risk, and that Tehran has accelerated its own strategic marginalization by weaponizing the strait.

    But the claim that “the Strait of Hormuz will become irrelevant” is grossly misleading. The waterway’s true strategic weight comes from its role as the shared export gate for a bundle of commodities — LNG, urea, ammonia, sulphur, helium — that are seaborne by physics, concentrated in a handful of Gulf facilities, and impossible to re-source at speed. Each has been disrupted in the real world over the past five months, and each disruption has produced price shocks and downstream damage that a crude pipeline is powerless to prevent.

    The current market underlines the point. As of early August, Brent was trading in the mid-$80s and climbing on Hormuz headlines, with a war-risk premium that has refused to deflate through months of on-again, off-again negotiation — the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve has been drawn down to its lowest level since the 1980s in the process. That premium reflects traders pricing the whole basket of what the strait carries, not just its barrels of crude. Until there is a plan for the LNG tanker, the ammonia cargo, the sulphur shipment, and the helium flask — none of which fits in a pipeline — Hormuz will remain very far from irrelevant.

    A pipeline can carry crude. It cannot carry the rest of what Hormuz moves. And it is the rest that is quietly reshaping the global economy right now.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.