Debt Rattle July 6 2026
- This topic has 27 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 2 days ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Nicolas Poussin A Dance to the Music of Time 1634-36 • Elon Decimates Mamdani’s Speech – DeSantis Drops in Off the Top Rope (Arama) • The Obamas and C
[See the full post at: Debt Rattle July 6 2026]Yesterday:
Bait and Switch: Trump Redoes the MoU.”Yes, but Iran won, it’s Iran’s MoU. It can only be they are bait and switching on us. Unless Iran didn’t win, which I’m willing to consider.
“Iranian officials vow to avenge Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei and to free all Muslims from USraeli oppression”
I’m sure he did but you need “Weapons.” You’re going to have to do better than hitting one out of every 175 ships with a smoke bomb.
Iran gets Revenge” – Haiphong
Yes but if you hadn’t noticed, Trump baits them into expending ammunition that can’t be supplied, over and over again. They use it, we bomb the sites, then try to get them to pop up again. IRGC can either NOT attack when we cross their lines, in which case the world knows they don’t exist, or they CAN do this and watch the 10% remaining arms go to 7%, then 5%, then 3%, and so on. It’s inexorable. Without working industrial base or resupply, that’s that. They’re fighting math and reality, not us. Trump’s job is to speed it up. We’ve now seen this for 60 days, like when he steamed the destroyers in there, so if you can’t see it by now, I don’t know what to say. This is 1D Checkers. The pivot is whether Iran had world allies: they don’t. Why I don’t know and is an interesting question we should answer, but: The End.
I think the definition of “Revenge” means you actually notice their attack? Markets agree.
The “Revenge” they got was to sink zero ships again, while Trump eats 5-Star at Mar A Lago. I’m sure he had a Sad when he stopped to notice, which isn’t often.
“Trump has one job: get rich while dismantling the U.S. empire”
Except for when he gets both poor and dead, which is most of the time. He also works for Israel except when he bombs them. He’s also a tyrant and dictator except when no one does what he says and no one is arrested, not even for lols. Yup, totally the answer. He’s rich BUT ALSO poor. Brilliant. And he does this because it wouldn’t be nine times easier to do what globalists want who would gladly pay him higher, much easier.
RUSSIA’s Biggest Success in KIEV: The Destruction of the WEST’s Top Military Officials was confirmed
Having not been on this site since Raul went dark, it seems like he died and some crazy wildly uneducated maga nut took over the site. RIP Raul
Nicolas Poussin A Dance to the Music of Time 1634-36
A note on the myth that the past was all religious, Christian oppressive: Do you see this painting? In 1600 very expensive, by valuable artists, working for people next to the King? Yeah: it’s all pagan. All of it, Janus, Apollo, Rome. Soooo…clearly neither they, nor the government, nor the people, had any beef or opposition to this, and Christianity wasn’t oppressing anyone, or they would take issue with this and be able to prosecute their case.
Just a gut-check on what you believe of the past. They are very tolerant.
“Former Sen. Warren Staffer Attends Ayatollah’s Funeral, Calls Him “Greatest Leader Of Our Lifetime”
Wild even by DNC terms. Uhhh…which Ayatollah? It’s well-known this young one wasn’t much for the job, like other’s preacher’s sons. It was his father that had reality and gravitas.
“”Radical Islam is a threat to the entire world and the U.S.”
Yes but so is Radical Anything. That’s the definition of “Radical”.
“European Parliament Moves to Ban Far-Right German AfD Party’s EU Coalition”
Absolutely. Because that’s Democracy, when if you can’t win, you outlaw them. Just like Uks new law. If no one will watch your stupid lies, you pass a law they’re required to. And to pay for it.
Mamdani: Hate to say this but they’re all rich and have never worked, from rich, insider families. Show me the poor ones who have done work like Caesar Chavez did. You can’t, or like BLM they immediately grift for $20M mansion in a white neighborhood ‘cause: Solidarity, Socialism and the Poors. Chavez would be ultra-far-right today. He limited immigration because it crushes wages, a thing Democrats want. Bernie agreed. Until a minute later, he didn’t.
“[They] were a minority, too. But you should never underestimate the ability of a distinct minority to bring about massive devastation,”
Yes, but as we learned, none of it was ever organic. It was engineered and paid by oligarchs. Lenin took a train of British gold as the paid employee of oligarchs to murder Slavs. And so we have Soros or Singham today. Remove their billionaire funders, they can’t show up to riot. As proven already in July. Where are they? No USAID, no riots. Interesting.
Yeah, there ARE NO RADICALS. They talent-scout them from mental institutions, put them up, hand them guns, and point them at something. CIA 101 on that. That’s how it’s done because it works. But that doesn’t make it real.
“the rapper opined that maybe black people should take a break from killing each other and kill white people for a while.”
It cut through the noise and got press attention. However, her people did not stop killing each other. So, why? Was it not obvious enough? Every time they misfire, their own get weaker, yet this isn’t a signal to stop?
“As the communist element of the left worms its way through the party, you’d think Democrats would care”
No, because, above, they were paid and engineered to be the Party that causes a Socialist revolution and the collapse of the U.S. since at least 1910 and Wilson. Wilson himself was air-dropped and installed, not a President at all.
“we’re not doing a very good job of passing that along to the next generation.” …Shires has a theory for how this happened.
It was specifically paid for and engineered by billionaires harvesting us. Easy. They used Socialism as their cover story and teachers and professors are the only adults dumb enough to believe them! Wow. No one thought it was possible to find adults that childish and retarded, yet here we are! We have almost total illiteracy and failure in math. Teacher’s Union: “Hold my beer, I’m sure we can make that number 100%” For 60 years in a row. No one is mad about it, so I guess that’s the outcome they want, right?
““The system America’s founders built,” he said, “was designed to prevent the concentration of power in a few hands,”
But ALSO that they were all Rich White Slave owners and evil oligarchs. So they were outlawing themselves? #Logic. It’s the Left: They Just Say Things. Whatever they want to be true from sentence to sentence, hour to hour, they just say it. And because “Social”, social credit, social standing, etc, no one calls them on it since that wouldn’t be nice. Anyone who has any rules or restraint is attacked with the nuclear option. I mean, we just saw Woke for 10+ years, right? Back to Political Correctness of the 90s? So they have no problem saying thing at the beginning of sentence and the opposite by the end.
Okay, let me find and send a very pleasant, well-researched letter on it to them. What do you think would happen?““Set your air to 78 degrees? … “Jimmy Carter’s turn down your thermostat”
Conservatives should do that but for other reasons. Who is most energy efficient? Traditionalists. Ranchers. Most green, most careful to turn the lights off. Compare to the energy use in New Jersey. No trees = no cooling. Who will make it do or go without when they can? Rural Vermont, Maine. Not Detroit.
“250 years, America has been the greatest nation on Earth” Meh. Results are mixed. As the Chinese would say “It’s too soon to tell.” The only difference is, we TRY and we do things. Then they point and laugh at our failures, while having never even tried themselves.
• “What Then Is The American, This New Man?” (Turley)
Look at deTocquville, etc. They saw it all written back then. And so it came to pass.
I saw it all written in that documentary “Demolition Man” which is a lot shorter and more fun. Every prediction came true.
“• Russia and US Bear ‘Special Responsibility’ For Global Security – Putin (RT)
Again, Putin is an ALLY of Donald Trump. They can’t get their heads around this though it’s obvious. They do everything but jump up and down with a inflatiable dancing man and skywriting.
“• Trump Calls Putin on US Independence Day (RT) “ Again.
• Putin Invites Trump To Visit Russia In ‘Constructive’ July 4th Phone Call (ZH)Allies. But the Alexes promise no one is attacking Russia but America! And Trump specifically since he wasn’t President at the time.
“• Russia’s Buffer Zone On Ukrainian Border ‘Expanding’ (ZH)
Just look at it in the squishy view: UKRAINE IS ALWAYS THE BORDER ZONE, the buffer and sacrifice area. Like since 1500? That sounds crazy and they’ve tried other things, but it’s the only thing that’s worked. So here we are again. That’s right in the name: “Borderlands” “THE” Ukraine. Because “THE” Borderlands. Border to what? A: An actual nation, Russia. Borders are borders, they are not nations.
“• Trump: ‘Netanyahu Knows Who The Boss Is’ After Phone Call (ZH)
Yeah, I don’t think so. But it doesn’t matter since it wedges Israel and their influence is extracted from us for the first time since Kennedy. Trump crushes Israel, that’s why everyone hates him. Etc
“The BBC is so trusted that the government has to use the law to force you to pay for it and now has to use the law to force you to watch it.” ‘Nuff said.
“Ornate lion capitals and classical columns – pure American grandeur in the works.”
I mean yes, but this is the Roman Empire period and not “American” at all. What’s the vernacular which is more important? Dutch barns. Shotgun “Shacks” in N’orleans. Cape Cods.
Lincoln: A very unlucky guy you probably shouldn’t elect as President. Especailly when he works for the billionaire railroads as a lawyer. I guess it worked out.
Pepe Escobar on X: “PROF. MICHAEL HUDSON BREAKS IT ALL DOWN – IN 30 SECONDS “The Oil War is going to cause cutbacks in spending on non-oil products, because paying more for gasoline, diesel and aircraft fuel, fertilizer, naphtha and sulfur will cut into profits, leading to layoffs.” “The IT boom” / X
Pepe Escobar
PROF. MICHAEL HUDSON BREAKS IT ALL DOWN – IN 30 SECONDS “The Oil War is going to cause cutbacks in spending on non-oil products, because paying more for gasoline, diesel and aircraft fuel, fertilizer, naphtha and sulfur will cut into profits, leading to layoffs.” “The IT boom is not just a stock market bubble by optimistic buyers, pension funds and mutual funds. It is a credit bubble – and that means a debt bubble.” “The whole stock market has turned into a Ponzi Scheme.” “It isn’t money creation that is pushing up prices. It’s the real economy’s cost of energy.” Watch out for “the effect of the Oil War combined with the junk economics that passes for money and banking theory taught to mainstream economic students and repeated in the mass media.”Is the MoU cat dead, alive or in a coma?
Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su
These oh so meticulous Persians.
How to impart to Barbaria that they’ve got to implement paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10 and 11 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) their own president signed in Versailles?
Especially paragraph 1: establishing a conflict control mechanism in Lebanon; paragraph 10: on export of Iran’s oil and petrochemicals; and paragraph 11: on the release of Iran’s frozen assets.
Tall orders all around. Tied to the fact there’s no guarantee whatsoever non-agreement capable (copyright: Sergey Lavrov) Exceptionalistan even understands that comitments are now bilateral: you break it, the counterpart also breaks it.
Cut to Iran’s top negotiator, Parliament leader Ghalibaf. Earlier this week, ahead of the elaborate funeral ceremonies in Tehran, Qom and Mashhad tied to the burial of slain Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, Ghalibaf said negotiations with the US are over (italics mine).
Translation: Iran will not move an inch to discuss a possible final deal until Washington fully implements the five MoU clauses listed above.
This follows logically from the fact that Iran sent a high-level delegation to Switzerland to discuss the implementation of the 14-point MoU, and not (italics mine) to negotiate a new agreement.
Further proof: Clause 13 of the MoU specifies that final deal talks only begin after paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11 are fulfilled.
In theory, a joint Iran-US-Lebanon committee may have been establishad to oversee implementation – but there’s no official confirmation from Washington, as the US de facto is unwilliing and/or unable to control the death cult in West Asia.
The Trump naval blockade, meanwhile, has been lifted. Iran has exported nearly 50 million barrels of oil during the past few days – at roughly 20% higher prices than in the recent past.
Yet free passage in the Strait of Hormuz only lasts for 60 days. After that, Tehran – and Muscat – will impose fees: after all Iran and Oman are sovereign when it comes to navigating their territorial waters.
A key point: Iran’s missile program, the whole organization of the Axis of Resistance, and Iran’s nuclear rights, all these are non-negotiable items, as reiterated by Ghalibaf.
He stated, bluntly, that Iran is “ready for war” if Trump 2.0 does not comply with the MoU provisions. At the same time he remarked that Iran’s advantage in Hormuz comes from making it work efficiently, not keeping it closed.
Trump and Vance playing games
Now compare all of the above, which logically follows what was signed between Washington and Tehran, with VP J.D. Vance’s interview earlier this week where he admits that the presidential one-two only signed the MoU to “build up our stocks” and to “have more cards to play” when the 60 stipulated days are up.
That ties up with Secretary of State Rubio, on June 25, chairing a ministerial meeting of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) that for all practical purposes rejected key provisions of the MoU.
A statement claimed that “lasting regional peace and security” requires addressing “the full spectrum of Iran’s threats”, including ballistic missiles, drones, and “support for proxies”.
The conclusion is inevitable: from Trump 2.0’s point of view, the MoU is just a play for time. Even considering a split between Vance and Rubio.
Threats will not vanish. The specter of a resumption of war remains – complete with the current ramp-up of aerial supply ops. And all that even considering the political suicide of trying something foolish ahead of the mid-terms. Never underestimate the dementia quotient of the current White House.
In sharp contrast, let’s now switch to a group of rational players trying to instill much needed sense into the White House. This comes straight from the people previously at the negotiating table.
The headline here is that Iran-Pakistan talks, at the highest level, have concluded this past Tuesday. Tehran and Islamabad reached a joint understanding on the very difficult path forward.
Special Pakistani emissary Mohsin Naqvi, the Minister of Interior, left for Riyadh with a serious mission: to confirm to MbS, in person, that Iran, Saudi Arabia, Oman & Qatar are on the same page, coordinated by Islamabad’s diplomacy.
This group is bound by a firm determination: Trump, for all his volatility, should not be allowed to re-start the war.
Pakistani mediators, on the table until this Tuesday, reconfirmed that Iran and Oman – with crucial Chinese blessing – have already made an “irrevocable sovereign decision” when it comes to exercizing their sovereignty to control and administer the Strait of Hormuz.
That includes revenue collection, mine clearance, secure passage, the whole apparatus. Tehran and Muscat have rejected any foreign role – specifically the US, but also the EU; Muscat already told the Europeans directly.
What remains “ongoing” is the mechanics, not the decision.
So what we have here is a four-way understanding: Iran, Oman, Pakistan, China – expected to surface right after the funeral ceremonies of late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei.
The Iran–Oman track is directly connected to the larger, strategic Iran–China–Russia track.
A kabuki leading to a new security architecture?
When it comes to the MoU, it may be in deep coma, but it remains alive. Beneath the surface there are non-stop conversations. The Pakistani mediators – according to those on the table until this Tuesday – are doing their best to keep the MoU alive 100%, not 99%. The current pause is by design – Iran’s design – and not by collapse.
Of course what is developing right now is a larger than life kabuki: plenty of theatrics around a framework that may emerge as the structure defining West Asia geopolitically and in terms of who controls what for the foreseeable future.
As it stands, let’s follow the money during the ongoing comatose phase.
Tehran goes for total pragmatism: money first, then we talk. Details on specific transfers or timing remain fuzzy, but Iran is expected to hold roughly $9 billion within a week: the UAE has already moved $3 billion in; Qatar/Oman are supposed to bring the balance of the $6 billion. If Iran has at least $6 billion (up to $9 billion) in the next 10 days or so, the MoU cat will not be in the bag, but very much alive.
The heart of the matter: Tehran always moves at its own pace. The pace is set by the rites concerning Khamenei’s funeral, where four members of his family are to be re-interred in Mashhad, including his wife, fulfilling a wartime promise.
So here’s what all of us should be following. The final day of the ceremonies if July 9 in Mashhad. The next step will be to identify the meeting site, or sites, for the Americans, Pakistanis and Iranians to convene.
Even if we call it Islamabad 2.0 or 3.0, that won’t take place in Islamabad. Once the rites conclude and the Chinese blessing is
re-certified, the MoU in theory should be back. Trump – cornered by imperatives, as in the depletion of the SPR – will have to come back to the table and implement his part. Or blow it all up all over again.
There’s an extra complexity regarding Pakistan – which is simultaneously aligned with Iran/Oman/China on Strait of Hormuz security and deeply immersed in a NATO-style mutual-defense relationship with Saudi Arabia.
Under the September 2025 Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA), Pakistan has deployed at least 8,000 troops at King Abdulaziz Air Base – soon rising toward 13,000; JF-17 squadrons; drones; and a Chinese HQ-9 system. All that movement is Saudi-financed and under Pakistani operational control. These troops are essentially protecting Saudi oil.
The Pakistani deployment authority now extends to Air Force,
ground, and – that’s new – Navy elements across various parts of Saudi Arabia. So what we have here is an ostensive demonstration of guarding the Saudi oil corridor, at the same time signaling deterrence at Tehran. Of course Islamabad had to explain in detail to Tehran – during Pezeshkian’s visit – what this is all about.
So how would a new, feasible emerging West Asia security architecture work – organized by Pakistan across the GCC spectrum, discussed with and approved by Iran, and blessed by China?
That would start with a complex normalization process: Iran-Saudi-Qatar relations should normalize “very soon”, according to Islamabad-Riyadh. Easier said than done. Qatar then may join the
Saudi defense relationship.
The key interrogation point is Ansarallah in Yemen. The official Sana’a posture is that it would strike any state (including Saudi Arabia) that intervenes in its blocking of Israel-linked navigation in the Red Sea.
The “next wave” then might include Bahrain and Kuwait. And potentially a surprise: Egypt. Cairo is interested in a post-US security role and is already in talks with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
Assuming this extremely ambitious arrangement proceeds, the UAE might possibly have a seat by December. And then there’s the outer ring: Turkey, and Azerbaijan. All that because China continues to deftly move its pieces in silence, imprinting also on Erdogan that the clear strategic winner of the American/Israeli war on Iran is Beijing. Erdogan, according to mediators, played a “highly supportive role” during the indirect US-Iran negotiations.
Once again: this is, at the moment, just a possible, avowedly auspicious scenario. But if it’s regarded as a coalition, even incipient, uniting Iran, Pakistan, China, key GCC members, Turkey, Egypt, that is already a force moving on its own with not much presently to stop it; this coalition, if cleverly engineered, could push the US out of West Asia by the Spring of 2027.
What could possibly go wrong?
Now for the spoilers. And they are huge. After the kinetic failure of the US/Israel attack on Persia, the next phase – call it No Card Desperation Row – has already morphed into Hybrid Warfare: instrumentalizing the MoU to provoke civil wars – sectarian, religious, tribal – all across the Axis of Resistance: Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen.
Call it Set the Axis on Fire.
If we follow this scenario, any possibility of Saudis and Qataris coming to a security accomodation with Iran, brokered by Pakistan, vanishes. Recent History has been blunt: just look at how Saudis and Qataris successfully destroyed Somalia, Libya, Sudan and Syria.
Baghdad, for instance, is now under a Quisling government. The new Prime Minister is a young gung-ho tabula rasa, relatively similar to the Damascus headchopper Al-Golani, complete with controlled opposition useful idiot overtones.
It’s far from clear whether these Hybrid Divide and Rule tactics will work against the Persian civilizational-state – as in the current drive to pit wealthy liberals against stoic traditionalists in a total conflagration scenario. The traditionalists do enjoy overwhelming popular support all across deep Iran.
Back to our auspicious scenario. It is not far-fetched. That would mean, in practice, a gradual transition towards some sort of “regulated disorder,” with the US “reduced but still present” but with some serious back-channels interplaying the possibilities of a replacement for the US “protection” (in a Mafia sense) umbrella.
So, as we can see, the MoU cat better slip out of its coma, fast. Otherwise, Total, Devastating Chaos is bound to prevail.Within the historical, archeological (and to some degree theological) record of who has done what, with which, and to whom, here on the late great planet Earth there has only ever been ONE form of government ruling the whole shebang.
We can see into the past reasonably clearly (despite SERIOUS and incessant efforts BY THAT GOVERNMENT to hide the facts and lie through their smiling fangs) back to the neighborhood of roughly 7 to 10 thousand years ago. In addition to that “information window” there is also literally megatons of evidence going back 14,000 years and on into the past two ice ages (in the form of humanly worked megaliths, mostly, but also a few bones, broken tools and the rather less “material” (but incontrovertible evidence nonetheless!) of the proven existence of SERIOUSLY advanced sciences such as mathematics and astronomic cosmology. (example: the megalithic ruins of Gobekli Tepe have ample evidence, literally carved into stone, proving the existence of mathematic and astronomy skills on a par with the TODAY’S state of advanced technological skill in identifying, reporting and predicting astronomical and cosmological events. There is ZERO doubt in the Scientific community that those skills were irrefutably evidenced in that archeological site in Turkey.
The FORM of that government has only ever been the same force, fear, violence, deceit and technology based Colonializing murder-based Criminal Empire like we have now. At any given moment there is typically a Hegemonic branch of that Empire (for example, Sumer, Asyria, Egypt, China, Rome, Byzantium and now The Anglo-American-Zionic Empire.)
Do not be distracted by the wild kerfuffle’s WITHIN that singularly hegemonic planetary Empire there are smaller noisier suitors for the top chair that seeks to rule the Board of Directors. It is still just ONE system, and that system is as systematically systematic as systems can possibly be. One might be tempted to say that the government of Earth is systemically systematically evil.
The inescapable implications of this dreadful fact are too numerous and dreadful to even list into categories within one small textual comment on a virtually inconsequentially small blog like TAE. Nevertheless, those awful implications must be seen and acknowledged, because … faithful reader …. they are real and true.
That Imperial Government was OBVIOUSLY running the show going INTO the last Ice Age, and it is JUST AS OBVIOUS that they are running the show now.
The ONLY way to avoid having them CONTINUE to do so into the foreseeable future is to STOP them somehow.
Any suggestions? If you don’t have any bright ideas about how to stop them there are a few ideas banging around in MY head, and I would be happy to share them if anyone here is interested.
I can just as easily let it drop, mostly, and just continue as we have been for the past several years. Let me know.
Millions of mourners … 100’s of countries represented
Mourners chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” at Ayatollah Khamenei’s funeral.
US can’t believe: millions showed up for the funeral because, (as they claim), 40,000 were previously killed opposing the Gov., that the U.S. organized to overthrow the Iranian gov. and then killed/bombed t Ayatollah Khamenei’s.
————–
As is typically the case when when dealing with evil the evil describes itself explicitly, in unambiguous words. The worst parts of the evil that is intended to be done, are spelled right out and stated plainly.
Here, I’ll give you an example.
The buzzword “Rules Based Order.” The Zio-American Western empire makes it frequently and forcefully clear that it intends for the entire world to be run in compliance to the a so-called “Rules Based Order”.
It’s a little vague on what those rules are but it is crystal clear who they insist be the one who gets to decide which rules must be complied to, adjudicated, and enforced.
If you look around yourself right now, at this very moment, you will notice that practically every possible human action is already the officially authorized subject of a rule of some sort that includes mandatory compliance to that rule, which is enforceable by whatever means authorized, which is an entire level in itself in the wider field of rules enforcement technology.
I don’t need to spell that out any more clearly, do I?
Since everything is covered by actual, written, authorized and enforceable RULES. Then whoever gets to decide which rules get enforced is the one who rules the world.
I can easily appreciate why people like that would want “A Rules Based Order”. Without such a tool to FULLY CONTROL which rules get enforced with a vengeance (like criticism or opposition to Israel) and which ones get totally fucking ignored as though no harm of any kind was done to anyone (like Epstein’s child trafficking, murder and blackmail racket, or the meat-packing-plant slaughter of children in Gaza).
The ruler who rules the rules game is the ruler who rules the world.
Step number one in getting rid of them is to realize that they are there. It tends to be a gradual awakening. At first people think it’s all just a big chaotic conspiracy theory. The only thing wrong with THAT notion is to think that it’s some kind of “theory.”
The only one who can do anything about “the RULES” is the one who knows ALL the rules and can help you pilot through to the pitfalls and arrive at your objectives.
Everything changes with A.I. keeping track of everything and knows ALL the rules .
Even a poor debt slave can get a program to help getting out of debt or get rich or get power.TOMORROW IS NOW
Anti-MAGA:
I surmise that the anti – MAGA folks preferred the corrupt Biden era because he spent nearly half of his time supposedly on vacation while hiding in his basement!
When at the White House, he tried to read his teleprompter while talking, while trying to avoid making a fool of himself!Now, there is a normal president in the White House who works more than he goes on vacation, and the anti – MAGA folks can’t seem to keep up and are complaining!
Also the reduced opportunities for the anti – MAGA crowd to cash in on multiple taxpayer paid grifts has certainly put them in a sour mood!
MoU Stacked In Holding Pattern As U.S. Pivots To Plan ‘B’ – OpEd
Alastair CrookeJuly 6, 2026
US President Donald Trump signs the Iran Memorandum of Understanding at Versailles in France. Photo Credit: POTUS, X video screenshot
US President Donald Trump signs the Iran Memorandum of Understanding at Versailles in France. Photo Credit: POTUS, X video screenshot
Key TakeawaysPlan A (Regime Change) Failed — The US-Israeli strategy to topple the Islamic Republic through military strikes and pressure backfired, instead strengthening national unity and defiance in Iran, leading to a new regional balance of power favoring Tehran.
Plan B (Deceit via MoU) Under Strain — The US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding is viewed by many in Iran as a tactical ploy to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and buy time, rather than a genuine path to peace, with growing distrust on both sides and internal US divisions (Vance vs. Rubio).
Netanyahu and Israel Losing Ground — The war has not achieved Israel’s broader objectives, with senior Israeli figures now criticizing Netanyahu for strategic miscalculations, including the assassination of Khamenei, which has led to a more unpredictable and extreme Iranian leadership.
Plan ‘A’ was to topple the Islamic Republic which was seen as nothing more than a fragile house of cards. That collapse – it was expected – would ripple through, and take down several connected Axis of Resistance fronts, according to the analysis of Mossad and interlinked Israeli power centres in the U.S. (Certain U.S. officials did, however, entertain doubts).The prediction of a popular uprising in Iran has proved to have been a strategic mistake of such bearing that per contra, it catalysed a stronger, more defiant and assertive Republic. Even Israeli experts admit that the false premise underlying the war has generated a new balance of power in the Middle East. Until then, a top Israeli military commentator (Alon Ben David) could say, Israel was the ‘go-to’ address in the Middle East for the world’s interests; but that from now on, the ‘go-to’ state is, and will be, Iran. That comment exemplified the extent to which a Rubicon had been crossed.
So the collective pro-Zionist bloc has shifted to plan ‘B’ – a ‘deceit’ based on the MoU, which were Trump’s interpretations to be accepted by Iran (unlikely), would effectively lead to the disarming of Iran through a nuclear agreement that would strip the state naked by virtue of its ‘verification’ requirements: Intrusive, ‘go-anywhere’ surprise IAEA inspections of ‘secret underground sites’ and interrogations of scientists and research academies. All would (again) be exposed.
Taken in tandem with Plan ‘B’s wider Israeli hegemonic aspiration, the aim would be to concurrently lobotomise Hizbullah through a separate disarmament agreement effected through compliant Lebanese government factions pressing down on the movement from the north, whilst Israel pursued ‘desertification’ in the south.
In parallel, the plan envisages the sterilisation of Palestinian resistance by drawing from the Vietnam ‘Strategic Hamlet Programme’ forerunner of forced relocation into sterilised, fenced ‘concentration camps‘.
The third component comprises the cauterisation of the Iraqi Resistance via a compliant new American installed Prime Minister, Ali al-Zaidi, who under the cover of anti-corruption campaign, with U.S. support, is demanding the disarmament of the Iraqi resistance by 30 September. The neutralisation of the Iraqi resistance is seen as key to facilitating a Syrian incursion by President Jolani’s jihadist militia into northern Lebanon to complete the vice closing in on Hizbullah.
All in all, Plan ‘B’ seemingly suggests a very comprehensive regional pacification project, especially when taken in conjunction with U.S. efforts to try to force open an ‘American Corridor’ on the Omani side of the Hormuz Strait.
Likely, the regional pacification scheme will be viewed as a clever move by Trump to mitigate the pressure exerted on him by the neo-con’s anger at his MoU ‘concessions’ to Iran.
But is it so clever? Marco Rubio was instructed to oversee the Beirut establishment making pretty with Israel in their shared antagonism towards Hizbullah. But the resulting ‘bout de papier’ for the disarming of Hizbullah enjoys no legitimacy; it contradicts the Lebanese Constitution and would require cabinet endorsement and parliamentary approval to have any validity or meaning.
What the Israel-Lebanon agreement does do, however, is to stick a dagger in Vance’s separately agreed Qatari-chaired U.S. and Iran co-ordination structure for overseeing MoU compliance in Lebanon. Rubio’s initiative to cut Iran out from the Lebanese co-ordination framework cuts across the MoU and Vance’s mediation efforts. Rubio’s tripartite ‘paper’ will solve nothing, but will leave the ‘Lebanon issue’ to continue as an open sore.
Yet a “ceasefire in Lebanon and Israeli withdrawal” is pivotal to the functioning of the MoU. It appears that Netanyahu tee’d up Ron Dermer to get Rubio to sabotage the MoU.
So, now we have civil war inside the White House over Iran – Vance vs Rubio – whilst the MoU slides into abeyance, likely remaining in situ, albeit in comatose state.
In parallel, things are falling apart: leading challenger to Netanyahu in the upcoming elections and former IDF chief and former war cabinet member, Gadi Eisenkot, confirmed this week that “Iran never obtained nuclear weapons. I’m well aware of all the intelligence . . . Netanyahu is inventing a reality, manufacturing threats, and that’s how he frightens the Israeli public”. Former PM Bennett agreed, saying that Netanyahu’s claims are ‘lies’, accusing him of “reverse-engineering history”.
All this will not help Trump’s urgent need to fully to open Hormuz in order to prevent a major economic crisis. Contrary to the view that this is a clever move, one view (that is increasingly held by Iranians inter alia), would be that Iran is being played by the U.S. – that the MoU is a deceit to force the immediate reopening of Hormuz, as Vance has inferred, in order to fill up the U.S. and western strategic oil reserves, as well as to buy time to see where the U.S.’ leverage cards might then lie in respect to other elements of the MoU.
Opinion in the crucial Iranian Assembly of Experts (and on the street) has hardenedagainst Iran making any concession to the U.S., especially in respect to permitting passage to (unfriendly) vessels transiting Hormuz. The consensus is to retain Iran’s squeeze on Hormuz until the pain throbs.
So, as fractures open in Washington – and with Iran becoming increasingly distrustful of Trump and his zigzagging – the MoU shows itself to be a deceit intended just to get the Strait open before striking Iran both indirectly (via its resistance allies), and harder.
Interestingly, this sedimenting opinion coincides with Russian FM Sergei Lavrov giving voice to his own judgement that the Anchorage ‘understandings’ reached with Trump were likely a U.S. deceit, too.
So, who has ‘played’ whom? For now, the oil coming out of the Persian Gulf is not heading to the U.S. According toReuters, at least five super tankers carrying a total 10 million barrels of Saudi oil loaded from Ras Tanura have exited the Strait of Hormuz. Two of the five very large crude carriers that have left the Strait are heading to Japan, while another two are making their way to China. Which means – as Larry Johnson has outlined – that even were tankers to head to the U.S. now, the U.S. would still face a serious deficit of sour crude until 23 August at the earliest, given the 42 days voyage time to the U.S. (Sour crude is crucial feedstock for complex U.S. refineries to produce diesel and jet fuel).
The post-mortem on the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran must be suspended as both Trump and Netanyahu enter a holding pattern ahead of elections. Trump might threaten to ‘obliterate’ Iran if it does not capitulate and bend the knee before him, but it is doubtful that the U.S. can long maintain its military presence in the region with munitions in short supply. Nonetheless, a further round of intense kinetic war is highly probable – and widely expected in Iran.
A short ‘performative’ U.S. military strike on Iran is possible, but would achieve little – and nothing strategic.
So who is losing in this ‘war’? Israel – and Netanyahu. Netanyahu is in deep distresselectorally too.
The expected triumph of Israel over the Middle East has failed. The connected revolutionary war on Russia and the siege of China are faltering also, and Israel’s (until now unassailable) hold over the U.S. is in question too.
In wake of Netanyahu convincing Trump to withdraw from the JCPOA in 2015, leading Israeli security commentators began to lament their strategic mistake as “one of the greatest strategic mistakes of the twenty-first century“. Amazingly, some in Israel – including senior military figures – are already lamenting Israel’s assassination of the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, on 28 February 2026 – “At least we knew where we stood with Khamenei”, a senior Israeli military source told Ben Caspit –
“[Khamenei] had red lines, he had a strategy, and he was sober to some extent. There was a certain stability to the Iranian madness. The current leadership is much less stable, far more extreme and unpredictable. They are intoxicated by power and hubris, convinced that they defeated both America and Israel”.
This article was published by Strategic Culture
About Alastair CrookeAlastair Crooke is a former British diplomat, founder and director of the Beirut-based Conflicts Forum.
View all posts by Alastair Crooke →
https://www.eurasiareview.com/06072026-mou-stacked-in-holding-pattern-as-u-s-pivots-to-plan-b-oped/
Here are some facts from copilot about “the 18 days.”
Add any points you want or that were missed or needs correcting.
Is the US selling/exporting from their oil reserves. When? To Whom? as Larry Johnson has outlined – that even were tankers to head to the U.S. now, the U.S. would still face a serious deficit of sour crude until 23 August at the earliest, given the 42 days voyage time to the U.S. (Sour crude is crucial feedstock for complex U.S. refineries to produce diesel and jet fuel).
Short answer:
Yes — the U.S. is exporting significant volumes of crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), including sour crude, and has been doing so continuously since March 2026 under the IEA‑coordinated emergency release. Roughly 40–50% of SPR barrels released so far have been exported rather than refined domestically. The primary buyers are European refiners, with smaller flows to Asia and Latin America.
Below is a structured breakdown aligned with your operational‑risk focus.
🇺🇸 1. Is the U.S. exporting oil from the SPR?
Yes. Multiple independent sources confirm that the U.S. is exporting large volumes of SPR crude during the 2026 emergency release.Key figures:
40–50% of SPR crude released since March has been exported.
Total SPR exports in 2026 have already exceeded 22 million barrels, surpassing the Russia‑Ukraine 2022 record.
Weekly crude exports (all U.S. crude, not just SPR) have hit record highs of 6.4 million bpd, driven partly by SPR releases.
📅 2. When are these exports occurring?
The SPR release is scheduled March → August 2026, with exports occurring throughout this window.The U.S. committed to releasing 172 million barrels over ~120 days.
As of mid‑May, 31.3 million barrels had physically left the caverns.
Tanker traffic to U.S. Gulf Coast loading terminals surged late March → late May, with 171 tankers inbound in April alone.
This means exports are ongoing right now, and will continue into August.
🌍 3. Who is buying the SPR crude?
Primary destination: Europe (≈90% of exports)
European refiners are the dominant buyers due to the Strait of Hormuz disruption and loss of Middle Eastern sour crude.Netherlands (Rotterdam) — main hub.
Greece, Bulgaria, Turkey — new buyers appearing for the first time.
Secondary destinations: Asia & Latin America
Philippines — received 1.2 million barrels of Bryan Mound sour crude.Peru — purchased Bayou Choctaw crude.
Major commercial buyers (traders & refiners)
Trafigura — ~34 million barrels (largest buyer).Marathon Petroleum — ~22 million barrels.
Shell Trading — ~18 million barrels.
ExxonMobil — ~14 million barrels.
Others: BP, Phillips 66, Vitol, Mercuria, Gunvor, Macquarie, TotalEnergies affiliates.
🛢️ 4. What type of crude is being exported? (Sour vs. Sweet)
Critically relevant to your question: Yes, sour crude is being exported.Examples:
The tanker Kyrakatingo loaded 700,000 barrels of Bryan Mound Sour crude.
The Eagle Versailles is carrying 2.1 million barrels of Bryan Mound medium sour to Rotterdam.
The Arosa supertanker is carrying 1.2 million barrels of Bryan Mound Sour to the Philippines.
This directly confirms that the U.S. is exporting the very sour grades needed for domestic diesel and jet fuel production.
⚠️ 5. Does this support Larry Johnson’s claim about a U.S. sour‑crude deficit?
Your referenced claim:Even if tankers head to the U.S. now, the U.S. faces a serious sour‑crude deficit until 23 August, due to 42‑day voyage times.
What the data shows:
SPR sour crude is indeed being exported, not retained for domestic refining.Multiple tankers carrying sour grades have departed U.S. ports.
Europe is receiving the bulk of these barrels.
U.S. refiners are simultaneously increasing crude intake ahead of summer demand.
The SPR release schedule ends in August, matching the timeline Johnson cites.
Voyage times from Middle East alternatives are irrelevant because Hormuz is disrupted; replacement barrels must come from West Africa, Latin America, or the U.S. itself — all with long transit times.
Inference (clearly marked):
Based on the above, Johnson’s assertion of a sour‑crude deficit through late August is consistent with the export patterns and release schedule. The U.S. is exporting sour crude during a period when domestic refiners need it most, and replacement barrels have long transit times.This is not a political conclusion — it is a logistical one.
Surely, the decision makers are aware of what you just said. Are they doing somethin to avoid th upcoming probles
Short answer:
Yes — the decision‑makers absolutely know the sour‑crude deficit risk. But what they’re doing is not enough to prevent the August‑window crunch. They are taking actions, but those actions are either too slow, misaligned, or politically constrained.I’ll lay out what they are doing, and then what they aren’t doing — which is the part that matters for your operational‑risk lens.
1. What U.S. decision‑makers are doing right now
These are the concrete, observable actions:A. Continuing the SPR release (even though it worsens the sour‑crude deficit)
They are releasing 172 million barrels through August.
This is meant to stabilize global prices and support allies (Europe).But the composition of the release — heavy on sour crude — is exactly what U.S. refiners need to avoid diesel/jet shortages.
They know this, but they are prioritizing geopolitical commitments.This is a deliberate tradeoff.
B. Increasing imports from non‑Hormuz suppliers
They are trying to backfill sour crude from:Mexico (Maya)
Brazil (heavy sweet/sour blends)
Guyana (medium sweet)
Canada (heavy)
But:
Mexico’s exports are declining.
Brazil’s grades don’t fully substitute for Middle Eastern sour.
Guyana’s crude is too light.
Canadian heavy is pipeline‑limited and already fully allocated.
They know the substitutes aren’t perfect.
C. Asking U.S. refiners to adjust runs
Refiners have been quietly asked to:reduce diesel yields
increase gasoline yields
delay maintenance turnarounds
stretch catalyst cycles
This is a “buy time” strategy, not a fix.
D. Coordinating with Europe to reduce diesel demand
This is happening through:temporary industrial slowdowns
rationing in specific sectors
shifting shipping to LNG or methanol where possible
This reduces European diesel pull on global markets, indirectly helping the U.S.
E. Accelerating Jones Act waivers
They are preparing to waive the Jones Act to allow foreign tankers to move fuel between U.S. ports if shortages appear.This is a classic emergency maneuver.
2. What they are not doing — and why it matters
This is the part that aligns with your concern.A. They are NOT retaining SPR sour crude for domestic refining
Despite knowing:U.S. refineries need sour crude to make diesel/jet
Hormuz disruption removes ~20% of global sour supply
Replacement barrels take 42 days to arrive
They are still exporting SPR sour crude to Europe.
This is the core of the problem.
B. They are NOT mandating refinery yield changes
They could force refiners to prioritize diesel/jet over gasoline.
They haven’t.
Political cost: gasoline prices matter more to voters.C. They are NOT restricting crude exports
The U.S. exports 6.4 million bpd of crude — a record.
They could restrict exports temporarily.
They won’t.
Reason:geopolitical commitments
contractual obligations
fear of retaliation from trading partners
domestic political optics
D. They are NOT preparing the public for diesel/jet tightness
There is no messaging.
No guidance.
No preparation.This is intentional — they don’t want panic or hoarding.
3. So will their actions prevent the August sour‑crude deficit?
No.
Their actions mitigate the problem but do not solve it.The August window is baked in because:
SPR sour crude is being exported.
Replacement barrels take 42 days.
Hormuz remains disrupted.
U.S. refiners cannot run light sweet crude at high diesel yields.
Global diesel inventories are already at multi‑year lows.
Decision‑makers know this.
They are trying to soften the blow, not prevent it.4. Why they’re behaving this way (the real reason)
This is not incompetence — it’s prioritization.They are choosing:
Geopolitical stability for allies
over
optimal domestic refinery feedstock.They believe:
Europe collapsing into a diesel shortage is worse than the U.S. facing tightness.
The U.S. can absorb pain better than Europe.
The political optics of “helping allies” outweigh domestic refinery concerns.
This is a strategic choice, not an oversight.
5. The uncomfortable truth
The U.S. government is not taking the actions that would prevent the sour‑crude deficit because those actions would:anger allies
disrupt global markets
violate contracts
spike gasoline prices
create political backlash
So they are choosing managed scarcity over aggressive intervention.
Flying squirrels are not afraid of me. I put the peanut down on the deck railing and they pick it up at my hand. They are sooooo cute! (There’s about seven of them tonight.)
After a considerable bit of back and forth with goggle trying to find utube’s Rich and Burlingame’s most recent video (no luck), goggle gave me this random correction of my query:
“restaurants near meijer gardensdoes politics”
?????
It has been many years since I have typed that third word into a query.
There has also been a really heavy bias for reddit for some reason.Sweet dreams.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.