Debt Rattle October 12 2022
- This topic has 65 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
People don’t like Gabbard for these reasons. Some of them are valid criticisms. Her voting record is Progressive on domestic economic issues.
People are arguing that she has changed, she is a different person now. How many times have we heard that only to realise it is the usual re-writing history and that actually nothing has changed. She is political trouble and this clever stunt may just get her into higher office given she will be backed by the Israeli, WEF and other owners.
In the case of Gabbard it was her invitation to the 2015 WEF Young Leaders conference and her positions on key domestic policy issues. People don’t like Gabbard for these reasons.
People don’t like Gabbard because of her positions on key domestic policy issues? Never, that would mean that people were thinking about who to vote for and doing their own analysis, that will never happen as TPTB would distract them with a war, maybe in Ukraine. If it is true then people have legitimate reasons for rejecting her.
“..military men are essentially pacifists. That does not mean that they are cowards, it means that, as professionals, they want to achieve their aims avoiding losses as far as possible.”
This statement is specious at best…
It has no standing in the reality of our present day world…Exactly. At best – in a defensive role – the military are there to anull the violent forces of the invader, to prevent and/or limit the invader from using their men and weapons in the service of their owners. The Russian military is in Ukraine to anull the violent forces of NATO and to prevent NATO from doing what they want with the country. Their job is to anull and that means destroy the enemy’s equipment and destroy or capture the enemy’s forces, their means of implementing force.
Even if the purpose of this release of information about oil capacity is to manipulate for higher prices, the truth is the truth, and the truth often hurts.
Be good, y’all.
Judge for yourself.
Doom porn from another talking head that EG0icly extrapolates they absolutely know what’s bouncing around in Putin’s mind & how Russia’s “leaders” are prepared to respond 😐
Albeit, compared to the West’s autocrat puppets that are exploiting the Ukraine fiasco on behalf of “The Swamp”, Tulsi appears sane & caring in a matriarchal manner of performance…
Does she understand the historical mechanisms (U$ government & law precedents) that have manifested into the multi-generational nightmare unleashing upon humanity at large?
I seriously doubt it, nor is Tulsi prepared to do what is required to rectify the conditions that created “The Swamp” 70+ years ago…
More power to her in that Quixotic quest to create cause célèbre regarding the hopelessly corrupt district of criminals, but there’s a distinct whiff of self-promotion enveloping her, what with her manicured, polished extemporizations ~ And what’s up with the sudden appearance of white streaks in her hair displayed on the launch of “The Tulsi Gabbard” show?
Been there done that, sorry for the cynicism, but a couple decades of reporting from Gotham (where everyone has a shtick) makes it hard to ignore certain “tells”…
At best her benign presence could be useful with white hats trying to restore levelheaded logic to the nation, if there is even such an entity/group 😐
@boscohorowitz: Saudi Aramco said that in general the world has little excess-capacity to pump more crude, which is nothing new. They are not giving out personal information.
Look around … everywhere … Demand-Destruction
“We” peaked-out new “oil” and economy in the second half of 2018 by my estimation.
It’s “those times” now…
🙂
“When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.”Expect discontinuities.
@VP Gary: Thanks for looking at the Tulsi:Joe-Rogan clip.
The white streak has been there a long time. It’s natural. I saw it up-close in March 2020
My personal take is that she can’t say that the real threat of nuclear war originates with US/NATO, so she had to strain credulity by claiming Putin is cornered and panicked. That is a classic risk-scenario, by the way, but it’s not quite apt. She did her best, within the Overton-window for POTUS candidates, to point out the disservice being done to Americans, but it is really worse than that.
Can’t tell how much she really knows, can we?
She sure is consistently on an even and principled keel.
She quite the DNC in protest of 2016 primary mistreatment of Sanders/voters.About the Polaris 2021 NATO exercises: http://thesaker.is/nato-planned-a-pre-emptive-strike-on-russia/
Journalists came into possession of data related to the exercise POLARIS 2021. The data speak clearly about the advance preparation of the NATO to enter into an armed conflict with the Russian Federation in the event of Russia’s intervention in Ukraine.
According to the legend of the maneuvers, it was determined that in response to the alleged Russian intervention, the forces of the NATO coalition would form and send an aircraft carrier strike group led by the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier to the combat area in order to “stop the invasion and preserve the sovereignty of Ukraine.”
The context and scenario of the “exercise“ (the consonance of the names of countries, settlements, the names of political figures, the specifics of maneuvers, etc.) became for the Russian Federation a signal of the real preparation of NATO to the start of hostilities against Russia, as it happened similarly to the operation of the United Defender alliance grouping of forces before the intervention in Libya (the exercises Baltops-2010 and Frisian Flag-2010), when, after the maneuvers at the sea ranges, a full-scale operation followed to overthrow of the legitimate government of Muammar Gaddafi.
POLARIS 2021 was also a demonstration of NATO support to Kyiv in the event of an armed conflict with Russia and was supposed to push Kyiv to start hostilities with the Russian Federation, after which the intervention of the NATO was supposed. In principle, NATO was looking for an excuse to attack Russia, with the factor of surprise, so that Russia would not be ready for an adequate response.
Retired Army Gen. Don Bolduc, who won the Republican primary and is campaigning against Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), confirmed in a statement Wednesday that Gabbard will be stumping for him.
“We don’t agree on every issue, but I am honored to have the support of Tulsi Gabbard who shares my view that the status quo is broken, and we need a change of direction,” Bolduc said in a statement.
“Tulsi is a fellow change agent and independent-minded outsider willing to speak truth to power.”
Bolduc, notably, was endorsed by former President Donald Trump earlier this year.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tulsi-gabbard-stump-gop-candidate-day-after-leaving-democratic-partyI’ll stick my head up out the trench forTulsi, where it goes is anyone’s guess. Apparently it is wise to avoid French petrol stations during prime time.
The white streak has been there a long time. It’s natural. I saw it up-close in March 2020
John, if you look at the video that RIM linked in the rattle, the white streak has moved from where it was in your picture to the front of Tulsi’s hairline…
In fact if you look back at pictures of Tulsi over the last three years, “the streak” has moved all over the place ~ It’s beyond obvious that it’s an intentional display/ploy, that I interpret as a device to invoke wisdom beyond her (41) years, as other’s have noticed as well:
The @TulsiGabbard glorious gray hair streak says, “I may be under 40, but I’m ready to rule” pic.twitter.com/xmlgUXG3rC
— Booth Moore (@Booth) June 27, 2019
https://www.thecut.com/2019/07/hawaii-congresswoman-tulsi-gabbards-streak-of-gray-hair.html
Personally, I find it best not to trust “leaders” that are media prepped & extensively coiffured by makeup artists 😐
Trying to appeal to Collective EG0ic Madness through displays of vanity is a double-edged sword…
It’s a sad state of affairs when narcissistic buffoons like President Cheeto are the best chance the U$ofA has to stop political psychopaths.
Tulsi spent about 5-6 minutes with Tucker Carlson. It is clear and explicit.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/biden-actively-pushing-us-brink-nuclear-holocaust-tulsi-gabbard-goes-fox-interview@VP Gary:
“Does she or doesn’t she. Only her hairdresser knows for sure.”
(Part of your Television Heritage)
I think I hadn’t yet hit send when Dark Matter posted the same observation I had of the slip Small made. I’m glad I’m not the only one who notices things. Like aspnaz noticing the duper’s delight sense of Small’s behavior in the clip. I do feel chided a bit when framing myself in the context of the criticisms Veracious Poet made, insofar as it’s a bit silly for me to think I have insight into anyone’s head on the basis of a slip of the tongue or a giggle or a swivel of the head. But Veracious used the word ‘know’, whereas I’ll skip off the hook by recognizing about myself that I’m gullible enough to believe anything I say, and know that.
Speaking also of noticing things, if the news article says the underwater drone was found along Nord Stream 1, why does the photo of the submerged thing (a NATO Seafox, they say?) say Nord Stream Line 2?
My guess is that Nord Stream 1 is (at least?) two pipes together, which Wikipedia kinda confirms but uses the language that it’s Line A and B, not 1 & 2. But there it is in the picture.
Sometimes I wonder if part of the hyperunreality of our Matrix existence is a test to see not only who are paying attention to the paradoxes, inconsistencies, and contradictions but also will poke their heads up like the blind moles we are so that Trickster can whack us faster.
WW3: The producers and consumers of real goods against the financiers who place bets on what the producers do and make, and then bet on the bets and then bet on the bets on the bets.
And here we are with everything highly valued in something that’s worth nothing. While valuable things get strangled…
What could go wrong?
It’s allegiances and pledging them that worry me the most. What have I said online? Whose side am I on? Which side is which? Mums the word, I think.WW3: The producers and consumers of real goods against the financiers who place bets on what the producers do and make, and then bet on the bets and then bet on the bets on the bets.
And here we are with everything highly valued in something that’s worth nothing. While valuable things get strangled…
What could go wrong?
It’s allegiances and pledging them that worry me the most. What have I said online? Whose side am I on? Which side is which? Mums the word, I think.Tulsi Tattles, but not enough to get in trouble.
She said (and I quote), “I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness (etc.) ”
I have waited a full day for Tulsi’s proclamation to be “translated” from political rhetoric into plain -speak by the few remaining Americans still capable of thinking their way out of a wet paper bag.
So far, the silence is so profound that flea fart might waken the dead.
What she said . . . . in a politically dramatic but otherwise useless manner . . . . is that the currently ruling Hegemonic Imperial United States of America is in charge of NOTHING. It’s just another tool of a “ an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness….” .
Well tools, are themselves in charge of approximately fuck-all, so please notice that her noble proclamation tells us NOTHING actionable or new about any specific person or entity who would need to be shot, hung or revolutioned OUT of being in charge . In fact, she didn’t say actually ANYTHING that we haven’t known since Dwight Eisenhower’s Farewell Address in 1961.
Sure would have been nice if she had sorta penciled in a few of the missing pieces of the Organizational Chart , but that would make her a tattle tale . . . and deader than Kennedy . . . so don’t hold your breath waiting for any “big reveal” in that department. I don’t blame her for being scared, I’m just saying that she IS scared . . . . too scared to be effective.
Long story short: bad guys are in charge and will remain in charge until somebody MAKES them NOT in charge. Jawboning about making that happen with yet ANOTHER bogus “election” bores me beyond tears.
Like George Carlin said, “If voting made a difference they wouldn’t let you do it”, so PUH-LEEZ give my eyeballs a break from the wasted exercise. The bad guys have the officially legal institutional power of the misnomered democratic republic of the United States, sewed up tighter than a banker’s anus. To change that is going to require a change of gambit, not more rigged “elections”.
I like Tulsi a bunch, but in terms of meaningfully changing anything she’s just decoration on somebody else’s game board.
In the old days, before peak oil peaked, Saudi Arabia could be counted on to jack up a blitz-load of production and balance things out in the global supply market. Now they have openly and very publicly announced that they can’t do that any more.
***
Is somebody ghostwriting for VP?
His prose was actually colorfully informative with a relative minimum of self-braggadocio concealed as sadder-but-oh-so-wiser-than-thou humility. I even think I learned something. Strange things happen as the world falls apart. Hail Atlantis!
***
The Oaficial Narrative is eroding fast. Some say we should watch for an October Surprise. Quite likely. Also quite likely, and in my opinion even moreso, is a black swan no one expected. I just say that cuz I like extreme corners and a sense of drama, I suppose. But that kind of intuitive nonsense has served me at least as well as rational logic, so I’ll stick my neck out and say that about now seems a good time for the Rube Goldberg political golem AI running Joe Biden’s wetware to blow a gasket.
***
I know what’s in Putin’s mind: a really fine brain with what appears to me to be an extremely well-balanced and highly ethical psychopathic mindset: calm, cool, courageous and educated enough by a hard life in harsh crazy time to understand both loyalty and patience.
My parents said know:
I too have experience something weird trying to get into TAE. Not sure if I have kiooed it or not.
I have no skin in the Tulsi hope (or other hopefuls like Desantis) but I’ll noten that if she were to do any tattling, she’d do it after running as an independent and creating major buzz.
That’s how El DOnaldo did what he did. He slimed Hillary as lying warmonger and ghot elected.
Not that I think Tulsi will get elected. Just saying that if she were to lob some truth bombs she would wait for maximum strategic opportunity just like Putin waited until he could get people’s attention in the best way. After all, he could’ve wiped Kiev off the map, using conventional weapons, on 02-22- 2022, everyone’s favorite spooky dog whistle almost a palindrome.
It shall be what it shall be.
And now, a few words from my favorite shaman:
DBS said
notice that her noble proclamation tells us NOTHING actionable or new about any specific person or entity who would need to be shot, hung or revolutioned OUT of being in charge
Totally agree with this, you watch her on Joe Rogan and she complains like a Brit, but does she tell us what needs to be done, does she finger the bad people, defund the CDC, NIH etc. Does she fuck. She pretends we ar estill in the 1960s, she gives us moron-fodder to chew on while she accepts contributions from Israel and WEF. If she feels so strongly about the issues she claims to worry about, then why didn’t she leave the Democrat party when Hillary booted the old fart out of the presidiential candidate spot? She’s a total fraud, she worked with the Democrats when they were promoting HRC, probably the most criminal candidate for POTUS.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.