riesterm
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@ Dora: I agree with you about the recent substack by A Midwestern Doctor: The Forgotten Art of Surgery.
The Tucker video that was mentioned earlier is not official; someone put together a montage of previously aired interviews and commentary when Tucker was with Fox.
Most of the segments were new to me (I don’t have a TV) but none of it is new Tucker material.
Excerpt from FS’s post above:
Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy made an impassioned plea announcing his opinion that Israel should receive US backing for Netanyahu’s war on Hamas. Kennedy tweeted,
“This ignominious, unprovoked, and barbaric attack on Israel must be met with world condemnation and unequivocal support for the Jewish state’s right to self-defense. We must provide Israel with whatever it needs to defend itself — now. As President, I’ll make sure that our policy is unambiguous so that the enemies of Israel will think long and hard before attempting aggression of any kind.
“I applaud the strong statements of support from the Biden White House for Israel in her hour of need. However, the scale of these attacks means it is likely that Israel will need to wage a sustained military campaign to protect its citizens. Statements of support are fine, but we must follow through with unwavering, resolute, and practical action. America must stand by our ally throughout this operation and beyond as it exercises its sovereign right to self-defense.”
Scott Ritter quickly responded to Kennedy’s assertion tweeting,
“I like RFKJr. I think he’s the best choice for POTUS. He’s positioned himself as the peace candidate. And this is the tweet I fear may have sunk his chances. Israel’s policies regarding Palestine are indefensible. Bobby should be promoting an equitable peace settlement. Not war.”
https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1710689115522371772
I’m trying to square this sudden interest in “lab leak” with the excellent work that Sasha Latypova has done lately about DOD involvement:
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/reviewing-the-dod-contracts-for-covid
Headline over at Clusterfuck Nation this morning:
“We want to save the planet, and the life upon it, but we’re not willing to pay the price and bear the consequences. So we make up a narrative that feels good and run with it.” — Raul Ilargi Meier
Dr. D: What’s this about Ann Arbor ?
You wrote: “So who wants and approves of that plan? And puts in a worldwide eco panopticon into place in Ann Arbor just to “Keep Control”?
Dr. Day: This part of one of your comments this morning really spoke to me:
“Do the work decades before it is time. Be the seed you plant. Otherwise, you await a time where you will be old and unprepared to actually do anything, and people will not seek your opinion unless you can show-your-work.
It’s better if they have seen it for years, and it pops up in their mind when the question finally forms.
Giving it my efforts…
Doing finishing work on wood, cutting plywood for certain of the walls. ”Thank you.
An interesting find this morning by way of Jon Rappaport but will go directly to the interviewee’s site. Where this snip it is from:
As of October 6, 2021: 114 institutions and offices in well over 20 countries have responded thus far, as well as some “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study authors, and none have provided or cited any record describing actual “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification.
Numerous institutions have also made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
When you get there, scroll down to see latest update from author
Excellent and thoughtful summation, Noirette. Thank you for taking the time to expand on the MM topic to include Chomsky and Hedges, etc.,.
Long time reader, minimal commenter. Anyway, I subscribe to Michael Moore’s newish substack just to keep tabs on what he says; I like his docs, but what he wrote in his latest substack (which I read after reading Spartacus) is baffling. Thoughts ?
https://www.michaelmoore.com/p/mike-answers-all-your-vaccine-fears
Sidney Powell did not seem to unleash the ‘Kraken’ yesterday, as she stated she would over the weekend.
What’s rumbling out there?
Anybody heard anything?
Ilargi: What you have said so eloquently are the very ideas and thoughts that have been swirling around in my head the past few days. I only wish what you wrote will be shared with the entire nation. Thank you.
Ilargi, I appreciate your candor regarding differences between you and Nicole. It rather furthers my intuitive sense that the results of the election will be a mess made further worse by pandemic woes.
Keep up the good work. I enjoy and support your efforts and find it hysterically funny when you run the Tucker clips: That’s how upside down the landscape has become, it seems.
Ilargi: Been thinking this the last week or so; Your posts are the first thing I read each day. I value your perspective. I’ve always valued Nicole’s viewpoint, too. But for a while now, it seems that Nicole’s facebook posts concerning Trump are hyper-critical and I’m trying to grok what’s going on here. I appreciate your effort to explain this. Thanks.
Noted free-lance investigative reporter, Jon Rappoport, has been on to the flu fleecing for years. Check this post out: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2019/11/11/drilling-down-into-flu-deceptions-and-mind-boggling-lies/
Correction: It’s not that we haven’t “heard about” actual deaths in the U.S.; it’s that the media will not “tell us” about those appallingly high numbers.
I’m still baffled by the numbers, Ilargi as compared to some very big numbers that we’ve seemed to have forgotten:
USA deaths chart:
Cause Deaths (1/1 to 3/28/2020)
“Corona virus” official [1] 2,220
“Corona virus” no other illness [2] 22
“Seasonal flu” & pneumonia [3] 9,152
Pharmaceutical drugs [4] 30,800
Medical error [5] 60,280
Medical (drugs + error) 91,080References
[1] https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
[2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/99-of-those-who-died-from-virus-had-other-illness-italy-says
* 99% of a large statistical sample of “deaths due corona virus” in Italy were likely due serious pre-existing diseases and/or medical conditions (ie. it is more accurate to state such deaths as being with corona virus present, not due corona virus)[3] https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html
* Daily average (averaged over the whole year) of 104 deaths, based on an annual average of 37,875 deaths (using CDC data for all of the 2010-18 flu seasons)[4] https://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/new-prescription-drugs-major-health-risk-few-offsetting-advantages
* Daily average of 350 deaths, based on an annual 128,000 prescription drug deaths[5] https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/study_suggests_medical_errors_now_third_leading_cause_of_death_in_the_us
* Daily average of 685 deaths, based on an annual 250,000 deaths due medical errorIlargi: Been following TAE well before Nicole spent New Year’s eve with our Transition steering committee in 2012, I think it was.
In any case, Jon Rappaport published something yesterday where he referenced an editorial in JAMA written by Dr. Fauci in which Fauci wrote: If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%.-
This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.2
(I hope I got the underlining to work properly)
Here’s the link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387
Anyway . . . what is going on here ?
Thanks for your valued opinion.
Thank-you, Ash for your “no truly safe “safe havens” reminder. However, moving right down the supposed “safe haven” list, the one that may be safer than the rest is productive land.
The question(s) I wrestle with are “do I spend my cash on land now — before my cash loses its value? Or, do I wait for deflation and take advantage of the “cash is king” adage?
Thanks to all who are willing to share their perspective.
desert_planet: I did not mean to imply a reversal of Nicole’s opinion. Rather, I was checking to see if she still felt local institutions, particularly credit unions, were a “safe” haven for cash.
TheTrivium4TW appears not to think so.
While the topic rightfully addresses the crisis in Europe, I wonder how far behind the U.S. can be pertaining to capital controls and the like.
Also, has Nicole changed her opinion about the relative safety of local credit unions and has she changed her recommendation of keeping at least six months of cash on hand.
Thank-you.
