Why Trump Will Win

 

Home Forums The Automatic Earth Forum Why Trump Will Win

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #63475

    René Magritte The song of the storm 1937     I was going to make this the shortest essay I’ve ever written. “Trump Will Win Because of Energ
    [See the full post at: Why Trump Will Win]

    #63480
    Mr. House
    Participant

    Take care of the country, i don’t recognize my country anymore. All i ever wanted was to find a nice girl, have some kids, and mind my business. Sigh

    #63481
    Professorlocknload
    Participant

    My take on all this is, if Jerome’s handlers want Trump gone, they will instruct the Fed Chief to crash the equity markets. If not, they will see to it the Fed hits the throttle, full turbo, until the funny bucks in the street are ass deep to a tall Swede.

    #63482
    zerosum
    Participant

    ” …. instruct the Fed Chief to crash the equity markets”

    Yep!
    Money talks louder than words.
    Get your popcorn.

    #63483
    madamski cafone
    Participant

    What is winning in this election? I’m not sure that “winning” is even an option in this election.Charlie Sheen

    #63484
    V. Arnold
    Participant

    René Magritte The song of the storm 1937

    Ah Magritte, lovely, the rain detail is amazing…

    Why Trump Will Win

    …in this election winning is losing…
    Can’t say it better than that…

    The U.S. lost its soul in Vietnam’s War of Resistence; it killed it on March 19, 2003…

    #63495
    Huskynut
    Participant

    @Ilargi – a link for tomorrow perhaps.. Matt Taibbi has a wonderful column just out deconstructing all the media incentives and changes that have led to the hyper-polarised situation we now see.

    It’s been discussed here plenty in terms of the quality (or lack thereof) in MSM analysis, but I dont think I’ve seen it analysed quite so eloquently before. Sorry I don;t seem to be able to post the link (and will avoid posting the full text here, but google: “Hate Inc: Why Today’s Media Makes Us Despise One Another”

    #63496
    V. Arnold
    Participant
    #63513
    Dr. D
    Participant

    Your picture is upside-down.

    More interesting is that Kamala “Worst-candidate-in-the-history-of-the-United-States-even-including-Hillary” Harris, is arguably NOT eligible to be President.

    Not to get too far out on this, but although she is inarguably a “Citizen,” she is not a “Natural Citizen” as defined by the Framers. That is, although she was born in the United States, neither parent was a citizen – or even attempting to be – at the time. Why did the Framers set this slightly higher barrier, and why for the Presidency alone?

    Imaging Putin getting one of his supermodel girlfriends pregnant. And imagine he flies her to New York only for the day of the birth. That child WILL (according to new and recently made-up Supreme Court decisions) BE a U.S. citizen. So you want that child to be President? You know, when Russia or Britain attacks and therefore installs this child as the leader under King George III or Vladimir the Impaler? No, of course not. Yet as a nation of immigrants, we don’t want to DIS-allow self-made citizens from Congress or even Governorships, for example Arnold Schwarzenegger. So that’s what we did.

    Now note, this has never gone to court. Arguably McCain, being born in Panama (Military base) might not be eligible, but both his parents were citizens. Almost certainly Cruz and Rubio are ineligible, which is why they wanted them installed for ultimate removal leverage, better and easier than Nixon. So we don’t know what the Court MIGHT say because they make s—t up all the time: 2A, unlimited spying Patriot, civil forfeiture, Citizens United, whatever. But from the face-reading of the Constitution, as per the Federalist papers, Harris is not eligible to be President. And neither therefore Vice-President.

    Of course everybody knows nobody follows the law anymore. It was just floated a minute ago to both impeach the President for nothing, or to make the Court 1,000 members large to flood out elections, electors, and Conservatives, so the more obvious thing to do for now is to let them promote the worst candidate in the whole United States, one that even black people hate with every fiber, thank God every minute she speaks and leads the party with her dreadful baggage, and let her lose on her own merits. You can always take up this case later if necessary.

    But anyway, the riot thing failed, and you could tell the very hour their DNC internal polls came out and a) suddenly, there were riots! They weren’t peaceful! b) it was Trump’s fault. c) Trump was the one paying the rioters and fundraising to bail murderers and pedos out of jail d) actually Biden was the law-and-order candidate. Oh and he’s for jobs at home against China too.

    So since their violent gambit failed and as Nancy said “I don’t understand why there aren’t riots coast to coast” Joke’s on you Nancy! You haven’t left the bubble-of-dinosaurs in 50 years. They are just going to play plan B. I mean C. I mean D. I mean F. I mean F-37. That’s it. Where the pandemic that doesn’t kill anyone and Fauci and Birx say is safe to vote in will lead to a Biden landslide.

    You know how they said: not only does Electoral College allow small states to matter, but perhaps accidentally more important, it keeps you from knowing WHERE among 50 states to cheat. If it was a popular, you’d just sit home in Fairfax and stuff all 3 million votes at the county office. But when you don’t KNOW where, you have to rig all 50 States, each with different rules, right down to different counties.

    Well, the new plan solves all that. Now you just allow all the voting results to come in, see where you lost, then find mail-in votes with 20,000 Chinese mail-in voter IDs in THOSE counties. Lo! The election changes! As already reported! And amazing, they are psychic, they can report this result 3 months before it happens! Amazing, just shows how awesome and honest they are.

    When that doesn’t work, which it won’t, — and Podesta already said so last month — you get the contested election you want, which goes to the court you just lost but wouldn’t have worked anyway. Both sides claim victory, and the Derp State uses their operatives in the military to remove Trump regardless of the outcome. How can I say that? I didn’t say so, I’m just some dummy on the internet. THEY already said so in public. They “Will not concede under any circumstances” “they are going to remove him on Jan 20 if he knows it or not” and recently via the “82nd Airborne”. HereLetMeGoogleThatForYou.com

    So they have fast-forwarded past all good candidates (whhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyy?) past all campaigning, past all debates, past all votes and all vote counting, past all legal arguments, ALREADY to splitting the military into factions and open military civil war. But we knew all this decades ago. They’re just openly telling you now, if you bother reading anything.

    So: directly to Civil War and Generals arresting Generals. Got it. One problem: the military and military Intel is who installed Cheeto in the first place. The overwhelming majority of dog-faces, (excepting the Air Force, of course) support staunch Constitutionalism and 80% voted Ron Paul for example. So although they can cause a Civil War and get a bunch of folks killed, I don’t see how they can win there either.

    But killing folks is both their means and the end goal, so….

    Carry on. As you were, men.

    Anyway, don’t worry about the election. It’s a pointless sideshow. Nobody cares what happens there anymore.

    #63516
    Mister Roboto
    Participant

    I think the big central banks of the world are covertly on Trump’s side. For pity’s sake, starting the very afternoon after US Election Day 2016, they flooded the world’s financial markets with an overwhelming tsunami of printed money. Just look at a graph of any of the three major US stock-market indexes, and you will see it start to go steroidally up, up, up starting in exactly mid-November 2016. Why this would be so, I’m not sure. Perhaps these bankers understandably wish to see the horny-for-a-nuclear-war-with-Russia US Deep State reigned in. I’m pretty sure few of any of us would be here to talk about this topic if Hillary Clinton had won that election.

    #63543

    The incumbent has an edge.
    Oh, and the press (CNN!) wants Trump to win, because hate is as profitable as strife and anxiety.
    The only democrats who want Biden to win are the rank and file, but they are worth less than nothing- especially to the democratic leadership.

    #63547
    regionswork
    Participant

    I prefer thr option of four good hours a day from Biden over 24 hours of Trump disruption. The news cycle is not where problems are solved. Divide and sell is the business model, but journalism is not a business. MBAs have engineered that quite dysfunctionally. All those outside the US have no idea about what the people want, so you are wrong 90% of the time.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.