The New Narrative
- This topic has 10 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 7 months, 1 week ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Théodore Géricault The Raft of the Medusa 1819 A short comment on an all too familiar sort of MSM article about US politics these days.
[See the full post at: The New Narrative]@Michael Reid: thank you for introducing the “Prussiagate” NWO point of view to me/us.
https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/prussiagate-summaryI am very impressed with Will Zoll’s rigor and detail in all of this. I wonder how he affords this and who may help him. https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/table-of-contents
There is so much, all excellent, not redundant. You had included this recently and I excerpted it in my last blog post: https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/1871-part-v
Even CelticBiker and Aspnaz might venture a careful look.
That is completely correct. Democrats 100% believe “91 Charges” vs, GOP “witch hunt.” Talk to the hand, case closed.
I am exhausted with constant partisanship, but when I ask each, “What are the details of the case?” only one side has any idea or interest.
From Barnes…a fun hypothesis is that Trump wins election, then Biden pardons himself and Trump before Trump takes over the office in January ’25. This way, Biden looks bi-partisan.
Once the Uniparty eliminates Trump and Kennedy from the ballot, Joe Biden can be acclaimed re-elected since there are no other candidates running. The current candidates will all drop out when ordered!
The chosen ones get to do nuclear proliferation: one rule for me, a different rule for you, otherwise known as the USA’s rules based world order. Will the USA be supporting this? Of course, Israel runs the USA, why would they object. And if anyone were to object, I am sure that Netanyahu could do another “visit” to intimidate and threaten, like he did with Musk … https://www.rt.com/news/583336-israel-uranium-saudi-arabia/
Anyone want to be vaccinated with nano-particles? It is not as if the vaccinators and your government would try and screw you over with this stuff … https://phys.org/news/2023-09-nanoparticle-vaccine-candidate-emerging-tick-borne.html
Meh. I disagree. I assume you’re not saying “War is Politics by other means” and therefore war IS a political solution.
All that has to happen is like Andersen, people wake up and stop supporting. Blowing up some buildings or shootin’ some folks does very little to accomplish that. Right? So I sympathize with your position, and as with just the 5 comments above, we’re talking about going radically out of the political norm. Just swearing in and pardoning? Having a one-party race? That’s possibly MORE radical than a Civil War.
If you open that, then you can, say, arrest 2/3rds of Congress for instance. That would be “Legal” since I imagine there are at least that many felons under any normal person’s understanding of “Bribery”, etc. You can impeach 500 judges under the same entirely legal and proper, moral and appropriate process. You can defund the FBI completely legally and make another. Congress has the power.
You CAN. But you have to WANT to.
Let’s go your way on it: so…who do you shoot? And when you start shootin’ some folks, then what? They all lay down and say “I see the error of my ways”? So you start a war and to win it without being counter-attacked, end up with an America run by a 5-man military tribunal? Which can’t re-empower a Congress, a Judiciary…or the Constitution?
If we’re past all military solutions, what’s your productive solution? Just like in a war, we can’t sit down and sign a peace treaty? Because we do, you know. All wars end in peace treaties. And all struggles end in a political solution. Why not skip the war, DON’T blow up your own city and burn down your own house, and jump right to the “Political Solution” by waking people up?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.