TheUAoB
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
There are also people who grasp the science but recognise there aren’t any answers. To me the biggest question is how we handle the coming collapse in complexity, and whether we can avoid burning everything in a futile attempt to hold entropy at bay.
Bishko uses the fact he is a Chemist to claim authority on Atmospheric Physics? He seems to be letting his politics affect his science while claiming to do the opposite, which is something we’ve certainly seen a lot of lately.
We’re where we are because of MPP (Maxium Power Principle) and it’s also why we’re not getting out of this by “Going Green”. It’s a biological imperative to consume all available resources, that’s why we call them resources! Do we have to? That’s a philosophical question, not a practical one.
Karen Kingston is running interference for Pfizer. She’s discrediting those who noticed the FDA bait-and-switch. She’s mixing a whole boat-load of truth and complete nonsense which when taking as whole makes those who refer to her look like they’re crazy anti-vaxers, while re-enforcing the idea the the FDA did indeed give full approval, which of course they did not!
“On of my kids was exposed to someone with Covid yesterday. Now he is home from school, quarantined. Apparently, if he were vaccinated he wouldn’t require quarantine. Totally hilarious, since the vax doesn’t stop infection nor transmission.”
Ah, but it did, or rather that was the original premise and is the ongoing theory behind vaccine induced herd immunity. It’s amazing how cognitive dissonance works.
Thanks Rual, that’s the scam I tried to point out in the last debt rattle. I’m still not clear about whether the non-Pfizer vaccines are still covered by EUA, did they also receive letters from the FDA that their products are “interchangeable”?
Yet it is “common knowledge” the vaccine confers superior immunity (even as that has morphed into ‘immunity from severe disease/death’!).
Nobody who has taken the vaccine wants to believe there’s a problem with it, so they don’t. Most who read TAE are those who don’t blindly trust authority, we are not credible to the mainstream which does.
There is so much deceit, it’s got to the point where I’m even self censoring myself in conversation where I can’t mention certain things *because* they’re so obvious. The conditioning to accept the official narrative is so strong. This FDA authorization nonsense, for example, it’s obviously a stunt to give authorization to an unavailable product to maintain the EUA for the other vaccines, or at lease for Pfizer (are the others now banned in the US?). No way will Pfizer make COMIRNATY available in the US, they would be liable for all the injuries stemming from the “mandates”. Even Chris Martenson can’t bring himself to say so.
“If true, it would be game changing (a first?!). A virus that becomes more transmissible and more lethal at the same time. For now, don’t buy it.”
This is a misunderstanding: Over the long-term, an endemic virus will become less lethal, and maximize transmissiblity. Any single mutation will may be more or less lethal, but selection against that mutation will only occur if the host is killed before transmission occurs. So it really depends whether that mutation virulence is sufficient to overcome any possible increase in reproduction and transmission. It must also compete with other strains, so all else being equal, a more virulent strain will do less well than less virulent strains. Of course all else isn’t equal…
