Aug 212021
 
 August 21, 2021  Posted by at 6:04 pm Finance Tagged with: , , , , , ,  Add comments


René Magritte The false mirror 1928

 

 

Look, we get it. The people working at institutions such as the FDA and CDC were anonymous nobodies with science degrees for as long as they can remember, just following protocols written by others, and getting relatively well paid. And then Covid came, and everyone looked at them to save the nation. Especially the government and the pharmaceutical industry. And they exert a lot of pressure.

Pressure to ditch established protocols in particular. Because those stand between them and enormous amounts of profits and political power. So, yeah, we get that part. But these little clerks and their little managers are the last bastion to keep Americans safe from dangerous abuses from the nation’s chemical giants, so there can be huge amounts of American lives at stake. So ditching protocols and good practice is never really an option. You would think. Until now.

On August 5 (last update) this was still up on clinicaltrials.gov (U.S. National Library of Medicine) for the Pfizer trials:

 

 

May 2 2023. But the trial will be finished around August 25 2021 (just as Dr. Fauci has been “predicting“ for weeks now). Which leads to the somewhat bizarre paradoxical conclusion that as the FDA declares the vaccine “Safe”, at the same time it declares the opposite. Because there has been no time for the study of medium- to long term effects of the substance; they just skipped over those entirely.

Which in turn, given the questions raised by many medical professionals about such issues as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and OAS (immune priming), is equally bizarre. At the very least, the forces in the government and the pharmaceutical industry, and now the regulatory agencies too, know there are very realistic risk factors related to the “vaccine”. And they just turn a blind eye.

We see people all the time discussing the credibility of these agencies, and that discussion is now over. That credibility will be reduced to zero around August 25. Is it really worth it? Guess that discussion is now obsolete as well.

And it’s not just the medium- to long term effects that are worrying. The same FDA has displayed no reaction whatsoever to the short term either. Here’s the US VAERS system on adverse reactions, August 13:

 

 

And its European sister, EudraVigilance, on August 14:

 

 

Both these systems are estimated to report 1 in 10 to 1 in 100 cases. They’re poorly set up on purpose, difficult to use etc. A Hawaii court care mentions 45,000 deaths. US statistician Mathew Crawford, whom I’ve cited a few times now, puts the number at 276,300. But even if we would limit ourselves to the “official”numbers, some 35,000 people in the EU and US have died from the vaccine (not all Pfizer, we know). And that’s just official numbers, that’s not the potenntially 10-100 times larger ones. I know, you might say: no way 350,000 died, someone would have told us! Okay, who told you about the 35,000, then?

Crawford also says: “At some point, when the potential for conflicts of interest are high and the point of failure is fundamental to the task of those doing the job, incompetence should no longer be differentiated from criminal intent.”

The FDA has strayed so far from its protocols and practices it’s hard to believe. A vaccine that killed more than 25-50 people in a trial would always be cut short. Now, at 35,000+ deaths, its crickets. And not just crickets, but an upcoming full approval. Someone should seriously look at taking the little clerks and their little managers to court for murder. Pfizer may have gotten full immunity, but perhaps they have not. And as of August 25, they will be just as guilty.

 

 

Let’s go to how the news today reported the approval.

No, we haven’t seen ADE (where your antibodies help the spike proteins enter your cells, to replicate and then kill them) take off on a large scale. But that was never expected, that would always take 6-24 months after inoculation. And even then, there’s nothing saying that what is now labeled Delta is not often already ADE. In the same vein, some are claiming that the rise in Covid in children is in reality RSV, not Covid. If the FDA and CDC are capable of what I’m describing in this article, who’s to say what they are not capable of?

But yeah, full approval would mean more pressure instruments, that’s the whole idea. Now everyone can take your Nuremberg and “Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights” rights away, because the little clerks and managers at the FDA said so. And when did all this happen? Just a year ago, none of those who now clamor to declare you a leper would have even dreamed of doing that. Then they saw the light.

Let me put this in simple terms: there is no chance in hell that they will ever get more than two-thirds of people “vaccinated”. None. And that means the entire vaccination scheme is moot from day one. One third of people will remain unvaccinated. And society, the economy, cannot afford to lose them. All it can do is threaten. And do you really think an approval without proper protocol will make another 10% “give in”? I don’t see it.

And besides, we already know the vaccines don’t work. All this talk about rare and one-in-a million events, humbug. It’s one every hour. No protection from infection, and very little from severe disease. You’re caught in a propaganda treadmill and it’s time to get out.

 

FDA ‘Finalizing Paperwork’ With Pfizer Aiming To Give Full Approval To Covid-19 Vaccine Next Week

The FDA will give full authorization to Pfizer’s Covid jab sometime next week, according to multiple reports, putting it on track to be the first in the US to get approval and likely paving the way for additional vaccine mandates. The US regulator is expected to give the greenlight for Pfizer’s immunization in the coming days, the New York Times and Politico reported on Friday, citing several “people familiar” with the agency’s planning. Though the FDA still has a “substantial amount of paperwork and negotiation with the company” to get through, it could give full approval as soon as Monday, the Times added. It was previously reported that the FDA hoped to grant authorization before Labor Day on September 6, and now appears set to meet that informal deadline.

With a number of hospital systems and universities around the US signaling plans to mandate vaccinations against Covid-19 upon full approval, the move is likely to trigger a spate of new requirements around the country. The US military, moreover, has also said it would compel immunizations for its 1.3 million active-duty troops by the middle of next month, but could do so sooner should the FDA give its blessing to Pfizer. While the Joe Biden administration previously suggested the president would issue a waiver to allow vaccine mandates for soldiers, it decided to hold off until regulators signed off.

Reports of the FDA’s plans come soon after the White House began promoting booster shots for all fully vaccinated adults, citing US health agencies, which noted the immunizations are losing effectiveness over time, particularly against more infectious Delta mutation. While the FDA hasn’t yet approved third doses for all healthy Americans, the agency did give the go-ahead for those with compromised immune systems, while Pfizer recently submitted its initial trial data for universal boosters. Health officials have voiced hopes that full approval for the Covid jabs could improve vaccination numbers in the US, which have been losing pace since hitting a peak in April. Recent polling by the Kaiser Family Foundation showed that more than 30% of respondents would be “more likely” to be vaccinated if the FDA authorized the shots, suggesting the move could indeed spur immunizations.

From the British Medical Journal. This simply stinks so badly, hell and high water got nothing. They don’t want a discussion, even if the protocol demands one. They don’t want Malone, McCullough or Yeadon, or you and me, to speak. And perhaps more importantly, they don’t want anyone to see the paperwork (re: “FDA ‘Finalizing Paperwork’ With Pfizer ..”) that the decision is based on. “The Science” has become awfully small.

 

FDA Set To Grant Full Approval To Pfizer Vaccine Without Public Discussion Of Data

Transparency advocates have criticised the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) decision not to hold a formal advisory committee meeting to discuss Pfizer’s application for full approval of its covid-19 vaccine. Last year the FDA said it was “committed to use an advisory committee composed of independent experts to ensure deliberations about authorisation or licensure are transparent for the public.”1 But in a statement, the FDA told The BMJ that it did not believe a meeting was necessary ahead of the expected granting of full approval. “The FDA has held numerous meetings of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) related to covid-19 vaccines, including a 22 October 2020 meeting to discuss, in general, the development, authorisation, and licensure of covid-19 vaccines,” an FDA spokesperson said.

“The FDA also has held meetings of the VRBPAC on all three covid-19 vaccines authorised for emergency use and does not believe a meeting is needed related to this biologics license application.” The spokesperson added, “The Pfizer BioNTech covid-19 vaccine was discussed at the VRBPAC meeting on 10 December 2020.3 If the agency had any questions or concerns that required input from the advisory committee members we would have scheduled a meeting to discuss.” The vaccine has already been rolled out to millions of Americans through an emergency use authorisation. Companies typically apply for full approval after a longer period has elapsed so that more data are available for review.

But with the US government indicating this week that it plans to start making booster shots widely available next month, experts said the decision not to meet to discuss the data was politically driven. Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee,4 said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinising the data. “These public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorisation,” she said. “The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing. These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled, and data scrutinised in advance of an approval.”

Witczak is one of the more than 30 signatories of a citizen petition5 calling on the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year to gather more data. She warned that without a meeting “we have no idea what the data looks like.” “It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years,” she said. “There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed. “Full approval of covid-19 vaccines must be done in an open public forum for all to see. It could set a precedent of lowered standards for future vaccine approvals.”

 

 

Finally, from a Google Doc I can’t trace the origins of, other than Steve Kirsch is involved. It saves me some time from stating the obvious.

7 Reasons Why The Covid Vaccines And Vaccine Mandates Should Not Be Approved

1/ The vaccines kill more people than they save. Although the vaccines reduce the number of COVID deaths, that benefit comes at a steep price: death from other causes. Pfizer’s own Phase 3 study (6 month) showed that more people died who got the vaccine than who got the placebo. Today, there is no risk-benefit analysis showing that the vaccines have saved more lives than they’ve taken. The VAERS data shows that the vaccines are extremely unsafe and for those under 50 years old will kill more people than they save. The vaccines elevate dozens of serious adverse cardiovascular and neurological events, reactivate latent viruses, and can make cancers worse. Healthy young people have died shortly and unexpectedly after vaccination.

2/ Multiple studies show that the vaccines have killed 150,000 Americans so far. More than 10 different analyses show that approximately 150,000 Americans have been killed by the vaccines. These analyses have not been disproven despite a $1M reward for any scientist who does so.

3/ There are safer, more effective options available. Early treatments are faster, safer, cheaper, and more effective (over 99% for all variants). VIrtually no one hospitalized for COVID today was treated with a proven early treatment protocol. Unlike the vaccine, nobody dies from these treatments.

4/ The required safety testing still has not been done. The proper testing still hasn’t been done. We don’t know if the vaccine will make people more susceptible to COVID infections through antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) and/or linked-epitope suppression (“original antigenic sin”). No study to date has covered the span of a single human gestation cycle. We know the spike protein is associated with Lewy bodies which are associated with prion diseases like dementia.

5/ No open forum to resolve the concerns of qualified scientists who have safety concerns. The CDC and FDA refuse to engage in discussions with top scientists, such as Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine, to discuss the fatality and VAERS analysis in a public forum. The CDC and FDA refuse to see the evidence that is contrary to the “safe and effective narrative.”

6/ No autopsies. There have been no autopsies of anyone dying after getting the COVID vaccine. This is troubling since one of the world’s top pathologists did such a study on 40 patients who died within 2 weeks after vaccination and found that at least 30% to 40% were killed by the vaccine. Despite the availability of robots that perform autopsies that include blood analysis, either none have been performed, or else they have been withheld from the public.

7/Clinical trial fraud. There was clear fraud in the Phase 3 Pfizer trial where at least one participant, 12-year old Maddie de Garay, was paralyzed less than 24 hours after receiving the vaccine. The FDA promised to investigate and did nothing. Today, Maddie cannot feel below her waist, cannot walk unassisted, cannot hold her head up, and must eat through a feeding tube. There were only 1,131 children in the treatment arm. One child in 1,131 being paralyzed is unacceptable to mitigate a potential risk that is close to zero.

 

Comments:

Unfortunately, it looks like full licensure of the Pfizer vaccine could be just around the corner. This breaks promises the FDA made, including accelerating the time to considering approval. So much data and associated concerns have accumulated in the past eight months, including recently learning that duration of immunity (DOI) is only ~4.5-6 months, which necessitates rapid boosting, which exacerbates safety issues (especially if damage is cumulative). And yet the FDA claims they have no questions beyond what they had in Dec. 2020. Narrowly focused immunity, ridiculously short DOI, largely ineffective against the delta variant, and the dangers associated with it have been underestimated by an unknown but substantial degree and there remain many questions about potential long-term harms. Unbelievable. Buckle your seatbelts. This is a runaway train that needs to be stopped immediately.

Dr. Byram W. Bridle,
Associate Professor of Viral Immunology,
University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada

 

It’s incredibly depressing to know that what was once the worlds most-respected medicines regulator is going full-on corrupt. They not only do not have anything enough duration after dosing to have a clue what’s going to happen, but the product has picked up enough baggage to warrant being pulled from the market, permanently. Anyone remember how the FDA handled thalidomide? Now look. I despise them.

Dr Mike Yeadon

 

PS: And the little clerks and mass murderers? Yes, I was very much thinking about the “decent” Germans in the 1940’s.

 

 

 

We try to run the Automatic Earth on donations. Since ad revenue has collapsed, you are now not just a reader, but an integral part of the process that builds this site. Thank you for your support.

 

 

Support the Automatic Earth in virustime. Click at the top of the sidebars to donate with Paypal and Patreon.

 

Home Forums How Little Clerks Become Mass Murderers

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #84844

    René Magritte The false mirror 1928     Look, we get it. The people working at institutions such as the FDA and CDC were anonymous nobodies
    [See the full post at: How Little Clerks Become Mass Murderers]

    #84859

    We are waiting to meet up for the second time with a vaxed family- ages 12, 16, 51, and 50. They will no doubt sign on for the “booster” shots. It breaks my heart. I held both of those kids when they were newborns. (I have no kids.) I want to scream at them- DON’T DO IT AGAIN.
    I suspect I won’t be getting my cataract fixed any time soon.
    I, too, despise those little clerks.
    Would I ever like to see what the insurance adjusters see.

    #84866
    citizenx
    Participant

    Yes Little Hitlers are everywhere in America and beyond right now… they are circling and clamoring for your blood.

    What other outcome could be expected when a population en mass has been subjected to Bernays style programming, brainwashing Propaganda?

    I have sadly realized over the years that the majority of people around me are completely and totally ignorant about U.S. Domestic policies, Foreign Policies, Economic Policies and their own nations History- most don’t even know about the propagandized history white washed victors style, let alone Zinns Peoples History… Stone even put it on video for them.

    Not only are they ignorant, but the don’t give a flying fuck… yet they virtue signal with BLM signs and “In this house we believe…” garbage. Ignorant arrogant uncaring masses virtue signalling creates Little Hitlers everywhere…

    When looking back Historically to where we are now- it only points in one direction sadly-
    How the f we can move away from that beyond the point of no return… I’m not seeing it, hoping and digging deep into idealism and optimism- but alas, reality awaits.

    #84874
    Doc Robinson
    Participant

    My guess is that the legal challenges to vaxx mandates had some traction because of the “unapproved” status of the EUAs, and the timing of the approval was hurried because of the start of the upcoming school year.

    #84884

    A joke Anna (16) wrote on my kitchen whiteboard:
    Two chemists walk into a bar. The first one says “I’ll have H2O.” The second one says “I’ll have H2O, too”.
    The second one died.

    #84885
    V. Arnold
    Participant

    my parents said know

    LOL…(I had to look it up…)

    #84886
    VietnamVet
    Participant

    This is the banality of evil. The Reagan Revolt successfully created the corporate state. There was no march down Constitution Avenue. Instead, the 1% bought the politicians and got fabulously wealthy and sent the money offshore. The revolving door expanded, industry consolidated, civil servants retired, fees for service implemented, corporate regulation died, PR took over, and if paperwork was needed subservient contractors hired to write what the political appointees wanted.

    The negotiated withdrawal from Afghanistan is a gigantic SNAFU. All that mattered for the last 20 years was that contractors made lots of money from helping to kill others. The Afghans, a deeply religious rugged mountain people, put a stop to it.

    The US public health service has collapsed. The privatized US healthcare system is cruel and deadly. For-profit mRNA vaccines, the one and only response to the pandemic, successfully created at least nine new billionaires.

    Hurricane Henri is headed towards Long Island. Wildfires, Toxic Air, Heat Domes, Polar Vortexes, Drought, Floods, Blocked Jet Streams and COVID-19 are the new normal. American deaths and chronic illness are of no consequence.

    Unvaccinated deplorables are America’s Mountaineers. The top 1% and their global Overseers will never defeat them. Already workers are missing. There are supply shortages. Only the restoration of the rule of law for all, by and for the people, can prevent succession. If not, Naval Base Kitsap, likely, will be the nuclear deterrence for the new nation of Cascadia.

    #84889
    toktomi
    Participant

    tip of the iceberg
    “no need to wonder why…” [Country Joe]

    #84890
    phoenixvoice
    Participant

    @ John Day
    Three days ago you asked me:
    “@Phoenix Voice: When does social distancing become ostracizing?”
    The kids went back to their dad’s yesterday and now I’ve more time to think. 😉

    “become ostracizing” encompasses two things
    (1) the ostracizing action taken by one group that excludes another
    (2) the feeling of ostracization by the individual(s)/group being excluded

    “Social distancing” encompasses keeping one’s physical distance from all who are not in one’s own household. At first, it feels awkward because although our different familial and cultural backgrounds and intuitive sense defines the details and distance that we naturally keep (or don’t keep) from others, “social distancing” is a “new” concept that is laid on top of all of the ones that we have developed, that is expected to supercede our old ways of interacting. It is, generally, more distanced than any of us were prior to its introduction. Social distancing is relatively benign with both/all parties agree to it, agree to the reasons why, etc. When social needs fail to be met, when these social agreements breakdown…that is when social distancing starts devolving into ostracization.

    Social distancing becomes ostracization for the person shunned when that individual’s needs for human interaction, physical closeness, etc., are hampered by social distancing. The person shunned feels a loss that can’t be filled. I am reminded of the story Reiner Fuellmich told in a recent video I watched of the man who approached the scared, masked elderly woman in a bank, hugged her, she cried, and admitted no one had hugged her for a year. Or, myself, who always enjoyed the opportunity after church service to mingle and chat with people — sometimes those conversation delved into “deep topics” — but without meeting in person, that interaction never happened, and it evolved into an ache of longing.

    Social distancing becomes the act of ostracization when overtures are made to end the distance, and one party refuses. With my choir group, we have essentially all been avoiding meeting since March 2020 — but when I “dropped the bomb” and suggested that we meet because we know so much more about the virus, and there is no need to continue to act out of fear…it was shot down, and my bid to return to “normal” was rejected…that feels the same as being ostracized.

    #84891
    those darned kids
    Participant
    #84892
    phoenixvoice
    Participant

    CitizenX
    “I have sadly realized over the years that the majority of people around me are completely and totally ignorant about U.S. Domestic policies, Foreign Policies, Economic Policies and their own nations History- most don’t even know about the propagandized history white washed victors style, let alone Zinns Peoples History… Stone even put it on video for them.”

    What gets me is…my liberal congregation *did* discuss just those sorts of things…but have become completely snowed anyhow. Fear blinds people.

    #84893

    From ZH-
    Utopia Planitia (the commenter)

    Watch out or next there will just be one giant German word that says everything there could possibly be to say!
    🙂

    I guess I’m in a laughing mood tonight. Beats my treacly song, I guess.

    #84895
    D Benton Smith
    Participant

    How come FACTS are “misinformation” in today’s Newspeak ?

    Easy. It works like this: when someone wants you to do something it’s usually because the ‘something’ that they want you to do is going to help THEM in some way. In other words, there’s something in it for them. There MIGHT also be something in it for you, but that is entirely beside the point. Basically, they want what THEY want, and screw you. (and don’t get up on any moral high horse, because you’ve done the same damned thing when the tables were on the other foot.)

    This self-serveing bias is not always the case, of course, but anyone who has lived on THIS planet for long has learned the hard way that it usually is. It is so true that we are automatically wary about doing anything we’re told without first checking the facts and thinking it carefully through.

    Getting back to the main point, they want something so they tell you whatever it is that they think is most likely to produce the result which serves their interests. To their way of thinking, good for them is the definition of good, period. They actually believe it. EVERYTHING that they tell you is therefore legitimate INFORMATION because the PURPOSE behind it is legitimate because it causes the “good” thing to happen, which just so happens to make them rich, powerful and immune from prosecution. What a coincidence.

    By that measure, then, any and all data that might prevent the desired “good” result they yearn for is MISINFORMATION. It does not matter one nano-fuck how TRUE it might be. They do not give a micro-shit about truthful factuality. That doesn’t even cross their brain barrier. Any and all data contrary to the achievement of their rapacious ambition simply IS . . . by defintion . . . misinformation.

    And yeah, it’s insane, but if everyone does it then who’s crazy ? Desiring lies of any kind at any time for any purpose . . . is as crazy as a bed bug. It is literally the act of WANTING AND ACTING to obliterate one’s own ability to think and act successfully . . . and that is batshit crazy. Just because everyone’s is doing it too doesn’t make it and less so. It might, however, mean that we are inmates in a lunatic asylum.

    #84898
    Huskynut
    Participant

    The NZDSOS group today posted a link to NZ’s Ministry of Health website. The MoH policy is now that kids 12 yo and older can provide “informed consent” for themselves, without needing parental consent.

    Which is still marginally better than Australia where they’re talking of compulsarily vaccinating 12+ yo,but only slightly.

    In NZ it’s illegal for a child to be left alone in the safety of their own house up till the age of 14. Yet these same kids are capable of “informed consent” to an experimental medical procedure?!

    #84899
    Huskynut
    Participant

    Which had me reflecting.. a few years ago i worked with a woman who was a Thalidomide baby, with all that entails.
    I doubt many kids these days even know of Thalidomide, let alone have met someone fro m that era.
    My colleague was a lovely woman in every way, but she also had to deal with the reality of her physical deformities every day.
    That grounding in reality doesn;t (or shouldn;t) leave anyone

    #84900
    Huskynut
    Participant

    @ My Parents Said Know

    What did the drummer name his kids?

    Anna 1, Anna 2…

    #84901
    V. Arnold
    Participant

    @ Huskynut

    LOL again; nice one… 😉

    #84908
    Red
    Participant

    It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.

    Jiddu Krishnamurti

    #84909
    V. Arnold
    Participant

    A shaggy dog story:

    It was a dark and stormy night and all of the Knights of the castle were out on their various Knightly quests of slaying dragons and saving damsels in distress; all that is except a novice.
    A rider came galloping up to the gate and cried out that a maiden had been taken by giant and was in great distress…
    The rider was brought inside to warm himself by the great fireplace; next to which was a huge Saint Bernard enjoying the warmth.
    It was explained to the rider there were no Knights or horses left in the castle. Only the lowly novice knight remained.
    In a panic the rider looked around and asked why the novice couldn’t ride out on the huge St. Bernard?
    The Lord of the castle replied:
    “I wouldn’t send a Knight out on a dog like this…”

    #84913
    Dr. D
    Participant

    “contractors made lots of money from helping to kill others. “

    The “others” were the deplorables. Us. I ain’t no Senator’s son.

    “Money simply allows us slaves to believe that we are not slaves.”

    In a certain sense, yes. But this is largely in debt-based fake money. Also not everything should be monetized, a thing they regularly pass laws or destroy societies to insure are financialized and skimmed, like Facebook, or an app for babysitters. Be careful since one constant failure of the Left is to therefore go without money and accounting hippie-style, which fails more or less instantly. Nobody’s stopping you, and this experiment is run over and over again by all sorts, plans, approaches. But people need fair like-for-like value, contribution, so that fact can’t be erased whether it’s money that measures it or not. And again, right now we don’t have “money” since Powell can create $500B in fake contribution ledgers each month and draw real claim on them.

    The measure of true? That can only happen with an enormous power differential that keeps the sub-human from telling the overlord he’s full of s—t, get lost. …And over time, due to Powell’s fake money contributions, above. Wanting the fake, believing the fake, I think that’s the definition of insanity and it doesn’t go well. Look at discussion of Ptomkin, or where soldiers in F-Stan, up to Colonels, told them every day. They didn’t care, but can only get away with that from being insulated from consequences, generally for a lifetime at Yale. Generations bought in that collective also have never met reality.

    Now that doesn’t help them either, they generally don’t like it and know they’re hollow and are as defensive as Fredo. Many the Trust Fund kid who drops out, goes backpacking, rebels, anything to re-contact the reality they lack and become something of their own man. Problem is, even if they do it a little bit, so soon as they return to family, they re-enter the hermetically-sealed bubble of ‘no consequences’. Why would you do this? It’s not a help to them, your own children, nor the society. Yet they have.

    Another reason to have a meritocracy, which requires sound and fair money. …Or collapse. Your choice.

    #84919
    Boogaloo
    Participant

    @phoenixvoice

    The tide will turn. This cannot go on forever.

    #84975
    userzeroid
    Participant

    Any room for doubt would cause a person of conscience to take a step back. Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.

    This is a sobering message and one that needs to be read the world over. The same can be said of your post “stop mass vaccinations now!”

    I know it is a poor excuse to borrow Kipling with no further explaination. However; “The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!”

    Perhaps it is more fitting to our current circumstances to mix things up with a little Pohl/Kornbluth (‘The Space Merchants’) along with Vonnegut (‘Welcome to the Monkey House’) to form a suitable backdrop the where we’re at. Even so, it doesn’t get us close to this surreal landscape we have ended up inhabiting.

    Last I looked (before this God-Forsaken viral Madness even began) reality was following the plot of Vonnegut’s ‘Harrison Bergaron’ pretty closely.

    Those were all enjoyable books/poems which is where the simularities end. This is more like a nightmare.

    Anyway, that’s more than enough science fiction references for one post. I don’t mean to be flippant, it’s just that reality has somehow become so entirely depressing it seems apropos to make light of things in a bizarrely surrealistic way where possible.

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.