D Benton Smith
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
What if rejecting the “Narrative” for it being false involved accepting instead the truth that one’s self was party to grave child abuse, treason and attempted genocide ?
What if belief in an insanely unrealistic story was necessary to getting the masses to continue obeying orders to collaborate in massive illegalities which spanned the entire range of criminality?
One of the things that holds “mass formation” insanity in place is personal guilt.
If we hold to dualism this video is terrifying
Well that’s a relief, because dualism is bullshit. It’s called a “Universe” not a “Duoverse”, and for good reason.
I consider it to be highly unlikely that the will or capacity for consciousness, awareness and the ability to deliberately communicate specific intentions such as thoughts and love would suddenly disappear when infinitely expanded to the level of Divinity, such as would have to be the case with the Creator of the Universe.
@JohnDay
You and the Missus are made of stern stuff, just looking at photographs of Annapurna makes me hypoxic and frostbit.
Thanks for the “emergent” Zelenskyy photo. I am so grateful that there are still a few brave souls who are tastelessly profane enough to speak the unspeakable by showing it instead.
Without China, we wouldn’t be able to feed, clothe, medicate or even wipe our butts.
Actually that should read, “without RUSSIA and China . . .” , because even though all of the toilet paper comes from China, the TREES that provide the pulp for that paper all come from Russia.
Everybody is missing the point on public AI like chatGPT or it’s sinister cousin over at Bing.
The Cabal doesn’t give the slightest shit about whether the “chat-buddies” are trusted, or liked, or even vehemently condemned as EVIL. The fucking POINT is that the AI is ACCEPTED AS REAL
Once folks start thinking about a talking AI as though it was actually a “somebody of some sort”, it is game over for people.
If a digital entity on the internet Cloud is an AI simulation of Grandma or any other dearly departed real person (like a beloved spouse, sibling or child) then it’s only a matter of time until that electronic entity will being protected from being ignored or erased or abused in any way that a real human would object to being treated. Hell, a medium decent simulated human can already “argue its case” for being a true consciousness. A few more years of data collected from people “talking” to (and even arguing with) chatbots will make it impossible to distinguish the difference without tangible “Habeous Corpus” evidence.
So does dear dead Granny in the Cloud lose the right to vote? How about getting paid for the “work” she and other bots are doing? Or the right to a fair trial?
If someone’s “consciousness” is uploaded to a computer could you then prove that it wasn’t?
Apparently the sky is no longer the limit on the amount of horseshit the foolish can be made to believe and accept.
I can only imagine the kind of threat it took to get those Sinaloan , MS-13, tatooed crime-gang maniacs to propitiate as submissively as they did. What I saw was 100% compliance to totally humiliating commands. I’ve seen slaves and POW’s and even armed robbery victims staring into the barrels of guns show more reluctance to do as they were told.
My guess is that the cops shot as many as they arrested, just to convince the living that anything other than instantaneous total compliance would have instantaneously fatal consequences, with zero hesitation and no exceptions.
The big news about the Woody Harrelson anti-vax joke on Saturday Night Live isn’t about the specific contents of his anti-vax message (even though that was, indeed, just wonderful).
The big news is that the Bad Guys’ powers of censorship have now decreased so drastically that even though SNL is a stronghold of Wokedom, the bastards COULD NOT STOP HERRELSON’S JOKE FROM BEING BROADCAST.
I other words, they are very significantly and very rapidly losing their ability to to stop the truth from being spoken to their heretofore captured LARGE and previously insulated target audience. As that sort of thing happens the share of power will continue to shift at ever-increasing rates for both sides. Exponential shrinkage versus exponential growth. Censorship weakening as truth revelation strengthens is a self-reinforcing feedback loop.
Kaboom.
Oh, it’s a psychology test, alright. And a damned good one, judging from the results so far. It’s sure got me hooked.
The last time I looked the world was still doing what it does, so I guess one would consequently have to say that in grand balance the “World Government” (Cabal, “Bad Guys”, whatever) is and always has been a fait accompli.
The only remaining questions therefore are the same two questions as they have always been, too.
The two questions are, “Just what, EXACTLY, are the details about that “fact” that was accomplished, and what, PRECISELY and accurately, was “accomplished” by that fact.
Answer those two simple questions adequately and I think we’re good to go.
The implications of the use of body doubles (as in REALLY doing it, at the TOP of the power elite food chain) has ramifications that will rock the world. Check out
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-polish-media-accidentally-captures-zelenskys-body-double-cameraThis official video footage from the Zelensky/Biden meeting in Poland establishes for the first time (that I am aware of) irrefutable PROOF of the practice, which moves it OUT of tin-foil-hat territory, and very very firmly INTO the category of hard material fact.
Stop and consider for a moment what it means to the stability of a society when the following scenario becomes not just possible, but commonplace factuality. Now that the official use of body doubles by high ranking persons is established as common fact, it is now reasonably, legally and publicly possible to CHALLENGE whether an important person is indeed actually legally present or if they are actually illegally absent, guilty or not guilty of being in a particular place at a particular time, publicly alive or secretly dead.
These are wild times, and about to get wilder.
It’s not a math test. It’s a psychology test.
Step #1 of the psychological test is to find out if the observer of the presented chart of symbols assumes the presentation to be an invitation (or instruction) to do something with it other than just SEE it. This self-imposed and somewhat voluntary presumption (or the absence of such a presumption) reveals a lot about the observer.
Step #2 of the psychological test would apply only to the sub-set of observers who assumed (without any explicit request that they do so) that the they were meant to deduce an implied (but not explicitly stated) instruction to “solve” the implied (but not explicitly stated) math problem. How the observer proceeds from that point forward in first delusionally imagining what the problem might be, and then solving that imagined delusional problem, also tells you a lot about the observer’s psychological profile.
Step #3 (and the least important, so far) of the psychological test consists of evaluating how well the observer solved their math problem that they just imagined for themselves. In other words, how good are they with math. A lot of people think that “good with math” also means “smart”, but in all of these many years still can’t pin down what “smart” really means.
Step#4 (and this one is REALLY tricky) is to if the observer catches (or misses) the subtle fact that the last equation (“3 = ?”) is sequentially numerically discontinuous from the pattern established in the first four equations ( that is, the initial sequence of 9,7,8,6, inexplicably jumps to 3, thereby destroying the implied formula suggested in those first four line items). One could of course supply the possibly missing equation lines for 5 and 4, but that merely brings us back to delusional assumption that we are “meant” to do anything at all. Nevertheless, I find it remarkable that the designer of the math test meme inserted a little “test lie” into the middle of it. Interesting.
Anyhow, and like I said before, it ain’t a math test. Its a psych-profiling test, and I’m pretty sure I flunked.
don’t let the knockers knock you down
But if you have to be knocked down being knocked down by knockers isn’t the worst way to go.
“I call the hat empire the Cabal” was that a Jungian Slip or just an ordinary typo?”
Regrettably it was just a garden variety typo, but hey, maybe that’s what Jungian slips all are !
Sure hope you’re feeling at 100% energy soon, Illargi. The next time you are, and the day is bright and beautiful, take a “Well Day” off , too. Post us a note that says you’re feeling so great and the day is so wonderful that it is just too good to waste so you’re spending it on the best stuff.
We are fighting against an empire without borders which has quite purposefully (with explicitly calculated malice) infiltrated and subverted all of civilizations’ governments and institutions so as to use that trusted authority and power as the means to generate conflicts which it both nurtures and feeds upon by selling meticulously measured and carefully controlled power and authority desired and paid for by both sides of the fight in their struggle to defeat their equally misguided and duped opponents. This arrangement has an optimal size determined by resources, technology and the ability of the domesticated victim population to fight back against the true aggressor (the empire). Surplus population is trimmed off by using the conflicting parts of the population to kill off an appropriate number of the other parts until the desired population size and ability to resist is reached. I call the hat empire the Cabal, and it is quite real and specifically actual.
@VeraciousPoet
You and Eckhart are quite right, and are doing the right thing about it: communicating to others so as to raise awareness, because awareness wins the day. Just continue to up that game.
Maybe it’s my Celtic roots, or perhaps it’s merely a seriously dark sense of humor, but in any case I find it uproariously ironic that the only thing we really need defense from in this country is our Defense Department.
Seen this one yet? https://www.youtube.com/live/q9mFc4_5S0A?feature=share
Things are popping so fast now that I can barely keep up with even the abbreviated summary of what is going on. However, the basic message (from almost innumerable sources) is pretty much the same, even though their styles and details are wildly various. Here it is:
The exponentially expanding revelation of new information about the nature and details of the war against the common population has finally hit the stage of automatically amplifying cacophony that it can only be described as explosive. BUT DON”T BE AFRAID ! That chain reaction explosion is not us common folk being blown up. It’s the BAD GUYS BEING BLOWN UP ! Annihilated by their own bomb.
It’s sort of funny how humans just can’t seem to refrain from anthropomorphizing God (whether it be for the purpose of worshipping Him, or ridiculing the image that is being amorphized for that purpose) because it is exactly opposite to the fact of who made who. God made you, bubba. Not the other way around. But no worries, I doubt if He is offended, and probably appreciates the comic relief.
@FormerlyT-Bear
I was hoping for at least 15th Century but now that you mention it stockpiling a little stone age gear as a hedge, might be a good idea, just in case.
What name can you give to the first globe spanning hot war (armed combat, biological, psychological, economic, etc.) that declines to name itself?
This current war will be the first major war to never have been formally declared by ANY of its active and participating belligerents. Direct war dead (meaning the number of people killed by direct hostile war action, not by anything else) can only be guesstimated, but it already compares to, and maybe exceeds the total war dead of WW2, which was about 100 million.
It will eventually acquire a name, I suppose, but it will never be legally, publicly, OFFICIALLY declared by any globally recognized government.
Why not?
Because when it is finished there will not BE any such government, on either side. It could only be (and therefore shall be) a NEW form of world order, of which there are only two possibilities.
The new form of government will be either one those two possibilities or the other.
Possibility #1 Would be a one world monolithic that goes far, far beyond mere government into the realm of complete coordinated control of all human activity.
Possibility #2 would be a collaborative confederation of self-defined nations that interact with each other under some sort of agreement which allows each member of the confederation of nations to continue to sovereignly exist.
When a game is for ALL of the marbles (and I do mean all) then maybe you don’t really need to give it a name at all. You just call it the war.
Since there are blessed few who know everything there is to know (present company excepted, of course) the rest of us must resort to getting our knowledge and information from sources other than ourselves. Our choices are limited to three. We can remain ignorant, get information second-hand, or become expert through direct first hand observation, measurement, hypotheses and experimentation.
No one (not even the experts in one or several fields of knowledge) has the brains, treasure or time to do that for all and every field of vital information. Therefore even the wisest and most knowledgeable experts must turn to others for some or all of their facts.
When we don’t know something we turn to other people (friend or stranger) who we have reasons to believe are more in the know than we are. Some of these sources of data and wisdom are people that we fully trust implicitly and some of them are people we trust less unconditionally and are consequently less certain about, but in either case it comes down to a matter of trustedness, in varying degrees.
This raises an intriguing new question, and that question is this: Who do our own trusted sources turn to for their trustworthy information? Certainly they must often turn to someone (many someones, actually,) because no one knows everything.
From this rhetorically answerable (obvious) question it is therefore also pretty obvious that most of what we know has come to us via networks or hierarchies of trusted sources who themselves look to other trusted sources. And that immediately presents the question of our own personal way of reckoning who or what is trustworthy, and who or what isn’t.
Is it a coin-toss, or do we have criteria and method to making that call?
Does that crucial decision pivot on unquestioning belief in what our trusted sources tell us? Or do we question what we receive and compare that received information to certain standards of trustworthiness which we have gradually learned through lived experience?
Personally, I favor the second method, and the criteria I apply is pretty simple. I trust (to varying degree) sources who have a record of seeking and relaying truth, regardless of where that truth might lead them. In other words, people who favor truth over untruth, even if that truth might seem to not serve their personal interests. Reciprocally, I dispense with self-serving liars very quickly and permanently. Mistakes happen. Lies don’t. Lies are purposefully committed, and so long as the purpose remains the lies will just keep on coming.
Externally, I observe that some people prefer method number one: unquestioning acceptance of authority. These trusted authorities assert that information is true because they said so, and assert that as experts they unquestionably know more about everything than you do. Their authoritative expertise derives from their accepting unquestionable information from other experts who are themselves experts for the same reason. To them, the value of authority far outranks the value of truth.
That brain grating circularity boils down to a simplicity.Some folks favor evidenced testable truth (which can be extremely labor and ego-batteringly intensive), and others prefer authoritative diktat (which is typically quick, tidy, lazy and often highly paid.)
These two preferences produce two very different types of society. One is a slave society, with all of its grisly consequences, and the other is a free society that requires eternal vigilance, courage and hard work.
The world is presently (and not for the first time!) sorting out which one works better.
How many more dots have to be connected before people counterattack in self defense against the Cabal that is methodically murdering humankind in an increasingly blatantly obvious fashion?
My opinion, formed over the course of roughly 50 years of research, is that a collaborative of folks smarter than thee and me put the picture together long ago, sounded the bugles then, and are now fully engaged in what looks to be the decisive battle unfolding around the globe.
History suggests that a 5th Gen Warfare counterattack was launched quite some time ago and us common folk are only becoming aware of it now because the counterattack has finally entered the “near vertical” phase of its exponential growth curve.
P.S.
And that history (by which I mean the real history, not the faked up bullshit you were fed in school) of Earth is gonna blow your hat in the creek. You could ease considerable future stress on yourself by digging it out of the existing record on your own. Or you can wait until the shock wakes you from slumber like a bucket of ice water in the face and find out the hard way. I recommend door #1, and a good place to start would be The Oera Linda Book, translated by Jan Ott, followed by Classical Greek history (Plato, Solon, etc.) and polished off with a short course in modern (last 30 years or so) evidence based archeology.Seismic weapons may or may not be a real thing, but the U.S. Department of Defense (and others of comparable credentials) have considered them to be a real concern for decades and one has to wonder what would lead them to think so.
Ya know, I think I have the same problem as Baerbock. Every time I swear to reform and turn my life completely around I find myself doing all the same stuff as before.
My wife won’t let me eat pecan pies any more. She says I can only eat one or at most two pieces of it and then stop.
It’s not that hard to put a targeted government leader into an information bubble so that the only things they get to hear are the things that you want them to hear. Thus Zelenskyy can be made to believe that he will become rich and powerful, or that Ukraine can join NATO, whip Russia, and is winning the war.
It’s not enough to just bribe them or convince them. You must control the flow of information that reaches them, too. Our clandestine services have no equal in that department. They could stand there with chocolate smeared all over their face and persuade their own mother that it wasn’t them who ate the candy.
Remember this, fellow paranoids, the psy op being run is of the highest possible expertise, financing, technology & psychological sophistication because it is being played for ALL of the marbles, and failure would very likely be fatal.
Underestimate that at your own peril.
The cruelest, and yet most efficient, way for the Good Guys to win this war is to enable, allow and encourage the Bad Guys to just continue doing what they are doing now. . . . because what they are doing now(stating it in the most cold bloodedly accurate terms) is killing off everyone who is either misguided enough to want to do it, or stupid enough to go along with it.
Those who are stupid enough to take the vax, fight Russians in Ukraine or submit like slaves to people who willfully kill them, are dying in massive numbers, daily. We exhaust ourselves every day, all day, trying to inform and educate and enlighten our fellow people to help them get smart enough to NOT do or submit to those suicidal activities. Unfortunately, some of them remain stupid too long, and die as a consequence. But we will NEVER stop trying to help every single one of them by providing truthful information and advice, because they are all PEOPLE, and we know to the depths of our soul that they are just like us (just more stupid).
Those who are evil enough to actually WANT to harm (rob, cheat, enslave, kill) others for personal gain will themselves be killed in revenge for what they have done, so in that sense they too are suicidally stupid. That is basically what insanity IS.
Such activities (lying, stealing, cheating, enslaving, killing) are stupid because when such things are done they ultimately result in the demise of the person stupid enough to do them. That’s because the action attempts to violate natural laws which cannot be violated. The immutable laws of Universe. God’s Law, if you will.
Better advice is to be less cruel. Continue to say the truth, and encourage and educate others to do the same . . . . and save us all.
Your entire first sentence is uninterrupted fabrication and series of rather outrageous lies. What is your purpose in doing that?
I will apologize profusely if you can cite even one of the statements in your opening sentence as true.
So if Black Rock owns Ukraine (and I have no doubts about that) then that explains why the United States is fighting so hard for Ukraine. It’s because Black Rock (i.e. it’s largest investors) which is well known to own the U.S., is simply using it like a junkyard dog to defend Black Rock’s investment property in Nazi-Land.
About those convenient UFOs ( 3 in a day is pretty remarkable ) I have this to say : When someone points with alarm and warns to LOOK! , is a good time to carefully look everywhere else.
Looks like that Alaskan UFO shoot-down debris landed almost on top of where I used to live back in the day (see Colville Lodge, Alaska on Google maps). THAT’S a little spooky.
The Government (and I’m talking here about the ENTIRE government, not just the big shots) which is a WHOLE lot of people inextricably hooked into government in one way or another, are in a serious bind. And by “serious bind” I mean to say that they are in a REAL pickle like we ain’t never seen before.
They have borrowed an absurd amount of money over the years and centuries in order to obtain and retain their positions of power over people. The sum is quite large, the interest and bribery rates are quite high, and SOME of the more powerful lenders are now asking for more interest and bribe than the government is able to pay without borrowing more money ( LOTS more money). That leaves them now with two, and ONLY two, possible choices : they must either pay back the loans or NOT pay back the loans (including bribes, interest and mature notes.)
If they pay back the loans they are screwed because the loans amount to more than they have (or will ever have) which would leave them with nothing or less than nothing.
If they do NOT pay back the loans then they are screwed because no one will trust them at all, or for anything, EVER . . . . because everyone will irrefutably know them as the guys who don’t repay loans or keep promises. That puts them OUT of business (at the very least) and possibly even IN prison or AT the end of a rope (more likely).
So if they pay they’re damned and if they don’t pay they’re daamned, and they are being watched VERY carefully by tough smart people who don’t trust them at all and are on high alert for further shifty tricks, which are fully expected.
The only way they’ve managed to last this long is because they’ve been able to borrow or steal enough more money from fresh suckers to keep paying off the bribes and “interest” (etc.) necessary to keep the existing “loans” from being called due (i.e. if that happens then they CAN’T pay, so Game Over).
Their big problem now is that there aren’t enough fresh suckers with anything left to lend or give up.. They could drain the old suckers to death and beyond and there STILL would not be enough to pay off or pay back even the tiny number of POWERFUL people who want their money back (not to even mentions the immeasurable hordes of smaller folks with various “notes” and obligations to collect as due and payable NOW.
Talk about a terminal case of “damned if you do and damned if you don’t”. Sure wouldn’t want to be in their shoes.
Maybe we could just ask. “What are you not allowed to talk about?”
That is a brilliantly good question.
