Richard Oelze The expectation 1936
The recombinant DNA "sneaks past" your body's defenses.
Why would we want that? pic.twitter.com/pFtDimu0oA
— Pasha (@jabU_Free) February 10, 2022
And the below extract is interesting, from the BBC:
— Maajid أبو عمّار (@MaajidNawaz) February 8, 2022
“And a bonus L-O-L for his effort to portray protests to regain basic freedoms as some kind of attempt to overthrow the government of Canada..”
Former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor, Mark Carney, a dual citizen of Ottawa and Globalistan, wrote in a recent Globe and Mail newspaper opinion piece: “[B)y now anyone sending money to the convoy should be in no doubt: You are funding sedition. Foreign funders of an insurrection interfered in our domestic affairs from the start. Canadian authorities should take every step within the law to identify and thoroughly punish them. The involvement of foreign governments and any officials connected to them should be identified, exposed and addressed.” Unlike previous environmental protests that have raged in Canada to the detriment of the country’s future energy independence, and been backed by US-based think-tanks funded by American business interests close to Washington elites — all of which have apparently escaped Carney’s attention or interest — truckers don’t actually require ‘foreign funding’. They have actual jobs that pay quite well.
You’d think he’d know that, given his illustrious background as an expert in money. But good luck trying to exploit the ‘foreign bogeyman’ trope and attempting to find the scapegoat that you’re looking for. Carney is concerned about the ‘occupation’ by protesters, who are merely fighting against the government blockade of citizens’ lives for the past two years. And a bonus L-O-L for his effort to portray protests to regain basic freedoms as some kind of attempt to overthrow the government of Canada. Perhaps someone could provide him with a paper bag before he passes out? Here’s your ground truth in Ottawa: “More than 100 Highway Traffic Act and other ‘Provincial Offence Notices’ were issued for offenses including excessive honking, driving the wrong way, defective muffler, no seat belt, alcohol readily available and having the improper class of driving license,” according to a Fox News report. Well, you know what they say. Every hardcore coup d’état starts with a seat belt offense, right?
Convoy gets bigger
Ottawa convoy getting bigger.. pic.twitter.com/vZLfJCNCJM
— Colin Korol (@colin_korol) February 11, 2022
“Canada has absolutely ZERO jurisdiction over how we manage our funds here at GiveSendGo..”
GiveSendGo, the crowdfunding website raising funds for the “Freedom Convoy” protest in Ottawa, says that it will be ignoring the order by the Ontario Superior Court to freeze the crowdfund. In defiance of the order, the U.S. based organization said that the court has no jurisdiction over its decisions and plans to disburse the funds to the protesters for whom the crowdfund was created. “Know this! Canada has absolutely ZERO jurisdiction over how we manage our funds here at GiveSendGo,” the organization stated on Twitter. “All funds for EVERY campaign on GiveSendGo flow directly to the recipients of those campaigns, not least of which is The Freedom Convoy campaign.”
As Rebel News reported earlier Thursday, Progressive Conservative Premier Doug Ford’s office issued the following statement: “Today, the Attorney General brought an application in the Superior Court of Justice for an order pursuant to section 490.8 of the Criminal Code prohibiting any person from disposing of, or otherwise dealing with, in any manner whatsoever, any and all monetary donations made through the Freedom Convoy 2022 and adopt-a-trucker campaign pages on the GiveSendGo online fundraising platform.” The order binds any and all parties with possession or control over these donations.
Canadians are pussies? How did that happen?
As provinces begin lifting COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, psychology experts expect stress and anxiety to run high among those who remain wary of letting their guards down. It will take time for many to adjust, they say, but the quick approach some provinces are taking could make the transition more jarring. Alberta ended its vaccine certificate system on Wednesday, days before its mask requirements for students is set to drop, while Saskatchewan plans to do away with its vaccine mandate on Monday. Other provinces, including Ontario, have taken a more gradual approach to dismantling COVID-19 measures. Steve Joordens, a psychology professor at the University of Toronto, said it’s natural for people to feel conflicted as restrictions ease.
Though many are tired of the mandates aimed at slowing the spread of the virus, there’s still some underlying fear. “In the back of our mind there’s this niggling anxiety of: are we doing this too soon?” Joordens said. “Are we going to end up getting our butts kicked again (by a new variant)? And given all the division we’re seeing right now, could this make things worse?” After two years of being told to avoid the virus, it will be hard for some people to switch their mindset, Joordens said. Limited PCR testing, which previously helped indicate how much COVID-19 was circulating, adds another complicated wrinkle by removing some of the information people used to weigh their own risk.
Joordens expects the majority of people, even those who feel initial stress around reopening, will resume previous social interactions in public settings quite easily. But others, including people with conditions that make them more vulnerable, will have a harder time. For those who have linked certain scenarios — like large crowds and unmasked individuals — to threats of danger, Joordens said reopening could bring about conditions similar to post-traumatic stress disorder.
‘If you don’t collect the adverse event data, and you don’t know the side-effect rates, you can keep the data-free experimental vaccinations going. With no one the wiser.’
In countries such as the US, where massive budgets are also dispensed by powerful bureaucrats, trenchant critics who present a threat to funding may find themselves subject to Soviet-style psychiatric evaluation, as well as having their licence to practice suspended. That is exactly what happened to Dr Meryl Nass, an American doctor accused of spreading misinformation about hydroxychloroquine, the cheap and long-established anti-malarial drug that was found at an early point in the Covid pandemic to help prevent the development of severe illness. She demonstrated that in UK and World Health Organisation trials of the drug, it was used in ‘a non-therapeutic, toxic and potentially lethal dose’, given too late in the disease course to determine its value against the virus.
A trial called Recovery, sponsored by the Wellcome Trust, the Gates Foundation and the UK Government, and conducted by researchers at Oxford University, reported an appallingly high death rate of more than 25 per cent among the 1,500 patients enrolled. In the WHO trial, Nass found that collection of limited safety data ‘serves to protect trial investigators and sponsors from disclosures of expected adverse effects, including death’. The ‘frightening’ conclusion to be drawn, she wrote, was that ‘WHO and other national health agencies, universities and charities have conducted large clinical trials that were designed so hydroxychloroquine would fail to show benefit in the treatment of Covid-19, perhaps to advantage much more expensive competitors and vaccines in development … in so doing, they have conspired to deprive billions of people from potentially benefiting from a safe and inexpensive drug, when used properly, during a major pandemic.’
Nass was also one of the first observers to challenge the high-level cover-up of the laboratory origin of the virus. Last month we learned that four prominent scientists who played key roles in promoting the theory that it was a natural event received millions of dollars in extra US Government grant money in the subsequent two years. Most recently, Nass has explained how, despite thousands of deaths and injuries reported informally in the wake of the vaccine rollout, US regulators have been unable to say how many are caused by the jabs – and have continued to insist that most are coincidental. She writes: ‘If you don’t collect the adverse event data, and you don’t know the side-effect rates, you can keep the data-free experimental vaccinations going. With no one the wiser.’
“If doctors and academic journals can’t debate publicly, then it’s not science at all. It’s religion.”
Major technology companies and social media platforms have removed, suppressed or flagged the accounts of over 800 prominent individuals and organizations, including medical doctors, for COVID-19 misinformation, according to a new study from the Media Research Center (MRC). MRC’s Free Speech America CensorTrack, an initiative that monitors acts of censorship across online platforms, identified over 41 instances between March 2020 and February 2022 in which doctors, scientists and medical organizations were censored, according to the results of a study shared with Daily Caller News Foundation. The study focused on acts of censorship on major social media platforms and online services, including Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Ads and TikTok.
Instances of censorship included Facebook’s decision to flag the British Medical Journal with a “fact check” and “missing context” label, reducing the visibility of a post, for a study delving into data integrity issues with a Pfizer vaccine clinical trial. Facebook also deleted the page of The Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter led by dozens of medical professionals, including Dr. Jay Battacharya, a Stanford epidemiologist, and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a former employee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which advocated for less restrictive measures to address the dangers of COVID-19. “Big Tech set up a system where you can’t disagree with ‘the science’ even though that’s the foundation of the scientific method,” Dan Gainor, MRC vice president of Free Speech America, told the DCNF.
“If doctors and academic journals can’t debate publicly, then it’s not science at all. It’s religion.” Big Tech also scrubbed podcast host Joe Rogan’s interviews with scientists Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone, the latter of which was instrumental in pioneering mRNA technology. Twitter banned Malone from its platform permanently in late December 2021 over the virologist’s tweets questioning the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. “We tallied 32 different doctors who were censored, including mRNA vaccine innovator Dr. Robert Malone,” Gainor said. “Censoring views of credentialed experts doesn’t ensure confidence in vaccines, it undermines faith in government COVID-19 strategies.“
“Oddly, for the issue of the day, the data on myocarditis was all hidden in the supplementary appendix to the paper..”
Nature published a comprehensive study this week on cardiovascular risk including a total of over 11 million patients that has made a few headlines. The aim was to identify the cause of increased cardiac pathology. It should have been a very simple study comparing four groups:
• Not infected and never vaccinated
• Not infected and vaccinated
• Infected but not vaccinated
• Infected and vaccinated
It is hard to believe the authors did not look at these groups, but whatever was found when comparing them remains a mystery. Instead, the following groups were compared:
• Not infected and never vaccinated data from 2017
• Not infected, including vaccinated and not vaccinated
• Infected but not vaccinated
• Infected with vaccinated people included but using modelled adjustments
When studies with huge datasets use modelling and fail to share data prior to their adjustments alarm bells should start ringing. Therefore, I took a deeper dive to see what else was questionable. There were serious biases in the paper which need addressing but first let’s look at the critical question of myocarditis (heart inflammation). Because of the known risk of myocarditis from vaccination it is worth looking particularly closely at the data presented on this. Oddly, for the issue of the day, the data on myocarditis was all hidden in the supplementary appendix to the paper. The risk of myocarditis appears to be an autoimmune (the immune system attacking the heart after interaction with the spike protein) rather than direct damage by the virus/vaccine spike protein. Therefore, myocarditis could result from the virus or the vaccine.
The key question that needs answering is whether vaccination protects or enhances the risk from the virus. The authors report 370 per million risk of myocarditis after Covid infection in the unvaccinated. The contemporary control rate was 70 per million and the historic one was 40 per million. What was wrong with the contemporary controls? They made it clear they removed those who had been vaccinated from the calculation in the Covid arm but they did not state they did this for the control arm. Did vaccination lead to a 30 per million increase in myocarditis in the control arm? Given the cohort appears to be old and we know myocarditis incidence is worse in the young a one in 30,000 incidence is significant.
“..when you get jabbed the titers disintegrate over the space of just a few months. There was never evidence this would happen in people who got the virus and recovered..”
Never has there been a virus that, once you get it, you don’t have durable immunity to that specific virus. Yes, viruses mutate. Some mutate so much (e.g. HIV) that vaccination is basically impossible; it doesn’t work. All attempts to vaccinate against a coronavirus in the past have failed for this reason as well. We know the current jabs, for example, wane off in about six months time, becoming statistically worthless, and even faster if a new mutation shows up (e.g. Omicron.) The screamfest has been that “oh, if you had Covid, you’ll get it again so you need the jab.” There was never any evidence for this claim. Now, we have duration data out 20 months, basically the entire pandemic, and… I’ll just quote it:
“Among 295 reported COVID-confirmed participants, 293 (99%) tested positive for anti-RBD antibodies (≥250 U/mL, 44%; ≥500 U/mL, 27%; ≥1000 U/mL, 15%). A median of 8.7 (IQR, 1.9-12.9; range, 0-20) months passed since reported COVID-19 diagnosis. The median anti-RBD level among those who tested positive was 205 (IQR, 61-535) U/mL. There was no evidence of association between time after infection and antibody titer (0.8% increase [95% CI, -2.4% to 4.2%] per month, P = .62)”
There was no evidence of deterioration of protection, such as it is. Yet we know, factually, that when you get jabbed the titers disintegrate over the space of just a few months. There was never evidence this would happen in people who got the virus and recovered. Never one scintilla of evidence was ever presented for that claim and we now know it was false. Indeed the CDC has admitted that among those who had Covid the jabs provide no statistically-significant improvement in protection whatsoever. Yeah, this new study was a relatively small sample. But it showed several things, all of them important. First, many people who thought they had Covid, but didn’t get proved up for it, really didn’t have it. Second, about 10% of those who didn’t think they had it actually did but didn’t know it. And third, if you really did have it whatever protection you are afforded does not disappear over at least nearly two years time, which is all the experience we have with this specific virus thus far.
“.. a belief among at least some on Biden’s team that Americans are living in fear and are pessimistic about returning to their normal lives.”
With the midterm elections in sight, President Biden and fellow Democrats in Congress and governors’ mansions nationwide are completing a 180 on their COVID-19 response, abandoning the president’s promise to “shut down” the virus as Americans say they want to “get on with their lives.” In the process, Democrats have begun to lift key COVID-19 restrictions and return to normal life — the same approach, long embraced by red states, that they once rebuked as cruel and dangerous. Yet Biden and his Democratic allies are now taking credit for ending the pandemic while adopting these same policies. On Wednesday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, both Democrats, announced they will end mandates in their states requiring face coverings in most indoor public settings. However, masking rules for schools will remain in place.
Several other blue states — New Jersey, Connecticut, Delaware, Oregon, and California — are also lifting their indoor masking requirements in the coming days. All but California said they’ll no longer require masking in schools. The decisions by Democratic governors to ease COVID-19 restrictions come amid a larger push by the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress to contain — rather than defeat — the pandemic and prepare the country to live with it. “We are moving toward a time when COVID won’t disrupt our daily lives, a time when COVID won’t be a constant crisis,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Wednesday, adding that the president is looking to turn the page on the pandemic.
“We are internally discussing, of course, what it looks like to be in the phase of the fight against the COVID pandemic where it is not disrupting everyone’s daily lives, where people are moving on and living, lives free of, hopefully, masks at some point and many of the restrictions that we’ve all been living through over the past two years,” Psaki said. Her comments came after Politico reported the Biden administration is plotting to adapt to a “new normal” and condition Americans to live with COVID-19 in a bid to increase his low approval ratings and “boost [Democrats’] midterm prospects” amid soaring inflation and a stalled legislative agenda. “But in order to get people to view the pandemic differently, they have to feel differently about the pandemic,” said one senior administration official, echoing a belief among at least some on Biden’s team that Americans are living in fear and are pessimistic about returning to their normal lives.
Google translation from German.
An analysis of the Pentagon Health Database (DMED) points to a worrying increase in vaccine injuries among US soldiers. The study was presented on January 24 during a hearing by US Senator Ron Johnson. To shed more light on the matter, the Republican representative of the state of Wisconsin in the US Senate wrote to US Secretary of Defense Lloyd James Austin last Tuesday in a letter. In it, he listed other diseases potentially induced by the corona vaccination, which have increased significantly in 2021 compared to the five-year average:
Malignant tumors of the esophagus: increase of 894 percent
Multiple sclerosis: 680 percent increase
Breast cancer: 487 percent increase
Malignancies of the thyroid and other endocrine glands: 474 percent increase
Malignant tumor disease of the digestive organs: increase of 624 percent
Nervous disorders: increase of 1,048 percent
Johnson goes on to say that attorney Thomas Renz told him that some data regarding registered diagnoses of myocardial infarction had been removed from the Department of Defense database. Renz is representing the three Pentagon whistleblowers who released the disturbing numbers. “Have registered myocarditis diagnoses been removed from the database from January 2021 to December 2021?” Johnson bluntly asks the US Secretary of Defense. “If yes, please explain why and when this information was removed and who removed it.”
The senator also sees signs of deception as explosive: “After it was established that DMED data had been manipulated,” writes Johnson, “I immediately wrote to you on January 24th to keep all records that relate to the DMED or you were reported.” However, he has not yet been able to find out whether Austin complied with this request. Many questions that contain significant health-political explosives. Johnson has given the highest supervisor of all US soldiers February 15 as the deadline for an answer.
Huge if true… pic.twitter.com/LoajBfrV4M
— Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle (@DowdEdward) February 6, 2022
“..determined within 3 hours of visiting the Wuhan lab in February 2021 that there was no leak..”
Scientists in Hungary examining a unique variant of COVID-19 have discovered genetic material that suggests the strain was being examined in a Chinese lab, bolstering the lab leak theory. The researchers “found traces of a unique variant of coronavirus while examining DNA from soil from Antarctica that had been sent to the firm Sangon Biotech in Shanghai,” reports the Daily Mail. Genetic material from Chinese hamsters and green monkeys was also discovered, “which may suggest the virus was being examined in a lab, using either the animals themselves or their cells,” according to the report. Viscount Ridley said that such evidence bolsters the theory that the virus accidentally escaped or was leaked from the Wuhan lab deliberately.
The presence of “three key [COVID] mutations” is characteristic of the early sequences of the virus, according to Ridley. The discovery contradicts claims that the virus jumped from animals to humans naturally. For the best part of a year, the lab leak theory was dismissed by the legacy media and ‘fact checkers’ as a racist conspiracy theory. It subsequently emerged that Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance, a group that has extensive ties to the Wuhan lab gain of function research, thanked Dr. Anthony Fauci for dismissing the lab leak theory early on in the pandemic. He subsequently created a pressure campaign via a letter published by The Lancet to force the scientific community into avoiding looking into the lab as a potential source of the outbreak.
Daszak was also tasked by Facebook with ‘fact-checking’ (censoring) information related to the hypothesis, while Google, which via YouTube also censored information about the theory, also funded Daszak’s virus research. Daszak was also the lead investigator for the World Health Organization investigation that determined within 3 hours of visiting the Wuhan lab in February 2021 that there was no leak purely based on the word of researchers there.
Russia might steal his DNA…
French President Emmanuel Macron refused a Kremlin request that he take a Russian COVID-19 test when he arrived to see President Vladimir Putin this week, and was therefore kept at a distance from the Russian leader, two sources in Macron’s entourage told Reuters. Observers were struck by images of Macron and Putin sitting at opposite ends of 4-metre-long (13 ft) table to discuss the Ukraine crisis on Monday, with some diplomats and others suggesting Putin might be wanting to send a diplomatic message. But the two sources, who have knowledge of the French president’s health protocol, told Reuters Macron had been given a choice: either he accepted a PCR test done by the Russian authorities and was allowed to get close to Putin, or he refused and had to abide by more stringent social distancing.
“We knew very well that meant no handshake and that long table. But we could not accept that they get their hands on the president’s DNA,” one of the sources told Reuters, referring to security concerns if the French leader was tested by Russian doctors. The second source in Macron’s entourage confirmed Macron declined to take a Russian PCR test. The source said Macron instead took a French PCR test before departure and an antigen test done by his own doctor once in Russia. “The Russians told us Putin needed to be kept in a strict health bubble,” the second source said. On Thursday, three days after Macron and Putin had their socially-distanced meeting, the Russian leader received Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. The two men shook hands, and sat close to each other, divided only by a small coffee table.
It’s literally a School For Dictators…
In 1992 Schwab established a parallel institution, the Global Leaders for Tomorrow school, which was re-established as Young Global Leaders in 2004. Attendees at the school must apply for admission and are then subjected to a rigorous selection process. Members of the school’s very first class in 1992 already included many who went on to become important liberal political figures, such as Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy, and Tony Blair. There are currently about 1,300 graduates of this school, and the list of alumni includes several names of those who went on to become leaders of the health institutions of their respective nations. Four of them are former and current health ministers for Germany, including Jens Spahn, who has been Federal Minister of Health since 2018. Philipp Rösler, who was Minister of Health from 2009 until 2011, was appointed the WEF’s Managing Director by Schwab in 2014.
Other notable names on the school’s roster are Jacinda Ardern, the Prime Minister of New Zealand whose stringent lockdown measures have been praised by global health authorities; Emmanuel Macron, the President of France; Sebastian Kurz, who was until recently the Chancellor of Austria; Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary; Jean-Claude Juncker, former Prime Minister of Luxembourg and President of the European Commission; and Annalena Baerbock, the leader of the German Greens who was the party’s first candidate for Chancellor in this year’s federal election, and who is still in the running to be Merkel’s successor. We also find California Governor Gavin Newsom on the list, who was selected for the class of 2005, as well as former presidential candidate and current US Secretary of Transportation Peter Buttigieg, who is a very recent alumnus, having been selected for the class of 2019. All of these politicians who were in office during the past two years have favored harsh responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, and which also happened to considerably increase their respective governments’ power.
Tucker & Malone Discuss The World Economic Forum & It's Young Global Leader Program… pic.twitter.com/keVQpK7GBW
— Covid-1984 (@Orwells_Ghost_) February 10, 2022
Some confusion about the numbers out there, but it’s significant. “.. a group of more than 10,000 Assange supporters called AssangeDAO..”
Assange collaborated with a crypto artist known as Pak to sell a collection of NFTs (non-fungible tokens) called Censored in an online auction from February 7-9 to raise funds to support his case. NFTs are a kind of crypto asset that uses blockchain to record the ownership status of digital files such as images, videos and even items within online games. The centrepiece of the auction was an NFT artwork, Clock, that displays the number of days Assange has been imprisoned in white text on a black background. It updates each day. The Clock NFT fetched 16,593 of the cryptocurrency ether, a sum worth around $72 million. It was bought by a group of more than 10,000 Assange supporters called AssangeDAO.
A Decentralised Autonomous Organisation (DAO) is a sort of online community which allows members to pool their money and use blockchain-based tokens to vote on decisions about how the group is run. Proceeds from the sale of Clock will go to support Assange’s legal defence. “This is tens of thousands of people coming together to show real strength — the Power of the People,” AssangeDAO community lead Joshua Bate said in a Discord post. “In less than one week, we have shown that decentralised and distributed peoples can band together to fight injustice.” Another member of the AssangeDAO team, Amir Taaki, told Reuters: “The AssangeDAO represents a Rubicon that’s been crossed”.
Everything Censored returns to the people.
Auction (1/1) proceeds will go to Wau Holland foundation to support Julian Assange's defence.
Open Edition (x/x) proceeds will go to freedom of information, digital privacy, education, health, human and animal rights organizations. pic.twitter.com/C7LK8yroRJ
— Pak (@muratpak) February 5, 2022
The real Joe Rogan
— Saagar Enjeti (@esaagar) February 10, 2022
The real Russell Brand
Reacting to why the media now brands him "right-wing" as his independent shows explode in growth, Russell Brand explains who really are the people who have abandoned corporate media and now rely on independent media. This is what scares the shit out of them and why they malign it pic.twitter.com/u3tBhWELkd
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) February 10, 2022
Support the Automatic Earth in virustime with Paypal, Bitcoin and Patreon.