Sep 082016
 September 8, 2016  Posted by at 12:55 pm Finance Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,

AlfredEisenstaedt View of Midtown Manhattan NYC 1939



This is part 4 of a 4-part series by Nicole Foss entitled “Negative Interest Rates and the War on Cash”.

Part 1 is here: Negative Interest Rates and the War on Cash (1)

Part 2 is here: Negative Interest Rates and the War on Cash (2)

Part 3 is here: Negative Interest Rates and the War on Cash (3)

We will soon publish the entire piece in one post.

Here is Nicole:




Financial Totalitarianism in Historical Context


Nicole Foss: In attempting to keep the credit bonanza going with their existing powers, central banks have set the global financial system up for an across-the-board asset price collapse:

QE takes away the liquidity preference choice out of the hands of the consumers, and puts it into the hands of central bankers, who through asset purchases push up asset prices even if it does so by explicitly devaluing the currency of price measurement; it also means that the failure of NIRP is — by definition — a failure of central banking, and if and when the central bank backstop of any (make that all) asset class — i.e., Q.E., is pulled away, that asset (make that all) will crash.

It is not just central banking, but also globalisation, which is demonstrably failing. Cross-border freedoms will probably be an early casualty of the war on cash, and its demise will likely come as a shock to those used to a relatively borderless world:

We have been informed with reliable sources that in Germany where Maestro was a multi-national debit card service owned by MasterCard that was founded in 1992 is seriously under attack. Maestro cards are obtained from associate banks and can be linked to the card holder’s current account, or they can be prepaid cards. Already we find such cards are being cancelled and new debit cards are being issued.

Why? The new cards cannot be used at an ATM outside of Germany to obtain cash. Any attempt to get cash can only be as an advance on a credit card….This is total insanity and we are losing absolutely everything that made society function. Once they eliminate CASH, they will have total control over who can buy or sell anything.

The same confused, greedy and corrupt central authorities which have set up the global economy for a major bust through their dysfunctional use of existing powers, are now seeking far greater central control, in what would amount to the ultimate triumph of finance over people. They are now moving to tax what ever people have left over after paying taxes. It has been tried before. As previous historical bubbles began to collapse, central authorities attempted to increase their intrusiveness and control over the population, in order to force the inevitable losses as far down the financial foodchain as possible. As far back as the Roman Empire, economically contractionary periods have been met with financial tyranny — increasing pressure on the populace until the system itself breaks:

Not even the death penalty was enough to enforce Diocletian’s price control edicts in the third century.

Rome squeezed the peasants in its empire so hard, that many eventually abandoned their land, reckoning that they were better off with the barbarians.

Such attempts at total financial control are exactly what one would expect at this point. A herd of financial middle men are used to being very well supported by the existing financial system, and as that system begins to break down, losing that raft of support is unacceptable. The people at the bottom of the financial foodchain must be watched and controlled in order to make sure they are paying to support the financial centre in the manner to which it has become accustomed, even as their ability to do so is continually undermined:

An oft-overlooked benefit of cash transactions is that there is no intermediary. One party pays the other party in mutually accepted currency and not a single middleman gets to wet his beak. In a cashless society there will be nothing stopping banks or other financial mediators from taking a small piece of every single transaction. They would also be able to use — and potentially abuse — the massive deposits of data they collect on their customers’ payment behavior. This information is of huge interest and value to retail marketing departments, other financial institutions, insurance companies, governments, secret services, and a host of other organizations….

….So in order to save a financial system that is morally beyond the pale and stopped serving the basic needs of the real economy a long time ago, governments and central banks must do away with the last remaining thing that gives people a small semblance of privacy, anonymity, and personal freedom in their increasingly controlled and surveyed lives. The biggest tragedy of all is that the governments and banks’ strongest ally in their War on Cash is the general public itself. As long as people continue to abandon the use of cash, for the sake of a few minor gains in convenience, the war on cash is already won.

Even if the ultimate failure of central control is predictable, momentum towards greater centralisation will carry forward for as long as possible, until the system can no longer function, at which point a chaotic free-for-all is likely to occur. In the meantime, the movement towards electronic money seeks to empower the surveillance state/corporatocracy enormously, providing it with the tools to observe and control virtually every aspect of people’s lives:

Governments and corporations, even that genius app developer in Russia, have one thing in common: they want to know everything. Data is power. And money. As the Snowden debacle has shown, they’re getting there. Technologies for gathering information, then hoarding it, mining it, and using it are becoming phenomenally effective and cheap. But it’s not perfect. Video surveillance with facial-recognition isn’t everywhere just yet. Not everyone is using a smartphone. Not everyone posts the details of life on Facebook. Some recalcitrant people still pay with cash. To the greatest consternation of governments and corporations, stuff still happens that isn’t captured and stored in digital format….

….But the killer technology isn’t the elimination of cash. It’s the combination of payment data and the information stream that cellphones, particularly smartphones, deliver. Now everything is tracked neatly by a single device that transmits that data on a constant basis to a number of companies, including that genius app developer in Russia — rather than having that information spread over various banks, credit card companies, etc. who don’t always eagerly surrender that data.

Eventually, it might even eliminate the need for data brokers. At that point, a single device knows practically everything. And from there, it’s one simple step to transfer part or all of this data to any government’s data base. Opinions are divided over whom to distrust more: governments or corporations. But one thing we know: mobile payments and the elimination of cash….will also make life a lot easier for governments and corporations in their quest for the perfect surveillance society.

Dissent is increasingly being criminalised, with legitimate dissenters commonly referred to, and treated as, domestic terrorists and potentially subjected to arbitrary asset confiscation:

An important reason why the state would like to see a cashless society is that it would make it easier to seize our wealth electronically. It would be a modern-day version of FDR’s confiscation of privately-held gold in the 1930s. The state will make more and more use of “threats of terrorism” to seize financial assets. It is already talking about expanding the definition of “terrorist threat” to include critics of government like myself.

The American state already confiscates financial assets under the protection of various guises such as the PATRIOT Act. I first realized this years ago when I paid for a new car with a personal check that bounced. The car dealer informed me that the IRS had, without my knowledge, taken 20 percent of the funds that I had transferred from a mutual fund to my bank account in order to buy the car. The IRS told me that it was doing this to deter terrorism, and that I could count it toward next year’s tax bill.



The elimination of cash in favour of official electronic money only would greatly accelerate and accentuate the ability of governments to punish those they dislike, indeed it would allow them to prevent dissenters from engaging in the most basic functions:

If all money becomes digital, it would be much easier for the government to manipulate our accounts. Indeed, numerous high-level NSA whistleblowers say that NSA spying is about crushing dissent and blackmailing opponents. not stopping terrorism. This may sound over-the-top. but remember, the government sometimes labels its critics as “terrorists”. If the government claims the power to indefinitely detain — or even assassinate — American citizens at the whim of the executive, don’t you think that government people would be willing to shut down, or withdraw a stiff “penalty” from a dissenter’s bank account?

If society becomes cashless, dissenters can’t hide cash. All of their financial holdings would be vulnerable to an attack by the government. This would be the ultimate form of control. Because — without access to money — people couldn’t resist, couldn’t hide and couldn’t escape.

The trust that has over many years enabled the freedoms we enjoy is now disappearing rapidly, and the impact of its demise is already palpable. Citizens understandably do not trust governments and powerful corporations, which have increasingly clearly been acting in their own interests in consolidating control over claims to real resources in the hands of fewer and fewer individuals and institutions:

By far the biggest risk posed by digital alternatives to cash such as mobile money is the potential for massive concentration of financial power and the abuses and conflicts of interest that would almost certainly ensue. Naturally it goes without saying that most of the institutions that will rule the digital money space will be the very same institutions….that have already broken pretty much every rule in the financial service rule book.

They have manipulated virtually every market in existence; they have commodified and financialized pretty much every natural resource of value on this planet; and in the wake of the financial crisis they almost single-handedly caused, they have extorted billions of dollars from the pockets of their own customers and trillions from hard-up taxpayers. What about your respective government authorities? Do you trust them?…

….We are, it seems, descending into a world where new technologies threaten to put absolute power well within the grasp of a select group of individuals and organizations — individuals and organizations that have through their repeated actions betrayed just about every possible notion of mutual trust.

Governments do not trust their citizens (‘potential terrorists’) either, hence the perceived need to monitor and limit the scope of their decisions and actions. The powers-that-be know how angry people are going to be when they realise the scale of their impending dispossession, and are acting in such a way as to (try to) limit the power of the anger that will be focused against them. It is not going to work.

Without trust we are likely to see “throwbacks to the 14th century….at the dawn of banking coming out of the Dark Ages.”. It is no coincidence that this period was also one of financial, socioeconomic and humanitarian crises, thanks to the bursting of a bubble two centuries in the making:

The 14th Century was a time of turmoil, diminished expectations, loss of confidence in institutions, and feelings of helplessness at forces beyond human control. Historian Barbara Tuchman entitled her book on this period A Distant Mirror because many of our modern problems had counterparts in the 14th Century.

Few think of the trials and tribulations of 14th century Europe as having their roots in financial collapse — they tend instead to remember famine and disease. However, the demise of what was then the world banking system was a leading indicator for what followed, as is always the case:

Six hundred and fifty years ago came the climax of the worst financial collapse in history to date. The 1930’s Great Depression was a mild and brief episode, compared to the bank crash of the 1340’s, which decimated the human population. The crash, which peaked in A.C.E. 1345 when the world’s biggest banks went under, “led” by the Bardi and Peruzzi companies of Florence, Italy, was more than a bank crash — it was a financial disintegration….a blowup of all major banks and markets in Europe, in which, chroniclers reported, “all credit vanished together,” most trade and exchange stopped, and a catastrophic drop of the world’s population by famine and disease loomed.

As we have written many times before at The Automatic Earth, bubbles are not a new phenomenon. They have inflated and subsequently imploded since the dawn of civilisation, and are in fact en emergent property of civilisational scale. There are therefore many parallels between different historical episodes of boom and bust:

The parallels between the medieval credit crunch and our current predicament are considerable. In both cases the money supply increased in response to the expansionist pressure of unbridled optimism. In both cases the expansion proceeded to the point where a substantial overhang of credit had been created — a quantity sufficient to generate systemic risk that was not recognized at the time. In the fourteenth century, that risk was realized, as it will be again in the 21st century.

What we are experiencing now is simply the same dynamic, but turbo-charged by the availability of energy and technology that have driven our long period of socioeconomic expansion and ever-increasing complexity. Just as in the 14th century, the cracks in the system have been visible for many years, but generally ignored. The coming credit implosion may appear to come from nowhere when it hits, but has long been foreshadowed if one knew what to look for. Watching more and more people seeking escape routes from a doomed financial system, and the powers-that-be fighting back by closing those escape routes, all within a social matrix of collapsing trust, one cannot deny that history is about to repeat itself yet again, only on a larger scale this time.

The final gasps of a bubble economy, such as our own, are about behind-the-scenes securing of access to and ownership of real assets for the elite, through bailouts and other forms of legalized theft. As Frédéric Bastiat explained in 1848,

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”

The bust which follows the last attempt to kick the can further down the road will see the vast majority of society dispossessed of what they thought they owned, their ephemeral electronic claims to underlying real wealth extinguished.


The Way Forward


The advent of negative interest rates indicates that the endgame for the global economy is underway. In places at the peak of the bubble, negative rates drive further asset bubbles and create ever greater vulnerability to the inevitable interest rate spike and asset price collapse to come. In Japan, at the other end of the debt deflation cycle, negative rates force people into ever more cash hoarding. Neither one of these outcomes is going to lead to recovery. Both indicate economies at breaking point. We cannot assume that current financial, economic and social structures will continue in their present form, and we need to prepare for a period of acute upheaval.

Using cash wherever possible, rather than succumbing to the convenience of electronic payments, becomes an almost revolutionary act. So other forms of radical decentralisation, which amount to opting out as much as possible from the path the powers-that-be would have us follow. It is likely to become increasingly difficult to defend our freedom and independence, but if enough people stand their ground, establishing full totalitarian control should not be possible.

To some extent, the way the war on cash plays out will depend on the timing of the coming financial implosion. The elimination of cash would take time, and only in some countries has there been enough progress away from cash that eliminating it would be at all realistic. If only a few countries tried to do so, people in those countries would be likely to use foreign currency that was still legal tender.



Cash elimination would really only work if it it were very broadly applied in enough major economies, and if a financial accident could be postponed for a few more years. As neither of these conditions is likely to be fulfilled, a cash ban is unlikely to viable. Governments and central banks would very much like to frighten people away from cash, but that only underlines its value under the current circumstances. Cash is king in a deflation. The powers-that-be know that, and would like the available cash to end up concentrated in their own hands rather than spread out to act as seed capital for a bottom-up recovery.

Holding on to cash under one’s own control is still going to be a very important option for maintaining freedom of action in an uncertain future. The alternative would be to turn to hard goods (land, tools etc) from the beginning, but where there is a great deal of temporal and spatial uncertainty, this amounts to making all one’s choices up front, and choices based on incomplete information could easily turn out to be wrong. Making such choices up front is also expensive, as prices are currently high. Of course having some hard goods is also advisable, particularly if they allow one to have some control over the essentials of one’s own existence.

It is the balance between hard goods and maintaining capital as liquidity (cash) that is important. Where that balance lies depends very much on individual circumstances, and on location. For instance, in the European Union, where currency reissue is a very real threat in a reasonably short timeframe, opting for goods rather than cash makes more sense, unless one holds foreign currency such as Swiss francs. If one must hold euros, it would probably be advisable to hold German ones (serial numbers begin with X).


US dollars are likely to hold their value for longer than most other currencies, given the dollar’s role as the global reserve currency. Reports of its demise are premature, to put it mildly. As financial crisis picks up momentum, a flight to safety into the reserve currency is likely to pick up speed, raising the value of the dollar against other currencies. In addition, demand for dollars will increase as debtors seek to pay down dollar-denominated debt. While all fiat currencies are ultimately vulnerable in the beggar-thy-neighbour currency wars to come, the US dollar should hold value for longer than most.

Holding cash on the sidelines while prices fall is a good strategy, so long as one does not wait too long. The risks to holding and using cash are likely to grow over time, so it is best viewed as a short term strategy to ride out the deflationary period, where the value of credit instruments is collapsing. The purchasing power of cash will rise during this time, and previously unforeseen opportunities are likely to arise.

Ordinary people need to retain as much of their freedom of action as possible, in order for society to function through a period of economic seizure. In general, the best strategy is to hold cash until the point where the individual in question can afford to purchase the goods they require to provide for their own needs without taking on debt to do so. (Avoiding taking on debt is extremely important, as financially encumbered assets would be subject to repossession in the event of failure to meet debt obligations.)

One must bear in mind, however, that after price falls, some goods may cease to be available at any price, so some essentials may need to be purchased at today’s higher prices in order to guarantee supply.

Capital preservation is an individual responsibility, and during times of deflation, capital must be preserved as liquidity. We cannot expect either governments or private institutions to protect our interests, as both have been obviously undermining the interests of ordinary people in favour of their own for a very long time. Indeed they seem to feel secure enough of their own consolidated control that they do not even bother to try to hide the fact any longer. It is our duty to inform ourselves and act to protect ourselves, our families and our communities. If we do not, no one else will.

Home Forums Negative Interest Rates and the War on Cash (4)

Viewing 28 posts - 1 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • Author
  • #30312

    AlfredEisenstaedt View of Midtown Manhattan NYC 1939     This is part 4 of a 4-part series by Nicole Foss entitled “Negative Interest Rates
    [See the full post at: Negative Interest Rates and the War on Cash (4)]


    Excellent and timely; many thanks!

    “Indeed they seem to feel secure enough of their own consolidated control that they do not even bother to try to hide the fact any longer.”

    Always a big mistake. What Toynbee calls “the dominant minority overstepping their bounds.”


    Addendum to my earlier comment:


    Thank you for a very accurate summation of the impending situation, without trying to sell me gold [which will be worthless in a cashless society] and or a book depicting the world economic collapse and how to survive it [buy gold].


    I think if you have some land and resource under your own control – such as cash, firewood, food growing etc. and you have any spare time right now – it is worth allowing for arrangement s whereby friends and family can be accommodated. If there is more than one family or interest on site productive work goes up and so does the security of the assets on site. As the trust horizon shrinks it is worth approaching these abstract concepts from a permaculture perspective and treat relationships in a zonal framework. Zone 1 – trusted (family / close friends) is like the veggie garden and the lemon tree – keep it close and interact often. The government – least trust (zone 5) is like the wildlife corridor which has access through the property (rates and taxes) but steered away from important aspects like vegetables that need protection (which in the case of this concept maybe privacy and personal communication for example).
    Or am I just trippin’ coz this new article has blown my mind – yet again.


    Banks are like foxes; and netting to protect the chickens (family) is essential. I have noted that during very dry times foxes will even dig deep into dry mud to look for yabbies and they have scat filled with insect skeletons. The point is they do whatever it takes and they are out there in the shadows watching your shit and working out ways to steal and devour it!


    I don’t think the central banks are even trying anymore. QE seems to be thinly veiled looting of the system. It makes no sense, has no logical structure that suggests it might stimulate the economy. It seems to be on the order of prayer, if we shovel money to the top of the economic chain, maybe people will spend money again. Let’s face it, we have ‘grown’ into every nook and cranny of the planet. Max finance, max exploitation, max pollution, nothing left but to circle the drain.


    Jim Rickards talks about the use of the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights to function as a global central bank, issuing debt to buy up the bad assets of the Central Banks. That would keep the game going longer. It isn’t part of this scenario, so does that mean you reject it?


    Just as electronic money can be confiscated, so will land be. Best to travel light and be able to change directions in a moments notice. With .gov by emergency, property rights go out the window, along with other rights and liberties.


    Agree, there Tulsa. QE will ultimately lead to a breakdown of the supply chain. And when that happens there will be shortages, leading to a massive money supply chasing too few goods. Velocity squared will be the result. Think Venezuela on a mass scale.

    Deflation is what comes after, not before, the destruction of the currency.


    Guess the poor will always be with us,,,as will the black markets,,,,whatever they use for currency.


    I know we will have structural change when the dust settles but all land confiscated….? I guess they did it to indigenous cultures the world over but that was a lot of peoples and their power structures versus very few people. I am inclined to agree with Nicole that there will be political and financial upheaval in the event of these sort of controls. Or alternatively it just gets harder and shitter by increments every. single. day.


    Interestingly, what you describe as “the worst financial collapse in history to date (…) the bank crash of the 1340’s, which decimated the human population, was cause by one country: England, which defaulted on its debt.


    regionswork et al

    The issue of SDRs was the topic of Christopher Balding’s latest (Debt Rattle Sep 7). Where Rickards and others see SDR issuance as a sign of Chinese strength (and of impending end of USD), Balding concludes the opposite. I don’t know about Nicole, we haven’t discussed this, but I would certainly agree with Balding. A new Goldman report estimates annual growth in Chinese debt/GDP at 30-40%, on top of a recent IIF estimate of total debt/GDP of 300%. Claims of Chinese strength are greatly exaggerated.

    Why China Isn’t a Financial Center doesn’t want to let the yuan’s value float freely, which would be a prerequisite to its becoming a true reserve currency. China saw SDRs as a way to split the difference, to create a competitor to the dollar and maintain a fixed exchange rate at the same time. The problem is that there’s almost no conceivable reason to use them. SDRs were created as a synthetic reserve asset by the IMF decades ago, under the Bretton Woods system. No country uses them for normal business, and no government is likely to issue bonds denominated in them except for political reasons, as the World Bank is doing. Companies won’t use them either. If a firm wants to borrow to build a plant in Japan, it will issue a bond in yen so it can repay in yen.


    What’s a poor boy to do?

    Need to get out of equities, they’re in an unsustainable bubble. Need to get out of bonds, they’re in an unsustainable bubble. Need to get out of real estate, it’s in an unsustainable bubble. Need to get out of bank deposits, they’re vulnerable to bail-in confiscation. And there’s a war on cash. Phew!

    The least bad option (in the UK) seems to be very short-dated gilts (1 year or less). Yeah, you’re guaranteed to lose a little because consumer prices are going up faster that the interest rate paid … but that seems to be the least bad thing one can do at the moment. Thoughts?


    By the way, hoarding cash is certainly not a robust response to the war on cash. They can just re-issue new set of notes and declare the old ones null and void. You have to take your old ones to the bank to change them into new ones (at an extremely unattractive rate) or, in the event of a cash ban, you have to take your old notes to the bank to convert them into bank deposits.

    The first one was done in Russia and Poland in the nineties. I was there, I saw what it did. Ordinary people were wiped out.

    V. Arnold

    @ the3rdhorse
    Thank you for a very accurate summation of the impending situation, without trying to sell me gold [which will be worthless in a cashless society] and or a book depicting the world economic collapse and how to survive it [buy gold].
    Well, 5,000+ years of history would prove you dead wrong. You would be well served to read David Graeber’s; Debt, the first 5,000 years.
    It’s quite an eye opening view of the store of value throughout the very recent history of human “finance”; and barter is a myth that continues to perpetuate with no historical evidence.
    There is no limit to human’s propensity for self delusion and mythological belief…

    John Day

    There is so much questioning of what to do, questions I have long asked myself.
    Any answer must evaluate baseline assumptions, such as immediacy and mobility, “fungibility” of assets, places and people.
    The fungibility is what has to be removed in a time where the elites will commandeer everything which can be taken away.
    Don’t merely have a very small farm/homestead on fertile soil with access to water, but grow sweet potatoes, not wheat or corn. An army will take wheat and corn from you.
    One (really a small, coeherent working group) must also maintain a foot in the other camp, or simply be evicted and the homestead given to somebody who does support the system.
    Where should such a place be located? Not Phoenix, Arizona.
    Any “solution” to such a complex and pervasive threat becomes extremely constrained. We need to be close enough to the worlds we are part of to maintain the value of those ties.
    The picture at this link is of me in the garden 7/4/16, which was a smallish back yard of a duplex unit, until 3 years ago. It’s not a “solution”. It’s a step.
    The article describes a 3-bed and 5-bed succession/rotation growing system for Climate Zone 8A (sub tropical, modest freezes), which is a partial-solution.

    John Day

    Here is something instructive, “Nutrition in Neo-Peasant Wessex”, where a small farmer across the Atlantic from us yanks works out what can reasonably done to subsistence-farm 10 hectares in Wessex.

    Nutrition in Neo-Peasant Wessex

    Nicole Foss

    For those who may be wondering why I haven’t mentioned gold in this article, here’s my take on gold:

    Nicole Foss

    Seychelles, I completely agree about “the dominant minority overstepping their bounds”. They are over-confident and think they have far more control than they actually do. They have a tiger by the tail, so to speak.

    Nicole Foss

    Oxymoron, thanks for the permaculture analogy – very apt 🙂

    Nicole Foss

    Regionswork, I don’t think the SDR proposals will work. However you slice it, there’s simply too much bad debt in the world to shovel under the carpet at this point. It’s a very large multiple of global GDP. No lender of last resort can absorb that.

    Nicole Foss

    Professor Locknload, indeed property rights will be threatened, land and other things can be confiscated. There are no risk-free options. People need to decide whether they want to invest in a fixed location and make the best of it, or opt for maximum mobility. Both options have advantages and disadvantages, so there’s no one right answer. Different people will make different choices.

    As for your view on hyperinflation, I disagree completely, as you know. We have had the inflation in the form of credit hyperexpansion. Deflation comes next. Only in places such as Greece, with currency re-issue on the cards, and Japan, which is at the other end of the cycle from the rest of us, is currency hyperinflation a threat in the relatively near term. For most of the developed world, credit collapse is going to send economies into a long-lasting deep-freeze, along the lines of Dante’s Ninth Circle of Hell.

    QE has monetized only a tiny fraction of outstanding debt, and has done nothing to stimulate the economy. All it has done is inflate asset bubbles, setting up the asset owners for a price collapse. Where those assets are leveraged, they will be lost and the debt added to the overall leverage burden acting as a millstone round the neck of the economy. The velocity of money will be very low, as it always is in an economic depression. People will be trying to sell all manner of consumer goods in order to buy essentials like food and fuel, but there will be no buyers. Think of the photos from the 1930s of bankers trying to sell off fancy cars for next to nothing and still finding no buyers.

    The price of essentials (as opposed to consumer goods) is likely to rise in real terms, even as they fall in nominal terms (at least initially). A much larger percentage of a much smaller money supply will be chasing them, and providing relative price support.

    Nicole Foss

    Beanny, England defaulting on its debt was only one aspect of the banking crisis of the 14th century. The full picture is far more complicated and multi-dimensional. Here’s an article I wrote some time ago on the early stages of that crisis – looking at the great credit crunch of 1294.

    The Infinite Elasticity of Credit

    Nicole Foss

    Chemical Kev,

    Indeed there are few places to hide stores of value that confer freedom of acton in the future. I wouldn’t touch equities or long term bonds, and I wouldn’t trust the banking/brokerage system at all. Short term government bonds are a cash equivalent for the time being, and therefore a least-worst option, along with cash itself. There aren’t any really good options, only balance of risk calculations for each possible choice.

    The risks for cash and short term bonds are currency re-issue and short term bonds being recategorized as long term (to be defaulted upon later). These risks vary in significance depending on where one is located, but in general terms are lower than the risks associated with equities and most debt instruments. Currency re-issue is a major problem for the eurozone. For other places it may happen, but probably not soon. Cash is in any case a short term option to ride out the deflation, before moving into hard goods prior to the bottom. Holding cash initially, but getting out of it in favour of hard goods as prices fall, seems one of the best options. I discussed this point in the article (noting the Russian experience).

    As for real estate, the risks are illiquidity and price collapse. Real estate makes sense if one can purchase it with no debt, if it can provide for the essentials of one’s own existence, if it can be a focus for community and if one doesn’t have to be concerned about its falling value in financial terms. For some people it will make at lot of sense, but for others no sense at all, depending on individual circumstances. In general, young people will be better off focusing on mobility and flexibility.

    V. Arnold

    Hi Nicole, I read your response above re: gold.
    I agree with most but not all of what you said; first I would say owning physical gold is the only option (in what ever form one chooses). IMO, gold should not be considered an investment, period; but strictly a store of value and it should be bought, regardless of price, whenever one can afford it. By afford I mean just like buying stocks or gambling in a casino (bad analogy, I know), spend only what one can afford to lose.
    A true anecdote; my mother and father in law were Ukrainian, released from their prison camps with the fall of Germany (WWII; Stepan fought in the Russian army), bread, in Germany, could not be bought with paper money; the bakers would only accept gold.
    I have the impression many think “the coming collapse” will look like that. I have no idea; I’ve been listening to the doomers for decades and obviously, due to many factors, their views are wrong. Yes, things are deteriorating across the board, but almost slow motion, including the violence.
    There are many options still; but I see borders closing and the day may come when U.S. citizens will be denied freedom to travel/move abroad. Record numbers of U.S. citizens are renouncing their citizenship (it went from $400+ to almost $4,000 USD). The borders are closing…

Viewing 28 posts - 1 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.