Oct 262021
 October 26, 2021  Posted by at 8:51 am Finance Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,

M. C. Escher Relativity Lattice 1953


Who Will They Blame When Everyone is Vaccinated?
Concerns About Suboptimal Vaccine Antibodies Erasing Natural Immunity (Blaze)
Informed Consent Disclosure To Vaccine Trial Subjects (NIH)
Why Won’t The CDC or FDA Reveal The VAERS URF? (Kirsch)
200,000 Grannies, No Problem. A Few Puppies? (Denninger)
Consider the Lowly Sandflies (Kunstler)
The Age of Exterminations (VI): The Great Famine to Come (Ugo Bardi)
Biden’s “C’mon, Man” Defense Will Not Fly on Religious Freedom (Turley)
Hertz Orders 100,000 Teslas For Rental Cars (Byte)
‘Unthinkable’ For High Court To Lift US Extradition Ban On Julian Assange (DM)
Allegation Of CIA Murder Plot Game-changer In Assange Extradition Hearing (R.)
A Guide To The US Appeal In The Assange Extradition Case (Gosztola)







Scott Jensen



They will always find a witch to burn, or drown.

Problem is, how are we going to tell the vaxxed that they are in grave danger?

Who Will They Blame When Everyone is Vaccinated?

A question we have been asking for several months: Who are the political officials going to blame for rising COVID infection and hospitalization rates when the vaccination rates are well over 90 percent? What happens on a sociological scale when a vaxxed society realizes there is no magic panacea afforded by the vaccination narrative? Author Jack Cashill takes those questions head-on in a Spectator article noting we only need to look at Waterford, Ireland, to see the dynamic where an almost completely obedient and vaccinated population of 99.7% is facing rising COVID infection rates despite their good citizenship:

Cashill – […] “The arbitrary evolution of Irish COVID policy over the past 18 months has made it clear that public health officials and government policy makers have no idea what they are doing. If proof were needed, County Waterford provides it. According to data published on October 21, Waterford City South has the nation’s highest 14-day incidence rate at 1,486 cases per 100,000 and Tramore-Waterford City West has the third highest at 1,122 cases per 100,000. This is despite internal travel bans and the county’s more than 90 percent vaccination rate. Although Waterford is running three times the rate of the nation writ large, Ireland as a whole is not faring particularly well, especially given its draconian restrictions. In the seven days preceding October 21, Ireland reported 2,026 new cases. To put that number in perspective, wide-open Florida had 2,262 cases during that same period with a population more than four times greater than the Irish Republic’s.”

Read more …

More vaccines -> More Covid.

Concerns About Suboptimal Vaccine Antibodies Erasing Natural Immunity (Blaze)

In many areas of life, half a loaf is better than no loaf at all. But when it comes to vaccines, the opposite is true. Half-baked antibodies injected throughout the entire population can make the virus even stronger and negate people’s natural immunity. Thus, all the defenses of the leaky vaccine suggesting that it at least conveys “some” protection are actually extremely concerning, a point driven home by a nugget in the most recent surveillance report from Public Health England (PHE). On page 23 of PHE’s “COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 42,” British health officials report a shocking finding. They believe their serology tests are underestimating the number of people with prior infection due to “recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.”

In other words, the vaccine might be reducing the all-important N antibodies that one generates from natural infection. Kudos to former NYT reporter Alex Berenson for discovering this important point. Until now, we’ve been operating under the assumption that those with prior infection don’t need the vaccine to boost immunity and taking the shots would only expose them to the growing risk of side effects. However, what if the shots are actually sliding back the natural immunity generated in those with previous infection? What if that is related to the macro concern that a narrow-spectrum vaccine with suboptimal antibodies that only recognize the “S” (spike) protein of the virus but not the “N” (nucleocapsid) of the virus will cause B cells in those with the vaccine to learn to produce only S antibodies, which are slower-acting and less sterilizing (don’t stop transmission) than N antibodies, which are faster-acting and are more effective in their protection against the virus?

It’s not like we weren’t confronted with some other warning signs that the vaccine could perhaps negate some of the immunity acquired from prior infection. In March, researchers from Mount Sinai in New York and Hospital La Paz in Madrid posted a preprint study indicating that at least the second Pfizer shot might weaken T cell immunity. In a shocking discovery after monitoring a group of vaccinated people both with and without prior infection, they found “in individuals with a pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the second vaccine dose not only fail to boost humoral immunity but determines a contraction of the spike-specific T cell response.” They also note that other research has shown “the second vaccination dose appears to exert a detrimental effect in the overall magnitude of the spike-specific humoral response in COVID-19 recovered individuals.”

Thus, mass vaccinating with leaky suboptimal antibody production could serve as a Trojan horse and make people more susceptible to an ever-enhanced virus. It’s not like we had no warning about the possibility of viral enhancement through waning and suboptimal vaccine-mediated antibodies. On page 52 of Pfizer’s “Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product Review Memorandum,” it is admitted that antibody dependent disease enhancement was a possibility in the long run with waning efficacy. “However, risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and/or licensure,” write the FDA regulators in the memo.

[..] According to PHE data, 86% of all U.K. residents over age 12 have received at least one shot, including nearly everyone in a vulnerable age bracket. Yet the summer and early fall curve, as presented by Worldometer, has blown out the magnitude of the case curve last year when nobody was vaccinated, and the daily numbers are reaching close to their winter peak.

Read more …

Vaccines killing off antibodies is not a new idea. This is from March 2021.

“Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease.”

Informed Consent Disclosure To Vaccine Trial Subjects (NIH)

Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.

Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.

Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

Read more …

Steve keeps pushing.

Why Won’t The CDC or FDA Reveal The VAERS URF? (Kirsch)

VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It is the official system relied upon by the FDA and CDC for adverse event tracking. For example, if you report an adverse event in V-Safe, the app they told you about when you got vaccinated, you are told to file a VAERS report. It is essentially the mother of all adverse event reporting systems for vaccine events in the US. There is nothing more comprehensive than VAERS. The most important thing to know about VAERS is that it is always underreported. This is widely known. To properly interpret any safety data, you must know the underreporting factor (URF). For example, the famous Lazarus report estimated the VAERS URF to be over 100:

“Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.” The Baker paper, Advanced Clinical Decision Support for Vaccine Adverse Event Detection and Reporting, showed that “the odds of a VAERS report submission during the implementation period were 30.2 (95% confidence interval, 9.52–95.5).” In other words, the VAERS URF was at least 30 (since the system wasn’t perfect, 30 is a lower bound of the URF in that study), but they estimated that it was likely between 9.5 and 95.

The URF is normally calculated for very serious events since these are required to be reported for all vaccines by healthcare workers. That URF can then be applied to less serious events to create a conservative estimate of the true incidence rate (since less serious events would have a higher URF). The method for calculating the URF is well known. Sadly, the CDC has erroneously assumed that Vaccine Safety Datalink represents a fully reported comparator. This is clearly false as can be seen from slide 13 in ACIP Chair Grace Lee’s presentation delivered on August 30, 2021:

Read more …

“Fauci slaughtered tens of thousands of AIDS sufferers by blocking Bactrim in HIV+ persons for years, arguing he needed “controlled trials” first to “prove” that it worked to prevent PCP.”

“.. in the case of HIV it was AZT. This time its intentionally falsely labeled drugs that are called “vaccines” yet are not, along with a new drug from Merck that may be even more dangerous than the jabs.”

200,000 Grannies, No Problem. A Few Puppies? (Denninger)

If you want to know why God is sipping on a cold one and laughing at the evil in our nation and indeed the world you need nothing more. Fauci slaughtered tens of thousands of AIDS sufferers by blocking Bactrim in HIV+ persons for years, arguing he needed “controlled trials” first to “prove” that it worked to prevent PCP. We already knew it did, by the way, having learned that in the late 1970s with Leukemia patients — it cut the mortality rate of people with Leukemia during chemo by a huge amount. Fauci claimed that wasn’t good enough. 30,000, roughly, Americans got shoved in the hole, dead from PCP, as a result. This time around Fauci proclaimed that we had “insufficient evidence” to recommend that people use HCQ, Ivermectin, Budesonide and a whole host of other things at first indication of Covid-19.

The answer was “vaccines”, which did not exist for 11 months, and were not rolled out in size for a full year. In both cases pharmaceutical companies made billions; in the case of HIV it was AZT. This time its intentionally falsely labeled drugs that are called “vaccines” yet are not, along with a new drug from Merck that may be even more dangerous than the jabs. Two hundred thousand Grannies and Grandpas, mostly, died during the last 18 months without even being able to say goodbye to their loved ones, having been denied drugs that might have worked and might not have — but which were almost certainly better than being dead. If they did nothing, so what? Dead is dead, right? Well, neither Ivermectin or Budesonide killed me. I used both when I got Covid in August.

I do not know if Ivermectin appreciably impacted the course of the disease because I hit it early and hard and thus perhaps it did nothing (hard to prove otherwise, isn’t it?) but the budesonide reversed symptom progression within 12 hours of initiation of use. I cannot attribute that change to mere chance. Is it proof? No. But do I believe it worked? You bet. And I’m still here; neither killed me, nor did either do any harm I can detect (nor did the virus itself) to my cardiopulmonary function from pre-infection baseline. Will any of these drugs work for everyone? Nope. Does vaccination? Nope.

St. Elizabeth’s, as of 10/22, makes quite clear that people winding up in the hospital, ICU or with a tube down their throat on a vent happens all the time in fully-vaccinated people. None of that is “rare” and, I remind you, this is a major hospital chain all over NE KY along with a couple of other states. Do the jabs “reduce the risk”? Probably. Do they work as well as using drugs at first hint of trouble? Since these “breakthroughs” that land people in the hospital, ICU or on a vent are hardly RARE — they’re extraordinarily common despite the lies the media, CDC and other hospitals have told — I maintain that I made the correct choice as I did not wind up in a hospital at all and now I have presumptive immunity that actually works unlike these “jabs” which, on the data certainly appear to NOT.

Read more …

“Dr. Fauci is ever more emblematic of the American predicament: maniacs and doofuses in charge of powerful institutions strategically positioned to wreck the country.”

Consider the Lowly Sandflies (Kunstler)

Some flinched when Dr. Fauci commanded the children of America to take the mRNA shots fraught with deadly side effects, but now it’s out that the agency he has controlled for decades like a Byzantine despot, the NIAD, gave a $1.6 million grant to a lab in Tunisia — that world-beating center of the bio-sciences — to study what happens when puppy-dogs are pinned down so that ravenous sandflies can chew their snouts off. I guess it didn’t go to well for the puppies. (And doesn’t one wonder exactly what was learned doing that?) We are not Tunisia, of course, at least not yet. We are the mighty USA, a nation imbued with the moral spirit of Walt Disney, and for us this puppy-dog caper might just be an experiment-too-far.

We’ll have to stand by months, maybe years, to find out what the effects are of mRNA shots in human children, but two known possibilities stand out: inflammation and scarring of the heart (myocarditis + sequelae), and an incrementally disabled immune system. Do you really want those shots in your children? — America might ask. And how does Dr. Fauci imagine the child vaxx program would be carried out? In the schools, I suppose, where the subjects of the experiment can be conveniently rounded-up every day. Would you suppose that roughly half the parents in the land would then withdraw their kids from the public school system and, if so, what becomes of the system when they’re gone? Not anything good, I promise you.

But consider that it is already a rotten system ever more incapable of turning out citizens who can speak English, write a coherent sentence, and add up a column of figures, let alone name the capital of Tunisia (warning: trick question!). Dr. Fauci is ever more emblematic of the American predicament: maniacs and doofuses in charge of powerful institutions strategically positioned to wreck the country. For now, they strangely enjoy protection within this matrix of captive institutions while carrying out their nefarious missions. So, the question arises: do Americans wish to live in a wrecked country?

Read more …


The Age of Exterminations (VI): The Great Famine to Come (Ugo Bardi)

Note how, in the calculation, the world population decline starts around 2050, some three decades after the start of the crash of the industrial and agricultural systems. Why is it that the population keeps growing while people are starving? Unlikely, to say the least. It is hard to quantify people’s intention to have children or not have them, so the modelers used past data on birthrates as a function of the gross domestic product (GDP). It was equivalent to “running in reverse” the demographic transition that took place in the 1960s when natality had collapsed in many regions of the world in parallel with an increase of the GDP per capita. The result was that a contraction of the GDP would cause people to have more children? These assumptions were later reconsidered and different results were obtained in 2004.

Now, the population starts declining around 2030, less than a decade after that food production starts collapsing, and that looks much more reasonable. Yet, even this curve has problems: would you really believe that in the midst of the great turmoil of the global collapse the result would be such a gentle decline? More likely, all the four horsemen of the apocalypse would enter the game and generate a disastrous general crash. This is called the “Seneca Effect.” You see the typical shape of the Seneca Curve in the figure: decline is much faster than growth. Models such as the one used for the “Limits to Growth” cannot reproduce a really sharp Seneca Curve because they do not consider the many possible “tipping points” that may affect the world system. But the historical data tell us that the Seneca shape is the typical behavior of population collapses. Here is the example of the data for the great famine in Ireland (From Ugo Bardi’s book “The Seneca Effect.”) You can clearly see the “Seneca Shape” of the curve, with a sharp decline following growth.

Read more …

“..the federal government must show that the burden imposed furthers a “compelling governmental interest” and is “the least restrictive means” of furthering that interest.”

Biden’s “C’mon, Man” Defense Will Not Fly on Religious Freedom (Turley)

“Come on, man,” seems to be President Biden’s signature response to any uncomfortable question. The phrase is meant to be both dismissive and conclusive in ending inquiries, frequently used to counter reporters before often walking away. Indeed, it is so often repeated that it appears on T-Shirts or coffee mugs and in remixes. This week, however, it was not the pesky press but freedom itself that got hit with a version of the comeback. When asked during a CNN town hall program about those still objecting to taking COVID vaccines, Biden mocked them and their claimed rights with “Come on, ‘freedom.’ ” He then called for any police officers, firefighters, medical personnel or other first responders to be fired en masse if they refuse to be vaccinated.

Biden’s response to the question was applauded by the CNN audience, as if to say “Freedomm Ptff, that is so last century.” And he reduced any vaccine refusals to claiming “I have the freedom to kill you with my COVID.” He is not alone in such rhetoric. Chicago’s Mayor Lori Lightfoot declared that police officers refusing to take vaccines are insurrectionists. The problem is that the courts already recognize some religious exemption arguments. Those arguments are based on both the constitutional protection of religious values but also laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(a), which declares unlawful any “employment practice for an employer … to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of such individual’s … religion.”

The federal government also is subject to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which prohibits the government and other covered entities like the District of Columbia from “substantially burden[ing]” a person’s exercise of religion. Under RFRA, there is no “Come on, man,” defense. Instead, the federal government must show that the burden imposed furthers a “compelling governmental interest” and is “the least restrictive means” of furthering that interest. There is a move in many states to refuse to allow such exemptions, but courts have pushed back. In New York, the state is appealing a preliminary injunction against its refusal to allow religious exemptions to its vaccine mandate. A lower court found the governor’s mandate “has effectively foreclosed the pathway to seeking a religious accommodation that is guaranteed under Title VII.”

Likewise, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals this month affirmed such a preliminary injunction against Western Michigan University. The university allowed students to ask for individual exemptions but failed to grant religious exemptions under its discretionary policy.

Read more …

“The deal caused Tesla’s market valuation to hit the $1 trillion mark.”

“It’s a striking decision given that Hertz filed for bankruptcy last year..”

Hertz Orders 100,000 Teslas For Rental Cars (Byte)

Rental car company Hertz has ordered 100,000 Tesla Model 3s as part of a massive push to electrify its fleet — the largest purchase of electric vehicles ever, according to Bloomberg. It’s a massive deal reportedly worth $4.2 billion, pushing the automaker’s valuation past the $1 trillion mark for the first time ever. Shares were just two dollars shy of reaching the $1,000 mark on Monday, a new record for the Elon Musk-led company. Musk’s own net value soared in response to the news as well, crossing the quarter trillion mark. “Electric vehicles are now mainstream, and we’ve only just begun to see rising global demand and interest,” Hertz interim CEO Mark Fields told Reuters.

It’s a striking decision given that Hertz filed for bankruptcy last year as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. But the company’s market value has recovered, Bloomberg reports. Even more so, it’s a major win for Tesla, giving vast numbers of potential customers a first-hand look at the electric carmaker’s offerings when they travel. Bloomberg reports that Hertz is hoping to push maintenance and refueling costs down by switching to electric cars, as well as planning to build out a customers-only charger network. To celebrate the deal, Hertz hired quarterback celeb Tom Brady for a cheesy ad, showing off its new Tesla fleet. Now, the ball is in Tesla’s court to deliver the vehicles. “There is quite an execution journey ahead of us,” Tesla CFO Zachary Kirkhorn told Reuters.

Read more …

“‘It would be such a stain on the system in this country that I certainly hope there will be enough pressure and realisation of how devastating it would be for this country ..”

‘Unthinkable’ For High Court To Lift US Extradition Ban On Julian Assange (DM)

The editor-in chief of WikiLeaks believes it would be ‘unthinkable’ for the High Court to lift a US extradition ban on website founder Julian Assange. Speaking ahead of a crunch hearing at the High Court this week, Kristinn Hrafnsson said would be ‘totally unacceptable’ for judges to overturn a decision blocking the extradition of the Australian activist. The High Court is due to hear an appeal this week against a January decision not to extradite the 50-year-old to face charges relating to WikiLeaks’ publication of secret military files due to concerns that he would be a suicide risk in a US prison. And Mr Hrafnsson told a press briefing in London on Monday: ‘It is unthinkable that the High Court will come to any other decision but to uphold the magistrates’ court decision. Anything else is totally unacceptable.

‘It would be such a stain on the system in this country that I certainly hope there will be enough pressure and realisation of how devastating it would be for this country if somehow the judge comes to the decision of reversing the magistrates’ court decision.’ The briefing panel, which also included Mr Assange’s lawyer and partner Stella Moris and director of international campaigns at Reporters Without Borders (RSF) Rebecca Vincent, said the forthcoming hearing follows an investigation, published by Yahoo News, which alleged plots to abduct or kill Mr Assange. A security firm, under investigation in Madrid, is also alleged to have spied on Mr Assange on behalf of the CIA while he was in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and been part of the alleged plot. Ms Moris said: ‘This is a game-changer going into the appeal because it shows the true nature, the true origins, the true criminality of the US actions against Julian and it completely taints any semblance of legality of this appeal going into it.’

Read more …

It certainly should be.

Allegation Of CIA Murder Plot Game-changer In Assange Extradition Hearing (R.)

The partner of Julian Assange said on Monday a media report that the CIA had plotted to kill or kidnap the WikiLeaks founder was a game-changer in his fight against extradition from Britain to the United States. U.S. authorities will this week begin their appeal against a British judge’s refusal to extradite Assange – who is wanted on 18 criminal charges including breaking a spying law – because his mental health problems meant he would be at risk of suicide. Last month, Yahoo News reported CIA officials had drawn up options for former U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration for dealing with Assange while he was holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London, including assassinating or kidnapping him.

[..] “This (Yahoo report) is a game changer going into the appeal because it shows the true nature, the true origins, the true criminality of the U.S. actions against Julian,” his fiancee Stella Moris, with whom Assange has had two children, told reporters. WikiLeaks came to prominence when it began to publish thousands of secret classified files and diplomatic cables in 2010. Soon afterwards Sweden sought Assange’s extradition from Britain over allegations of sex crimes. When he lost that case against extradition in 2012, he fled to the Ecuadorean embassy. He was finally dragged out from the embassy in April 2019 and jailed for breaching British bail conditions, although the Swedish case against him had already been dropped.

U.S. authorities then sought his extradition. Although the British judge on Jan. 4 rejected Assange’s arguments that the case was political and an assault on freedom of speech, Moris said there was a real risk that, if found guilty, he would be held in a maximum security prison in almost total isolation. That would lead him to attempting suicide, Moris concluded. U.S. lawyers aim to challenge the ruling against U.S. extradition and the evidence given by a key expert at a two-day High Court appeal hearing in London starting on Wednesday. No result is immediately expected, and Moris said the process could be fast, with Assange extradited by next summer, or it could take years. “Both prospects are terrifying,” she said. Currently, Assange is being held at London’s top security Belmarsh Prison where Moris visited him on Saturday, saying he looked very thin. “He was looking very unwell,” she said.

Read more …

Kevin Gosztola spells it all out.

A Guide To The US Appeal In The Assange Extradition Case (Gosztola)

On October 27, the High Court of Justice in the United Kingdom will hear the Crown Prosecution Service argue on behalf of the United States government that a lower court improperly blocked the U.S. from extraditing WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. The proceedings in London are expected to last two days and will involve five grounds for appeal that were previously approved by the High Court of Justice. (Two were reinstated by the court after a hearing on August 11.) District Court Judge Vanessa Baraitser ruled on January 4 that Assange’s mental health was such that it would be “oppressive to extradite him” to the U.S. But two days later, she accepted the U.S. government’s objections and ordered him to remain in jail while her decision was appealed.

Assange is detained at Her Majesty’s Prison Belmarsh in London, a high-security prison where he has been held since he was expelled from the Ecuador Embassy on April 11, 2019. He faces 18 charges—17 of which are charges under the Espionage Act. The Espionage Act is a U.S. law passed in 1917 that the Justice Department has increasingly wielded against media sources who share “classified” documents or talk about sensitive information with journalists. Because Assange is the first publisher to be charged under the law, press freedom organizations around the world have roundly condemned the political prosecution. It also is part of a troubling development where the U.S. government increasingly seeks to impose its domestic laws on foreign nationals. Assange is an Australian citizen and has no ties whatsoever to the United States.

Each of the charges, aside from a conspiracy to commit a computer crime offense, solely relate to the documents that were submitted by U.S. Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning to WikiLeaks in 2010: the Iraq and Afghanistan War Logs, the U.S. State Embassy cables, and the Guantanamo Files. The general allegations in the indictment against Assange directly criminalize the publication of information.

Read more …






Still eating





You may have noticed that: 13 x 13 = 169 and 31 x 31 = 961 which makes the two operations true even if read in reverse.
But this is not the only case.



Support the Automatic Earth in virustime; donate with Paypal, Bitcoin and Patreon.


Home Forums Debt Rattle October 26 2021

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 85 total)
  • Author
  • #90845

    M. C. Escher Relativity Lattice 1953   • Who Will They Blame When Everyone is Vaccinated? • Concerns About Suboptimal Vaccine Antibodies Erasing
    [See the full post at: Debt Rattle October 26 2021]


    Must watch:

    Piers Robinson on Covid Propaganda



    This was posted to the New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern’s page
    by a person named Jo Wright :

    Of all the vaccines I have taken in my life like Tetanus shots, measles, mumps, polio, meningitis, TB shots, etc…
    Never have I heard so many lies and deceptions over a vaccine that says I have to wear a mask and socially distance even when fully vaccinated, and that I could still contract or spread the virus even after being fully vaccinated.

    Never had to get tested when I was perfectly healthy without any symptoms whatsoever.
    Never been bribed by the establishments to take the vaccine in order to win a holiday and/or cash prizes or earn frequent flyer points.
    I never had to worry about cardiac issues, neurological disorders, blood clots and sadly more! Didn’t even have to worry about death.

    Never was I ever THREATENED by the use of FORCE by the Government, Employers, Police force, and Military for a vaccine as seen overseas.
    I was never judged by my friends or relatives if I didn’t take it. I was never discriminated against for travel or other regular services to a point where I could not buy or sell without it.
    The vaccines I have listed above never told me I was a bad person for not taking them or for even taking them for that matter.
    I have never seen a vaccine that threatened the relationship between my family members and/or close friends to a point of destroying my relationships with them ever.

    Never have I seen it used for political gain.
    Never seen a vaccine needing 24/7 mass media advertising and promotion on every media outlet known to man.

    Then there’s mixing and matching different vaccine brands and being told it’s okay to do it one day and then told the next day to not do it (overseas)
    I have never seen a vaccine threaten someone’s livelihood, as well as wipe out their jobs.

    I have never seen a vaccine that allows a 12-year-old child’s consent to supersede their parent’s consent (that one alone blows me away).

    Finally, after all the vaccines (jab, shots) I listed above, I have never seen a vaccine like this one that discriminates, divides, and judges a society. So much information is censored, deleted, and removed from the internet and mainstream media!

    So many doctors, health care professionals, police and scientists are censored and forbidden to speak out or ask legitimate questions when what is being allowed or not allowed does not make sense!

    Particularly when it comes from mainstream media. I have never known a vaccine that has made all the Pharmaceutical companies that manufacture it exempt from liability if it kills everyone to a point where no life insurance will cover it!

    This is one powerful vaccine guys! It does all these things above that I have mentioned and yet? It does NOT do the one thing it is supposed to do which is ……. ?


    When a student under the charge of one of these headteachers is injured, or dies, as a result of these jabs, then they will then realise why these papers were served on them, and why it was video recorded.

    Love the use of the word “sinister” – blaming the other for what you are, in fact, guilty of yourself! Classic.



    Sir Christopher Chope MP:
    “Our hospitals have got a large number of in-patients who are only there because those patients took the vaccine.”



    Hold New Zealanders in you thoughts.


    I‘ve been thinking about that „Dads on Duty“ video from a few days ago and why that is so touching.

    Back in the comments, somebody mentioned that these dads also should lead by example and lose a few pounds… Which is correct, of course, but that is exactly the point:

    These guys aren‘t superheroes.

    They‘re not former marines. They‘re not successful businessmen or lawyers.

    The universe didn‘t throw rainbow shit and sparking unicorns at them.

    They obviously carry their own stuff around with them, some of it quite literally.

    And despite all this, they do the right thing and show up for their kids and for their community.

    If these guys can do it, everybody can.

    Michael Reid

    We are truly in an information war that is killing people and we are losing. Society is divided into two groups:
    The Normals (follow government instruction because they trust)
    The Awake
    (do own research concluding government instruction is flawed and dangerous to their health and freedom)

    Germ posted in #90782

    As a person in the Awake group with all of my friends and family in the Normal group I am at the point where sharing the above video with them no longer works. We no longer share the same worldview. The Awake are losing this war. The future has never been more uncertain from my perspective.

    Yet there is still hope things may move in a more positive direction

    Open Letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki


    @ Micheal Reid
    Agreed! Same issue here for me, (Nova Scotia), lost all hope for a speedy realization of the con. Time to start the underground market I guess. If the failings we see else where in the west, by the years end it should be getting quite interesting here in Canada as well.
    @ Germ
    Great letter to NZ’s supreme leader wraps it up fairly well.


    More on Original Antigenic Sin and the Folly of Our Universal Vaccination Campaign
    A deeper look at a decisive limitation of our adaptive immune systems.

    Saul Goodman

    Well, unfortunately today is the last day for me to get a shot or start the process of losing my job. I am no John Day. I stated before I am a father to 3 youngsters and my wife has been staying at home to insulate our children from having to be raised by someone else. I made the choice to get the JnJ with all the information I learned here. The protocal of taking OTC meds, vitmains, using the right arm, asperating the needle, etc all should make more 100x’s more prepared than most people who walk in.

    Thanks to this group for all the information and time spent sorting this out. I told my boss the other day that boosters will be next, and send him what the CDC director said the other day about needing to consider redefining what it means to be vaxxed. He said if that happens he will put his tin foil hat on and join in the protests (as he doesn’t think a booster is needed). He means well and it really is out of his hands too.

    Unfortunately my skills are in business development (sales) so its a role that is on the go. I am one of those ethical sales people too, which makes me good, not most of the douches you encounter.

    Dr. D

    “China has been building gold bullion stores since around 1980, and they are probably bigger than what is admitted, maybe several times bigger. This might be revealed when the $US appears weak, to support a global reserve currency, perhaps backed by gold, which would serve Chinese interests. China sees the US as morally degenerate,”

    Yes, however, “China sees pays trillions to MAKE the US as morally degenerate,” They cannot win an open war, their planners say.

    Also, the U.S. has been up to something for a long time. Although gold, mining at only 3%/yr is a stable proven currency, there are manyfold times more gold than admitted. Obviously, if you think about it. China would revalue gold given extreme conditions like Evergrande collapse to take advantage of that, as is constant in financial history. And the U.S. has no gold. Presumably. We have “deep storage” gold that is the mines we haven’t opened yet. Literally on the books of the Fed. Products we haven’t created or started to create yet are “inventory.” Meh, less fraud than Tesla, Morgan, and the SEC.

    Okay, why? Because back when, (1913?) we became aware that there was ALWAYS more gold than we thought, and since it’s above ground, there’s no pratical solution to that. And we, the U.S., took a vicious hit when the 49ers flooded the economy with gold (and after, but…). So gold isn’t ‘stable’, it’s more dangerous than it appears, and in history they topple empires in rotation, paper to gold to silver to paper to gold… Positioning for decades, having governments then enact “solutions” that drive that “Cross of gold” up 20x, then in that flip buy up the next in rotation, then buy more governments, on forever.

    …This takes longer than I thought. Okay, so why? The U.S. is now dead in every way, will lose the war, lose the US$, collapse, blah blah blah. So…what about silver? Silver is 16:1 gold for 2,000 years, we have paper and gold in play, both collapsing the US$. So what about silver?

    There is none. China doesn’t have it either. We are using it, there is no storage, it is direct-demand only, from the mine face to the chip makers. It been in shortage for years, decades perhaps. Hmm. So…

    Who owns the silver mines? Mexico, but among others, the United States. Say, how does that fit into our US$ problems, our financial system, constitution, etc.??? Silver is money. Not gold, as defined by the Constitution. So it will keep Wall Street happy and buying Congressmen? No. Without fraud and hypothecation, those methods will stop and establish a (mostly) sound money system. Wizard of Oz?

    So gold holds price, let’s say, $5k, $10k, whatever. Silver goes to 1:1 gold price. All paper promises, debt, vaporizes in comparison. Who wins? Those with high debt, check. Those with enormous hundred year silver mines, check. It becomes the new petrodollar based on long-term shortage of tech silver, instead of carbon, check.

    So they’re not wrong, but there’s more. “IS” the West defeating itself? Is it? Or do SOME parts of the West have plans against OTHER parts of the West? That is, Constitutionalists, anti-empire, (and being not Empire therefore dirty “Nationalists”) against CIA/CCP/Money interests. Plans that have been running a long, long time, at least since 1971, and probably 1963.

    If “China” causes this to happen, as an act of their war against us, I’ll shake their hand.

    The Age of Exterminations (VI): The Great Famine to Come (Ugo Bardi)”

    This was always their PLAN, not “Prediction.” How do I know? We have enormous oil resources that would blow this immediately. Iran is just one. Yemen, as the oil doesn’t stop a mile from the Saudi border. Leviathan. Cyprus. Cuba is not drilled, nor the East and West coasts, none of Siberia, hardly the Arctic, we know there is technical oil too deep off Brazil. Also in the Gulf Deepwater Horizon. Yet “we have no oil”. …Other than all the oil we locked up with sanctions and exploration bans that is. Which seems like half of it.

    Again, MONEY system moving FROM oil. It’s going TO electric, and therefore silver. He is right about the planned mass famine though. We see it in halting all farming (water) and stopping food shipments in CA. Voluntarily. On purpose. No reason. The poor all die at home! Yaaaaayyyyyy! I’m a Senator, and I approve this message.

    Comcast Refuses Pfizer Adverse Effects Ad at Last Minute (GP)”

    Sounds like they need an uncensorable internet, perhaps on crypto. Preferably one we can participate in and make money on.

    Tesla. …Exists solely by (illegally) burning shorts. The SEC approves. If I were Tesla I’d pay Hertz to pretend to buy my cars, make money on STOCK, not the cars, use the money to buy more SEC regulators and every Senator, then like Boeing each GDP quarter, quietly cancel and “adjust” the orders. To 10k, not 100k.

    Like Max Keiser says, “Fraud is the business model. If you got rid of the fraud, there wouldn’t BE a U.S. economy.”

    Assange: I hope they do lift the extradition ban – it’s been too long already. Getting him under oath and in front on Congress should be a national priority.

    “Border Patrol To Fire Up To 5,000 Agents Over Vaccine Mandate (OAN)”

    I mean, this is said before, but Agents need vaccines but immigrants don’t? And one of them is spread widely over the nation using tax dollars?

    “I think you have got to make it clear that we are not going to go back into lockdown – “But if you don’t have proof of vaccination when you go into a club or a restaurant…”

    Sounds like a lockdown. Open mouth: lie comes out.

    Australia Plans to Force Parental Consent for Minors on Social Media” –CNN

    Are you kidding me?

    “Anti-Biden ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ Song Censored On Social Media, #1 On iTunes (JTN)”

    Somebody said the young are the ones who will Robespierre and round people up for the camps. Are they?

    Why does everyone just lie about everything? What makes “corruption” “capitalism”? Just because you said so? I mean, is this in the dictionary or do you just say things? (don’t ask Merriam Websters)

    Okay, in “capitalism” – again, merely the creation and ownership of private property – who owns the nation’s natural resources? The Nation, maybe? And so if you have the SALE of those resources, the transfer of them, then the price needs to be set and the profits dispersed to the owners? And did they do this? And why not? Uh, because of corruption? But do you go take action, identify and arrest the specific criminals involved in the theft? No you do not. You say “capitalism” — ding! cold prickly word — and therefore let them all go off with the People’s ill-gotten gains, generation after generation. No wonder the oligarchs support it: using their, wrong, inaccurate definition you just let them rob the bank! I can do this all day and you’ll never arrest me, you’ll arrest this abstract “capitalism,” who can’t be arrested. Joy and rapture.

    Was a crime committed? Yes. Do we prosecute crimes in Capitalism? Yes. Because “Property”? Yes. Next question. In Socialism you can say nothing. It is not distributed as seen in all Socialist systems worldwide. There is no right of the people to anything and you’ll be shot. They SAY it’s for the people, take most for lavish Party Dinners, and if “you’re not happy” you won’t be at all. In the “West” they mostly just annoy you and call you names.

    “Capitalism kăp′ĭ-tl-ĭz″əm:
    An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development occurs through the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.”

    A “Free” market, unrigged minute by minute by government and central banks? Where the means of production are owned — but also controlled — by private, non-government entities? When was the last time government wasn’t interfering in every nut and screw, shutting off all shipping in the nation’s largest port? The “Accumulation of profit”? Yes, but also it’s dispersement in bankruptcy. According to law, not politics? Yes, according to law not Senator blowhard and Fed chief front-running his own investment by millions. Huh.

    absolute galore

    Michael Reid wrote: We are truly in an information war that is killing people and we are losing. Society is divided into two groups:

    I’ve been writing a weekly column for my local paper since April of last year. I only missed one week–because the general manager refused to publish the column. He somehow felt it expressed negativity toward the vaccines. This was late September, when the FDA advisory committee came out against boosters for the entire population. All I did was report this fact, and the fact that some doctors and scientists were calling for a more comprehensive approach toward dealing with the virus. All sources were actually mainstream. The theme of the piece was the various “wars” we’ve declared. My conclusion was meant to warn against this separation into two groups.

    I pasted the whole thing here about a month ago. Here are a few excerpts, seeing as how my regular readers never got to see it:

    Americans like to declare war on things we want to eliminate. There was the War on Poverty announced by Lyndon B. Johnson back in 1964 as part of the envisioned Great Society. In 1971 Richard Nixon declared a War on Drugs. We’re also waging wars on Fat, Terror, Cash, and Information. Then there is the all-encompassing existential War on Reality being fought on the battlegrounds of the various media, both mainstream and social. The most recent war to be announced is the War on Covid. This latest war is also a global war.
    Unfortunately, most of these wars don’t seem to be going all that well.


    The War on Fat was declared over by Time magazine in 2014, but that hasn’t been due to its successful conclusion. In 1980, with an obesity rate at about 15% and heart attacks rising, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued its first dietary guidelines, which heavily emphasized carbs and avoided cholesterol and fat of all sorts. Today the obesity rate is hovering around 40%. In that same time period, type II diabetes in the population went from about 5.5million to just over 25 million cases. A big reason was the food industry jumping in to help with processed “low fat”foods and lots of high fructose corn syrup.
    From the 2014 Time article:

    “We were embarking on a ‘vast nutritional experiment,’ as the skeptical president of the National Academy of Sciences, Philip Handler, put it in 1980. But with nearly a million Americans a year dropping dead from heart disease by the mid-’80s, we had to try something.
    Nearly four decades later, the results are in: the experiment was a failure. We cut the fat, but by almost every measure, Americans are sicker than ever.”

    These are stressful times. It would behoove us to listen to each other carefully. Whatever our particular beliefs, we all want to stay healthy and flourish. As Ruskin noted, “Wealth is Life.” We might dial back the war mentality, especially when it comes to relations with our neighbors. “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand” Matthew 12.25


    absolute galore

    The IMG upload interface is hit or miss for me. Trying a different url:



    …. and the winner is ….

    Vaccine Immunity VS Natural Immunity System

    Motivators (Gem #90847 This is one powerful vaccine guys!) VS Natural Immunity System

    Money VS Natural Immunity System

    Lies VS Natural Immunity System

    Fear of Death (Vaccine) VS Natural Immunity System (Life/adapt/adjust/coexist)

    absolute galore

    Covid/vaccine headlines from today’s NYT:

    F.D.A. Panel Considers Pfizer Shot for Younger Children
    Federal officials hope the pediatric dose can help close a major gap in the nation’s vaccine campaign. Here’s the latest on the pandemic.

    The Morning: Covid-19 cases have been falling in every region of the U.S., offering hope.

    Business updates: Days from its Nov. 1 deadline, Tyson Foods said that 96 percent of its U.S. workers were vaccinated.

    Vaccines for Young Kids May Be Coming. An Expert Explains Why That Matters.

    Here’s what happens next if an F.D.A. panel recommends pediatric Covid shots.

    Long Covid and the Blind Spots of American Medicine

    This Flu Season Is Different. Here’s How to Prepare.

    My Kid Fears Shots. How Can We Prepare for the Covid Vaccine?

    Is It Covid-19 or the Flu?

    Are we ready for a pandemic novel? Gary Shteyngart thinks so, and is getting heavy praise for his attempt.

    (considering most of the reporting is already fictionalized, Gary is a bit behind….)

    This last one, I actually decided to click on (by copying the headline and searching “incognito”). Wow. It sure is counter to a lot of the information we receive here on TAE. From that standpoint, it is an extremely insidious piece of MSM covid vaccine propaganda. I’m pasting below:

    ‘There’s Almost No Incentive at All to Give Him the Vaccine.’
    Oct. 25, 2021

    By Jessica Calarco
    Dr. Calarco is a professor of sociology at Indiana University. She has been leading a research study involving surveys and interviews of 250 mothers of young children, whose vaccination decisions she has tracked since 2018.
    Before the Covid-19 pandemic, a mother I interviewed as part of my study on pandemic parenting said, she never had a problem with vaccines. Her 2-year-old son got all his recommended immunizations on schedule. When it comes to the Covid-19 vaccines, however, the mother, who is white and has a college degree, says she isn’t so sure.
    “I just feel there’s almost no incentive at all to give him the vaccine,” she said. “Even if there was like no risk to it. It just seems why would we even get it for him? If he were to get it, he would be able to heal pretty quick. And it’s unlikely that he would spread it to others.” (All the mothers agreed to take part in this research on condition of anonymity.)
    Vaccination for younger children could be available very soon, and while many parents have longed for it, there’s a substantial group of parents who are uncertain. A recent report from the Kaiser Family Foundation found that only a third of parents with children ages 5 to 11 say they will vaccinate their children right away. Less than a quarter of parents with children under the age of 5 say they plan to do the same when a vaccine is available for that age group.
    Even among children who are currently eligible — ages 12 to 17 — vaccination rates are lower than would be expected. About 59 percent of kids in that age group have received at least one dose.
    These numbers contrast with the uptake rates for most other vaccines for children. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggests that the portion of American children vaccinated by age 2 is more than 90 percent for polio, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B and chickenpox, and more than 80 percent for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis.
    So, what’s different about the Covid-19 vaccines? Certainly they are more politicized than other vaccines, and there’s a great deal of misinformation and disinformation shared about them online. But, as I’ve covered in my research, those factors cannot entirely account for why so many parents — including politically liberal parents, highly educated parents and parents who previously followed vaccine protocols — are not planning to vaccinate their children against Covid-19.
    What I’ve argued in my recent study — which draws on interviews with 80 mothers of young children whose vaccine decisions I’ve been following since 2018 — is that to explain why so many parents see little incentive to vaccinate their children against Covid-19, we need a theory of “moral calm.”
    Opinion Conversation Questions surrounding the Covid-19 vaccine and its rollout.
    • Should pregnant women get the vaccine?
    Gil Mor, a reproductive immunologist, explains why old science has led to conflicting advice.
    • As more vaccine mandates arrive, how will we handle verification?
    Tom Frieden, a former director of the C.D.C., describes how a safe and secure system could work.
    • Are vaccine mandates a problem for civil liberties?
    Two writers from the A.C.L.U. argue that actually, it’s quite the opposite.
    • How many people have died because of undervaccination?
    Comparing different areas of the U.S. suggests there have been many preventable deaths.
    A moral calm is essentially the opposite of a moral panic — a term popularized in the 1970s by Stanley Cohen, who was a professor of sociology at the London School of Economics. If a moral panic is a situation in which exaggerated or misleading claims about the harm associated with some phenomenon lead to widespread fear of that phenomenon — such as the violence supposedly caused by video games — then I argue a moral calm is a situation in which we might expect widespread concern about some potentially harmful phenomenon but get the absence of fear instead.
    Examining the moral calm around children and Covid-19 can help explain the hesitation around the vaccines and reveal what it may take to convince parents that their children should contribute to the public good.
    In the United States, children are often sentimentalized, and parents fret about wildly inflated threats to children’s health, leading them to check Halloween candy for razor blades or wring their hands over teenagers eating Tide Pods. It would not have been surprising to see widespread panic among American parents about the possibility of their kids getting seriously ill from or even dying of Covid-19.
    And yet, in interviews, that’s not what I hear from most mothers in my study. An Asian American mother with a master’s degree in mental health counseling said she would “probably not” seek the vaccine for her children because “the data shows that they’re not very high risk at all.”
    Recent evidence has shown that Covid-19 can be a threat to children, even if the overall risk for severe illness remains low. Children’s risk of getting infected, for example, appears similar to that of adults, children are much better at spreading the virus than early studies suggested, and they may experience symptoms that last for weeks or more if infected.
    The risk of Covid-19 to children is higher than the risk of the vaccine. So why don’t parents feel more urgency around vaccination?
    My research suggests it’s because public health messaging during much of the pandemic reassured parents that children, especially “healthy” children, were at low risk of contracting, transmitting and suffering serious consequences from Covid-19. An April 2020 report from the C.D.C. stated that “relatively few children with Covid-19 are hospitalized, and fewer children than adults experience fever, cough, or shortness of breath.” Mainstream media outlets amplified those early public health messages, with headlines that reinforced the idea that children, especially healthy white children, were safer.
    Those public health and media messages assuaged mothers’ worries, leading them to view Covid-19 vaccines as unnecessary, even if they previously accepted all other recommended vaccines for their children.
    In some cases, mothers I interviewed said they are not planning to vaccinate their children against Covid-19, even though they got the vaccine for themselves. One mother, who is white and has a master’s degree, said she and her husband both got a Covid-19 vaccine around July, but are not planning to vaccinate their three children under 12 — at least not right away.
    “Part of me is almost not ready for it to be approved, because, at least at this point, you know, I don’t have the choice in my hands,” the mother said. “I’m not sure I believe the benefits of the vaccine for children outweigh the risks and unknowns,” she said, adding, “If it was something like smallpox, I would feel a much greater level of concern than I do in this situation.”
    Confirmation bias — the tendency to stick with what we already believe despite new information to the contrary — may also lead some parents to overlook new messages about children and Covid-19 risks. Many mothers I’ve interviewed say they’ve stopped paying close attention to Covid news because they’re so overwhelmed by the conflicting information. “I’m listening to my husband and my mother a lot, but otherwise I’ve kind of put my head in the sand a little bit,” one said. That makes it harder for public health experts to share new information about the importance of vaccines or the risks of Covid-19 for children and have credibility.
    Parents may also feel unmotivated by a lack of tangible incentives. If concern over Covid-19 risk to children is low, then suggestions that the vaccines may not change their child’s daily life right away may add to the lack of urgency. Why bother to vaccinate if vaccinated kids are still required to wear masks at school, for example, or if the school district has already eliminated mask requirements for unvaccinated students?
    Prepandemic research suggests that once parents view vaccination as unnecessary for their children, they can also become more susceptible to misinformation about vaccine risks. Parents may be weighing the risks they hear about Covid-19 vaccines — even if inaccurate — more heavily than the vaccines’ potential benefits for that reason.
    A pregnant mother of three I spoke to, who is Black and has some college education, said she would wait to get the vaccine both for herself and for her children. “They have told us, the C.D.C., that it’s safe,” she said, “but a lot of people are having bad reactions to it, which is leading people to believe that it’s not as safe as they claim. So I’m just really still iffy about it.”
    “I wear my mask and the kids wear their masks,” she added, “and I feel a little bit safer doing those methods than the vaccine.”
    American parents may also be particularly susceptible to misinformation about vaccines because of the pressure placed on parents, and especially mothers, to keep their children safe. Given America’s lack of public investment in families, parents know that if they don’t look out for their children, there’s a good chance no one else will. That pressure can leave mothers on alert for potential risks to their children’s health. In the absence of messages about the risks of Covid-19 for children, false and exaggerated claims about the vaccine risks can trigger that alert system, serving as fuel for fears and outlets for the pressure mothers face to keep their children safe.
    The problem with that kind of individualistic thinking is that vaccines are most effective when everyone gets the shot. Public health experts have estimated that to reach herd immunity, more than 70 percent of the global population will need immunity to Covid-19. Vaccinating children may be important for ending the pandemic or at least making it safer for families to return to familiar routines.
    Public health communicators face a difficult challenge. On the one hand, scaring parents unnecessarily is unproductive. On the other, the absence of fear around children and Covid-19 is discouraging parents from having their children do their part for the greater good.
    If the short-term goal is to vaccinate as many children as quickly as possible, then media and public health experts have a key role to play in shaking parents’ sense of calm around children and Covid-19. Any information about vaccine risks, for example, should be presented in the context of information about the risks that Covid poses to children and also the risk that unvaccinated children pose to people around them, including vaccinated adults.
    My hope is that when parents consider the “incentives” of vaccinating their children against Covid-19, they’ll look beyond the individual benefits and focus on how their children can help protect others. That’s why schools have long required vaccinations for children. And that’s why most parents have, historically, complied.
    If we want to end the pandemic and avoid similar moral calms and moral panics in the long term, Americans need to rethink our insistence on individual responsibility as the key to public health.
    More on vaccine hesitancy


    Saul, godspeed

    I don’t see any way boosters will not be ‘needed’. Same compound, same waning, same timeframe. Cue no. 4,5,6,7 etc. by 8 your chances of survival become slim.

    Saul Goodman

    Thanks Raul, and thanks for the website. This is prompting me to do better planning to find a way out of a company that wants to go this route.

    I make a large income where I am, so I was in that ‘retire’ early mindset (you know prior to 2 years ago when this blew up). Most of my money is tax advantaged accounts, equity in the home we are trying to pay off, and a cash position for a bad day. Never imagined a bad day like getting let go, my wife who is an RN being a backup job (now more difficult if we want to keep her from having to be vax). And most companies are potentially going down this road in my field, so though job hunting is an option, how soon until I leave my current situation and then run into the same problem. Need a total reinvention which takes time. Which I will do.


    I posted this article late last night regarding pushback from the RCMP.

    I think it is a very encouraging development and deserves the wider attention that the author, Francis Marion, hopes for.

    We want to reiterate a point stated earlier in this letter, so it is remembered. If the people believe the government is continuing to censor experts, the country will fall into instability. We are experts in law enforcement and investigations. We are losing faith in the motives of our government, and we will not willingly participate in actions against people whose Charter rights and freedoms are being violated.

    Maxwell Quest

    “M. C. Escher Relativity Lattice 1953”

    I thought Ilargi’s choice of artwork is a good metaphor for our current situation, where it is difficult for the average person to get his bearings – up is down and down is up. As Piers Robinson said in the interview posted by Germ, “We’re really living in a world where it’s very difficult for people to work out the truth of what’s going on.”

    Was pondering this morning, where would we be if the vaccines had actually been safe and effective? There’s a good chance that we would all be vaccinated by now, and their “vaccine passport” -> Digital ID agenda would be well on its way. I’m sorry that so many are being injured and killed by the vaccines, but without this ‘glitch’ in the plan, the opposition currently growing and pushing back would’ve never had the chance to build, and would’ve been steamrolled into submission long ago.


    Taking a moment to think of Saul, Oxy, Phoenix Voice and others with young families or bills to pay that coerce them in their decisions around the vaccine.

    Re the RCMP letter: there is some inconsistency in the count of signatories. The letter says it is signed by active duty members.However the letter says 43,000 have signed but there are only 19,000 RCMP members. There are also civilian members but that would only bring us to less than 30,000 potential signatories (and it would be highly unlikely that all would have signed).


    Denial emails for exemptions are starting got at my workplace. I haven’t heard but this was the rejection a coworker got.

    “After engaging with you in the interactive process, we have determined that we cannot grant your request for a religious exemption from the Covid-19 vaccination requirement.”

    Interesting wording since I have had zero interaction with the “US Covid Team” after submitting my exemption request. 


    Here are the actions that we are recommending for those that don’t survive the cut.

    Subject: [Rest] What if I am denied?

    Here are the actions that we would need to take, if our accommodations are denied, to implement the Indiana EEPC:

    What if I am denied?!?
    Hoosiers for Medical Liberty – 6/14/2021

    “…I spoke with an attorney who would be willing to take cases HOWEVER they are ONLY for adverse job actions.  Adverse job actions may include:
    1. demotion,
    2. loss or decrease in hours.
    3. other instances that result in financial “loss.”

    The attorney states that in Indiana the only way to win a case is for adverse job actions. These are violation of civil rights based on religious discrimination but you must have submitted a religious exemption and notified the employer of the violation of rights.

    What does that mean?
    FILE YOUR RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION! If you quit your job, walk off, or fail to send them notice of your rights
    So what do you do?
    Through my conversation with the attorney you complete the following steps:
    1. Submit your religious exemption. Express that your sincerely held religious beliefs prevent you from receiving the vaccination. (Register for and watch our video here for full details and tips).
    2. IF your religious exemption is denied you can send an email to your employer’s HR department with a statement informing them that they are violating your rights. It may look similar to:
    1. “I submitted my religious exemption on —-, and received the attached refusal to accept my religious exemption on —-. I have genuine and sincere religious beliefs that will not allow me to accept this vaccination. By denying my religious exemption you discriminating against me and are violating my civil right to freedom of religion.”
    2. Immediately file a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC. This must be done!
    1. You can read about that here.



    On Ugo Bardi’s Extermination Series. (he is good and i reco’d iirc part 1 a while back.)

    Ugo, UB, knows a lot about the Irish Famine, it is well worth a read. Complex societies… See e.g. Tainter, The Collapse of Complex Societies.

    In systems discourse, there isn’t, can’t be, one main cause, or even a series of contributary causes, or a causal chain of events (Jack ’n Jill..), but rather a multifactorial interplay and ‘forcing’, which leads (in exs. like the Ir. one) to breakage, damage, that spreads thru the system via ‘ricochet’ (Frenchism), and feed-back loops.

    UB takes human evil / murderous impulses and actions for granted, as part of human nature and thus the human condition — OK, all righty. He focusses on the physical aspect, e.g. deforestation and soil erosion.

    The piece thus skims over politics and ideology, in this case the sadism of the British, who colonised Ireland and treated the Irish as untermenschen.

    — No or almost no aid was offered to starving Irish peasants, be it for food – some soup kitchens were set up but abandoned; no emigration aid was given, etc. etc. —

    ‘Capitalistic’, individualistic, free-market ‘values’, protestantism, etc. rationalised what was seen as non-action.

    Today is similar, in a covert, watered-down form, policies aimed internally in the UK, see Cameron’s Austerity Programs, Universal Credit (2010), new Welfare Acts, under May, and today’s lying discourse about saving the National Health Service, while starving it, to sell it off bit by bit (Bojo.)

    Another point that might be explored is the danger of being forced into agri. monoculture (in this case, potatoes) – it is best to rebel before that happens.

    orig. article.


    Saul Goodman, best wishes.

    Dr. D
    Doc Robinson

    The FDA advisory committee meeting, on whether the Pfizer injections should be authorized for children age 5-11, is happening right now, and currently is live-streaming the public input portion (3 minutes per speaker):

    Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee – 10/26/2021
    4,324 watching now


    Dr. D

    Note: Gerald Celente has started a Church of Freedom. By joining this church, you get access to his legal team for exemptions. There are others, Solari is another.

    If Ugo knows the Irish famine, he knows it’s a template for mass-purges. Although potatoes were huge, Ireland had some food, certainly seafood, meats, Baronial estates. They shipped the food to England instead. Now is similar. We HAVE oil, and we HAVE food. We just refuse to DELIVER it. We “made a mistake”. …You know, the kind of “Giant Sucking Sound” “Green New Deal” mistake everyone in the country told them for decades was a mistake? That kind of “mistake”? The sort you make a fortune on, whole careers with medals and honors?

    So I would hope he can recognize a spade when he sees one. I suspect he can, but can’t grasp it, because you have to propose that sometimes some men are evil and intend harm for profit. I don’t know why everyone seems to recoil from this incredibly self-evident reality, but most often they do.


    We HAVE oil, and we HAVE food. We just refuse to DELIVER it.

    I suspect the reason the Chinese don’t destroy the US is that they want that oil and that food and they want enough infrastructure left in the US to deliver it to them. They can crash the US dollar any day they want but they are playing the long game and they don’t crash it because it is in their best interest not to. It is better for them to buy up US farmland and other resources with dollars and use the US government to enforce their ownership. They will be the new British and the US will be the new Irish.

    a kullervo

    Civil Disobedience illustration

    It would be interesting if all these “feel good” posters started tallying also the consequences of doing what it’s suggested.

    Dr. D

    P.S. Related to nothing.


    I used to respect Chomsky and hate Fox.
    Now I respect Fox and hate Chomsky.
    The great reset!


    Something Wicked This Way Comes

    “Really knowing is good. Not knowing, or refusing to know, is bad, or amoral, at least. You can’t act if you don’t know.”

    ~Ray Bradbury




    The vaccine doesn’t help to protect you for more than 11 months.
    1. Would VD and Zinc Help the immune system to reduce/eliminate the bad effects of the vaccines?
    2. How much and how long before being forced to take the vaccine?
    3. How much and for how long after being forced to take the vaccine?
    4. What else could be taken, before and after being forced to take the vaccine, to reduce/eliminate the bad effects of the vaccines?


    Chomsky will likely get his wish. The immune systems of the vaccinated will become fragile to the point that they will have to be segregated into a bubble of their own making.


    Calling all undertakers

    Canada Population – 38,185,042

    population of Afghanistan is 40,077,990

    Millions of Afghans will face starvation this winter unless urgent action is taken, the UN World Food Programme (WFP) has warned.

    More than half the population – about 22.8 million people – face acute food insecurity, while 3.2 million children under five could suffer acute malnutrition, the WFP said


    Noirette & Dr D:

    When it comes to the Irish potato famine(s) I my ancestry leaves me in a bit of a quandary to say the least!

    You see I am about 3/4 English and maybe up to 1/4 Irish!

    I have Irish ancestors who as Irish tenant farmers, were suddenly replaced with sheep by the English landlord. I am sure at the time they didn’t think this was morally right, as they boarded a ship to Quebec City on a “one-way” ticket. Another Itish ancestor had to leave Ireland in a hurry after being on the losing side of some kind of Irish clan dispute (stirred by the English?). So no direct references to potatoes but none-the-less around the same time frame. The reason we know so little about why my Irish ancestors came, is none could read or write. Any records were birth or deaths recorded in family bibles (since lost) by priests.

    Another ancestor, likely English (but might have been Irish too?), was a minor landowner’s son deciding to marry, below his class, a miller’s daughter. This violated accepted class structures at the time, earning them a “one-way” ticket to Canada to cool off!

    It is interesting that I know so much more about my English ancestors, being able to trace my surname back in England to the early 1600s. I think that is largely because they were by-and-large semi-educated people leaving behind some written cival 9records.

    My most unsuccessful ancestor is of course Bridget Bishop, who was made infamous as the first witch to be hung in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. Another Bishop, who took a politically incorrect position, as a doctor to a British General, had to swim the St. Lawrence River (just a few miles down river from the family island cottage), as an Empire Loyalist, to Upper Canada (Ontario), after the American War of Independence in 1776. The remaining Bishops stayed in the US.

    Today the vaccine mandate reminds me so much of the maddeness of the Salem witch hunt. People go crazy in crowds but only come to their senses, slowly, one by one.



    You raise a good question(s).

    Somehow I think the vaccinated need to stay away, from compounding their poor choice to be vaccinated, from any further jabs and hope over time their bodies can lessen some of the damage already done.

    I suspect taking some proactive steps, like vitamins C & D3, plus zinc will also be required. Maybe even low dosage of aspirin too?

    It would be interesting if we could find out more on how the vaccinated can better cope in the future with the negative consequences of being vaccinated. Then we could at least send a more positive message to our vaccinated family and friends, instead of the current negative one that they are screwed!



    Is it raining cats and dogs out in BC at the moment?

    It has been raining non-stop here in Ontario for 2 days! I have to keep bailing the boat out to keep it from sinking!

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 85 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.