John Day

 
   Posted by at  No Responses »

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 10,841 through 10,854 (of 10,854 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Uneconomic Growth: When Illth Trumps Wealth #1391
    John Day
    Participant

    Enjoying your input Ilargi!
    We, who are reading this, need to look at what is at hand, and how to create little living seeds to plant deeply as the forest fire roars in the distance. We have lots of resources, some under-appreciated, and some to undergo deep discounts in the near future as stages of economic withdrawal-convulsions sweep over our human world. Maybe we are in the fortunate position to be out of debt, and valued, with some resources as a result. It has been a long time since I bought a new car, but I just spent $11k in overpaid taxes on a 1.2 kW solar PV set up with 10 kWHr of nickel iron battery storage. This is not for immediate deployment, but when we settle into our longer term situation, the seed we hope will grow after the fire.

    in reply to: Automatic Earthships #844
    John Day
    Participant

    This is very nice. I’m glad this exploration of new and useful directions is taking place. this presentation of earthships is more practical for someone considering such a home, than what I have seen before.
    Good work!
    I’m sending some of these links out to friends with today’s news-picks.

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #647
    John Day
    Participant

    Steve B

    The process of change in monetary system will certainly be violent, and will go first into deflation, as it is doing in the middle East, Europe and the US. There is a necessary destruction of the old regime, which is translted into humans being destructive and violent, in an effort to survive.
    That’s where the copper wires get pulled out.
    It is possible to trade through computerized electronic creditd, even in a complex marketplace, like the Pacific rim. Some of that is happening. It is like electronic money. It requires something like the internet and lots of computing power, a central heirarchy.
    People will choose, naturally, to enrich themselves or an ally, even if it means somebody they don’t know gets killed. It’s human nature.
    Any system has to work with this.
    The question of how something is organized must arise at the outset, because there are people who have a skillset to selfishly use any system. We see that with money. It is less in a cash system, and more in a centrally controlled electronic monetary system, such as we are moving into.
    Let’s look at a realistic scenario for any monetary system, which is arising in a self-organizing fashion after a 90% die off of the species, and destruction of vast swthes of habitat. There will be trust for one’s own small clan, and little else. Within the small clan, money will not be essential, but money, or specialized trade items, like wine, cheese or tools, will be necessary for external trade.
    Living systems go through overgrowth and die-back. Bacteria and deer herds behave the same within their respective closed systems. I think we are about there.
    Recall that money has co-arisen with all that our species has been through, over eons. Like language, something like money (salt, for instance) is archetypal. We have evolved species characteristics into a world, in which it is an integral part.

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #641
    John Day
    Participant

    Steve B

    Perhaps I should have said that I can only REALISTICALLY imagine living without money in a small agrarian community.
    I read lots of science fiction in my younger years, and found all those scenarios easy to imagine within the context presented.
    You present no context, yet you feel free to speak down to me, for failing to mentally create a context, which you cannot apparently create yourself.
    Why do you think the infrastructure, which is now present, will survive the end of money? Iraq got all the copper wiring stripped out of the buildings and power plants. This is happening in America now. It is only one example of the difficulties involved in major transitions.
    90% of the population of the world is about to die-off.
    Get back to me in 20 years.

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #635
    John Day
    Participant

    Steve B

    Yes, I think that historically all transitions of large groups of people are based within fear.
    That is the only thing which changes how people live their everyday lives.
    This is common knowledge, certainly among those who control our species.
    I can only imagine myself living without money in a very small, agrarian community, where these things commonly work. This is no frills existence. A wound gets infected and you die of gangrene. 50% of children die before puberty, etc.
    I have visited such a community in the Laotian jungle. They still travel for a day to take the pigs to the nearst market, to sell, so that they may wear Chinese manufactured clothing. They catch and eat rats, other jungle-meat.

    in reply to: Employment = Poverty and Inequality #602
    John Day
    Participant

    Hey, where’s El Gallinazo and Greenpa and all the smart, clever folks?

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #599
    John Day
    Participant

    The bigger question is where you will be part of a functioning community with food, water, shelter, some fuel, all the things to keep living. Functioning community AND all those things. This is a much more complex and difficult question than whether the government will confiscate your solar panels, inverter and Edison cells. The government is mostly going to collapse at some time. I hear those bunkers under the Denver airport are well stocked, but I’m not invited, and wouldn’t want to go.

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #590
    John Day
    Participant

    MR 166

    Bullets as local currency and government taking productive land from farmers are easily grasped and well-worn paradigms.
    This is common fare, part of an uneasy transition period between more stable arrangements.

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #581
    John Day
    Participant

    Steve B,

    I am an imaginative and innovative person, yet your words are not painting any picture which I can realistically envision. That makes your idea a non-starter for the 95% of humans who have less imagination than I do, not to mention the whole, vested intersts with power killing anything they can’t control, aspect…

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #573
    John Day
    Participant

    Hi Steve B

    There is a “time share” group here in Austin, but their time sharing is suspect, so that small groups that already know and trust each other, are setting up their own limited time share arrangements to avoid rip-offs.
    I am OK with a world without money or heirarchy/oligarchy, but I cannot envision how it would realistically operate, let alone how to make the transition.
    I like gift economy. It is easy, but it only goes as far as the excess ripe fruit coming off your trees. It cannot pay for advanced medical training, or support specialists.

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #556
    John Day
    Participant

    Steve B.

    Money is necessary for lots of things, like flying somewhere, or having your infected appendix out.
    I have needed both, and so did my Mom, and my eldest son.
    Money saved our lives. We come from an appendicitis prone family.
    No money = no surgeons.
    I’m sure you can think of other examples.
    Money allows a complexity of economy, which is otherwise not obtained in history.
    I’m not a fan of money or oligarchy or economic change, just a participating observer in the whole process.

    in reply to: Why So Angry? #513
    John Day
    Participant

    How does a nice global financial oligarchy change the financial paradigm from debt-based-exponentially-growing money supply to something which does not grow, as dictated by the economic fundamentals of Peak Oil?
    It appears that little collapses, zero interest, and war in the oil-places are part of the step-down experiment. All the little collapses, and taking one then another oil-supplier offline are testing how this may be accomplished short of WW-3.
    At some point, the big transfer of monetary definition will be necessary. Gold would be easiest at that point.
    Until then, it’s year after year of squeezing those who have the least power to resist, and watching their behavior closely, to further refine techniques.

    in reply to: trying to post… #469
    John Day
    Participant

    Hi Ashvin,

    Here’s what I did, trying to treat the new system, somewhat like the old system:
    I went down to the bottom of your article about “Who killed the money…”
    I looked under “Discuss This Article”
    There was a space with my name, and an empty “Message” box under it for prose.
    I wrote a message and hit the “Submit” button.
    There was no “captcha” as there is here.
    My prose disappeared and couldn’t be retrieved.
    I got a message that I had entered the wrong captcha.
    I hope this helps.
    John

    in reply to: Putin has Europe over a barrel again #465
    John Day
    Participant

    Aloha Y’all,
    Russia blames Ukraine, and Ukraine blames Russia for gas shortages to Austria and Italy over aged pipeline in the bitterest part of Winter, when all parties are using more (“fungible”) natural gas, and nobody wants to be blamed…
    I don’t think Putin has anybody over a barrel. It’s just how things go.
    Russian strategic interest is in building a better relationship with neighbors (Europe and China). Europe may have a stressed relationship with “Anglo-American banking” very soon, and Russia will serve strategic intersts best by being a friend through that harsh time.
    Putin is no dope. This is a time to feed Europe more rope, not jerk it back hard.

Viewing 14 posts - 10,841 through 10,854 (of 10,854 total)