Raúl Ilargi Meijer

 
   Posted by at  No Responses »

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 40 posts - 2,561 through 2,600 (of 3,201 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Debt Rattle March 21 2017 #33246

    Watching this astonishing masterpiece again right now. Don’t miss. Full screen is brilliant.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle March 21 2017 #33243

    The only thing surprising about the letter bomb for Dijsselbloem sent from Greece is that it took so long.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle March 20 2017 #33216

    It’s funny that Comey will testify about Trump-Russia links that nobody, including US intelligence, has so far provided any proof for? What is he going to say? That they found something just last night? Or they’ve held back evidence all that time?

    in reply to: Winners are Losers and Left is Right #33176

    ExpAbs

    Higher prices do not equal inflation. And you give a good example of why that is, by mentioning taxes. Which should never be included in any calculation of inflation, because it would mean a government can induce higher or lower inflation simply by raising or lowering taxes. We all know that’s not true; if it were, all inflation issues would be solved. It’s velocity of money (spending) that is the missing ingredient in most inflation discussions.

    in reply to: Winners are Losers and Left is Right #33166

    That craziest thing about the Yellen and Fed rate hike is that they say it’s to FIGHT inflation. After they spent years trying to CREATE inflation. And it’s still not there, but they don’t know how to define inflation, they simply don’t know what it is. Orwell’s everywhere these days.

    in reply to: Winners are Losers and Left is Right #33165
    in reply to: Austerity Kills. And Then Some. #33142

    It can. but why try the hard road? A central bank can just say: from tomorrow 7am, our Zwops is worth 20% less against the USD. Done.

    in reply to: Austerity Kills. And Then Some. #33139

    states can devalue their currencies to get themselves out of trouble

    in reply to: How to Drain the Deep Swamp #33051

    “One thing the WikiLeaks files accomplished is they made and and all accusations of Russian hacking, and of links between Trump and Russia, utterly meaningless in one fell swoop. ” I have followed your posts for many years and enjoyed them, particularly when you could still differentiate between fact and assertion. I have an incredibly low level of trust for the CIA but I still find myself disappointed to read statements like that above and

    Thank you.

    you taking it as a given that Obama backed off in order to avoid assassination.

    I said: Obama allegedly gave in to the CIA for fear of ending up like JFK How that translates as taking it for a given I don’t know.

    That’s some real tin-foil hat stuff and I always pictured you in a fedora.

    It would be fair to say that accusations of Russian hacking are suspect in the context of the latest revelations but not “meaningless” nor, how did you phrase it “utterly blown to pieces.” I’m not going to play your polarization game where Russia = Good and CIA = Bad. You used to do nuance quite well but now…in the words of your new hero…”Sad!”

    You’re overplaying your hand. But yes, since all Russia accusations could now have originated with the CIA -we will likely never know-, they are now all meaningless. Nothing to do with Russia = Good. I would agree with CIA = Bad though. And calling Trump my hero is just real cheap and dumb.

    It’s still quite possible that Russia subverted our election process and it’s still quite possible that we know this from multiple sources rather than a single avenue where the Dark State (whatever TF that is around here from one moment to the next) planted a smoking gun with Vlad’s prints all over it (“You coppers got it all wrong I tell ya…I’ve been framed!!!”).

    It doesn’t matter anymore. In CSI terms, the evidence has been tainted and is no longer admissible in court.

    I agree that Snowden and some others should get medals rather than condemnation but wouldn’t necessarily say that about Assange until I see his pay stubs.

    That’s baseless innuendo. Why do it?

    Putin should get one too for working with a crap budget, a good temperament and a heart of gold (It’s gold right? Something down the periodic chart…maybe Plutonium?).

    Trump will start a shooting war long before he does anything about the Hydra you call the Deep State. He is cross-breeding with reptiles as we speak and making the swamp warmer, deeper and more fetid. If he’s our only remaining hope then, as the saying goes, ” Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.”

    Trump is not the biggest problem, America in the run-up to Trump is. For now, the Deep Swamp doesn’t look to be aligned with him. It may yet come to be.

    I’m going down my list of formerly rejected POTUS candidates like they were old girlfriends I let get away. Romney looked so bad a few years ago and looks like Lincoln today. There are others. Sigh.

    Here’s hoping you don’t pre-select for sociopaths only when it comes to girlfriends.

    in reply to: How to Drain the Deep Swamp #33044

    Or is the problem perhaps that Obama and Clinton seemed good alternatives to someone rational?

    in reply to: Debt Rattle March 6 2017 #32989

    It’s easy to just discard these ideas as communism or something, but Paine and Henry George were not fools.

    And then we haven’t yet discussed why we tax work, instead of for instance land. Look, it’s simply not true to say that anyone would need to work and not eat for everyone who doesn’t work (and that’s presuming people wouldn’t work; some might not, but many do not now).

    The oil beneath our communities’ land provides us all with an average of at least 100 energy slaves. That’s the energy required to feed 30 billion Americans, presuming an American can feed himself with his work. Now we run into entirely different problems and issues.

    There are many who work hard and live in poverty. There are many who live in luxury and don’t work.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle March 6 2017 #32988

    Private ownership of land and resources is disputable enough in itself. That all revenues of them must also be paid out exclusively to private owners, and not taxed to a degree by the community living on the land for its benefit, is quite another step. None of these things is as obvious as our ‘education’ makes them seem; what we learn is goal seeked towards a particular point of view.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle March 2 2017 #32921

    The recent history of Europe is one of politicians saying the future of Europe should not be subject to elections. Isn’t that amazing, stunning, and yet who says anything? Where’s the European press?

    in reply to: Debt Rattle March 1 2017 #32893

    VA,

    When things like the Teamsters story become common knowledge, many more funds will be pushed/forced to allow a peek in their books, and the whole thing will snowball. It’s merely yet another side of the multi-faceted pensions tragedy. How many fund managers would volunteer to open up their books, how many present far too rosy prospects, how many will claim -perhaps even to themselves- that things will be better tomorrow, how many that they’re still gunning for a 7-8% return (just waiting for interest rates to pick up!), while they get 2% and can only dream of getting more by going into ever riskier ”investments”. I’ve said it before: what happened to pensions funds only being allowed to invest in AAA assets? They’re all in stocks. What could go wrong?

    in reply to: Debt Rattle February 9 2017 #32607

    Or is it just increasing nationalism and anti-globalization, John? Gold as a barometer for the economy at large?!

    in reply to: Unrest Is The Only Growth Industry Left #32581

    debtserf, sorry, I didn’t see that. No, I wouldn’t know how to retrieve it

    in reply to: Debt Rattle February 6 2017 #32551

    That debt ceiling thingy might not be that easy. Republicans got a thang about that.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle Groundhog Day 2017 #32510

    Seems only fitting:

    “Punxsutawney Phil sees shadow, predicts 6 more weeks of winter”

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 26 2017 #32400

    ESwanson,

    Interesting story. Your source is WaPo, and that’s no longer reliable. Did all these people leave of their own accord, in some kind of protest, as we’re led to believe, or were they either asked to leave or not asked to stay on? White House says it wanted to “clean house at Foggy Bottom.” It’s tradition that they all send resignation letters when presidents change, but not that these letters are readily accepted. Anyway, great to get rid of Nuland.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 22 2017 #32337

    Joe

    I don’t mean “Trump as a wake-up call” as a wake-up call to Trump or what he might or might not do. I mean a wake-up call to what has led to Trump being elected. i.e. the utter failure of the previous government and the hubris of the Democratic party (and all the left/right faceless coalitions in Europe).

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 20 2017 #32284
    in reply to: He’s Just Not That Into You #32269

    Joe,

    NATO and EU were one stabilizing forces for good. But they no longer are. They are the very ones who will cause the next warfare.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 16 2017 #32243

    composer, they temporarily blocked my account again ”for security reasons”. I don’t know what these people want, and they don’t tell me.

    in reply to: Fire With Fire #32241

    Miguel

    Pretty sure it’s OECD. I was thinking about where I got it, can’t recall. There’s one direct link I can find, but it’s a paywall thing.
    https://www.xing.com/communities/posts/oecd-cumulative-gross-labor-income-growth-2007-14-1012470653

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 18 2017 #32236

    Oh yeah, and now H.W. is in intensive care. I was kidding!

    in reply to: Fire With Fire #32228

    kudos diablo

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 18 2017 #32217

    ZH: Trump Tells Democrats Boycotting Inauguration: “I Hope They Give Me Their Tickets, We Need Seats So Badly”

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 18 2017 #32216

    In 50 hrs and change, Trump will be the new US president.

    BTB, what are the odds that H.W. is going to croak just in time to spoil the party?

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 17 2017 #32215

    Does that mean America lost its power on McCain’s watch?

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 13 2017 #32154

    I said about the Fiat article: “And now for the rest”. That didn’t take long. Now Renault is under investigation too, tumbling shares and all.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle January 12 2017 #32145

    zerosum, good. my neighbors across the street in Athens feed the stray cats everyday, care for them.
    john day, i’m not convinced Trump is aware of any of this

    in reply to: The Only Man In Europe Who Makes Any Sense – Redux #32070

    My Facebook account says:

    For security reasons your account is temporarily locked
    If this account reflects your real name and personal information, please help us verify it.

    See, I don’t mind transferring to a company account or something like that, it’s just that so far FB says that means losing all of one’s history. Why would I want that? Let them solve that issue.

    The Tae Page account was set up -not by me- in a somewhat clumsy way back in 2009, I know. But why it was done the way it was, I have no idea.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle December 26 2016 #31979

    Good catch Ciber, but still not complete. Depends on the definition of a ton.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle December 26 2016 #31978

    Glennda

    I already corrected that. Copy and paste and then you sometimes forget the pesky little details…. Thanks for pointing it out.

    in reply to: 2017: Where The Truth Lies #31958

    It’s lovely that people try to define what fake news is, and what is not in their view, in the light of a few specific recent examples, but I don’t see how that makes the WMD story any less fake. Anyone who reports a lie as truth while knowing it’s a lie writes fake news. Why limit the term? So we have to invent a second one? I don’t see the use. If someone unwittingly reports or repeats a lie, we can question whether that should be called fake news. But otherwise, no distinctions seem especially helpful.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle December 18 2016 #31821

    Yeah, Guardian has plunged into nitwit territory for sure, and WaPo is gone for good NYT not far behind. But what am I to do? Include infowars and Breitbart into my news overviews? Don’t think so. I know where they come from.

    in reply to: Debt Rattle December 10 2016 #31704

    neoh. many thanks for the kind words.

    zerosum, Crete is large enough to produce excess crops. many smaller islands can hardly produce enough for themselves -let alone the tourists-.

    in reply to: Mass Extinction and Mass Insanity #31645

    thing is, problem is, glennda, that it is indeed not too late. but only if we all drop whatever we’re doing, right now. other thing is, we don’t want to do that, we want to save the planet while continuing to do enough of what we’e used to doing that it doesn’t disturb our lives too much. and we’re constantly being led to believe that this is an option. talk about fake news!

    in reply to: Mass Extinction and Mass Insanity #31644

    we do not refer to GuyMcP here in any way, ever. even that’s already way too much

    in reply to: More Talk About More Growth and More Globalization #31616

    You acknowledge that civilization is crumbling ‘around them’, but maintain that incumbents have not failed miserably. How does this add up?

Viewing 40 posts - 2,561 through 2,600 (of 3,201 total)