Raúl Ilargi Meijer
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Meanwhile plenty of hospitals have gone on the record saying that they have up to 80% jabbed on their wards
Do you have the sources for that?
Monty Python icon Terry Gilliam has new stage production CANCELLED after staff uproar over ‘transphobic’ views
If you go through all the times where Python played women, in often not very flattering ways, there’s not much left. And they say satire’s dead. No, it just got born again.
Might anyone here have kept a list -if only in their heads- of the countries and reachers reports, starting with Vietnam state TV I guess, who started saying more vaxxed than unvaxxed are getting infected, dying, etc.? To use, I would need links, obviously. And I know I posted many of them myself…
Bit of a side issue in the media: American Airlines has so far cancelled at least 2,300 flights this weekend, far as I can see, due to staffing shortage and bad weather (“high winds”). Haven’t seen any other airline complain about the weather so far. The weekend’s far from over. lots of people want to get home.
Saul, godspeed
I don’t see any way boosters will not be ‘needed’. Same compound, same waning, same timeframe. Cue no. 4,5,6,7 etc. by 8 your chances of survival become slim.
The UK press says there’s a new wave (coming). The PHE numbers up top say if that is so, it’s only due to the vaccinated. In the 30-60 year old not jabbed, new cases are falling fast, But cases in the jabbed pop skyrocket, 50% in 40-49 yo. What am I getting wrong?
So Bannon is held in contempt for not complying with a summons, but Fauci is not despite repeatedly lying straight faced to the same Congress. Right.
Boogaloo #90542
Yes, it is a bit strange. Their full wording is a bit more nuanced: “perhaps a form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome”.
Boog and chooch,
The wording is a bit unfortunate, but it still fits with the numbers we’ve seen, effectiveness falling from 95% to 47% in 6 months, just a bit stronger. What it adds to the vaccine effectiveness reports is that the immune system itself deteriorates due to the vaccines. Not a minor point.
phoenix, love your observation
what statement was Bruegel the elder making when he chose those colors?
but I have no idea.
There are 10 parts to this.
Please SHARE with courage and empathy ❤️
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò: Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City#Covid19
1/10 pic.twitter.com/8IzTxqPpbZ
— Martin Place Bets (@martinplacebets) October 12, 2021
Australia’s Northern Territory imposes the strictest vaccine mandate in the world. Those who don’t comply by Nov. 13 will be fined $5,000.
“..heightened cultural sensitivity..”
Rolling Stones retire classic rock song ‘Brown Sugar’
“You picked up on that, huh?,” Keith Richards, 77, responded to the LA Times when asked if the Stones had cut the second-most-performed tune in their catalog amid a climate of heightened cultural sensitivity. “I don’t know. I’m trying to figure out with the sisters quite where the beef is. Didn’t they understand this was a song about the horrors of slavery? But they’re trying to bury it.”
The first verse of the hit song depicts slaves being sold and beaten in Louisiana, with references to a “slaver” who whips “women just around midnight.” The famous chorus portrays a non-consensual sex encounter between the violent master and a young female slave, while possibly also alluding to heroin use. In the next verse, the song describes the abuse suffered by slaves on a plantation.
Lead singer Mick Jagger ends the tune by singing, “How come you taste so good … just like a black girl should.” “We’ve played ‘Brown Sugar’ every night since 1970,” Richards told the newspaper. “So sometimes you think, ‘We’ll take that one out for now and see how it goes.’ We might put it back in.”
”The Coming Pandemic of the “Vaccinated”
Been afraid of that for quite a while now. It would prove us right, but the misery would be heartbreaking. And spanning across much more than just one winter.
I don’t remember where I originally found out about this Whitney Webb article regarding Moderna,
Right here 3 days ago?! 😉
Only if the deaths grow out of hand, and the heart- and brain problems, the narrative may be hard to hold on to.
Looking at the stats, flu vanished for a year, was all called Covid. Now all the vaccine breakthrough cases will be called flu.
For a vaccinated person, if they get Covid (while the vaccine still works and with the right variant) it can multiply in their respiratory lining but once it crosses into the blood stream the spike protein antibodies would keep it from doing major damage. So they would have a sizable viral load and be able to infect others but wouldn’t suffer the worst effects themselves.
This is possible, but by no means assured. “..while the vaccine still works” is already a slippery slope. It may be more “enlightening” to think back to how the “vaccines” were originally promoted. And still are by many sources. Is it already 2 months ago that Biden and Fauci said: take the jab and you won’t get infected, or is it less than that?
Saying: “..this will turn you into a potentially huge source of infection for your children, your loved ones and friends, but at least you may get less sick yourself..” is something every second hand car salesman would have stayed away from. Also, once the spikes get into the blood stream, I would think things are pretty much up for grabs. You better hope your T cells are strong enough.
I am looking for the estimation of the number of mRNA instructions
I remember it was 14,000 trillion, haven’t found the source for it yet.
..real people are still working in hospitals, and in most places, those real people are still experiencing the % of hospitalization and death being higher in the un-jabbed than the corresponding % within each age bracket.
The stats in my article today say that, while vaccinated outnumber non-vaxxed (60-40%?!), infections among the former outnumber those in the latter by factor of 6!. Pandemic of the unvaccinated?! So no, that is simply not true. The only age bracket where it is true is the youngest, who are not jabbed.,
As for all these numbers, we need to realize that deaths and hospitalizations lag infections. About which, therefore, we can say very little at this point. Alex Berenson’s graph, referenced here today, makes very clear why that is. These developments move at lighting speed.
I appreciate the subtleties you voice, but I don’t think this is a time for subtleties. 6x as many infections among fully vaxxed points to a scary trend, and that’s bigger than a moment in time.
germ, another nice one from Singapore:
This is from regular commenter UserZeroid, who appears to have been shut dow by our multi-layer spam defense. I have no idea why that happened, or how to solve it. But without it, all you would see here is penis enlargement ads. Can’t win
UserZeroid: A rebuttal for ‘deflationista’
“‘In vitro (meaning in glass, or in the glass) studies are performed with microorganisms, cells, or biological molecules outside their normal biological context”
Why do ‘in vitro studies’? Because the empirical clinical studies prove that IVM does have a biokinetic effect, reducing mortality for individuals suffering from sars-covid2. You can attempt to use these ‘in vitro studies’ to deny the plausability that IVM helped these individuals in any meaningful way and suggest that it was the test subjects over-arching belief that IVM that worked that helped them. It doesn’t matter, either way, IVM worked. Not ‘in vitro’, but empirically, in real life. It doesn’t matter that the studies you cite argue against it.
If you are angry that some people are being conned about IVM but are apparently indifferent that world governments have locked us down for a pandemic that does not even qualify for the classic definition of said virus spreading the globe (over 7% mortality) and vaccines pushed against our will to the point of coercion, I’d say at the very least you were (brain damaged) ‘morally confused’
“Orders of magnitude difference between IC50 and Cmax suggests that ivermectin cannot reach a high enough concentration to inhibit viral replication.” Who cares? This is in vitro. Pharmakinetically the mechanisms for biological effect do not take place ‘in stasis’ (in vitro). The body is a working organism with a finely tuned immune system. No matter how subtle a change may be at the inception or catalyst level, major changes can and do occur at the internal cellular level based up our intake of essential vitamins, minerals and bacteria (IVM is a bacteria, in case you weren’t paying attention).
“A large observational trial by Surgisphere “…
Is this the same surgisphere that was fraudulently set up to falsify hydroxy data early on in order to help push the vaccines? Just asking.
“Surgisphere – also notable for fabricating data on a hydroxychloroquine” –
ah well, at least they admitted as much in the next paragraph.
Ok, then they debunked three retracted studies. Fair point (everyone seems to fabricate studies in covid-land, even the “vaxxines”. Who do you trust?)
Then what follows is a dissection on “meta-analysis” with a focus on probability based medicine. Who wrote this? Why bring up probability when medicine should be about evidence? And the use of ‘probability’ as risk analysis in medicine is limited to.. managing risk. It has a some basis in medicine. Not as much as the author is emphasising. As much relevance in hedge fund management, insurance salesmen, public events (and charlatanism, like the angle of this article falls into by default, by not critiquing ‘the only alternative’ left, by default, “the vaxxines’
Then what follows this in this ‘thorough debunking of IVM’ is a dismissal of “epidemological studies”, which is about as clear cut empirical evidenced-based as you can get. So this article bases almost its entire premise on ‘in vitro’ studies (amongst “scholars” respected as it is repeatable, reliable and also almost totally devoid of the complexities of the living organisms’ immune system) and then debunks the most practical emperical evidence we have which is field studies and first-hand clinical practice?
Back to the best bit of critical thinking in the whole piece. The dissection of the graphs showing correlation between the first wave of the virus and the lower wave as it fizzles out.
The author obviously feels very strongly about discrediting ivermectin and there is some room for interpretation that ivermectin is not as effective as we are led to believe or that regional variations and/or data collection had something to do with the results shown. All the same, so what? IVM has an extremely safe profile compared to ‘the vaxxines’. And about all those indian pharmaceutical companies getting rich selling 8 cent tablets of ivermectin to naive foreigners.. Wow. Not a peep about bioNtech, J&J, moderna and the other pharma lobby who have sold an equally insidious lie with much more lethal consequences at far, far greater profits. Meanwhile world governments have taken away or are in the process of taking away all our basic rights and freedoms within society.
Why did I just waste 30 minutes of my life reading and critiquing something like this? Can’t you see Raul is busy fighting against genocidal mass murderers?
No, perhaps not.
Phoenix
Read 1491 and 1493, Michael Mann?! In 1500, threre were as many people in the Americas as there were in Europe. Much more in those books. Must read.
Phoenix
Read 1491 and 1493, Michael Mann?! In 1500, threre were as many people in the Americas as there were in Europe. Much more in those books. Must read.
Raul-
Maybe you should read the damn article that contains the quote? And then ask yourself why you keep pushing a certain narrative.
You mean you’re bad at picking the right quotes? Or that I haven’t read 1000 “debunking IVM” articles?
Who’s pushing a narrative?
Doc R
Health freak @Mangan150 has referenced a lot of iron related things on Twitter. May be worth a look.
