Polder Dweller
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
This is why I went off on one yesterday because my crystal ball (gut feeling mainly) tells me that this is going to be a reality this autumn. Exactly how bad it will be in terms of numbers (body count) is unclear, but it’s certainly going to be bad enough that it will be the centre of attention in the last few months of the year.
As for schadenfreude, I hope I’m wrong, so please quote this back at me if nothing like this has happened by Christmas. Instead, if I’m right, the scientists will be running around trying to think up ways to head off ADE in the vaccinated.
It’s interesting that the Chinese, at least with Sinovac and Sinopharm, have gone down the deactivated virus route, suggesting that they are aware of the potential ADE problem.
This whole Covid thing is driving me so crazy because I can’t get an answer to the big question of “Why?” Why aren’t doctors (John Day excepted) treating outpatients with ivermectin, HCQ or any number of other tried and trusted drugs? Why is everything being bet on black instead of trying to cover all the bases (mixing my metaphors there, but I hope you’ll forgive me)?
Here’s the transcript of an interview Tucker Carlson recently had with Dr Peter McCullough, Professor of Medicine at the Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas and he asks that very question. Why Covid-19 treatment has been ignored and banned
That Pfizer, Moderna and the rest want to cash in this year, next year ad infinitum, I get, but is it enough to justify deliberately withholding treatment of patients until they need oxygen? How immoral is that? How did they manage to get all the doctors, governments and health agencies on board? Surely there are enough people who can’t be bought?
Then there’s the governments (particularly UK, Australia, but also EU) making the most of the situation to push through draconian freedom-limiting measures.
Unfortunately, all this leads me into thinking way out wacky and very disturbing thoughts – what if the vaccines really do cause major problems a few years later (it’s not as if there’s no evidence that this might be the case), millions, no, tens or even hundreds of millions could die. Do the powers that be even consider this possibility or is that the entire point? Is this a cull, a thinning out of the overpopulated world? Who apart from certifiable psychopaths could possibly even entertain such a plan?
“A new study of the U.K. and South Africa variants of SARS-CoV-2 predicts that current vaccines and certain monoclonal antibodies may be less effective at neutralizing these variants and that the new variants raise the specter that reinfections could be more likely.”Always assuming the vaccines don’t have nasty long-term side effects, isn’t this what’s really going on, that due to the limited scope of the antibodies new jabs will forever be required to handle the latest variant? So people will have handed over responsibility for their immune systems to Big Pharma. No wonder there has been such a desperate rush to vaccinate everybody.
@ Germ
“ why on earth would your wife get the ‘vaccine’ if she already had the disease?
All risk, absolutely zero benefit.”My take exactly, but there was no convincing her. Propaganda and peer pressure worked their voodoo on her and against that I was powerless.
Germ,
A few weeks back my wife had her first Pfizer shot and the next day she woke up feeling lousy with a temperature, aches and pains, headache etc, in other words the same way she felt when she had Covid last year. My Covid symptoms were much milder than hers at the time, I just felt very tired, had a racing heart rate and my pee turned a really weird luminous yellow colour. So, imagine my surprise, when in the afternoon of the day after she got her jab, I suddenly felt very tired, my heart rate was up and my pee turned luminous yellow. The next day I felt fine again and, with the help of paracetamol, my wife was back to normal after lunch.
My guess is that was due to viral shedding.
A point not to be missed in the article about the Harvard medical professor is that he does advocate social distancing. He says that wearing a mask gives a false sense of security and that masked people do not maintain social distance.
Jaap van Dissel (our Tony Fauci) was very much against face masks last year for exactly the same reason and made a point of arguing against them. He was overruled in the autumn by the Prime Minister who takes his marching orders from Mutti Merkel and, increasingly, Ursula von der Leyen. Needless to say, the case rate ramped away almost immediately after that.
@ Mister Roboto
None of my business, really, but have you considered following the keto diet to cure yourself of diabetes? I know someone who did it successfully. He’s loads fitter now and lost a lot of excess weight.
Sorry, tried to post a gif of Donald Sutherland at the end of Invasion of the Bodysnatchers, but I can’t get it to work.
Forget about herd immunity through vaccines. Not going to happen. Your immune system will have to do the job.
I agree with that 100%. It needs to be on the front page of every newspaper and news website.
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Reprograms Innate Immune Responses
If I understand this correctly, then though Covid might not get you, some relatively benign fungus or bacteria might. It’s in line with my expectation for this autumn, I just didn’t know what the mechanism could be.
Does anyone know how Sinovac or Sinopharm work? Are they adenovirus vector vaccines, mRNA or something else?
Thanks, but it’s exactly this point: The smaller the population and the faster mass vaccination campaigns are rolled out, the faster infection, morbidity and mortality rates will rise. that I don’t get. Surely more people, more vaccinations, more infections, morbidity and mortality. What difference does a smaller population make?
The graphs for Seychelles, Maldives and Bahrain seem to support Vanden Bossche’s theory, but the ones for Israel, UK and US don’t. Why is that? Anyone care to explain it to me or does it mean that Vanden Bossche is wrong?
Well, here in Holland they’re pushing to vaccinate those who are pregnant (I’ll deliberately avoid using language which is derogatory towards women) saying that although the chances of catching Covid are lower for the pregnant, the risks are much higher if they do get it.
No, I can’t make it make any sense either.
As for the Seychelles, case numbers don’t necessarily mean very much, but it’s interesting to look at Worldometers where you can see that they hadn’t had any Covid deaths until they started vaccinating.
Django wrote:
If William H Gates wants to reduce the world population by 10 to 15 percent why does he want to vaccinate them in the same breath? Am I missing something? Wouldn’t vaccination create more potential parents?
Always assuming the vaccines don’t make people sterile, of course, but as Germ’s link above shows, the vaccines are resulting in a high number of miscarriages, so who knows if sterility won’t increase as well, say by 10-15%.
..the National Institutes of Health issued a guideline recommending physicians not treat COVID-19 until a patient needs oxygen.
The 1964 Hippocratic Oath from Wikipedia:
I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:
I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.
I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.
I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon’s knife or the chemist’s drug.
I will not be ashamed to say “I know not”, nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient’s recovery.
I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.
I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.
I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.
I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.
If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.Italian parliament questions “philanthropist” Bill Gates’s motives.
Perhaps that’s why he and Melinda are getting divorced, one or other is no longer on board with the genocide thing and starting to worry about their immortal soul.
Clotting and Covid Vaccine “Science”
Simply put: there is overwhelming evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [that is also synthetically produced by the Covid vaccines] is a central part of the mechanisms of morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2, and therefore is also a risk of the vaccine. In regard to clotting, that risk is greater if you receive a vaccine.
The data clearly demonstrate that the last thing you would ever want to do, is make a vaccine that produces a spike protein. As the literature clearly showed it would cause significant damage including brain clots and death. And that literature, for the most part was available before the release of Covid vaccines to the public.
Lavrov Calls Out Perfidious Albion in EU Diplomat Spat
I’ve been expecting this and I think this story has legs. My guess is that Russia, most likely helped by China, is collecting a mountain of irrefutable evidence of the jiggery-pokery carried out by Bellingcrap et al, which they are preparing to show to some European governments showing that Perfidious Albion has been working hard to undermine them for years if not decades. I think they’ll bypass the EU as the Russians see them as fully compromised. I expect France, in particular (once they’ve got rid of McWrong in the spring) to take the presented evidence very seriously indeed and this will precipitate a major rupture in the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe even to the point that there will be talk of war.
There’s a worse scenario whereby PA actually precipiates a war between Russia and the EU, but I don’t like to think about that too much for obvious reasons.
As for the timeframe, I think there’s a lot going on already – hence the SCF article – but it looks set to happen by the autumn of next year.
Yesterday, I wanted to watch the Dr Bhakdi video you linked, but it’s been removed by people who know better what’s good for us at YouTube.
You can still find it here though.
@absolute galore
I agree that it would be an unforeseen flaw in the vaccines rather than something deliberately built in. Still, if you know how the vaccines work in detail, maybe these flaws do exist. Otherwise, and perhaps more likely, a year or down the line, blood clot problems start happening more often.
I don’t really believe all this, it just occurred to me when I re-read the Dr. D. piece.
I read this piece on ZH yesterday about Doug Casey’s take on the Deagel predictions, and it prompted me to re-read Dr. D’s article on Deagel from a couple of months back (I even wonder if Doug Casey didn’t get a lot of his ideas from that Dr. D piece).
Anyway, what struck me this time was the percentages of population reductions per country: US -70%; UK -80%; Germany: -65%; France -40%, which seem to be remarkably well correlated with the expected vaccine uptake in those countries (yes, there are exceptions). I realize that this is heading far into conspiracy theory territory, but what if the real pandemic isn’t the virus, but the vaccines?
Then there was Bill Gates a while back talking about “pandemic 2” like it was the latest update to his software and that it was “pandemic 2” that was the one to worry about. Suppose all these vaccines just prime you for the next virus to do you in? Would the whole world have to be in on this, or just a few people who can pull all the media strings?
If somebody would like to debunk that idea, I’d be only too happy – I’m beginning to sound paranoid.
Did BoJo suddenly get a clue? In this article it is made clear that he doesn’t believe that the vaccines will work and now he’s calling for more to be done with antivirals. Perhaps he’s finally seen the light.
The Lancet has published an article confirming what we all already knew, that transmission of SARS-Cov-2 happens primarily by aerosols.
if an infectious virus is mainly airborne, an individual could potentially be infected when they inhale aerosols produced when an infected person exhales, speaks, shouts, sings, sneezes, or coughs. Reducing airborne transmission of virus requires measures to avoid inhalation of infectious aerosols, including ventilation, air filtration, reducing crowding and time spent indoors, use of masks whenever indoors, attention to mask quality and fit, and higher-grade protection for health-care staff and front-line workers.
In conclusion, we propose that it is a scientific error to use lack of direct evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in some air samples to cast doubt on airborne transmission while overlooking the quality and strength of the overall evidence base. There is consistent, strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 spreads by airborne transmission. Although other routes can contribute, we believe that the airborne route is likely to be dominant. The public health community should act accordingly and without further delay.
Excellent article, thanks for posting it.
What is going on here? Is it profit motive, pure and simple, and hang the consequences, or is there something more Malthusian at hand? What happens if even 1% of those vaccinated end up with serious medical problems or dying? What happens if it’s many more?
Meanwhile, my wife has just signed up for the Pfizer vaccine – I couldn’t persuade her otherwise. She had Covid last year and had flu-like symptoms plus loss of smell but otherwise her immune system dealt well with it. I had fewer symptoms so I’m not at all keen to damage a well-functioning immune system. That’s the key question for me: if it doesn’t work, will it at least do no harm?
I looked for articles debunking the Vanden Bossche letter and found plenty, there’s a technical one
and an easier to read one
They both wipe the floor with the guy, but fail to answer that one key question and put my mind at ease. There’s a good reason for that, no one knows and no one CAN know at this stage.<<Sorry, had to take the links out as they wouldn’t post. >>
Vanden Bossche again. I don’t know if this video has been shared before, it’s an hour long and if (like me) you haven’t got time for that, there’s a really good five minute sequence starting at 38:50 where what Vanden Bossche is on about is explained in terms of a game of football.
The WEF knew about the benefits of vitamin D for the immune system way back in 2017 and still our governments ignore it.
Vitamin D could be much more important to your health than you think.
All these people trying to guilt-trip others into getting the vaccine – even Craig Murray is up to it! – should maybe take a look at the list of people who died after being vaccinated. Warning, it’s quite upsetting because a lot of them were really young.
From the Slog:
This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.” You couldn’t make this up: even without left-field factors, there’ll be a resurgence after lockdown exit, but this is not Astrazeneca’s fault – the “problem” was high uptake. By vaccinating the vulnerable bigtime, we killed more people, but a drug struggling to demonstrate efficacy had nothing to do with it.
It occurs to me that what maybe started out as a bug in the way the vaccines work is being turned into a feature. Basically, once you get yourself vaccinated you then will require new updated shots every six months to a year (that’s what Netanyahoo said) just to stay alive because you will be
- much more vulnerable
than if you hadn’t had the vaccine in the first place. At that point, Big Pharma and the government have you by the short and curlies.
When I click on your Buffalo News link I get this:
451: Unavailable due to legal reasons
We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. For any issues, call (800) 777-8640.
What gives?
@ absolute galore, mister roboto
Ha! How about this sentence?
While the references that point out the dangers of hypoxia are valid, there are no references that provide evidence connecting mask-wearing to hypoxia.
References? Good grief, have you ever tried walking up a flight of stairs wearing one? I have and I very nearly collapsed at the top from lack of oxygen. I don’t need references to tell me that the things cause hypoxia.
Key didn’t come through. Red = mask obligatory on all beaches, yellow = on some beaches and green = not required.
I’m not the first to say this, but George Orwell’s book 1984 may have started out life as a disturbing novel about a dystopian future, only now it is being used as a blueprint by TPTB. Klaus Schwab gave plenty of hints in his recent Great Reset speech, and even Airstrip One has now been wrested from the clutches of Eurasia to become part of Oceania. If you want to know what happens next, you could do worse than re-read the book.
