Dora
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Check out the image of the Australian vaccine cert that’s in today’s links above. “There is a piece of data that shouldn’t be there.” Is it a data bit that shouldn’t be there if the cert is only about a vax and nothing more? Enquiring minds want to know.
@ zerosum
vaccine passports = intermediate step to ID2020 universal digital id.
Said unique digital id being the necessary requirement for rolling out an all cashless, central bank digital currency world, where the central bank can approve or deny every penny you spend with your central bank ‘mastercard’. Absolute control. (This is the idea I get from reading the WEF’s Great Reset plans. Build Back Better for transnational capital.)
@ John Day,
The heaviness you describe sounds much like grief. How could one not grieve when leaving a loved, longtime job and co-workers, leaving either voluntarily or involuntarily. Best wishes for your future which is out there even if the horizon is cloudy right now.
@ Mr. House
Yes. NC is good on finance. On other issues like Covid they’re MSM standard. Many commentators disagreeing with the the MSM narrative are silenced on that issue. It’s NC’s business and their business model.
Glad I found TAE.
ID2020 is already rolling out in West Africa. Here’s Mastercard’s statement from last year.
Signed, sealed, encrypted: This digital ID is all yours
” Trust Stamp is now working with Mastercard to integrate its digital identity capabilities into Mastercard’s Wellness Pass solution, which will be launched alongside Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, in West Africa.”
Is this what vaccine mandate’s are really about? The push to digital ID2020 supported by Gates/GAVI/Mastercard ?
“ID2020 group ‘profoundly disappointed’ in Biden’s ‘failure to recognize need’ for digital health passes [vaccine passports]
Good Health Pass Collective doesn’t like the term ‘vaccine passport,’ but what else is it used for? perspective ”
Dr. Malone interviewed about corruption in govt and at the FDA. “…Pharma bought the Hill…”
https://rumble.com/vnpbdv-jim-hale-interview-with-dr-robert-malone.html
@ ctbarnum
Thanks for the link to ‘The Fear Pandemic and the Crisis of Capitalism.’ What he describes is similar to the way plague laws were used in earlier centuries to consolidate financial and political power in northern Europe’s countries.
Here’s a book review of “The Edge of the World” by Micheal Pye:
These two separate paras seems relevant to what we’re experiencing today with our new “plague laws”.
“Plague justified the rules that kept a person in her place. . . . We’ve seen how plague became the reason, just like terrorism today, for social regulation, for saying how children must behave, for taking a worker’s right to choose what work he wanted, for deciding which of the poor are worthy of help and which are just wastrels. Plague enforced frontiers that were otherwise wonderfully insecure, and made our movements and travels conditional. It helped to make the state a physical reality, and gave it ambitions.”
and
The next-to-last chapter in The Edge of the World is about “The Plague Laws,” beginning with the Black Death in the 1300s. Pye writes, “This medieval horror had very long consequences. It is the start of the process we still know of anxious, insistent social controls, of policing lives; and what goes with it, an official suspicion of the poor and the workless, who are never just unfortunate. Our nightmares begin with their nightmares, in the 1340s.” It turns out that plagues helped fuel the rise of a centralized nation-state, and with it the centralized control of labor and taxation, and the concentration of cash flows and capital.
Given the big push to get everyone vaxed (or fired) before Jan 1, 2022, I wonder what they have in store for everyone in 2022? So much for “two weeks to flatten the curve.”
Good twitter thread from Dr. Malone. He’s going to Hawaii to help.
For your information, although I am insanely busy these days, I will be traveling to Hawaii and Maui to see what I can do to intervene in the very twisted case being made against these highly qualified Hawaiian physicians Drs. Kirk Milhoan and Lorrin Panghttps://t.co/IaAmEdYsYe
— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) October 7, 2021
Dr. Peter McCullough speech to the AAPS on Oct. 2, 2021. 1 hour. He puts it all on the table: the lack of safety, the corruption, the data showing the path recommended by the CDC and FDA is exactly the wrong path. Well worth watching.
This is an interesting, wide-ranging conversation about c19, vaccines, digital ids, and global finance with Catherine Austin Fitts and Rocco Galati. It’s about 2 hours long.
CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS AND ROCCO GALATI HAVE URGENT WARNINGS REGARDING MR. GLOBAL PLANS
PD.
As for no one you know having a bad reaction to the jab, that could be true… or not. Not being told about a thing is not the same as a thing not happening, and talking about bad reactions to the jab is a taboo subject in many many people’s minds – just like talking about sexual assault was taboo many years ago. (I expect you know many women who experienced at least on episode of s.a., but they never mention it even to close friends. “That’s something not talked about.” This is how taboos work.)I know 2 people, my friends for several years each, who got the jab and to weeks after the 2nd jab, both started having trouble walking or standing without collapsing. Both went to their docs for full tests. Nothing found. No mention that the jab could be related. They each mentioned this to me some months after the events and never connected the jab as a possible cause. I didn’t mention it to them. It was taboo. So, long story short, you may know people who’ve had bad reactions who don’t talk about it, never mention it.
Fauci is asked why people who had Covid already are being required to vaccinate, even though they’re likely more protected than vaccinated people
“That’s a really good point…I don’t really have a firm answer for you on that””
Fauci is asked why people who had Covid already are being required to vaccinate, even though they’re likely more protected than vaccinated people
“That’s a really good point…I don’t really have a firm answer for you on that” pic.twitter.com/MXGQGinTbn
— Eli Klein (@TheEliKlein) September 10, 2021
Victory in France: Judges Overturn Macron’s Decree to Deny Food to the Unvaccinated
Victory in France: Judges Overturn Macron’s Decree to Deny Food to the Unvaccinated (Video)
From ‘Perspectives on the Pandemic’, episode #20, about 1 hour.
In Episode 20 of Perspectives on the Pandemic, “‘This Interview Could Save Your Life’ Part Two: The Dangers of the Injections,” Dr. Peter McCullough offers the most lucid and meticulous analysis to date of the mass injection program…
The question asked above “what are goverments going to do when when they have to admit vaxes aren’t working as well as predicted” might be reformulated as “how will govts keep the extra-constitutional controls they’ve granted themselves once they have to admit the vaxes aren’t working as predicted”. Don’t think the govts want to relinquish the new powers they’ve granted themselves during C19.
Interesting article at The Mises Institute site – a libertarian leaning site ( … even so, it’s a good article, imo).
Writer points out what he sees as all the opportunities C19 gives large entities to increase their power and wealth. His argument is coherent about the opportunism involved. Can’t say if he’s correct.
Some humor:
</i>You are not a dog.
Seriously. Stop taking aspirin, y’all. </i>
This. 👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/l0lYnJabO6
— FLCCC Alliance (@Covid19Critical) August 25, 2021
The govt’s entire handling of the C19 pandemic hasn’t made much sense to me. Re-reading this 2018 Philip Mirowski article about neoliberalism seems to put an organizing structure around the govt’s actions – at least in my mind. You can read the whole article or just skip down to the eleven numbered points. Is this “markets are in control and should be in control of govt ” philosophy in action? I don’t know. But Pfizer renaming their C19 jab for better marketing purposes is interesting.
” Far from trying to preserve society against the unintended consequences of the operations of markets, as democratic liberalism sought to do, neoliberal doctrine instead set out actively to dismantle those aspects of society which might resist the purportedly inexorable logic of “catallactics,” and to reshape it in the market’s image. For neoliberals, freedom and the market would be treated as identical. Their rallying cry was to remove the foundation of liberty from natural rights or tradition, and reposition it upon an entirely novel theory concerning what a market was, or should be. They could not acknowledge individual natural rights, because they sought to tutor the masses to become the agent the market would be most likely to deem successful. The market no longer gave you what you wanted; you had to capitulate to what the market wanted. All areas of life could be better configured to behave as if they were more market-like. ”
Long time lurker, first time commentator.
The US Southern 19th century Uncle Remus story “Brer (brother) Rabbit and the Tar Baby” is relevant to the deflationist controversy, imo. The Tar Baby story explains why I read and wouldn’t “cancel” those comments, I think there’s something “tar baby” about them.
