₿oogaloo
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
“ If Russia wants to acquire bitcoin, why would it announce that? What’s the upside?”
To encourage the rest of the world to follow and promote network effects. But you are correct, it makes sense to buy first and announce after the fact, just as central banks do will gold purchases.
“Washington could target major Russian banks and could even disconnect Moscow from the SWIFT banking network.“
The world needs Bitcoin. The counter-move is for Russia to announce that it will move 1% of its reserves into Bitcoin.
Veracious Poet,
It sounds like you are suffering greatly from the burden of the red pill. But do you really want to go back?
You know, I know this steak doesn’t exist.
I know that when I put it in my mouth, the Matrix is telling my brain that it is juicy and delicious.
After nine years, you know what I realize?
Ignorance is bliss.
-Cypher
@sumac.carol
What you describe is a world-wide phenomenon. This rising inequality is what we get from near zero interest rates and soaring asset prices. Some striking quotes from an article in today’s Korea Times titled More Koreans frustrated by ‘broken social ladder’:
“My friends and I feel that monthly income cannot even guarantee our near future. There is no chance of a rags to riches story anymore… Without hitting the jackpot in cryptocurrency, the stock market, or on YouTube, turning my life around seems impossible.”
“I feel like it’s getting more and more difficult to achieve a better living standard out of individual effort, compared to the past when I was in my 20s. The inequality seems to get stronger especially as financial income from investments far surpass earned income in all classes.”
https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2021/12/281_319782.html
The central bankers need to go. Bitcoin is the future.
“30,000 mutations in the spike protein alone”
That caught my eye too, and it must be an error.
I understand that the entire genetic sequence for the virus contains only 30,000 “letters in the code” and the number of known mutations is approximately 50, with more than 30 of those on the spike protein.
I agree that Germ’s Japan video by Dr John Campbell was quite informative.
I have been watching Dr. Campbell’s channel for a few months now. The first video I watched really turned me off because it was strongly pro-vaccine. But then I see him talking favorably about Vitamin D, and then talking favorably about Ivermectin, and then talking favorably about other points that are not officially approved talking points, which boosted his credibility.
Personally (I am no doctor), if Covid infection moved from respiratory to circulatory (things aren’t improving after 8 to 10 days) I would want IVM, HCQ, and some kind of corticosteroids on hand. As far as an antibiotic like AZ, I am pretty anti antibiotic, not opposed, just very conservative.
Chooch, you would be waiting too long if you wait until days 8-10. Even in severe Covid patients, the body has typically cleared most of the virus by day 9, and what is left is the aftermath of the immune system’s overreaction. For antivirals, early treatment is key. You should start the IVM at the first sign of symptoms. If you bother with HCL at all, that also needs to be early, and it needs to be accompanied by zinc, which is the key anti-viral agent (HCL is a zinc ionophore, helping the zinc to get into the cells where it can interfere with viral replication).
You need to fill your medicine cabinet before you get sick. Now is the time to prepare. I have ordered ivermectin, fluvoxamine, nitazoxanide and dutasteride from India, and if I use them, it will be in accordance with the FLCCC protocols.
@Henry
Here is how to get the tablets made for humans:My previous message was perhaps a little too bleak.
Rather than try to stop the decision that already seems to have been made, there still may be hope to try to mitigate the effects. You might suggest at least checking Vitamin D levels in advance to confirm that this is in the normal range, and if it is low to bring it up to normal first. You might suggest taking nattokinase before and after to reduce the risks of clotting. There are other suggestions that have been made on this board for people who believe that they have no choice but to get the clot shot. That might be the best chance . . .
I’ve consulted with his pediatrician and guidance from the CDC and AHA in formulating my proposed determination on this medical issue. You are welcome to respond in writing (only) to communicate your concerns and alternate proposals, including any supplemental material for my consideration.
absolute galore, I read those words and I conclude that the decision is already made. It’s really an appeal to authority, evidencing trust in the CDC and AHA. For the vast majority of people with no independent critical reasoning ability or curiosity to keep digging to get to the truth, it won’t go further than that. It cannot. You waste your time, like spitting into the wind.
The answer is that the spike protein vaccines are fundamentally problematic because of the spike protein. Even if the spike protein does not cause myocarditis, it is still an active agent that binds to cells and affects the body’s organs on a sub-clinical level. You don’t know how much spike protein is being produced, and you do not know how long it will take for the body to clear it. You do not know how many boosters will be required in the future. The boosters are not at all like an annual flu vaccines. The body does not replicate the antigen in the flu vaccines. The antigen in the flu vaccines does not bind to the ACE2 receptors throughout the body — it is inert and can be easily cleared. That is not the case with these spike protein vaccines. The problem is not the delivery platform (mRNA or adenovirus) — the problem is the payload they deliver. The problem is the antigen itself. The problem is the unknown long term effect of repeatedly priming the body to produce a substance that interferes with normal functions. The body many be able to clear it once, twice, three times, four times . . . but what is happening at a sub-clinical level in the meantime? Single exposure to lead isn’t what causes harm most of the time. It’s repeated long term exposure. Long term effects of repeatedly priming the body to produce and them clear spike protein is not on the CDC’s or AHA’s radar. They are myopically only focused on the short term, and having ruling out any other options such as early treatment, I suppose that is not very surprising.
I remember when Hank Gathers collapsed and died. I remember that being exceptional and shocking, not something routine.
Sometimes you have to stand back and let the idiots takes each other out
That line made me think of this piece by Alasdair Crooke I read last week. Recommended.
@phoenixvoice
I hope the Ivermectin does the trick. If it does not, the FLCCC recommends fluvoxamine for the long covid “brain fog” symptoms. If fluvoxamine is not available, they say fluoxetine (prosac) is the next best substitute. But hopefully Ivermectin solves everything.Raul, I just canceled my Paypal monthly automatic payment. I am done with Paypal. They are deplatforming the FLCCC, so I refuse to work with them any longer.
I just sent my first donation to your bitcoin address.
Another suggestion might be to set up to take donations through Revolut. That is a fantastic service with no fees.
I am not buying this story that the Expose is pushing that the vaccines cause AIDS.
AIDS was a disease that dramatically lowered T4 cells counts and made patients susceptible to rare forms of pneumonias that only appear in severely immuno-compromised patients. Patients did not die from AIDS. They died from the pneumonia that followed decimation of their immune systems, and particularly T4.
That is not what is happening here. As van den Bossche explains in practically every one of his videos, there is a tradeoff with the vaccines. They boost the highly specific immune response to the spike protein antigen, but that comes at a cost. The cost is a reduction in the effectiveness of the body’s innate and generalized immunity. That is NOT the same as saying that the vaccines are causing AIDS. The Expose is peddling junk science.
@sumac
For 30%, the brainwashing was complete before the propaganda even started. For 20%, the outcome was equally clear — they would resist the government no matter what — it did not matter whether the measures were temporary or permanent, ratonal or arbitratary, supported by data or purely speculative. For the 50% in the middle, they sense something is wrong, but are subject to the spell. These people might be reached, one at a time, by science and rational argument. But most will still find security in the group, and will not want to make waves.The news about Russia is not too surprising. It’s already cold there. Cases are rising. Deaths are at a daily all time high. This is what you get with no Ivermectin, no promotion of Vitamin D, and a low (30%) vaccination rate.
I disfavor the vaccines because I think that Ivermectin is the better and safer choice. But you need to choose one or the other. The vaccines have a terrible safety profile, but at least they bring down the hospitalization rate over the intermediate term.
Taking too much zinc will deplete your copper over time. No problem taking zinc as long as you take copper with it. I think I recall the ratio is 60:1. There are videos over at Youtube that address this topic.
I had a Zoom call this morning with two old friends that I have not seen in 15 years. The three of us have always been at odds over various matters. Lots of banter, debate, teasing and trash talking — typically about political matters, but sometimes it seems like we would go out of our way just to find something to argue about.
So I figured the vaccine issue was bound to come up.
When it did, I explained that there are no vaccine mandates in Korea because of the high voluntary compliance rate. I also explained that the health authorities here announced that everything would go back to normal once we hit the 85% target. So then they asked: “Are you in the 85%? Or the 15%?” At this point I had not figured out what camp they would fall into, so I said “I’m one of those 15% holdouts.”
And that got them fired up.
“What’s wrong with you?”
“Don’t you want inflammation of your endothelial lining?”
“Don’t you want the prions?”
“Don’t you want the micro-clotting?”
“Don’t you want the myocarditis?”And when I mentioned my three year supply the Ivermectin, we all started whinnying with laughter.
I was a bit surprised that they were as up to speed on the data as they were. This is the first time in as long as I can remember that we all agreed on such a hot button topic.
The agreement ended when the subject turned to Bitcoin . . . and then we were back to our old selves.
All the best to you, Dr Day. May you find peace in your vegetable garden until this mass hypnosis lifts.
TDub, of course one strategy is to keep taking zinc, but to take it with the right amount of copper to keep them in the right proportion.
Another alternative is to save the zinc for when you start feeling symptoms, and then to take it with quercetin and lecithin (quercetin to help the zinc enter the cells where it can interfere with viral replication, and lecithin to increase the absorption of quercetin).
Having the extra zinc in your system doesn’t really help if the zinc cannot get into the cells.
The naturalnews.com article looks suspect.
Hows does one lose 5% of one’s immune’s system in a week? Or any other percentage? How exactly is that measured? What exactly is being measured? The article does not say. I have never heard of losing immunity by percentages. And to say this “appears” to be the same as AIDS? This looks like pseudo-science.
In light of Paypal’s decision to deplatform the FLCCC, I plan to either terminate my Paypal account or suspend all payments for a year. I am waiting to hear back from them before I decide which it will be.
But this means that my TAE donations will now be arriving at the bitcoin address. This is a switch I should have made a long time ago.
I presume you are referencing crypto-currencies
Only Bitcoin. The only one that is decentralized, with no pre-mine, unconfiscatable, and already widely adopted. You are looking for a monetary revolution? If this isn’t it, then what are you waiting for? Pitchforks and guillotines? This is it. The revolution is here. There is going to be a battle for a few years to control the onramps and offramps, but eventually that will fail as centralized power structures begin to crumble.
You need to take a trip down the rabbit hole.
@TheTrivium4TW
I hear you, but the antidote to our monetary slavery has arrived:
1HYLLUR2JFs24X1zTS4XbNJidGo2XNHiTT@shinzonbeta
Thanks for the link about nattokinase. If I have to get the clot shot (and I probably will need to at some point because my work requires that I travel), I need to also have the antidote.
@John Day
I know you do not want to fight. But part of me would like to see you scare the bejesus out of them by sending them a letter calling them out on the sudden change of position and reserving all of your rights.@ John Day
Your consolation prize is that you have become a much better writer since July. Good piece today!
@aspnaz
I can understand why people would support mandatory vaccination if it meant that we could all go back to normal, including going on holiday. But what makes people think that is ever going to happen? Wishful thinking? It is hard to imagine Hong Kong tolerating the huge spike in cases that will follow leaky vaccines..The data are really confounding, and the epidemiology of this disease is really hard to understand:
Cases spiked in low-vaxxed India, India deployed Ivermectin, the cases came down, and many Ivermectin proponents declared victory. Case numbers have remained at a low baseline.
Cases spiked in highly-vaxxed Israel, and that seemed to discredit the vaccine narrative. But now cases are coming way down. If the vaccines enhance transmission, why are case numbers down?
Cases spiked in highly-vaxxed England, and that also seemed to discredit the vaccine narrative. Cases have since come down off the peak, but the new baseline is very high, especially compared to highly-vaxxed Israel. Why such a big difference?
The delta wave hit the US, but New York and LA were only mildly affected. How did the two largest population centers dodge the bullet?
Cases spiked in highly-vaxxed Singapore, and now seem to be coming down again. But why?
Cases spiked in low-vaxxed Indonesia, Indonesia deployed Ivermectin, and now the new baseline is much lower than it was before the spike.
Remember when the Maldives and Sechelles were the first to open up once they reached high vaccination rates? Vanden Bosshe predicted the spikes that followed, but the spikes were short lived and case levels have returned to baseline. Why?
Does this make any sense to anyone? Maybe this just comes in waves, regardless of vaccination, regardless of Ivermectin, and (mostly?) regardless of social distancing?
Could someone comment on whether AsraZeneca is the same or similar in regard to this particular danger?
@vlad Pfizer, Moderna, AZ and J&J are are the same in that they all instruct the body’s cells to produce the spike protein. The body then produces an immune response to that spike protein. In that sense they are all “spike protein” vaccines.In the beginning, there was some concern about the mRNA delivery mechanism in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Some believed that the AZ, J&J and Sputnik platforms were safer because they used an existing adenovirus delivery platform. But now the long term safety concerns have shifted. The concern is not so much the delivery mechanism, but the payload of what is being delivered. The problem is the spike protein, which binds to the ACE2 receptors throughout the body and interferes with the proper functioning of multiple organs.
The Chinese vaccines are different. They do not instruct the body to make any spike protein at all. Instead, they try to produce an immune response by injecting complete (but inactivated) viral particles into the body.
Do people really believe there was no flu last year?
Yeah, pretty much, I do believe that. For the first time in years I did not get sick at all — not even a cold. This is a big deal for me because I never get “just a cold”. It’s always a cold (or flu), followed by sinus infection, followed by bronchitis and weeks of coughing. Usually multiple times a year. But since February 2020 I have not been sick at all. And lots of people I know have had the same experience. Masks, sanitizer, distancing, regular hand washing, and more sleep have all made a huge difference to me — like night and day. I really do believe that the flu all but disappeared in Korea last year.
@Michael Reid
Ha! If everything goes to hell, that might be the only OTC anti-viral product you can buy.
Seriously, they claim that there is data indicating that using povidone-iodine nasal drops in the nasal passages may reduce the risk of hospitalization. I am not sure how compelling the data is, but a bottle of 10% povidone-iodine where I live costs about a dollar. I have it in my medicine cabinet, and will try that if and when I ever develop symptoms. Can’t hurt.
John Day knows which nasal spray is best. Also include regular mouthwash.
Mouthwash: The FLCCC recommendation is that it should contain cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine. The former is more common.
Nasal drops: The FLCCC recommendation is to use 1% povidone-iodine nasal drops if you can find them. They can be hard to find. It is easier to find 10% povidone-iodine solution. You can use this, but you must dilute it down to 1% with distilled or boiled water.
I agree that the new McCullough video is worthwhile. It’s not as good as the last one that somebody linked to, but still worthwhile.
Exactly what is a Digital Dollar beyond what already exists – sans paper and coin?
Tree Frog, presumably a digital dollar would have an additional advantage that you would trade 24/7 without currency exchange fees, bypassing the banks, and with much lower remittance fees. That’s the whole reason the USD “stable coin” cryptocurrencies were invented — to let people trade into a USD equivalent outside the banking system. A digital dollar would eliminate the risk that one of these stable coins might implode one day (there is not enough transparency about what backs these stable coin USD equivalents). Having said that, nobody is going to save in a digital dollar as a long term store of value. But if it gives you a chance to give the banks the bird, I am all for it.
Boogaloo: What if Bitcoin does what Facebook did? Repeatedly? Cash?
John Day, I am not sure what you mean by that question. Bitcoin is only a protocol — it is not a company. It cannot really do anything. There is no phone number to call, no door to knock on, nobody to arrest or threaten or intimidate. It is nameless and faceless. Doing anything to change the protocol requires nearly unanimous consent, which is nearly impossible, even for non-controversial actions.
Other cryptocurrencies like ETH or ADA are more centralized. They work a little bit more like companies — like Facebook. They are platforms, not protocols. They have leaders who are easily identifiable. They are a lot easier for authorities to target, and a lot easier to regulate. They are the Wall Street version of a crypto asset. For that reason they may be a good speculative buy, but make no mistake: They are operating within the status quo system.
If you want to opt out of the system, you have to go 100% decentralized — and the only option available is Bitcoin.
How ya gonna mine or spend your bitcoin when the power is out?
I don’t think the internet will permanently shut down. If it does, our problems are even bigger than I realized. Until it does, migrating to Bitcoin is one of the most important acts of resistance available to us. Decentralization is the only antidote to totalitarianism. It is the only way to vote against the Empire.
@absolute galore
Another issue to think about is just how much is on the line regarding vaccination in general.
If, in a years time, the data clearly indicates that the risks of these vaccines clearly outweigh the benefits, this will further embolden the “opposed to all vaccines” crowd. That would be unfortunate — because a science-based approach should consider each vaccine on its own merits, its own risk-benefit analysis. Good luck with that if these Spike protein vaccines turn out to be the long term disaster that we fear. How could the establishment admit that they were wrong about these vaccines without destroying their credibility? Hard to imagine at this point.
John Day, I appreciate that you are taking the moral high ground, but at the same time I wish that more would fight this evil menace in the courts, advancing legal arguments supported by real science.
Any chance you might open your own practice? Or has the medical establishment now made that too expensive, too complicated, too risky?
I do not share the optimism of some here that the “narrative” is turning around.
A lot has changed. They have stopped talking about herd immunity from the vaccines. That is a huge step forward. Yet there is still great faith that booster shots will turn out to be the answer. That will take some time to play out.
If booster shots end up conferring some form of long-lasting protection, then vaccine passports are here to stay.
If it turns out that booster shots wear off in a few weeks, then maybe the vaccine passport plan gets scrapped before the end of the year.
If it turns out that booster shots extend protection for six months each time, then vaccine passports are here to stay for at least another year. It will take time to see whether the cumulative detrimental costs of repeated vaccination with S-protein vaccines outweighs the benefit. The costs may come in the form of increased rates of short term side effects, increased long term side effects, or ADE (or some other form of enhanced disease).
Here in Korea things are better than Western countries in some respects, but worse in others. There is no vaccine mandate, and I have not heard of employers imposing vaccine mandates, but the rules say that evening meetings in public places can only have two adults, or up to four as long as two are vaccinated (doesn’t matter which two) . When things are relaxed, there can be gatherings of up to six, as long as four are vaccinated. This is a way to put indirect pressure on people, as this is very much a group oriented society.
Now there is discussion about a vaccine pass to enter public places like sporting events. The bizarre thing is that there is a recognition and admission that this will not stop the spread of the virus, or even prevent severe disease in the long run. The officials admit that the purpose is to create incentives to get vaccinated by intentionally making it more “inconvenient” if you are not. That is the purpose: To increase the vaccination rate as an end in itself. There is a bit of mass psychosis here that many Koreans see increasing the vaccination rate compared to other countries as some source of pride — as if there is a competition.
Another bizarre thing: The officials are quite open that they will just follow the lead of other countries, especially the US and UK. If the trend is vaccine passports, they will be rolled out here too. If the US and UK accept the Pfizer, Moderna, AZ and J&J vaccines, then those same vaccines will be recognized here too. If the trend is to ignore Ivermectin, they will ignore it here too. There is no original thought, no leadership. Which is really disappointing because there are a lot of smart people in this country who should know better.
