Forum Replies Created
Thank you for the post on breaking the mass psychosis. I think this is one of the most important discussions we can have right now. I literally have no idea how to break the spell so many seem to living under. If anyone has links or ideas to point to, please share them. If things continue along this trajectory much longer…
The top story, citing,“..a death rate of .86 percent among the vaccinated and .17 percent among the unvaccinated..”, is extraordinary. The link is to Trial Site News, which then links directly to the source data, which is: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 20, 6 August 2021. I was able to locate the two most recent Technical Briefings. Summary infection fatality data below for comparison:
Briefing 20, released 8/6, featuring data from 2/1 to 8/2
Vax’d: 402 deaths/47,008 cases = 0.0086 x 100 = 0.86% IFR
Unvax’d: 253/147,612 = 0.0017 = 0.17%
Briefing 21, released 8/21, featuring data from 2/1 to 8/15
Vax’d: 679/73,372 = 0.0093 = 0.93%
Unvax’d: 390/183,111 = 0.0021 = 0.21%
Briefing 22, released 9/3, featuring data from 2/1 to 8/29
Vax’d: 1091/113,823 = 0.0096 = 0.96%
Unvax’d: 536/219,716 = 0.0024 = 0.24%
ADE? Both groups are trending up, but the Vax’d appear to be trending upward more quickly. Likely worse than the data show, too, with them excluding all vax’d prior to 2 weeks after second injection. How are they still pushing this with a straight face. Getting the vaccine now in the UK, increases your risk of dying of Covid by 4 to 5 times.
Text: H.R.4980 — 117th Congress (2021-2022) To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure that any individual traveling on a flight that departs from or arrives to an airport inside the United States or a territory of the United States is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, and for other purposes.
And there is this link, featuring the following text.
“Still, while more severe measures — such as mandating vaccines for interstate travel or changing how the federal government reimburses treatment for those who are unvaccinated and become ill with COVID-19 — have been discussed, the administration worried that they would be too polarizing at this time. An administration official said the interstate travel vaccination requirement was not under consideration at the moment.
That’s not to say they won’t be implemented in the future, as public opinion continues to shift toward requiring vaccinations as a means to restore normalcy.
Lawrence Gostin, a professor of health law at Georgetown University, said Biden would likely need to continue to turn up the pressure on the unvaccinated. “He’s really going to have to use all the leverage the federal government has, and indeed use pressure points,” Gostin said. “And I think there are a few that he can do but he hasn’t done yet.”
“The country is completely fatigued with lockdowns, business closures and masking,” added Gostin, “and vaccines are literally our only tool. We’ve tried masking, distancing, occupancy limits, even entire lockdowns now for coming along nearly two years. And the virus just keeps raging back. And the vaccines are the only thing we have now to defeat the virus. We need to use that tool and we need to use it vigorously. And I think there will be large public support for that.” End Quote
If your only tool is a hammer… Ya just gotta keep bangin’ away!!!
Yesterday, Boogaloo was asking about Dr Hoffe’s microclotting hypothesis that was featured in the 8/12 Debt Rattle. One piece of the puzzle that may be helpful to clarify: the spike protein binds to ACE2 receptors. The cells that make up your blood vessel walls have ACE2 receptors. His hypothesis (used to try to explain the 62% of his patients that showed signs of clotting (using the D-dymer test) that did not show up on x-rays or other scans) is that the spike proteins are attaching to the ACE2 receptors in very small vessel walls. His theory is that the spikes would disrupt smooth flow of blood and attract platelets, which would cause clots. In the case of very small blood vessels in the lungs, microclots. His theory goes on to suggest this could lead to heart failure from the heart being forced to pump against the resistance caused by these blockages.
Another theory has antibodies attacking the spikes on the interior of blood vessel walls & killing the cells that make up your blood vessels, leading to other internal problems.
If interested, the following link describes Marek’s disease. Kinda sounds familiar…
The FLCCC has been doing weekly webinar updates. I have found them informative. They typically involve Dr. Kory and/or Dr. Merik and/or Dr. Osgood and/or Dr Varon discussing some aspect of Covid treatment. You can register at the following link. Webinars are each Wednesday at 7pm East Coast USA time.
I am hoping tomorrow we will have Dr. Kory discussing why the MATH+ protocol is less effective and hopefully he can begin to address the giant freaking elephant in the room… is the MATH+/ICU treatment less effective in vaccinated or unvaccinated or both? That is ADE or Marek’s Disease or ???
My sense is that prophylaxis and early treatment with IVM will continue to be effective, but once a person’s body enters the cytokine storm/inflammation/thrombosis phases of the disease a different approach may be needed.
Thank you for the head’s up and link regarding the IMDoc post. Powerful and humbling…
Below is a link to the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care study, commissioned by US Department of Health & Human Services, that found:
“…less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.” I’m thinkin’ we got us a “problem drug”! Kind of an obvious one, though.
Regarding Alex Berenson, he has a really good twitter feed. You don’t need a twitter account to view the feed, just search ‘twitter alex berenson’. He also has a substack & yesterday published a great article titled ‘Vaccines: Reasons for Concern Part 3’. Yesterday I was able to view it in its entirety without subscribing to his substack. Great article! Lines out with data & evidence that the data coming out of Israel and UK are demonstrating that the vaccines are starting to fail in these locations with some of the highest vaccination rates in the world. His concluding paragraphs followed by a link to the substack:
“I hope it is clear by know that to know for sure just how quickly the vaccines lose their effectiveness will require very careful AND HONEST statistical analysis of complex data.
Instead of offering that, however, American public health authorities are doubling down on their promise of vaccine effectiveness. They trumpet unverified statistics that appear increasingly implausible in the light of the more granular data coming from Israel and especially Britain (which has excellent data from a national health care system and a commitment to publishing weekly reports that cannot be easily manipulated).
For now, the United States has not seen the big increases in cases that have hit Britain and Israel since May. But the mRNA vaccines work the same everywhere. So it is hard to see why America will not, unless natural infection-generated immunity is so much higher here that it blunts the impact of vaccine failure.
Over the next few weeks, the data will bear very close watching. But we already know this much. As public health authorities and the media press vaccinations ever harder on young people – who are at almost no risk from Covid anyway – their unwillingness to face difficult realities will only feed conspiracy theories and resistance.”
An alternative name: Parasitic Overlords?
“Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from the oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.”
George Orwell, ‘1984’
On the front “Ivermectin kills Covid-19”
On the back “I’m part of the control group!”
I am reasonably sure that in my 70+% vaxxed community, that would only lead to further (if it is possible) shunning from the clean & holy.
Very glad to have you here again, madamski!
Math mistakes above (imprecise). Corrections below:
Case Fatality Rates for the UK data at the top of today’s Debt Rattle:
Unvaxed: 0.00082 or 0.082% or about 1 death per 1,219 cases
Vaxed: 0.00247 or 0.247% or about 1 death per 400 cases
Case Fatality Rates for the UK data at the top of today’s Debt Rattle:
Unvaxed: 0.00082 or 0.082% or about 1 death per 1,200 cases
Vaxed: 0.00247 or 0.247% or about 1 death per 450 cases
Stay strong in your decisions. Nobody knows how this plays out, but this fall and winter are going to be very interesting. I live a US county with 70% of residents fully vaccinated. There have been less than 200 cases and zero deaths over the 18 month scare-fest.
Further, a critique of the Roman study, by Dr. Tess Lawrie’s group, British Ivermectin Recommendation Development group. Link:
Help on the way… Here are two meta-analyses recommending ivermectin for Covid-19:
I hope that helps!!!
American science reporter, Alex Berenson, posted a tweet claiming cases in Israel are doubling about every two days. Our world in data claims Israel is one of the most vaccinated countries on earth at 64.14% (having received at least one dose). Berenson’s comments:
“Back in Israel the vaccines are working so great that cases are doubling every three days. ExPONEnShuL!
The two major possible explanations are:
A) The vaccines are failing
B) They aren’t failing but the government is pretending they are to scare teens into getting vaccinated…”
Or could this been the vanden Bossche theory playing out in real time?
Hey, wait a minute aspnaz! My neighbors are my friends… At least they used to be until they learned that we are unwilling to accept the experimental vaccine. Now they don’t invite us to cocktails anymore. Never mind…
The video I attached above includes a statement by the mother of Maddie de Garay, Stephanie de Garay. She volunteered her child to participate in the clinical trial for one of the mRNA experimental vaccines. Heartbreaking…
The universal story these folks are telling is one where there is zero attempt by the drug manufacturers to make even a modest attempt to try & understand what happened to these people and use that knowledge to prevent harm in future experimental vaccine recipients. You take that shot today, there is no effort whatsoever to correct the sins of the past. They are literally making billions. And they don’t give one shit.
United States Senator, Ron Johnson, held a press conference today (Monday) where he provided several people that were injured by the vaccine the opportunity to tell their stories. It might not be on youtube/Google for long, but here is a link. Worth the time:
Thank you very much for generously sharing the fruits of your knowledge and research with us. You have made a very real and positive difference in the lives of me and my family. I hope you know how important this is and how very much appreciated it is by many of us. Never thought I would learn to love a Germ!
Thanks to Germ & others for all the great links & info.
Karl Denninger thinks there are going to be consequences. Great read:
I don’t know if it will work in the Great White North, but you might check on the FLCCC website. They do have a button ‘How to get Ivermectin’, which I know has worked for some people. Don’t know about you Canucks. (BTW Letterkenny rocks!)
Just had a conversation with someone today that had a very nasty Covid battle. Very. Local medical center (something less than a hospital by a long sight) would not let her come to the ER unless she was unable to breath. She was damn close (“like breathing through a small straw”) and suffered for seven freaking weeks. She had never heard of Ivermectin. The freaking catholic church sponsored medical center is going to follow the WHO rules, damnit! This is beyond dystopic. Beyond idiotic. She is now in long-covid misery. I let her know about the covidlonghaulers website. She is pissed. So much suffering could have been avoided, except for abject, horrific, inexcusable greed. I am now fully aware that they are intent on killing us. I think that is the purpose of this. I want to say words that would make a difference, but I don’t have them and don’t know how to use them to make a difference if I did. So sad. So bleak. Foreshadowing a future…
“We thought we were getting something for nothing, but we were really getting nothing for everything.”
My experience is different: I actually know 6 people that have been hospitalized and/or had an emergency room visit from the vaccine. I do not know one person that has even had an emergency room visit, let alone died from the virus. I know several that had it… all asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic.
Dr. Mike Yeadon with a very pointed article asking the ‘Why’ question:
“BE in no doubt, among the reasons that voices and opinions like mine are never heard in the main media is extreme censorship more suited to China than a liberal democracy. Please allow me to illustrate with an example close to my heart why it is high time for us to change our response.
Ivermectin is one of the WHO’s ‘essential drugs’ which all countries should have access to. It’s very cheap as its patent has long expired; it’s one of the most-used drugs in world history; it’s extraordinarily safe; it is often life-saving against parasitic infections. It is also one of the best-established pharmaceutical treatments for Covid-19, showing benefit in every stage of the disease, in multiple independent clinical trials of varying quality. On January 3, 2021, Dr Tess Lawrie attempted to alert the Prime Minister to the potential of ivermectin. Her video here was pulled from YouTube within hours of posting, though it survives on Vimeo. The paper by the FLCCC group of US intensivists (whose survival rates for severe Covid-19 are best in class) that was the inspiration for Dr Lawrie’s work was accepted after extensive open peer review (including two career employees of the FDA) and ‘provisionally accepted’ by the ‘open science’ journal Frontiers in Pharmacology. The screenshot of the abstract tweeted by Clare Craig shown here attracted more than 100,000 views. Then, mysteriously, it was rejected and pulled by the Frontiers editor in chief. It is still here in cached form though the Ministry of Truth has been at work and placed it in a memory hole, so no trace survives on Frontiers’ own website.
Intended for a Special Issue on ‘repurposed drugs’ for Covid-19, various guest editors were so incensed at this behaviour that they resigned in protest. You can read their letter here. They concluded that ‘these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by Frontiers.’ Fortunately this major paper is now published by the American Journal of Therapeutics and can be read in its final form here.
This nevertheless successfully delayed by nearly six months its circulation to leading public health bodies starting mid-November. A copy was sent to Sir Jeremy Farrar (boss of the Wellcome Trust and member of Sage) who passed it on to Professor Peter Horby (also on Sage), amongst others, on November 18, 2020. So the efficacy of ivermectin must be well known to the Government’s advisers, but they have done nothing about it. Likewise, the formal and rigorous meta-analysis performed by Dr Tess Lawrie’s team at the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd has been communicated to Matt Hancock, but without reply.
I am telling you about this, because all that governments, their scientific advisers, big pharma (here’s Merck, who originally developed & marketed it) and regulatory agencies will tell you is that ivermectin doesn’t work in Covid-19. They are lying. I am inviting any of them to sue me, but they won’t, for I would win easily.
If ivermectin was more widely used, there’d be no need for vaccines.
To date, despite the brains, expertise and stature of those scientists questioning the official Covid-19 narrative, as a group they quite patently have been ineffective. And this is unlikely to change while, as polite professionals, they won’t say: ‘This is corruption and they’re lying deliberately to scare the people.’ Furthermore, unwittingly, they have been playing the parts intended by those, including our own Government and their advisers, who control the global Covid narrative.”
The whole thing is worth a read:
Yesterday, I tried to post a link about a very positive article on ivermectin, but ended up in some kind of spammers prison. Trying again today:
And here is Dr. Peter McCullough being interviewed on fairly mainstream media about actually treating the virus (instead of simply sending people home & telling them to come back to the hospital when they are having trouble breathing. Located this on rumble. Searched youtube & could not find. Link:
Peter McCullough interview
FLCCC Weekly update video from May 5, includes Dr. Ram Yogendra discussing treating covid long haulers:
FLCCC May 5 weekly update video
For Mister Roboto and anyone else who knows someone with Covid longhauler syndrome.
The FLCCC has been doing video updates. A recent one featured Dr. Ram Yogendra, a doctor in Rhode Island that has started a practice focused on treating patients suffering from Long Haul Covid. They have a website where patients can register, arrange to get lab tests and received personalized medication based on their symptoms and lab test results. Here is the link: https://covidlonghaulers.com/.
Best I can tell. Stats was a big part of my MS in toxicology, but that was a number of years ago (many). Maybe tomorrow I can attempt to reconstruct the math. Relative risk and absolute risk are very different concepts.
FYI… the censorship police have struck again! The video Germ posted above regarding absolute and relative risk reduction has been taken down. The gist of the video: The absolute risk reduction for the Pfizer “experimental injection” is 0.84%. This implies that you need 119 people to get two shots of the Pfizer “experimental injection” in order for one person to benefit from the injection. And the “benefit” endpoint is NOT avoiding hospitalization or death! No. It is a reduction in one or two symptoms. So, efficacy means reducing symptoms, and 118 people that get the experimental injections will NOT benefit in any way. Moderna was similar. Number needed to treat (with two experimental injections) to see just one benefit (meaning reduction in symptoms, not avoiding hospitalization or death) was 88 people! All that AND Tucker Carlson is starting to make sense. We are now in the upside down.
I am a Happy Organic Human (H2O)! Looking to stay this way even though my own family and friends are actively shaming me and pressuring me to get the experimental injection. We have already been banned from birthday parties, which of course can only be attended by GMHs, even though they are ones with the “vaccine” that is supposed to protect them. What a world.
“wait until they announce that it’s sexually transmissable.”
The virus or the vaccine?
Are you a Genetically Modified Human (GMH) or a Happy Organic Human (H2O)?
I am a pretty introverted H2O, myself. My social circle is quite small. That said, I know of 5 people that have had serious adverse reactions that landed them in the hospital or ER on the road to becoming GMHs. Three had strokes, 2 of those VERY serious, one has serious kidney damage, one had such serious nausea that they landed in the ER. I know for a fact that 4 of those are not reflected in the VAERS statistics. I only know of four people, other than my household, that are embracing their H2O-ednesss and refusing the experimental mRNA vaccines… despite my pleas and “facts”. I am not sure if the social consensus has abandoned me or I have abandoned the social consensus, but I most certainly have become disconnected from it.
Thanks to all that contribute here, shedding light, rather than shedding viral mRNA particles and bits of spike proteins. While I might mourn a bit, I am reminded “It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society” (quote from J Krishnamurti).
Dr. D or others… can someone please provide a link to the 3/11 CDC paper that Dr. D references often. I have tried search engines and also searching the CDC website, and cannot locate anything. Thanks in advance!
Teenage mutant ninja virus…’Rona on the half shell!
Head’s up for anyone getting the jab. Two ladies I know, both around 80 years old, both received two doses of the Pfizer experimental vaccine, both suffered strokes approximately two weeks after the second shot. One had a transient ischemic attack (TIA). She is recovering at home. It caused a serious problem in one eye. The other lady had a more serious stroke, hospitalized for a week followed by several more weeks in rehabilitation facility learning to speak again. It is not known if she will be able to live independently again.
Absolute: Send a wire directly from your bank to theirs. It increases the cost considerably, but you are still getting protection for a fraction of the cost if you filled a script (at least in the US).
Dr Naomi Wolf discussing vaccine passports:
From the March 8 Debt Rattle and the user ‘Maxwell Quest’:
“Here’s a link with instructions: https://swprs.org/why-ivermectin-works-and-where-to-buy-it/
I went through the Indiamart website and dealt with the company below, using PayPal for payment:
Anil Gangwani (Director)
Kachhela Medex Private Limited
Shop No. 403, 4th Floor, Panjwani Market, Near Teen Nal Chowk, Gandhi Bagh
Nagpur – 440002, Maharashtra, India”
Website is: https://www.medicinesdropshipper.com/
I screwed that up above. Should have read:
7% mortality in the CONTROL group and 1.4% in the group receiving Ivermectin.
Mr. House’s conclusion… Hard to dispute. Merck has rights you know!
WHO updated their ‘Therapeutics and Covid-19’ Meta-analysis document today. For Ivermectin, they report an 80% relative reduction in mortality (7% in the treatment group and 1.4% in the group receiving Ivermectin). Their conclusions:
Plain text summary for the mortality endpoint: “The effect of ivermectin on mortality is uncertain”
Overall summary for the use of Ivermectin on patients with Covid-19: “We recommend not to use ivermectin in patients with COVID-19 except in the context of a clinical trial”.
Got it! 80% mortality reduction is uncertain & don’t use it even if more people die. Perfect. Totally rational. Totally ethical. Link to download the report, if anyone is interested: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-therapeutics-2021.1